2010 will be even BETTER for Ps3 exclusives than 2009

Really? Because if I recall correctly, sales, not reviews bring in the money. A system can't win a system war if it doesn't sell as well no matter what games are out. I won all 3 so I'm not biased, I'm just pointing out that your logic is completely flawed.dukebd699

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="RM84x"]Sony is owning 2009 when it comes to games.noble_aryan

Completely subjective. I felt that 360 won 2008. The only games i like for ps3 were MGS4 and Valkyria chronicles. 360 had Gears2, fable 2, L4D Banjo and kazzooie and Castle crashers :) But hey dont take this as a fact.

As for 2009 i think every console is about equal. Ps3 has KZ2 which is amazingly fun. (dont have inFamous yet) 360 has Star ocean 4 and Halo wars.

I dont know why people just use gamespot scores to justify that 1 game is better than another.... its all opionion

star hawk? Resistnace 3? :D that alone makes me happyand i will laugh if GT5 get's delayed again

[QUOTE="noble_aryan"][QUOTE="AlphaGamer469"] Really? Dead last is winning?dukebd699

Remember last gen when cows just sales mattered? now they somehow think that review scores are the only thing. Let's just disregard how much money the PS3 has lost Sony. I bet they dance in the streets every fiscal quarter. Yay, we keep losing money, but we have good GS scores...

[QUOTE="noble_aryan"][QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]Owning with two exclusives?deathtarget04

Completely subjective. I felt that 360 won 2008. The only games i like for ps3 were MGS4 and Valkyria chronicles. 360 had Gears2, fable 2, L4D Banjo and kazzooie and Castle crashers :) But hey dont take this as a fact.

As for 2009 i think every console is about equal. Ps3 has KZ2 which is amazingly fun. (dont have inFamous yet) 360 has Star ocean 4 and Halo wars.

I dont know why people just use gamespot scores to justify that 1 game is better than another.... its all opionion

Because Sony is in dead lasty and that's the only card they can play...

Um I think I see more than two exclusives here

Killzone 2 (awesome)

inFAMOUS (awesome)

Uncharted 2 (will be game of the year)

M.A.G (unknown)

Ratchet and Clank Future 2 (another solid R&C game)

Final Fantasy (exclusively on Ps3 in Japan this year)

Fat Princess (the funnest looking game of all)

Afrikahttp://www.gamespot.com/news/6210339.html?tag=latestheadlines;title;6

Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2

[QUOTE="RM84x"]Sony is owning 2009 when it comes to games.Stevo_the_gamer

Um I think I see more than two exclusives here

Killzone 2 (awesome)

inFAMOUS (awesome)

Uncharted 2 (will be game of the year)

M.A.G (unknown)

Ratchet and Clank Future 2 (another solid R&C game)

Final Fantasy (exclusively on Ps3 in Japan this year)

Fat Princess (the funnest looking game of all)

Afrikahttp://www.gamespot.com/news/6210339.html?tag=latestheadlines;title;6

Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="RM84x"]Sony is owning 2009 when it comes to games.redskins2156

Wow, now they are owning with a bunch of unreleased games.

So if an AAA game sells modestly it is now a flop?

I guess I have to go return Killzone 2 now :roll:

Seriously if sales matter more than the actual game itself, we should all be playing Wii Fit

[QUOTE="RM84x"][QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

Lets hope so since 2007,2008, and 2009 still weren't ps3 years, Maybe the ps3 will finally outsell the 360 in 2010.

WilliamRLBaker

Where as halo wars alone will likely sell more then both infamous and killzone2 combined.

[QUOTE="dukebd699"]Really? Because if I recall correctly, sales, not reviews bring in the money. A system can't win a system war if it doesn't sell as well no matter what games are out. I won all 3 so I'm not biased, I'm just pointing out that your logic is completely flawed.Stevo_the_gamer

[QUOTE="RM84x"][QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

Lets hope so since 2007,2008, and 2009 still weren't ps3 years, Maybe the ps3 will finally outsell the 360 in 2010.

WilliamRLBaker

Where as halo wars alone will likely sell more then both infamous and killzone2 combined.

This is the worst argument I've ever heard. So all the crappy Wii games that score terribly but sell better than Halo Wars and Ninja Blade are therefore better games? Okay, so more sales = better quality game.

And yeah, Sony is owning Xbox 360 this year when it comes to quality games, there truly is no comparison. KZ2 and Infamous are excellent, regardless of whether they sell amazingly or not. As someone who plays games and knows that good scores are representative of a quality product, you should know that if you're looking for quality exclusives, PS3 is your best bet so far in 2009.

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="dukebd699"]Really? Because if I recall correctly, sales, not reviews bring in the money. A system can't win a system war if it doesn't sell as well no matter what games are out. I won all 3 so I'm not biased, I'm just pointing out that your logic is completely flawed.RM84x

[QUOTE="dukebd699"][QUOTE="noble_aryan"]halo is milked to the fullest nd M$ are good avertisers thats y they sell lots. reviews r more importiant then sales......and all i have to say is...MGS5 :) finishedAlphaGamer469

Remember last gen when cows just sales mattered? now they somehow think that review scores are the only thing. Let's just disregard how much money the PS3 has lost Sony. I bet they dance in the streets every fiscal quarter. Yay, we keep losing money, but we have good GS scores...

Well better than praising MS for subpar low quality games and yelling yeee hawwww keep bringing in the money MS. I'm sure they are happy that their consumers praise them for selling them low quality hardware and half baked games so they can make a huge profit.

I'm almost willing to bet that you have more games from MS than Stock from MS. So again how does a bad made game that sells well make you feel better as a gamer?

And if you take Halo 3's sales away from MS exclusive game sales you would see that overall Sony's ps3 game sales really shine in comparison, and then figure in that they are quality titles from Sony. Its nothing to brag about when your console of choice in its 3rd year is in the mud when it comes to quality games.

Lemming talked bad about the ps3 in its first full year for not having much but again it was its FIRST year, not its 3rd year. Now the ps3 is coming off of a stellar 2nd year and is working on a super 3rd year. So as I see it the ps3 launched in Nov 06, and it won the year of 08 and is looking at winning 09 for its games. So really what this shows is that the 360 only reigned while there wasn't a ps3 on the market. Since its release the 360 games have been scoring lower and lower, and this is because the ps3 has raised the standards and MS and the 360 just aren't keeping up with these standards that the ps3 is laying out. Think most lemmings consider GRAW a 360 exclusive but don't want to admit that it was an exclusive because the ps3 wasn't even out yet lol.

[QUOTE="AlphaGamer469"]

[QUOTE="dukebd699"] Really? Because if I recall correctly, sales, not reviews bring in the money. A system can't win a system war if it doesn't sell as well no matter what games are out. I won all 3 so I'm not biased, I'm just pointing out that your logic is completely flawed.GreyFoXX4

Remember last gen when cows just sales mattered? now they somehow think that review scores are the only thing. Let's just disregard how much money the PS3 has lost Sony. I bet they dance in the streets every fiscal quarter. Yay, we keep losing money, but we have good GS scores...

Well better than praising MS for subpar low quality games and yelling yeee hawwww keep bringing in the money MS. I'm sure they are happy that their consumers praise them for selling them low quality hardware and half baked games so they can make a huge profit.

I'm almost willing to bet that you have more games from MS than Stock from MS. So again how does a bad made game that sells well make you feel better as a gamer?

And if you take Halo 3's sales away from MS exclusive game sales you would see that overall Sony's ps3 game sales really shine in comparison, and then figure in that they are quality titles from Sony. Its nothing to brag about when your console of choice in its 3rd year is in the mud when it comes to quality games.

Lemming talked bad about the ps3 in its first full year for not having much but again it was its FIRST year, not its 3rd year. Now the ps3 is coming off of a stellar 2nd year and is working on a super 3rd year. So as I see it the ps3 launched in Nov 06, and it won the year of 08 and is looking at winning 09 for its games. So really what this shows is that the 360 only reigned while there wasn't a ps3 on the market. Since its release the 360 games have been scoring lower and lower, and this is because the ps3 has raised the standards and MS and the 360 just aren't keeping up with these standards that the ps3 is laying out. Think most lemmings consider GRAW a 360 exclusive but don't want to admit that it was an exclusive because the ps3 wasn't even out yet lol.

The quality of the game is still a subjective point. all you have to point out is another persons opinion and then try to oppress said opinion on everyone else. Face reality, the games aren't selling good. The average PS3 owner avoids the supposed quality games. Most of the true gamers here spend the time to play the game and form their own opinion as opposed to people like you that try to oppress other opinions on the rest of us, BTW, PS3 is still 3rd and is still losing money.

[QUOTE="noble_aryan"]halo is milked to the fullest nd M$ are good avertisers thats y they sell lots. reviews r more importiant then sales......and all i have to say is...MGS5 :) finishedStevo_the_gamer

1. motorstorm 3.48 million
2. Uncharted 2.34 million
3. MGS4 4.04 million
4. GT5p 3.04 million
5. Rfom 3.59 million
6. LBP 2.21 million
7. KZ2 1.62 million
8. R2 1.55 million
9. R&C:tod 1.47 million
10. Heavenly Sword 1.36 million

Well I think thats pretty decent lol.

1. Halo 3 9.6 million
2. Gears of War 5.89 million
3. Forza 2 3.98 million
4. Fable II 2.75
5. Dead Rising 1.6 million
6. Viva Pinata 1.45 million
7. PGR 3 1.39 million
8. Halo Wars 1.23 million
9. Perfect Dark Zero 1.29 million
10. Splinter Cell Double Agane 1.14 million
11. DOA 4 1.01 million

And to think that the 360 has had a install base bigger the whole time. I would definitly say that Sony has had decent sales for its games. So now can all of this crap that Sony doesn't sale any games end please.

By the way these numbers are from vgchartz and I stopped listing once each consoles games was below 1 million in sales. Which Socom Confrontation is reaching 1 million in sales, along with Haze lol, and Hot Shots Golf: Out of bounds.

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="noble_aryan"]halo is milked to the fullest nd M$ are good avertisers thats y they sell lots. reviews r more importiant then sales......and all i have to say is...MGS5 :) finishedadman66

[QUOTE="adman66"][QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]So, let me guess -- five Halo games is milking, and over 23+ MGS games is not?GreyFoXX4

metal gear acid 1 & 2?

Another PS3 games thread turned into a sales thread by Alphagamer and other lemmings.

[QUOTE="GreyFoXX4"][QUOTE="adman66"] no its not , mgs doesn't count because its on the ps3 only........(this is a cow excuse all the time) but its not only mgs , R&C is on thier what... 7th game in 2 gens, ff13vs(a twist but still 13) gt5, gow3... see a patern.....CaseyWegner

metal gear acid 1 & 2?

A psp game for the franchise? Really? I mean really? Thats not miking that is giving psp owners a game from the mg universe. Well I guess MS just wanted rts fans to have a halo game made by another developer to play to huh lmao.

[QUOTE="GreyFoXX4"]

[QUOTE="AlphaGamer469"]

Remember last gen when cows just sales mattered? now they somehow think that review scores are the only thing. Let's just disregard how much money the PS3 has lost Sony. I bet they dance in the streets every fiscal quarter. Yay, we keep losing money, but we have good GS scores...

AlphaGamer469

Well better than praising MS for subpar low quality games and yelling yeee hawwww keep bringing in the money MS. I'm sure they are happy that their consumers praise them for selling them low quality hardware and half baked games so they can make a huge profit.

I'm almost willing to bet that you have more games from MS than Stock from MS. So again how does a bad made game that sells well make you feel better as a gamer?

And if you take Halo 3's sales away from MS exclusive game sales you would see that overall Sony's ps3 game sales really shine in comparison, and then figure in that they are quality titles from Sony. Its nothing to brag about when your console of choice in its 3rd year is in the mud when it comes to quality games.

Lemming talked bad about the ps3 in its first full year for not having much but again it was its FIRST year, not its 3rd year. Now the ps3 is coming off of a stellar 2nd year and is working on a super 3rd year. So as I see it the ps3 launched in Nov 06, and it won the year of 08 and is looking at winning 09 for its games. So really what this shows is that the 360 only reigned while there wasn't a ps3 on the market. Since its release the 360 games have been scoring lower and lower, and this is because the ps3 has raised the standards and MS and the 360 just aren't keeping up with these standards that the ps3 is laying out. Think most lemmings consider GRAW a 360 exclusive but don't want to admit that it was an exclusive because the ps3 wasn't even out yet lol.

The quality of the game is still a subjective point. all you have to point out is another persons opinion and then try to oppress said opinion on everyone else. Face reality, the games aren't selling good. The average PS3 owner avoids the supposed quality games. Most of the true gamers here spend the time to play the game and form their own opinion as opposed to people like you that try to oppress other opinions on the rest of us, BTW, PS3 is still 3rd and is still losing money.

[QUOTE="GreyFoXX4"]

[QUOTE="AlphaGamer469"]

Remember last gen when cows just sales mattered? now they somehow think that review scores are the only thing. Let's just disregard how much money the PS3 has lost Sony. I bet they dance in the streets every fiscal quarter. Yay, we keep losing money, but we have good GS scores...

AlphaGamer469

Well better than praising MS for subpar low quality games and yelling yeee hawwww keep bringing in the money MS. I'm sure they are happy that their consumers praise them for selling them low quality hardware and half baked games so they can make a huge profit.

I'm almost willing to bet that you have more games from MS than Stock from MS. So again how does a bad made game that sells well make you feel better as a gamer?

And if you take Halo 3's sales away from MS exclusive game sales you would see that overall Sony's ps3 game sales really shine in comparison, and then figure in that they are quality titles from Sony. Its nothing to brag about when your console of choice in its 3rd year is in the mud when it comes to quality games.

Lemming talked bad about the ps3 in its first full year for not having much but again it was its FIRST year, not its 3rd year. Now the ps3 is coming off of a stellar 2nd year and is working on a super 3rd year. So as I see it the ps3 launched in Nov 06, and it won the year of 08 and is looking at winning 09 for its games. So really what this shows is that the 360 only reigned while there wasn't a ps3 on the market. Since its release the 360 games have been scoring lower and lower, and this is because the ps3 has raised the standards and MS and the 360 just aren't keeping up with these standards that the ps3 is laying out. Think most lemmings consider GRAW a 360 exclusive but don't want to admit that it was an exclusive because the ps3 wasn't even out yet lol.

The quality of the game is still a subjective point. all you have to point out is another persons opinion and then try to oppress said opinion on everyone else. Face reality, the games aren't selling good. The average PS3 owner avoids the supposed quality games. Most of the true gamers here spend the time to play the game and form their own opinion as opposed to people like you that try to oppress other opinions on the rest of us, BTW, PS3 is still 3rd and is still losing money.

This is your way of justifying your disregard for PS3 games. You have said many times you dont like PS3 games, however this is such a decieving way for you to hide behind the "everyone has the right to an opinon/no opinion is wrong" line of reasoning.

There are many objective points to a game. Graphics, gameplay, etc, can be judged objectively. You dont have to like a game to appreciate it, but all I see you do is disregard the quality of PS3 games because you hide behind this disguise that in your opinion, they suck.

YOU may not like them, but its clear already that you are a major lemming. However, the majority of gamers, based on reviews, based on votes, regard the PS3 library as having great games. So what exactly is your point in relation to this thread?

YOU may not like them, but its clear already that you are a major lemming. However, the majority of gamers, based on reviews, based on votes, regard the PS3 library as having great games. So what exactly is your point in relation to this thread?

Alpha-Male22

On MetaCritic:

360

Ninja Blade has a 68 overall rating

Halo Wars has an 82 overall rating

Race Pro has a 72 overall rating

Raiden Figther Aces has a 71 overall rating

Star Ocean The Last Hope has an overall rating of 74

Stoked has an overall rating of 74

PS3

Killzone has a 91 overall rating

InFamous has an 85 overall rating

MLB 09 The Show has a 90 overall rating (Don't give me not exlcusive BS, because it is something on the PS3 not on the 360 and while it isnt exclusive it is relevant in making the argument the overall media confirms that so far PS3 > 360)

So there you have it. Every Retail exclusive so far this year. I don't think I missed any.

[QUOTE="RM84x"][QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

Lets hope so since 2007,2008, and 2009 still weren't ps3 years, Maybe the ps3 will finally outsell the 360 in 2010.

Where as halo wars alone will likely sell more then both infamous and killzone2 combined.

considering 2009 wont be anything special ofcoruse 2010 will be better

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

[QUOTE="RM84x"] Sony is owning 2009 when it comes to games. Sonys had Kz2 and Infamous. MS has had Ninja Blade and Halo Wars. LOL! GnR-SLaSh

Where as halo wars alone will likely sell more then both infamous and killzone2 combined.

[QUOTE="noble_aryan"]funny how the ps3 is the only console with AAA titles this year.Stevo_the_gamer

multiplat, DLC, multiplat.

[QUOTE="deathtarget04"]

[QUOTE="noble_aryan"]Uncharted 2 will end the 360's life by itself. so ya ps3 won 2009. it won 2008 tooAlphaGamer469

Completely subjective. I felt that 360 won 2008. The only games i like for ps3 were MGS4 and Valkyria chronicles. 360 had Gears2, fable 2, L4D Banjo and kazzooie and Castle crashers :) But hey dont take this as a fact.

As for 2009 i think every console is about equal. Ps3 has KZ2 which is amazingly fun. (dont have inFamous yet) 360 has Star ocean 4 and Halo wars.

I dont know why people just use gamespot scores to justify that 1 game is better than another.... its all opionion

Because Sony is in dead lasty and that's the only card they can play...

As opposed to sales? Oh please.

[QUOTE="GreyFoXX4"]

[QUOTE="AlphaGamer469"]

Remember last gen when cows just sales mattered? now they somehow think that review scores are the only thing. Let's just disregard how much money the PS3 has lost Sony. I bet they dance in the streets every fiscal quarter. Yay, we keep losing money, but we have good GS scores...

AlphaGamer469

Well better than praising MS for subpar low quality games and yelling yeee hawwww keep bringing in the money MS. I'm sure they are happy that their consumers praise them for selling them low quality hardware and half baked games so they can make a huge profit.

I'm almost willing to bet that you have more games from MS than Stock from MS. So again how does a bad made game that sells well make you feel better as a gamer?

And if you take Halo 3's sales away from MS exclusive game sales you would see that overall Sony's ps3 game sales really shine in comparison, and then figure in that they are quality titles from Sony. Its nothing to brag about when your console of choice in its 3rd year is in the mud when it comes to quality games.

Lemming talked bad about the ps3 in its first full year for not having much but again it was its FIRST year, not its 3rd year. Now the ps3 is coming off of a stellar 2nd year and is working on a super 3rd year. So as I see it the ps3 launched in Nov 06, and it won the year of 08 and is looking at winning 09 for its games. So really what this shows is that the 360 only reigned while there wasn't a ps3 on the market. Since its release the 360 games have been scoring lower and lower, and this is because the ps3 has raised the standards and MS and the 360 just aren't keeping up with these standards that the ps3 is laying out. Think most lemmings consider GRAW a 360 exclusive but don't want to admit that it was an exclusive because the ps3 wasn't even out yet lol.

The quality of the game is still a subjective point. all you have to point out is another persons opinion and then try to oppress said opinion on everyone else. Face reality, the games aren't selling good. The average PS3 owner avoids the supposed quality games. Most of the true gamers here spend the time to play the game and form their own opinion as opposed to people like you that try to oppress other opinions on the rest of us, BTW, PS3 is still 3rd and is still losing money.

Quality of games is subjective, that's why people use sites like metacritic as evidence that qualified game reviewers agree which games are good.

When all else fails just fall back on sales amiright? Btw that 7 silver 17 bronze trophy card doesn't mean much when all you do is PS3 bashing.

[QUOTE="AlphaGamer469"]

[QUOTE="GreyFoXX4"]

Well better than praising MS for subpar low quality games and yelling yeee hawwww keep bringing in the money MS. I'm sure they are happy that their consumers praise them for selling them low quality hardware and half baked games so they can make a huge profit.

I'm almost willing to bet that you have more games from MS than Stock from MS. So again how does a bad made game that sells well make you feel better as a gamer?

And if you take Halo 3's sales away from MS exclusive game sales you would see that overall Sony's ps3 game sales really shine in comparison, and then figure in that they are quality titles from Sony. Its nothing to brag about when your console of choice in its 3rd year is in the mud when it comes to quality games.

Lemming talked bad about the ps3 in its first full year for not having much but again it was its FIRST year, not its 3rd year. Now the ps3 is coming off of a stellar 2nd year and is working on a super 3rd year. So as I see it the ps3 launched in Nov 06, and it won the year of 08 and is looking at winning 09 for its games. So really what this shows is that the 360 only reigned while there wasn't a ps3 on the market. Since its release the 360 games have been scoring lower and lower, and this is because the ps3 has raised the standards and MS and the 360 just aren't keeping up with these standards that the ps3 is laying out. Think most lemmings consider GRAW a 360 exclusive but don't want to admit that it was an exclusive because the ps3 wasn't even out yet lol.

Gxgear

The quality of the game is still a subjective point. all you have to point out is another persons opinion and then try to oppress said opinion on everyone else. Face reality, the games aren't selling good. The average PS3 owner avoids the supposed quality games. Most of the true gamers here spend the time to play the game and form their own opinion as opposed to people like you that try to oppress other opinions on the rest of us, BTW, PS3 is still 3rd and is still losing money.

Quality of games is subjective, that's why people use sites like metacritic as evidence that qualified game reviewers agree which games are good.

When all else fails just fall back on sales amiright? Btw that 7 silver 17 bronze trophy card doesn't mean much when all you do is PS3 bashing.

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="noble_aryan"]funny how the ps3 is the only console with AAA titles this year.Gxgear

multiplat, DLC, multiplat.

Puzzle me this, Why is next year always the Year of the PS3? BoloTheGreat

Because the PS3 has been owning?

Puzzle me this, Why is next year always the Year of the PS3? BoloTheGreat

Same reason why every year is the year PS3 will die. :P

[QUOTE="BoloTheGreat"]Puzzle me this, Why is next year always the Year of the PS3? Lionheart08

Same reason why every year is the year PS3 will die. :P

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

[QUOTE="RM84x"] Sony is owning 2009 when it comes to games. Sonys had Kz2 and Infamous. MS has had Ninja Blade and Halo Wars. LOL! SilverChimera

Where as halo wars alone will likely sell more then both infamous and killzone2 combined.

I'll bet you bought at least one fail movie game before, right? They sell good usually...

anyway, this topic was a flame war from the start.

like 2008 and2009 we will own 2010. Sony chants

i only see 2 i know of , gt and twisted metal the others will have to wait and see , i cant rely on hype , ,nor can i rely on sonys brand name ,

i find it funny some one think a b ad game such as halo wars is better then kill zone 2 , ,

ill pass , i rather play mario party before i even touch halo wars , mario party got a bettter score to l ol lol . so ya play sales, play numbers in the end you lose , ,

i play games on all 6 , ,and thats why i own them

[QUOTE="Lionheart08"]

[QUOTE="BoloTheGreat"]Puzzle me this, Why is next year always the Year of the PS3? BoloTheGreat

Same reason why every year is the year PS3 will die. :P

I see where you coming from. Makes me kinda glad I sat out the gen for a while. Looking at the PS3 now, it has a respectable lineup, but from launch to early 08..yeah not that impressive.

[QUOTE="Gxgear"]

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]PC has Burnout Paradise, and the Xbox 360 has Lost and Damned (Metacritic) along with Street Fighter 4; looks like you're wrong, mate. Stevo_the_gamer

multiplat, DLC, multiplat.

Read topic title? :roll:

Read topic title? :roll:

Gxgear

[QUOTE="BoloTheGreat"][QUOTE="Lionheart08"]

Same reason why every year is the year PS3 will die. :P

I see where you coming from. Makes me kinda glad I sat out the gen for a while. Looking at the PS3 now, it has a respectable lineup, but from launch to early 08..yeah not that impressive.

[QUOTE="Gxgear"]Read topic title? :roll:

Stevo_the_gamer

Did and if you paid a little bit more attention you would see that in order for his statement to be correct, he must either 1. forgot about SFIV, or 2. staying on topic (ie. EXCLUSIVES!).

I'm going with option 2, considering how popular SFIV is right now and it falls in line with what the title suggests.

[QUOTE="Lionheart08"]

[QUOTE="BoloTheGreat"] well it has been this way (for both things, well pointed out) since 2006. it's always "Year of the PS3" or "Sony will cancel PS3" every year. It's just there always seems to be more on the horizon than there is on the dammed thing, it's frustrating, like running down an extending corridor. GreyFoXX4

I see where you coming from. Makes me kinda glad I sat out the gen for a while. Looking at the PS3 now, it has a respectable lineup, but from launch to early 08..yeah not that impressive.

Why do you think 360 had a bad first year? First, it was the first next gen console and there were a ton of updated games (Burnout, GH, etc), and second, didnt Halo come out the first year?

Since they had no competition, they had a great year. I always thought it was a sneaky move to end the Xbox so fast, but with how much of a fail that was, it's reasonable that MS jumped next gen early. Too bad they were too scared of Sony/Nintendo since they released a garbage piece of hardware.

I hope the same doesnt happen with Sony. I trust theyll come through with their 10 year plan

Did and if you paid a little bit more attention you would see that in order for his statement to be correct, he must either 1. forgot about SFIV, or 2. staying on topic (ie. EXCLUSIVES!).

I'm going with option 2, considering how popular SFIV is right now and it falls in line with what the title suggests.

Gxgear

[QUOTE="Gxgear"]

Did and if you paid a little bit more attention you would see that in order for his statement to be correct, he must either 1. forgot about SFIV, or 2. staying on topic (ie. EXCLUSIVES!).

I'm going with option 2, considering how popular SFIV is right now and it falls in line with what the title suggests.

Stevo_the_gamer

So THAT'S what the E is for!

So a AAAAE is a 10/10 Exclusive?

AAA is a 9+

AA is an 8

A an 7!

All makes sense now.

[QUOTE="Gxgear"]

Did and if you paid a little bit more attention you would see that in order for his statement to be correct, he must either 1. forgot about SFIV, or 2. staying on topic (ie. EXCLUSIVES!).

I'm going with option 2, considering how popular SFIV is right now and it falls in line with what the title suggests.

Stevo_the_gamer

If you knew he meant AAAEs why list anything but?

[QUOTE="noble_aryan"][QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]Owning with two exclusives?AlphaGamer469

[QUOTE="AlphaGamer469"][QUOTE="noble_aryan"]Uncharted 2 will end the 360's life by itself. so ya ps3 won 2009. it won 2008 toocoltsfan4ever