2 years old PC Games can beat Uncharted 2 in graphics

to all Uncharted 2 supporter

Uncharted 2 hasnt DX10, its weak. Every Game can look completely different on PC compare to the console versions. LP is a good example look at the beautiful DX10 fur and the DX10 filter. I can even see real bullet holes in 3d at the snow. On consoles the game is a decent multiplatform game. But on PC its a graphic bomb and does use a lot of the DX10 technology and SLI. So stop even to compare it with Crysis if it cant beat 2 years old games.

The MT Framework engine from Capcom is the best engine after crytek 2 and looks beautiful. Resident evil 5 has the same and looks also better than Uncharted 2 on any system.

It can look better... But can it be better? *fades into the ominous fog*

I'm sorry TC, I don't think nVidia is going to win the war against Intel. The GPCPU idea is going to catch on.

i edited it

The xbox version of LP is still good. The PS3 version was the worst one of all 4, i know it from my big brother he sold his vesion. The PS3 version realy lagged a lot.

I'm sorry but do you really believe that RE5 looks better than this.

Why do we get these PC vs. ??? threads? Are PC gamers getting that desperate to compare against consoles these days to get a win or something? Look PC is something on it's own level seeing you can upgrade your system every month to optimize speed, power, graphics and so on. You can't do that in a console, you haft to wait for the next gen if you want that much more. People who make topics such as these make PC fans look bad.

I'm pretty sure everyone with a brain and/or eyes knows Crysis looks better. No need to make a topic about it.

I'm sorry but do you really believe that RE5 looks better than this.

Nero_Paladin

Looks like some PC fanatics are quivering with fear because console quality graphics are getting to near PC level fidelity.Vadamee

there are so many topics about this i cant realy try to not discuss about it.

Why do we get these PC vs. ??? threads? Are PC gamers getting that desperate to compare against consoles these days to get a win or something? Look PC is something on it's own level seeing you can upgrade your system every month to optimize speed, power, graphics and so on. You can't do that in a console, you haft to wait for the next gen if you want that much more. People who make topics such as these make PC fans look bad.

ItsBriskBaby

more console fans make these threads and claims than pc fans

Looks like some PC fanatics are quivering with fear because console quality graphics are getting to near PC level fidelity.Vadamee

I honestly can not understand why the hermits keep having to throw their hat in the ring when it comes to graphics.. geez.. everyone knows pc graphics can beat console graphics. Quite honestly, only the hermits care. This board is about system wars and very few people compare pc's to consoles. When ever there is a topic about console graphics all the pc heads have to come in and show crysis.. no one cares.

[QUOTE="ItsBriskBaby"]

Why do we get these PC vs. ??? threads? Are PC gamers getting that desperate to compare against consoles these days to get a win or something? Look PC is something on it's own level seeing you can upgrade your system every month to optimize speed, power, graphics and so on. You can't do that in a console, you haft to wait for the next gen if you want that much more. People who make topics such as these make PC fans look bad.

more console fans make these threads and claims than pc fans

It can look better... But can it be better? *fades into the ominous fog*

emorainbo

Why do we get these PC vs. ??? threads? Are PC gamers getting that desperate to compare against consoles these days to get a win or something? Look PC is something on it's own level seeing you can upgrade your system every month to optimize speed, power, graphics and so on. You can't do that in a console, you haft to wait for the next gen if you want that much more. People who make topics such as these make PC fans look bad.

ItsBriskBaby

I believe thats the point of this kind of threads.

to all Uncharted 2 supporter

Uncharted 2 hasnt DX10, its weak. Every Game can look completely different on PC compare to the console versions. LP is a good example look at the beautiful DX10 fur and the DX10 filter. I can even see real bullet holes in 3d at the snow. On consoles the game is a decent multiplatform game. But on PC its a graphic bomb and does use a lot of the DX10 technology and SLI. So stop even to compare it with Crysis if it cant beat 2 years old games.

The MT Framework engine from Capcom is the best engine after crytek 2 and looks beautiful. Resident evil 5 has the same and looks also better than Uncharted 2 on any system.

SLIisaownsystem

[QUOTE="ItsBriskBaby"]

Why do we get these PC vs. ??? threads? Are PC gamers getting that desperate to compare against consoles these days to get a win or something? Look PC is something on it's own level seeing you can upgrade your system every month to optimize speed, power, graphics and so on. You can't do that in a console, you haft to wait for the next gen if you want that much more. People who make topics such as these make PC fans look bad.

more console fans make these threads and claims than pc fans

Thats some nice fur there on that worm.

and this is surprising because??

it happens EVERY generation.......

Your first 2 sentences made me LOL.

Anyway PC games generally have great textures, great resolution, and great open-ness. On the down side most PC games are glitchy, inconsistant, robotic in composition and excecution, and take rediclious install and load times to even begin to play.

Give props where props is due, for as impressive asUncharted 2 is said to be graphically it has 0 load times other than the begenning load. and regardless if crysis "can"look 10%-15% better than Uncharted it would be on hardware that would cost 3 to 4 times the cost of a PS3 to run. I have Crysis I can run it on high..and to be honest that really dosen't look better than Uncharted 2, but to run at the highest settings to get it to run at the level of graphics that you're hyping from your vid you have to have a $800 to $1200 rig.

BTW:2 year old PC specs won't yead a better looking game than U2, crysis or no crysis. I wonder dose YOUR rig run as good as the DEMO video for crysis that was run on

Crysis machine =

1x Quad cpu Supermicro X7QC3 board, Price = $1200
http://www.supermicro.com/products [...] /X7QC3.cfm

4x Xeon X7350 quads (total 16 cores) , Price = 4x $3000 = $12000
http://www.intel.com/products/proc [...] +tab_specs

16x Crucial 4gb DDR2 sticks (64gb ram), Price = 16x $600 = $9600
http://www.crucial.com/store/parts [...] 51272AF53E

2x Quadro FX 5600, Price 2x $3000 = $6000
http://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro_fx_5600_4600.html

Total = 1200 + 12000 + 9600 + 6000 = $28,800.00
+ some case , and psu(s) round it off at $30,000.00

GRAPHICS =/= GOOD GAMES

therefore

PC =/= ALWAYS BETTER GAMES

Crysis machine =

1x Quad cpu Supermicro X7QC3 board, Price = $1200
http://www.supermicro.com/products [...] /X7QC3.cfm

4x Xeon X7350 quads (total 16 cores) , Price = 4x $3000 = $12000
http://www.intel.com/products/proc [...] +tab_specs

16x Crucial 4gb DDR2 sticks (64gb ram), Price = 16x $600 = $9600
http://www.crucial.com/store/parts [...] 51272AF53E

2x Quadro FX 5600, Price 2x $3000 = $6000
http://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro_fx_5600_4600.html

Total = 1200 + 12000 + 9600 + 6000 = $28,800.00
+ some case , and psu(s) round it off at $30,000.00

playharderfool

Please tell me you're joking... otherwise :|

Are physics or animations better in RE5 than U2? no. btw TC why in all of your posts you are talking about SLI?

GRAPHICS =/= GOOD GAMES

therefore

PC =/= ALWAYS BETTER GAMES

BlackTragedy

I honestly can not understand why the hermits keep having to throw their hat in the ring when it comes to graphics.. geez.. everyone knows pc graphics can beat console graphics. Quite honestly, only the hermits care. This board is about system wars and very few people compare pc's to consoles. When ever there is a topic about console graphics all the pc heads have to come in and show crysis.. no one cares.

Dilrod

hermits always forget that there big gaming rigs cost far more then consoles do. 1 good video card can cost more then the ps3 .

It can look better... But can it be better? *fades into the ominous fog*

emorainbo

[QUOTE="emorainbo"]

It can look better... But can it be better? *fades into the ominous fog*

InsaneBasura

1x Quad cpu Supermicro X7QC3 board, Price = $1200
http://www.supermicro.com/products [...] /X7QC3.cfm

4x Xeon X7350 quads (total 16 cores) , Price = 4x $3000 = $12000
http://www.intel.com/products/proc [...] +tab_specs

16x Crucial 4gb DDR2 sticks (64gb ram), Price = 16x $600 = $9600
http://www.crucial.com/store/parts [...] 51272AF53E

2x Quadro FX 5600, Price 2x $3000 = $6000
http://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro_fx_5600_4600.html

Total = 1200 + 12000 + 9600 + 6000 = $28,800.00
+ some case , and psu(s) round it off at $30,000.00

playharderfool

Those are the specs for a Small server or High end workstation PC, not a gaming PC.

Are physics or animations better in RE5 than U2? no. btw TC why in all of your posts you are talking about SLI?

Syferonik

actually yeah. proceedurally rendered animations and some of the most advanced physics ever seen.

Crysis most definately can look better..... the question is.... does it look better on 95% of the PC's in peoples homes?

The Answer..... most likely not.

PS. I'm fine with people posting Crysis pics in any graphics thread.... but ONLY if they are screenshots they took themselves. There are so many Hermits that use screenshots from teh interwebs, and pass it off as something that they are playing, which they are not.

PSS. Oh and those pics of Crysis.... "real life" (on the left) vs "crysis" (on the right) are complete BS..... that shed isn't even in the game, and neither is that coast line w/ mountains.

Crysis most definately can look better..... the question is.... does it look better on 95% of the PC's in peoples homes?

The Answer..... most likely not.

PS. I'm fine with people posting Crysis pics in any graphics thread.... but ONLY if they are screenshots they took themselves. There are so many Hermits that use screenshots from teh interwebs, and pass it off as something that they are playing, which they are not.

PSS. Oh and those pics of Crysis.... "real life" (on the left) vs "crysis" (on the right) are complete BS..... that shed isn't even in the game, and neither is that coast line w/ mountains.

whatisazerg

thats a bit of a stretch. does it look better on 95% of people with gaming pcs? yes

not everyone is a gamer. just like not everyone has a console not everyone has a gaming pc even if they have a pc.

and actually you cant BS a pc shot. what you shoot is what you get. some of them have 16x qAA on but besides that theres no difference. itll still look the same.

all ingame shots. not even in the editor.

I have Crysis I can run it on high..and to be honest that really dosen't look better than Uncharted 2, but to run at the highest settings to get it to run at the level of graphics that you're hyping from your vid you have to have a $800 to $1200 rig.

BTW:2 year old PC specs won't yead a better looking game than U2, crysis or no crysis. I wonder dose YOUR rig run as good as the DEMO video for crysis that was run on

Crysis machine =

1x Quad cpu Supermicro X7QC3 board, Price = $1200
http://www.supermicro.com/products [...] /X7QC3.cfm

4x Xeon X7350 quads (total 16 cores) , Price = 4x $3000 = $12000
http://www.intel.com/products/proc [...] +tab_specs

16x Crucial 4gb DDR2 sticks (64gb ram), Price = 16x $600 = $9600
http://www.crucial.com/store/parts [...] 51272AF53E

2x Quadro FX 5600, Price 2x $3000 = $6000
http://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro_fx_5600_4600.html

Total = 1200 + 12000 + 9600 + 6000 = $28,800.00
+ some case , and psu(s) round it off at $30,000.00

playharderfool

all this hate for a good game

Firstly, well known fact. Duh. The graphics cards on consoles aren't great. Secondly, Crysis is a two year old game, so... I don't even need to explain myself. Third, It's receiving high praise for its visuals because it's actually pretty darn impressive given the hardware constraints. Show me a game that looks that good on similar hardware.

Of course, if all you're looking for is visuals, every game must be a bore after Crysis. And what a shame that is.

[QUOTE="Syferonik"]

Are physics or animations better in RE5 than U2? no. btw TC why in all of your posts you are talking about SLI?

washd123

actually yeah. proceedurally rendered animations and some of the most advanced physics ever seen.

What is the big graphically intense pc exclusive coming out this year? There isn't one.

The market isn't there anymore to support games like Crysis. Deal with it and move one.

It isn't as if people that play unchartered 2 will be disappointed with the graphics.

These types of threads only show how sad pc gaming has become.

[QUOTE="washd123"]

[QUOTE="Syferonik"]

Are physics or animations better in RE5 than U2? no. btw TC why in all of your posts you are talking about SLI?

heybooboo19

actually yeah. proceedurally rendered animations and some of the most advanced physics ever seen.

no. i wasnt referring to anything. that comment can just be ignored. i read the post wrong

Looks like some PC fanatics are quivering with fear because console quality graphics are getting to near PC level fidelity.Vadamee

Cool man, its cool to be insecure about your computer, just because you see pretty graphics on a PS3 or 360 doesnt mean buh buh buh computers better, youre telling everyone stuff we already know, just give credit where credit is due, and say U2 has good graphics for a console, or something like that, actually it doesnt matter what your opinion is, just stop stating the obvious, everyone knows PC is the best platform graphically.

[QUOTE="Vadamee"]Looks like some PC fanatics are quivering with fear because console quality graphics are getting to near PC level fidelity.Brownesque

But people like you seem to be stuck in 1999 when the gaming experience difference on the pc was much more significant. That's sad.

What is the big graphically intense pc exclusive coming out this year? There isn't one.

The market isn't there anymore to support games like Crysis. Deal with it and move one.

It isn't as if people that play unchartered 2 will be disappointed with the graphics.

These types of threads only show how sad pc gaming has become.

dc337

What is the big graphically intense pc exclusive coming out this year? There isn't one.

The market isn't there anymore to support games like Crysis. Deal with it and move one.

It isn't as if people that play unchartered 2 will be disappointed with the graphics.

These types of threads only show how sad pc gaming has become.

dc337

So you haven't heard of Dx11?

How is PC gaming sad? Games are not only about graphics... and anyway, Crysis is still the best looking game if that what makes you play games.

[QUOTE="Brownesque"][QUOTE="Vadamee"]Looks like some PC fanatics are quivering with fear because console quality graphics are getting to near PC level fidelity.dc337

But people like you seem to be stuck in 1999 when the gaming experience difference on the pc was much more significant. That's sad.

LOL, yeah... Most of the PC exclusive games are notebook friendly or else you call them badly optimized... man, your double standards are great!

DX10 is teh fail as well as your SLI :lol: X360PS3AMD05

You and TC are on the same level I see...