2012....Year of the PS3/SONY Confirmed.

[QUOTE="CajunShooter"]Can't ask much more from Sony in 2011. Sony delivered a A-AAA exclusive in 9 of the 12 months of the year. KC_Hokie

Damn, the ownage is strong.

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"] So it shows PS3 fanbois pump up PS3 exclusives but when it was time to actually buy them didn't in 2011.

CajunShooter

Again, welcome to the multiplatform generation. This isn't the PS2 or PS era.

Behind not only Uncharted 2 but Uncharted as well the last time I checked. KC_Hokie

Uncharted 3 will sell plenty over the next 2 years.

People hype PS3 exclusives to death all of 2011...

then Modern Warfare 3 comes and outsells every PS3 exclusives combined (on PS3, of course), becoming the best-selling PS3 game in history.

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Just answering the question...dude.Slashkice

Wrongly. Again.

Dude ;D

[QUOTE="StrongDeadlift"]

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

You confirmed it to be year of before the year even begins? Well I'm glad cows never get sick of that line.

Nothing on that list is really doing anything special for me. (TLG needs some gameplay and vids before I will get super hyped)

Also rofl, sly raccoon? At least get the name of what you're hyping correct. SLY COOPER.

AtariKidX

As for me, I dont give a f*ck about PS3 (or this generation in general) anymore. Im ready for next gen. I'll wait around for the re-reveal of the Wii-U and see what its all about, and if its cheap/worth it i'll get it. Other than that, PS3 lost this generation dude, just give it up.......5 years from now, people are going to look back and remember PS3 as one of the biggest failures EVER, and wont give a damn about all these "exclusives". That being said, Sony isnt even giving them the support they deserve anyways.

I say f*ck the PS3. no PS4, no care.

Sly Raccoon is the name in Europe......lol

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Behind not only Uncharted 2 but Uncharted as well the last time I checked. CajunShooter

Uncharted 3 will sell plenty over the next 2 years.

it's Sly COOPER 4 not sly racoon. You should be ashamed of yourself. Technically it's Sly: thieves in Time

it's Sly COOPER 4 not sly racoon. You should be ashamed of yourself.layton2012

He corrected everyone.

In Europe it's called Sly Raccoon. See his post above.

I still don't understand how PS3 games are better than 360 games, and the other way around. Can someone please explain this to me?

Im not going to speak on the quality of the games themselves, but if we are talking about what will be remembered, then you HAVE to take relevance into account. And in terms of relevance, people are going to look back at the xbox360 and remember Halo, Gears, Forza, and Call of Duty (which might as well be called a 360 exclusive. Thats the platform it will be associated with reguardless), as well as their advancements in Xbox Live (which is basically a synonym for "online gaming"). The 360 is going to be remembered this gen as the industry standard platform.

Again, in terms of RELEVANCE, the only thing PS3 has that will legitimately be remembered/relevant in the real world will be Uncharted and Gran Turismo. (and maybe Metal Gear Solid 4). In reality, while exclusives DO matter, not only did they come too little too late, but Sony doesnt even give them ANY mainstream marketing. The mainstream simply doesnt care about PS3 exclusives, and most people outside of the internet dont even know they exist. (again, outside of Uncharted, Gran Turismo, and Metal Gear). Again, im not speaking on the quality of those games, but in terms of RELEVANCE, and its Sony's fault. Sony failed these games by not agressively marketing them and giving them any market penetration. Nobody is going to talk about them/remember them 5 years from now. They are going to remember the PS3 as the console that launched at $600, with NO GAMES for 2 years, and was inferior in every possible way to the 360 in features (minus Blu Ray player). Not to mention the PSN hack, etc...

StrongDeadlift

So very correct. The real world isn't like the safe little bubble System Warriors reside in here...

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="AtariKidX"]

Sly Raccoon is the name in Europe......lol

AtariKidX

Welp, I admit to being wrong. Jumped the gun there. What you said is still none sense but I was wrong about the name. (what a terrible name)

Maybe a terrible name but very fun games.

For once I agree with you.

it's Sly COOPER 4 not sly racoon. You should be ashamed of yourself.layton2012

And again.....Sly Raccoon is the name in Europe and i live in Europe.You should be ashamed of yourself....lol

Mk....doesn't refute my point that every single 2011 PS3 exclusive sequel sold worse than its predecessor. Once again this is the age of the multiplatform. KC_Hokie

[QUOTE="Slashkice"]

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Just answering the question...dude.KC_Hokie

Wrongly. Again.

Dude ;D

You said "selling", which implies the speed of sales, which includes time.

If you said "has sold" I would agree with you.

I still don't understand how PS3 games are better than 360 games, and the other way around. Can someone please explain this to me?

vtoshkatur

It all comes down to this strange little thing called opinion..You play the respective games and take it from there..

[QUOTE="layton2012"]it's Sly COOPER 4 not sly racoon. You should be ashamed of yourself.MLBknights58

He corrected everyone.

In Europe it's called Sly Raccoon. See his post above.

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Mk....doesn't refute my point that every single 2011 PS3 exclusive sequel sold worse than its predecessor. Once again this is the age of the multiplatform. CajunShooter

It also doesn't change the fact we are in the age of the multiplatform.

People hype PS3 exclusives to death all of 2011...

then Modern Warfare 3 comes and outsells every PS3 exclusives combined (on PS3, of course), becoming the best-selling PS3 game in history.

WickoSicko

It was predictable right :)?

[QUOTE="layton2012"]it's Sly COOPER 4 not sly racoon. You should be ashamed of yourself.AtariKidX

[QUOTE="WickoSicko"]

People hype PS3 exclusives to death all of 2011...

then Modern Warfare 3 comes and outsells every PS3 exclusives combined (on PS3, of course), becoming the best-selling PS3 game in history.

speedfog

It was predictable right :)?

Maybe it was.

Or wait, was it?

[QUOTE="AtariKidX"]

[QUOTE="StrongDeadlift"] :lol:He doesnt even know the NAME of the game he's hyping. Shows you how much he cares about his PS3 exclusives ;).

As for me, I dont give a f*ck about PS3 (or this generation in general) anymore. Im ready for next gen. I'll wait around for the re-reveal of the Wii-U and see what its all about, and if its cheap/worth it i'll get it. Other than that, PS3 lost this generation dude, just give it up.......5 years from now, people are going to look back and remember PS3 as one of the biggest failures EVER, and wont give a damn about all these "exclusives". That being said, Sony isnt even giving them the support they deserve anyways.

I say f*ck the PS3. no PS4, no care.

StrongDeadlift

Sly Raccoon is the name in Europe......lol

[QUOTE="vtoshkatur"]

I still don't understand how PS3 games are better than 360 games, and the other way around. Can someone please explain this to me?

balfe1990

It all comes down to this strange little thing called opinion..You play the respective games and take it from there..

I still don't understand the fanboyism and so called "graphics comparisons" from the twin sub HD consoles.

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Mk....doesn't refute my point that every single 2011 PS3 exclusive sequel sold worse than its predecessor. Once again this is the age of the multiplatform. CajunShooter

They probably won't though. R3 isn't going to sell more than R1 in all likelihood. Basically, all the older games are still going to be selling as well. I don't see why anyone needs to defend the integrity of their system from sales scrutiny though. I thought only sheep played sales?

[QUOTE="AtariKidX"][QUOTE="layton2012"]it's Sly COOPER 4 not sly racoon. You should be ashamed of yourself.layton2012

[QUOTE="CajunShooter"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Mk....doesn't refute my point that every single 2011 PS3 exclusive sequel sold worse than its predecessor. Once again this is the age of the multiplatform. KC_Hokie

God of War 4 hasn't been announced yet...

[QUOTE="speedfog"]

[QUOTE="WickoSicko"]

People hype PS3 exclusives to death all of 2011...

then Modern Warfare 3 comes and outsells every PS3 exclusives combined (on PS3, of course), becoming the best-selling PS3 game in history.

WickoSicko

It was predictable right :)?

Maybe it was.

Or wait, was it?

Well since COD outsells every year every game, I think so :P.

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]

[QUOTE="CajunShooter"] Wasn't aware that the PS3 exclusives that came out this year won't be selling any more copies over the next couple years. All these games could have lifetime sales greater than its predecessors.CajunShooter

Again, welcome to the age of multiplatform where the two best selling PS3 games are multiplatforms called Call of Duty. And were multiplatforms crush Xbox 360 and PS3 exclusives combined in sales.

[QUOTE="layton2012"][QUOTE="AtariKidX"] And again.....Sly Raccoon is the name in Europe.You should be ashamed of yourself....lolAtariKidX

[QUOTE="CajunShooter"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Mk....doesn't refute my point that every single 2011 PS3 exclusive sequel sold worse than its predecessor. Once again this is the age of the multiplatform. KC_Hokie

It also doesn't change the fact we are in the age of the multiplatform.

That's fine, its true besides U3. I don't see why that denies the PS3 the crown though. Great games the majority didn't play. Yet SW isn't based on the majority, its based on its stupid little bubble of none existant logic propelled by extremely few. Why would you thihk games selling less is worse? Is SMG2 a failure because it sold half of what SMG1 sold?

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]

[QUOTE="CajunShooter"] Wasn't aware that the PS3 exclusives that came out this year won't be selling any more copies over the next couple years. All these games could have lifetime sales greater than its predecessors.ActicEdge

It also doesn't change the fact we are in the age of the multiplatform.

That's fine, its true besides U3. I don't see why that denies the PS3 the crown though. Great games the majority didn't play. Yet SW isn't based on the majority, its based on its stupid little bubble of none existant logic propelled by extremely few. Why would you thihk games selling less is worse? Is SMG2 a failure because it sold half of what SMG1 sold?

[QUOTE="rasengan2552"][QUOTE="StrongDeadlift"] :lol:He doesnt even know the NAME of the game he's hyping. Shows you how much he cares about his PS3 exclusives ;).

As for me, I dont give a f*ck about PS3 (or this generation in general) anymore. Im ready for next gen. I'll wait around for the re-reveal of the Wii-U and see what its all about, and if its cheap/worth it i'll get it. Other than that, PS3 lost this generation dude, just give it up.......5 years from now, people are going to look back and remember PS3 as one of the biggest failures EVER, and wont give a damn about all these "exclusives". That being said, Sony isnt even giving them the support they deserve anyways.

I say f*ck the PS3. no PS4, no care.

StrongDeadlift

Im not going to speak on the quality of the games themselves, but if we are talking about what will be remembered, then you HAVE to take relevance into account. And in terms of relevance, people are going to look back at the xbox360 and remember Halo, Gears, Forza, and Call of Duty (which might as well be called a 360 exclusive. Thats the platform it will be associated with reguardless), as well as their advancements in Xbox Live (which is basically a synonym for "online gaming"). The 360 is going to be remembered this gen as the industry standard platform.

Again, in terms of RELEVANCE, the only thing PS3 has that will legitimately be remembered/relevant in the real world will be Uncharted and Gran Turismo. (and maybe Metal Gear Solid 4). In reality, while exclusives DO matter, not only did they come too little too late, but Sony doesnt even give them ANY mainstream marketing. The mainstream simply doesnt care about PS3 exclusives, and most people outside of the internet dont even know they exist. (again, outside of Uncharted, Gran Turismo, and Metal Gear). Again, im not speaking on the quality of those games, but in terms of RELEVANCE, and its Sony's fault. Sony failed these games by not agressively marketing them and giving them any market penetration. Nobody is going to talk about them/remember them 5 years from now. They are going to remember the PS3 as the console that launched at $600, with NO GAMES for 2 years, and was inferior in every possible way to the 360 in features (minus Blu Ray player). Not to mention the PSN hack, etc...

COD is hardly asscociated with just the 360? Its a large seller on the PS3 nearing 7+ million units. Its recognizedas a multiplat franchise.

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]There are more PS3s now than there were when the predecessors were released and yet they all sold worse in 2011. You can try to spin this fact all you want.

It also doesn't change the fact we are in the age of the multiplatform.

KC_Hokie

That's fine, its true besides U3. I don't see why that denies the PS3 the crown though. Great games the majority didn't play. Yet SW isn't based on the majority, its based on its stupid little bubble of none existant logic propelled by extremely few. Why would you thihk games selling less is worse? Is SMG2 a failure because it sold half of what SMG1 sold?

So it can't be year of the PS3 because of sales? You're trying to argue year of is a sales thing? I would argue that the majority of PS3 users here did buy those overhyped exclusives and SW is about the users as they dictate the topic of discussion :|

I'm sure they'll beat the PC next year....

[QUOTE="StrongDeadlift"]

[QUOTE="rasengan2552"] people remember the games not the hardware my friend ... PS3 library = memorable games 360 = Kinect.ActicEdge

Im not going to speak on the quality of the games themselves, but if we are talking about what will be remembered, then you HAVE to take relevance into account. And in terms of relevance, people are going to look back at the xbox360 and remember Halo, Gears, Forza, and Call of Duty (which might as well be called a 360 exclusive. Thats the platform it will be associated with reguardless), as well as their advancements in Xbox Live (which is basically a synonym for "online gaming"). The 360 is going to be remembered this gen as the industry standard platform.

Again, in terms of RELEVANCE, the only thing PS3 has that will legitimately be remembered/relevant in the real world will be Uncharted and Gran Turismo. (and maybe Metal Gear Solid 4). In reality, while exclusives DO matter, not only did they come too little too late, but Sony doesnt even give them ANY mainstream marketing. The mainstream simply doesnt care about PS3 exclusives, and most people outside of the internet dont even know they exist. (again, outside of Uncharted, Gran Turismo, and Metal Gear). Again, im not speaking on the quality of those games, but in terms of RELEVANCE, and its Sony's fault. Sony failed these games by not agressively marketing them and giving them any market penetration. Nobody is going to talk about them/remember them 5 years from now. They are going to remember the PS3 as the console that launched at $600, with NO GAMES for 2 years, and was inferior in every possible way to the 360 in features (minus Blu Ray player). Not to mention the PSN hack, etc...

COD is hardly asscociated with just the 360? Its a large seller on the PS3 nearing 7+ million units. Its recognizedas a multiplat franchise.

Have people already forgotten that Black Ops is the best-selling PS3 game of all time?

The only game beating that is Modern Warfare 3.

Meaning the two best-selling game on the PS3 platform belong to the COD franchise.

Have people forgotten that?

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

That's fine, its true besides U3. I don't see why that denies the PS3 the crown though. Great games the majority didn't play. Yet SW isn't based on the majority, its based on its stupid little bubble of none existant logic propelled by extremely few. Why would you thihk games selling less is worse? Is SMG2 a failure because it sold half of what SMG1 sold?

ActicEdge

So it can't be year of the PS3 because of sales? You're trying to argue year of is a sales thing? I would argue that the majority of PS3 users here did buy those overhyped exclusives and SW is about the users as they dictate the topic of discussion :|

I'm trying to welcome him to the age of the multiplatform. He has the PS2 era mentality going on.

lol...another 'year of the PS3 exclusive'. Never heard that before.

Heard that for every year on SW including 2011. 2011 turned out to be the year of the over-hyped PS3 sequel exclusive that sold worse than its predecessor.

We are now in the multiplatform generation buddy. Get out of the PS2 mentality.

KC_Hokie

did somebody really try to make COD out to be a 360 exclusive ? I would assume not.

Halo IV is > about 90% of that combined.Spartan070

[QUOTE="StrongDeadlift"]

[QUOTE="rasengan2552"] people remember the games not the hardware my friend ... PS3 library = memorable games 360 = Kinect.ActicEdge

Im not going to speak on the quality of the games themselves, but if we are talking about what will be remembered, then you HAVE to take relevance into account. And in terms of relevance, people are going to look back at the xbox360 and remember Halo, Gears, Forza, and Call of Duty (which might as well be called a 360 exclusive. Thats the platform it will be associated with reguardless), as well as their advancements in Xbox Live (which is basically a synonym for "online gaming"). The 360 is going to be remembered this gen as the industry standard platform.

Again, in terms of RELEVANCE, the only thing PS3 has that will legitimately be remembered/relevant in the real world will be Uncharted and Gran Turismo. (and maybe Metal Gear Solid 4). In reality, while exclusives DO matter, not only did they come too little too late, but Sony doesnt even give them ANY mainstream marketing. The mainstream simply doesnt care about PS3 exclusives, and most people outside of the internet dont even know they exist. (again, outside of Uncharted, Gran Turismo, and Metal Gear). Again, im not speaking on the quality of those games, but in terms of RELEVANCE, and its Sony's fault. Sony failed these games by not agressively marketing them and giving them any market penetration. Nobody is going to talk about them/remember them 5 years from now. They are going to remember the PS3 as the console that launched at $600, with NO GAMES for 2 years, and was inferior in every possible way to the 360 in features (minus Blu Ray player). Not to mention the PSN hack, etc...

COD is hardly asscociated with just the 360? Its a large seller on the PS3 nearing 7+ million units. Its recognizedas a multiplat franchise.

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="StrongDeadlift"]

Im not going to speak on the quality of the games themselves, but if we are talking about what will be remembered, then you HAVE to take relevance into account. And in terms of relevance, people are going to look back at the xbox360 and remember Halo, Gears, Forza, and Call of Duty (which might as well be called a 360 exclusive. Thats the platform it will be associated with reguardless), as well as their advancements in Xbox Live (which is basically a synonym for "online gaming"). The 360 is going to be remembered this gen as the industry standard platform.

Again, in terms of RELEVANCE, the only thing PS3 has that will legitimately be remembered/relevant in the real world will be Uncharted and Gran Turismo. (and maybe Metal Gear Solid 4). In reality, while exclusives DO matter, not only did they come too little too late, but Sony doesnt even give them ANY mainstream marketing. The mainstream simply doesnt care about PS3 exclusives, and most people outside of the internet dont even know they exist. (again, outside of Uncharted, Gran Turismo, and Metal Gear). Again, im not speaking on the quality of those games, but in terms of RELEVANCE, and its Sony's fault. Sony failed these games by not agressively marketing them and giving them any market penetration. Nobody is going to talk about them/remember them 5 years from now. They are going to remember the PS3 as the console that launched at $600, with NO GAMES for 2 years, and was inferior in every possible way to the 360 in features (minus Blu Ray player). Not to mention the PSN hack, etc...

WickoSicko

COD is hardly asscociated with just the 360? Its a large seller on the PS3 nearing 7+ million units. Its recognizedas a multiplat franchise.

Have people already forgotten that Black Ops is the best-selling PS3 game of all time?

The only game beating that is Modern Warfare 3.

Meaning the two best-selling game on the PS3 platform belong to the COD franchise.

Have people forgotten that?

When it's time to actually buy games PS3 owners, like Xbox 360 owner, buy multiplatforms. Welcome to the age of the multiplatform 'year of the PS3' cheerleading squad.

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Read my original post please. I was arguing against this 'year of the PS3' bs. We heard it this time last year for 2011 and yet when it was time to actually purchase the PS3 exclusives PS3 owner generally didn't. Every single PS3 exclusive sequel in 2011 sold worse than its predecessor.KC_Hokie

So it can't be year of the PS3 because of sales? You're trying to argue year of is a sales thing? I would argue that the majority of PS3 users here did buy those overhyped exclusives and SW is about the users as they dictate the topic of discussion :|

I'm trying to welcome him to the age of the multiplatform. He has the PS2 era mentality going on.

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="StrongDeadlift"]

Im not going to speak on the quality of the games themselves, but if we are talking about what will be remembered, then you HAVE to take relevance into account. And in terms of relevance, people are going to look back at the xbox360 and remember Halo, Gears, Forza, and Call of Duty (which might as well be called a 360 exclusive. Thats the platform it will be associated with reguardless), as well as their advancements in Xbox Live (which is basically a synonym for "online gaming"). The 360 is going to be remembered this gen as the industry standard platform.

Again, in terms of RELEVANCE, the only thing PS3 has that will legitimately be remembered/relevant in the real world will be Uncharted and Gran Turismo. (and maybe Metal Gear Solid 4). In reality, while exclusives DO matter, not only did they come too little too late, but Sony doesnt even give them ANY mainstream marketing. The mainstream simply doesnt care about PS3 exclusives, and most people outside of the internet dont even know they exist. (again, outside of Uncharted, Gran Turismo, and Metal Gear). Again, im not speaking on the quality of those games, but in terms of RELEVANCE, and its Sony's fault. Sony failed these games by not agressively marketing them and giving them any market penetration. Nobody is going to talk about them/remember them 5 years from now. They are going to remember the PS3 as the console that launched at $600, with NO GAMES for 2 years, and was inferior in every possible way to the 360 in features (minus Blu Ray player). Not to mention the PSN hack, etc...

StrongDeadlift

COD is hardly asscociated with just the 360? Its a large seller on the PS3 nearing 7+ million units. Its recognizedas a multiplat franchise.

Last I checked MW3 was a multiplat so I have no idea what you're talking about.

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Read my original post please. I was arguing against this 'year of the PS3' bs. We heard it this time last year for 2011 and yet when it was time to actually purchase the PS3 exclusives PS3 owner generally didn't. Every single PS3 exclusive sequel in 2011 sold worse than its predecessor.KC_Hokie

So it can't be year of the PS3 because of sales? You're trying to argue year of is a sales thing? I would argue that the majority of PS3 users here did buy those overhyped exclusives and SW is about the users as they dictate the topic of discussion :|

I'm trying to welcome him to the age of the multiplatform. He has the PS2 era mentality going on.

Your point is stupid. Pick one, is it games or is it sales? Does having the best games make it your year or does having the best sales make it your year? I can't be both.

While some of the PS3 exclusives are great and really fun to play they get way too much credit here on SW.

TLG looks promising though :)

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]

lol...another 'year of the PS3 exclusive'. Never heard that before.

Heard that for every year on SW including 2011. 2011 turned out to be the year of the over-hyped PS3 sequel exclusive that sold worse than its predecessor.

We are now in the multiplatform generation buddy. Get out of the PS2 mentality.

Mozelleple112