[QUOTE="subrosian"]For those of you who aren't aware - Too Human has been killed by the media. The journalists of the gaming world, at E3 2006 - made up their minds. Denis Dyack has a personal disagreement with gaming journalists that just makes the situation worse. He basically feels you should be able to make up your own minds on games, that there should be a unified platform for gaming, and that the people who help make games (like writers, music designers, and animators) should be getting a paycheck from their developer even after the project is finished (instead of fired - like what happens when a project at EA is done).
Sounds like a terrible guy, right? Well unfortunately when you start saying things like "think about the consumer" and "make sure the guys making games are well-off" you piss off a lot of the profit mongers - amongst those the gaming journalism industy, and the console manufacturers and publishers who *fund* the gaming journalism industry.
Teufelhuhn
Even as someone who generally agrees with you about the quality of gaming "journalism", I'm having a hard time seeing this as anything but a wild conspiracy theory. I mean really, journalists purposely giving poor reviews because of Denis Dyack's employee relations?
I think you need to at least entertain the idea that many people just don't like this game.
No no, I fully believe that some people don't like the game - but reviews like the one 1up did are a hit piece. Even if the reviewer doesn't like the game, to have factually incorrect information, or to greatly exaggerate faults while leaving out huge amounts of the game's content is a failing of his journalistic integrity.
Much of the review's information is also factually incorrect - even in the demo, not every enemy in the game "blindly charges you" - and later game enemies are certainly more complex to take down - though they don't even mention status effects, polarity enemies, and the epic varients of levels - which leads me to believe they didn't play that far.
-
It's just a rather poorly written review with an obvious bias - and Mr. Dyack hasn't played the "game" of bull**** well with the journalists - in fact, he's spent a considerable amount of time fighting NeoGAF, struggling to get fair reviews for his title, and addressing stuff from E3 2006 that should have no bearing on his review score. I think the reality is - this game is getting attacked due to things that have nothing to do with the game - and many of the reviewers aren't even really *playing* the game before writing their review.
That bodes ill for the indusry - Dyack got the game out with a month to spare for these reviewers to spend the time they *need* to spend to grasp the game, and they wrote a 600-word review that sounds like something a troll in System Wars would write :|. I expect better.
Log in to comment