1st stage of Best of 2008: MGS4 wins 5 awards!

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for expanded
expanded

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#151 expanded
Member since 2003 • 8430 Posts
Well its official, gamespot has absolutely 0 credibility now.Vaasman
just because you didn't see a game there you approve of doesn't mean the site isn't credible. most people who didn't play MGS4 wouldn't understand why people find it "graphically technical" it really is a good looking game.
Avatar image for sirk1264
sirk1264

6242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#152 sirk1264
Member since 2003 • 6242 Posts
[QUOTE="Vaasman"]Well its official, gamespot has absolutely 0 credibility now.expanded
just because you didn't see a game there you approve of doesn't mean the site isn't credible. most people who didn't play MGS4 wouldn't understand why people find it "graphically technical" it really is a good looking game.

I played MGS4 yet I think it doesn't deserve the technical graphics award. I doubt you played Crysis or Crysis Warhead.
Avatar image for expanded
expanded

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#153 expanded
Member since 2003 • 8430 Posts
[QUOTE="expanded"][QUOTE="Vaasman"]Well its official, gamespot has absolutely 0 credibility now.sirk1264
just because you didn't see a game there you approve of doesn't mean the site isn't credible. most people who didn't play MGS4 wouldn't understand why people find it "graphically technical" it really is a good looking game.

I played MGS4 yet I think it doesn't deserve the technical graphics award. I doubt you played Crysis or Crysis Warhead.

nt i own (should say Owned) both. overrated game. horrible storyline. .. very horrible storyline..
Avatar image for fatzebra
fatzebra

1470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#154 fatzebra
Member since 2005 • 1470 Posts
[QUOTE="Hockey_Slayer"][QUOTE="fatzebra"]

Actually, it isn't, with a little common sense.

fatzebra

Common sense is long gone. Because if anyone had common sense they would know that Crisis Warhead just stright up looks better then MGS4.

And if anyone could read, they would see where I said WORD FOR WORD "Crysis looks better than MGS4" but that IS NOT the point of technical Graphics. How HARD is this concept?

TECHNICAL mean how TECHNICALLY efficient are the graphic sin a game. Crysis was for the PC, so it has future proof graphics, that can't be maxed out by a reasonable machine as of now. However MGS4 was mad eon the ps3, and it had limitation, but it is the BEST out there for the system, and pushed the ps3 to it's limits.

Example: If there was a DS game, that looked like CoD 1, it would've won for technical graphics because of the boundaries it had to work with.

Guys, just read. This isn't something to get bent out of shape over.

Avatar image for ToScA-
ToScA-

5783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#155 ToScA-
Member since 2006 • 5783 Posts
[QUOTE="Vaasman"]Well its official, gamespot has absolutely 0 credibility now.expanded
just because you didn't see a game there you approve of doesn't mean the site isn't credible. most people who didn't play MGS4 wouldn't understand why people find it "graphically technical" it really is a good looking game.

I've yet to see anyone claim that MGS4 isn't graphically technical. It's, however, the fact that Gamespot considered it to be more graphically technical than Crysis that boggles many minds, including mine.
Avatar image for sirk1264
sirk1264

6242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#156 sirk1264
Member since 2003 • 6242 Posts
[QUOTE="Hockey_Slayer"][QUOTE="fatzebra"]

Actually, it isn't, with a little common sense.

fatzebra

Common sense is long gone. Because if anyone had common sense they would know that Crisis Warhead just stright up looks better then MGS4.

And if anyone could read, they would see where I said WORD FOR WORD "Crysis looks better than MGS4" but that IS NOT the point of technical Graphics. How HARD is this concept?

TECHNICAL mean how TECHNICALLY efficient are the graphic sin a game. Crysis was for the PC, so it has future proof graphics, that can't be maxed out by a reasonable machine as of now. However MGS4 was mad eon the ps3, and it had limitation, but it is the BEST out there for the system, and pushed the ps3 to it's limits.

Example: If there was a DS game, that looked like CoD 1, it would've won for technical graphics because of the boundaries it had to work with.

No just no. You can't bring platform into a technical graphics vote. If you are going to do that then you need to split up the graphics award into technical graphics for consoles and technical graphics for PC.
Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#157 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts
Example: If there was a DS game, that looked like CoD 1, it would've won for technical graphics because of the boundaries it had to work with.

fatzebra

Aren't DS games already pushing the boundaries of the DS hardware? Shouldn't Dragon Sword have been nominated for Technical Graphics if your definition was correct?

Avatar image for ToScA-
ToScA-

5783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#158 ToScA-
Member since 2006 • 5783 Posts
[QUOTE="fatzebra"][QUOTE="Hockey_Slayer"] And if anyone could read, they would see where I said WORD FOR WORD "Crysis looks better than MGS4" but that IS NOT the point of technical Graphics. How HARD is this concept?

TECHNICAL mean how TECHNICALLY efficient are the graphic sin a game. Crysis was for the PC, so it has future proof graphics, that can't be maxed out by a reasonable machine as of now. However MGS4 was mad eon the ps3, and it had limitation, but it is the BEST out there for the system, and pushed the ps3 to it's limits.

Example: If there was a DS game, that looked like CoD 1, it would've won for technical graphics because of the boundaries it had to work with.fatzebra

Guys, just read. This isn't something to get bent out of shape over.

There's an example that counters this notation. And as such, either the staff of Gamespot have turned hypocritical, or simply changed their minds on how to judge the technical aspects of a game's visuals.

Looking at the previous graphics games of the year, it is quite clear that they couldn't give a damn about the limitations of platforms; for example, in 2004, Half-Life 2 won graphics of the year, in spite of the fact that Chronicles of Riddick had extremely impressive graphics on a significantly less powerful system.thepwninator

Avatar image for sirk1264
sirk1264

6242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#159 sirk1264
Member since 2003 • 6242 Posts
[QUOTE="sirk1264"][QUOTE="expanded"] just because you didn't see a game there you approve of doesn't mean the site isn't credible. most people who didn't play MGS4 wouldn't understand why people find it "graphically technical" it really is a good looking game.expanded
I played MGS4 yet I think it doesn't deserve the technical graphics award. I doubt you played Crysis or Crysis Warhead.

nt i own (should say Owned) both. overrated game. horrible storyline. .. very horrible storyline..

And you think that MGS4 has better technical graphics than Crysis or Warhead? Oh man that is funny. I don't think you played it.
Avatar image for Afro_Samurai1
Afro_Samurai1

522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#160 Afro_Samurai1
Member since 2008 • 522 Posts
[QUOTE="Afro_Samurai1"]

[QUOTE="agentfred"] It was an expansion. Is that relevant? It's still the best looking game, technically speaking, on the market.agentfred

the best looking game just lost

/argument

It should not have though, which is why this argument exists in the first place.

the people chose mgs4 not crysis there is no need to make a big deal out this the goty hasn't even been announced and people are already getting upset.

Avatar image for Ross_the_B0SS
Ross_the_B0SS

1210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#161 Ross_the_B0SS
Member since 2008 • 1210 Posts

[QUOTE="lawlessx"]best graphics? yeah..nothing wrong with that part :|Afro_Samurai1

it is not good to hate

It's not good to be dishonest with oneself either. Many people here honestly believe MGS4 does not deserve best graphics technically

Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#162 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts
[QUOTE="agentfred"][QUOTE="Afro_Samurai1"]

the best looking game just lost

/argument

Afro_Samurai1

It should not have though, which is why this argument exists in the first place.

the people chose mgs4 not crysis there is no need to make a big deal out this the goty hasn't even been announced and people are already getting upset.

Gamespot chose MGS4 over Crysis as well. The general opinion, allegiances aside, is that Crysis has far better graphics than MGS4. This is more than enough to make a big deal out of on SW.

Avatar image for fatzebra
fatzebra

1470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163 fatzebra
Member since 2005 • 1470 Posts
[QUOTE="fatzebra"][QUOTE="fatzebra"]

Guys, just read. This isn't something to get bent out of shape over.

ToScA-

There's an example that counters this notation. And as such, either the staff of Gamespot have turned hypocritical, or simply changed their minds on how to judge the technical aspects of a game's visuals.

Looking at the previous graphics games of the year, it is quite clear that they couldn't give a damn about the limitations of platforms; for example, in 2004, Half-Life 2 won graphics of the year, in spite of the fact that Chronicles of Riddick had extremely impressive graphics on a significantly less powerful system.thepwninator

True, however, HL2 had an extremely well optimized engine, that looked amazing AND came with physics. And no, it shouldn't have different categories for different consoles, that is ridiculous. That is why there is AN award for ONE winner.

Avatar image for expanded
expanded

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#164 expanded
Member since 2003 • 8430 Posts
[QUOTE="expanded"][QUOTE="sirk1264"] I played MGS4 yet I think it doesn't deserve the technical graphics award. I doubt you played Crysis or Crysis Warhead. sirk1264
nt i own (should say Owned) both. overrated game. horrible storyline. .. very horrible storyline..

And you think that MGS4 has better technical graphics than Crysis or Warhead? Oh man that is funny. I don't think you played it.

same to you with MGS4 :| .. do i come off as a fanboy to you? :roll: is it the sig? :roll: is it the avatar :roll: :lol:
Avatar image for NAPK1NS
NAPK1NS

14870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#165 NAPK1NS
Member since 2004 • 14870 Posts
I think we all know that Warhead looks better then MGS4. Not to say that Metal Gear looks bad, it doesn't by any means, but come on now. Everything else was well deserved. One of the best games I have played all year.
Avatar image for sirk1264
sirk1264

6242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#166 sirk1264
Member since 2003 • 6242 Posts
[QUOTE="agentfred"][QUOTE="Afro_Samurai1"]

the best looking game just lost

/argument

Afro_Samurai1

It should not have though, which is why this argument exists in the first place.

the people chose mgs4 not crysis there is no need to make a big deal out this the goty hasn't even been announced and people are already getting upset.

Because that is one category it shouldn't have won. I could careless if it wins the other awards but best technical graphics it does not have especially with Crysis Warhead on the same list. Its widely known here on Gamespot amongst the forum posters that Crysis and Warhead have the best graphics of any game to date.

Avatar image for fatzebra
fatzebra

1470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#167 fatzebra
Member since 2005 • 1470 Posts
[QUOTE="Afro_Samurai1"][QUOTE="agentfred"] It should not have though, which is why this argument exists in the first place. Cherokee_Jack

the people chose mgs4 not crysis there is no need to make a big deal out this the goty hasn't even been announced and people are already getting upset.

Gamespot chose MGS4 over Crysis as well. The general opinion, allegiances aside, is that Crysis has far better graphics than MGS4. This is more than enough to make a big deal out of on SW.

Which is WHY the award is NOT just about the best looking. GS employee aren't stupid, nor blind. However MGS4 had the more efficient graphics, given it's console!!!

Avatar image for sirk1264
sirk1264

6242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#168 sirk1264
Member since 2003 • 6242 Posts
[QUOTE="sirk1264"][QUOTE="expanded"] nt i own (should say Owned) both. overrated game. horrible storyline. .. very horrible storyline..expanded
And you think that MGS4 has better technical graphics than Crysis or Warhead? Oh man that is funny. I don't think you played it.

same to you with MGS4 :| .. do i come off as a fanboy to you? :roll: is it the sig? :roll: is it the avatar :roll: :lol:

Um you can send me a message on my psn name. Vader6412. That is my PSN name. Yes i have played MGS4. Yes I have Crysis and Warhead as you can see my laptop specs can play the game at pretty much high settings.
Avatar image for Afro_Samurai1
Afro_Samurai1

522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#169 Afro_Samurai1
Member since 2008 • 522 Posts
[QUOTE="Afro_Samurai1"]

[QUOTE="lawlessx"]best graphics? yeah..nothing wrong with that part :|Ross_the_B0SS

it is not good to hate

It's not good to be dishonest with oneself either. Many people here honestly believe MGS4 does not deserve best graphics technically

I thought we had to vote for who we wanted to win and whoever had the most votes won,So if everyone here believes crysis should of won why did it lose.

Is it because not enough people didn't vote

MGS4 is just that good

or there is a Conspiracy

Avatar image for sirk1264
sirk1264

6242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#170 sirk1264
Member since 2003 • 6242 Posts
[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"][QUOTE="Afro_Samurai1"]

the people chose mgs4 not crysis there is no need to make a big deal out this the goty hasn't even been announced and people are already getting upset.

fatzebra

Gamespot chose MGS4 over Crysis as well. The general opinion, allegiances aside, is that Crysis has far better graphics than MGS4. This is more than enough to make a big deal out of on SW.

Which is WHY the award is NOT just about the best looking. GS employee aren't stupid, nor blind. However MGS4 had the more efficient graphics, given it's console!!!

And again you can't bring platform into the discussion. If that is going to happen then Far Cry 2 for the PC should have beat MGS4 as it is optimized well and looks better than MGS4 on the PC.
Avatar image for Eddie-Vedder
Eddie-Vedder

7810

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#171 Eddie-Vedder
Member since 2003 • 7810 Posts

Oh boy! MGS4 is killin em just like I thought it would. And for the record I do NOT i repeat DO NOT agree with the Tech graphics award. Crysis simply looks better then MGS4 but that doesnt change the fact that MGS4 deserved every award it won except the aforementioned and deserves the awards that are coming up.

But I like how tech graphics award as led into all this MGS4 bashing and the tears of angry fanboys has truely made this a great first day of awards, bu bu teh cutscenes and teh convuluted storiez!!11

teh teh voice actingz was cartoon quailty!!11

Pfft, MGS4 did a ton of great things and did them extremely well and is getting the accolades it deserves. But please by all means keep the tears coming because they are delicious.

And now time to exit and bask in the slience of victory. And I'd like to point out that 8 awards were handed out to PS3 exclusive games. Which is far more then any other platform. Year of the PS3 confirmed? I think you already know the answer to that.

XturnalS

LOL

MGS4 > God.

Avatar image for sirk1264
sirk1264

6242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#172 sirk1264
Member since 2003 • 6242 Posts
[QUOTE="Ross_the_B0SS"][QUOTE="Afro_Samurai1"]

it is not good to hate

Afro_Samurai1

It's not good to be dishonest with oneself either. Many people here honestly believe MGS4 does not deserve best graphics technically

I thought we had to vote for who we wanted to win and whoever had the most votes won,So if everyone here believes crysis should of won why did it lose.

Is it because not enough people didn't vote

MGS4 is just that good

or there is a Conspiracy

The votes don't mean anything. The GS editors pick the winner.
Avatar image for 67gt500
67gt500

4627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#173 67gt500
Member since 2003 • 4627 Posts
[QUOTE="THQ88"]

MGS4 is nominated in 8 awards:

Game of the Year
Best PS3
Best Action Adventure
Best Story
Best Boss Fights
Best Graphics, Technical
Best Voice Acting
Most Memorable Moment

1st round is over and MGS4 WON EVERYTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The highlighted ones are the awards that it won today.

Come the 24th, 25th and 26th and we shall know if it takes the rest. I think MGS4 is getting GOTY this year!!!!!! AWESOME!!!! Congratulations Mr.Kojima!!!!!

Metal Gear FTW!!!

thepwninator

Do you honestly believe there wasn't some degree of bias in there? Hell, it even beat out Crysis Warhead for best graphics. Doesn't that raise some alarms for you?

Alarms? Bias? Ordinarily that might seem to be the case, but the award is conferred with respect to the platform, so yes - it's a legitimate winner...

Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#174 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts
True, however, HL2 had an extremely well optimized engine, that looked amazing AND came with physics.

fatzebra

So how is HL2's great graphics vs. Riddick's great use of hardware different from Crysis's great graphics and MGS4's 'great' use of hardware?

Avatar image for expanded
expanded

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#175 expanded
Member since 2003 • 8430 Posts
Um you can send me a message on my psn name. Vader6412. That is my PSN name. Yes i have played MGS4. Yes I have Crysis and Warhead as you can see my laptop specs can play the game at pretty much high settings.sirk1264
we could argue this all night :roll: we'll still end up with the same conclusion: I find mgs4 deserving of the award. and you don't. :T
Avatar image for Afro_Samurai1
Afro_Samurai1

522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#176 Afro_Samurai1
Member since 2008 • 522 Posts
[QUOTE="Afro_Samurai1"][QUOTE="Ross_the_B0SS"]

It's not good to be dishonest with oneself either. Many people here honestly believe MGS4 does not deserve best graphics technically

sirk1264

I thought we had to vote for who we wanted to win and whoever had the most votes won,So if everyone here believes crysis should of won why did it lose.

Is it because not enough people didn't vote

MGS4 is just that good

or there is a Conspiracy

The votes don't mean anything. The GS editors pick the winner.

well,then there is nothing you can do about it

Avatar image for myke2010
myke2010

2747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#177 myke2010
Member since 2002 • 2747 Posts
[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"][QUOTE="Afro_Samurai1"]

the people chose mgs4 not crysis there is no need to make a big deal out this the goty hasn't even been announced and people are already getting upset.

fatzebra

Gamespot chose MGS4 over Crysis as well. The general opinion, allegiances aside, is that Crysis has far better graphics than MGS4. This is more than enough to make a big deal out of on SW.

Which is WHY the award is NOT just about the best looking. GS employee aren't stupid, nor blind. However MGS4 had the more efficient graphics, given it's console!!!

You're right, it's not about the best looking, it's about the best graphics technically, and technically Crysis wins handsdown.

The whole MGS4 had more efficient graphics is laughable nonsense. Last year Crysis was using a less optimized engine and won. Also last year the PS3 had Uncharted which, even according to PS3 owners, looks better then MGS4 proving it had far more efficient graphics. And yet Crysis crushed all competition.

So since Crysis Warhead had a better optimized graphics engine and MGS4 didn't look as good as Uncharted then by your own logic Warhead should have been the clear winner based on past precedent.

Quit trying to spin this, MGS4 deserved a lot of awards, but technical graphics wasn't one of them.

Avatar image for Eddie-Vedder
Eddie-Vedder

7810

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#178 Eddie-Vedder
Member since 2003 • 7810 Posts
[QUOTE="thepwninator"][QUOTE="THQ88"]

MGS4 is nominated in 8 awards:

Game of the Year
Best PS3
Best Action Adventure
Best Story
Best Boss Fights
Best Graphics, Technical
Best Voice Acting
Most Memorable Moment

1st round is over and MGS4 WON EVERYTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The highlighted ones are the awards that it won today.

Come the 24th, 25th and 26th and we shall know if it takes the rest. I think MGS4 is getting GOTY this year!!!!!! AWESOME!!!! Congratulations Mr.Kojima!!!!!

Metal Gear FTW!!!

67gt500

Do you honestly believe there wasn't some degree of bias in there? Hell, it even beat out Crysis Warhead for best graphics. Doesn't that raise some alarms for you?

Alarms? Bias? Ordinarily that might seem to be the case, but the award is conferred with respect to the platform, so yes - it's a legitimate winner...

I made a thread trying to explain that, and somehow people kept coming in and saying "LOL Crysis >>>>>>>>>>>>>> MGS4!" It's a lost cause :P
Avatar image for expanded
expanded

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#179 expanded
Member since 2003 • 8430 Posts
MGS4 didn't look as good as Uncharted then by your own logic Warhead should have been the clear winner based on past precedent.myke2010
I don't understand the nonsense with uncharted having the best graphics ever :? because the graphics of that game isn't as great as people hype it..
Avatar image for Eddie-Vedder
Eddie-Vedder

7810

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#180 Eddie-Vedder
Member since 2003 • 7810 Posts
[QUOTE="fatzebra"][QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"]

Gamespot chose MGS4 over Crysis as well. The general opinion, allegiances aside, is that Crysis has far better graphics than MGS4. This is more than enough to make a big deal out of on SW.myke2010

Which is WHY the award is NOT just about the best looking. GS employee aren't stupid, nor blind. However MGS4 had the more efficient graphics, given it's console!!!

You're right, it's not about the best looking, it's about the best graphics technically, and technically Crysis wins handsdown.

The whole MGS4 had more efficient graphics is laughable nonsense. Last year Crysis was using a less optimized engine and won. Also last year the PS3 had Uncharted which, even according to PS3 owners, looks better then MGS4 proving it had far more efficient graphics. And yet Crysis crushed all competition.

So since Crysis Warhead had a better optimized graphics engine and MGS4 didn't look as good as Uncharted then by your own logic Warhead should have been the clear winner based on past precedent.

Quit trying to spin this, MGS4 deserved a lot of awards, but technical graphics wasn't one of them.

Last year Galaxy was nominated...
Avatar image for sirk1264
sirk1264

6242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#181 sirk1264
Member since 2003 • 6242 Posts
[QUOTE="sirk1264"][QUOTE="Afro_Samurai1"]

I thought we had to vote for who we wanted to win and whoever had the most votes won,So if everyone here believes crysis should of won why did it lose.

Is it because not enough people didn't vote

MGS4 is just that good

or there is a Conspiracy

Afro_Samurai1

The votes don't mean anything. The GS editors pick the winner.

well,then there is nothing you can do about it

No there isn't but if this site had any credibility left, well it just lost it because after questionable reviews on some games and I'm sure cows and lems and sheep can relate, gamespot has zero credibility in anything whether it be which game has the best graphics or which game deserves a 9 or vice versa.
Avatar image for Lionheart08
Lionheart08

15814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#182 Lionheart08
Member since 2005 • 15814 Posts
I'll try to give Gamespot the benefit of the doubt.....maybe they meant the best graphics on the respective console. I dunno, maybe MGSIV had the best graphics for a PS3 game in 08 or something.
Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#183 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts
I'll try to give Gamespot the benefit of the doubt.....maybe they meant the best graphics on the respective console. I dunno, maybe MGSIV had the best graphics for a PS3 game in 08 or something.Lionheart08
Their past choices don't indicate that.
Avatar image for -Ninja_Dog-
-Ninja_Dog-

4197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#184 -Ninja_Dog-
Member since 2005 • 4197 Posts

Overrated for sure. I played the demo and I don't feel like running out and buying it.

Sucks too because I wanted it to be good, Heck I had more fun with the Uncharted demo.

Totally over-rated and proof GS sucks. Bunch of losers I say.

Avatar image for myke2010
myke2010

2747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#185 myke2010
Member since 2002 • 2747 Posts
[QUOTE="myke2010"][QUOTE="fatzebra"]

Which is WHY the award is NOT just about the best looking. GS employee aren't stupid, nor blind. However MGS4 had the more efficient graphics, given it's console!!!

Eddie-Vedder

You're right, it's not about the best looking, it's about the best graphics technically, and technically Crysis wins handsdown.

The whole MGS4 had more efficient graphics is laughable nonsense. Last year Crysis was using a less optimized engine and won. Also last year the PS3 had Uncharted which, even according to PS3 owners, looks better then MGS4 proving it had far more efficient graphics. And yet Crysis crushed all competition.

So since Crysis Warhead had a better optimized graphics engine and MGS4 didn't look as good as Uncharted then by your own logic Warhead should have been the clear winner based on past precedent.

Quit trying to spin this, MGS4 deserved a lot of awards, but technical graphics wasn't one of them.

Last year Galaxy was nominated...

No it wasn't. Galaxy was nominated for best graphics artistic. That's a completely different category, we are talking about technical graphics here.

Avatar image for expanded
expanded

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#186 expanded
Member since 2003 • 8430 Posts
These threads are just rants on how people feel about the award. this will blow away in a couple of days. because there is really nothing any user can do about it :|.
Avatar image for spike6566
spike6566

1630

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#187 spike6566
Member since 2008 • 1630 Posts
YAY MGS WINS ALMOST EVERYTHING :)
Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#188 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts

These threads are just rants on how people feel about the award. this will blow away in a couple of days. because there is really nothing any user can do about it :|. expanded

What? This is SW. Did you expect a group hug?

Avatar image for expanded
expanded

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#189 expanded
Member since 2003 • 8430 Posts

[QUOTE="expanded"]These threads are just rants on how people feel about the award. this will blow away in a couple of days. because there is really nothing any user can do about it :|. Cherokee_Jack

What? This is SW. Did you expect a group hug?



hell yea. SW needs more respect and rep than its getting recently. since everyone thinks anyone who posts on SW is ignorant and a fanboy which
is clearly not true.
Avatar image for thepwninator
thepwninator

8134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#190 thepwninator
Member since 2006 • 8134 Posts
[QUOTE="thepwninator"][QUOTE="THQ88"]

MGS4 is nominated in 8 awards:

Game of the Year
Best PS3
Best Action Adventure
Best Story
Best Boss Fights
Best Graphics, Technical
Best Voice Acting
Most Memorable Moment

1st round is over and MGS4 WON EVERYTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The highlighted ones are the awards that it won today.

Come the 24th, 25th and 26th and we shall know if it takes the rest. I think MGS4 is getting GOTY this year!!!!!! AWESOME!!!! Congratulations Mr.Kojima!!!!!

Metal Gear FTW!!!

67gt500

Do you honestly believe there wasn't some degree of bias in there? Hell, it even beat out Crysis Warhead for best graphics. Doesn't that raise some alarms for you?

Alarms? Bias? Ordinarily that might seem to be the case, but the award is conferred with respect to the platform, so yes - it's a legitimate winner...

As I stated before, if that were the case, then Chronicles of Riddick should have beaten Half-Life 2 in '04; Chronicles of Riddick looked absolutely amazing for the XBox, which was far weaker than PCs of the time, yet Half-Life 2, which legitimately looked better, still won.
Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#191 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts
[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"]

[QUOTE="expanded"]These threads are just rants on how people feel about the award. this will blow away in a couple of days. because there is really nothing any user can do about it :|. expanded

What? This is SW. Did you expect a group hug


hell yea. SW needs more respect and rep than its getting recently. since everyone thinks anyone who posts on SW is ignorant and a fanboy which
is clearly not true.

This isn't a fanboy argument. Plenty of PS3 owners, even cows, think that MGS4 didn't deserve this award, and have said so. This is a legitimate issue, and warrants discussion. That's what SW is about.

Avatar image for expanded
expanded

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#192 expanded
Member since 2003 • 8430 Posts
Cherokee_Jack
zomg! a legitimate issue on a gaming forum :roll: there's no issue here. it's the editors choice. :| not people's choice.
Avatar image for madsnakehhh
madsnakehhh

18368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#193 madsnakehhh
Member since 2007 • 18368 Posts
I dont know about technical graphics, because i havent played Crysis, but i can tell that MGS4 deserve the awards, maybe The Boss fights werent as good as MGS1 or MGS3, but they were really good.
Avatar image for longshotgir
longshotgir

401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#194 longshotgir
Member since 2007 • 401 Posts
I just don't get it.... What makes MGS4 have superior technical graphics than Far Cry 2, Dead Space, Crysis and Gears of War?! For one the game does not look as good as people make it out to look. It's not even HD (wow nice tehnical proccessing power you got there.). Yet it beat CRYSIS !? Many games i played this gen got better and more complex coding AND better graphics. Maybe they mean the PS3 is inferior hardware? We will ever know, but this is pretty much the final proof.
Avatar image for VanHelsingBoA64
VanHelsingBoA64

5455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#195 VanHelsingBoA64
Member since 2007 • 5455 Posts

Overrated for sure. I played the demo and I don't feel like running out and buying it.

Sucks too because I wanted it to be good, Heck I had more fun with the Uncharted demo.

Totally over-rated and proof GS sucks. Bunch of losers I say.

-Ninja_Dog-

Because, you don't agree with their opnion? lol?

Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#196 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts
there's no issue here. it's the editors choice. :| not people's choice.expanded
We're not trying to make them change the award. We're just discussing whether it was the right decision. Why is that wrong?
Avatar image for expanded
expanded

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#197 expanded
Member since 2003 • 8430 Posts
[QUOTE="-Ninja_Dog-"]

Overrated for sure. I played the demo and I don't feel like running out and buying it.

Sucks too because I wanted it to be good, Heck I had more fun with the Uncharted demo.

Totally over-rated and proof GS sucks. Bunch of losers I say.

VanHelsingBoA64

Because, you don't agree with their opnion? lol?

I don't know Vanhelsing remember when Ratchet and Clank got a 7.5.. and the community whined so much that they changed the score.. -- oh wait! that's right. :| MGS4 looks great. might not be no crysis graphics. but i still think it deserves all the awards given
Avatar image for expanded
expanded

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#198 expanded
Member since 2003 • 8430 Posts
[QUOTE="expanded"] there's no issue here. it's the editors choice. :| not people's choice.Cherokee_Jack
We're not trying to make them change the award. We're just discussing whether it was the right decision. Why is that wrong?

because this "discussion" has turned into a "gs is bias for making a decision" "gs has no credibility for they have no written what the community believes" that is why.
Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#199 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts
[QUOTE="expanded"][QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"] We're not trying to make them change the award. We're just discussing whether it was the right decision. Why is that wrong?

because this "discussion" has turned into a "gs is bias for making a decision" "gs has no credibility for they have no written what the community believes"

No it hasn't. Some people are saying that, and they're free to come to that conclusion, but for the most part this thread has been about whether MGS4 deserves Technical Graphics.
Avatar image for expanded
expanded

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#200 expanded
Member since 2003 • 8430 Posts
[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"][QUOTE="expanded"][QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"] We're not trying to make them change the award. We're just discussing whether it was the right decision. Why is that wrong?

because this "discussion" has turned into a "gs is bias for making a decision" "gs has no credibility for they have no written what the community believes"

No it hasn't. Some people are saying that, and they're free to come to that conclusion, but for the most part this thread has been about whether MGS4 deserves Technical Graphics.

well by what i have read doesn't seem like it. :T I still think it deserves it. :)