A game loses its cinematic feel at 30fps. 24fps works much better for games & movies. 30 fps for games is just silly; 60fps is even sillier. Trust me, I'm a dev.
#lolatpcgamers , you guys know nothing.
i c wat u did there
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f83aa/f83aa63f266fd5650277a6707221a203d2e2cf60" alt=""
@Krelian-co: There's more too it than that. 60FPS looks cheap. Like a daytime soap-opera. Great when fluid motion is a constant, not so much when the entire frame and the relative (mostly static) position of all the objects on screen matters. Small things like characters breathing looks off in 60.
In any case. 60FPS is really one of those things that is a major boon but a minor loss to not. After all, you stop noticing some 10 minutes into playing a game anyway (irrespective of which way you go).
The only reason many people think 30FPS is sluggish or choppy is because they've not played games with properly implemented framecaps (common on PC games and increasingly on console games post-PS2 era), leading to juddering and constant (but minor) frame fluctuations. People confound that lack of fluidity with the framerate when it's actually the capping at fault.
60 fps tv and film looks off because you're used to seeing it at low fps your whole life.
24 fps was decided on because it requires less film which in turn saves a lot of money. Lugging around 60 fps film reels would have been a bitch too.
I will go out on a limb and say that if movie and tv were traditionally 60 fps and then a movie came out at low fps, people would hate it. They would complain about how blurry it gets when the camera is panning, movement being choppy and that it just looks looks plain weird. In that reality I could see trippy movies like Requeim for a Dream using 24 fps.
Fixed the title for you.
u didn't fix it you're trying to justify your life savings being spent on a rig
life savings? well that officially explains why you are so salty against pc if you think a couple thousand dollars are "life savings"
It's not even a couple of thousand for most, unless you want the whole multi monitor, multi high end card set up.
This myth is irritating enough, don't feed it.
There are posters here who keep trying to make out we have to spend so much money. For a single monitor set up like most have, we really don't.
Fixed the title for you.
u didn't fix it you're trying to justify your life savings being spent on a rig
or you're trying to justify your life savings being spent on crappy hardware that can't do 60fps?
Nope, every game would look better at 60 fps, EVERY SINGLE ONE, you can keep drinking your cool laid and tell yourself it isn't true, but it is. For the record i played a few months ago silent hill 2 and 3 and they ran and looked great at 60 fps, just the bump in resolution and fps made them look better than their "hd release"
Ofc consolites will try to justify their lol 30 fps, just like you, kinda sad.
And every game is better with an excellent online experience such that Forza gives (and 5 club does not).
steam is better, and it's free, get jelly consolite. but thanks for showing us how salty you are to bring a completely different topic into discussion.
steam is not better. it's different. Microsoft blows steam away when it comes to match-making and lobby wait times. It ain't even close son. Pull your head out of your rear and get some air. Now as far as offering deals on games, steam is killing everybody. I'll give ya that. Hey, I love steam. Looove it. But let's be real here kiddo. The ps network is a distant, and I mean very distant 3rd. bwaaahahahahahaaaaa! Moo-Moo buck-a-roo. Moo Moo!
Nope, every game would look better at 60 fps, EVERY SINGLE ONE, you can keep drinking your cool laid and tell yourself it isn't true, but it is. For the record i played a few months ago silent hill 2 and 3 and they ran and looked great at 60 fps, just the bump in resolution and fps made them look better than their "hd release"
Ofc consolites will try to justify their lol 30 fps, just like you, kinda sad.
And every game is better with an excellent online experience such that Forza gives (and 5 club does not).
steam is better, and it's free, get jelly consolite. but thanks for showing us how salty you are to bring a completely different topic into discussion.
steam is not better. it's different. Microsoft blows steam away when it comes to match-making and lobby wait times. It ain't even close son. Pull your head out of your rear and get some air. Now as far as offering deals on games, steam is killing everybody. I'll give ya that. Hey, I love steam. Looove it. But let's be real here kiddo. The ps network is a distant, and I mean very distant 3rd. bwaaahahahahahaaaaa! Moo-Moo buck-a-roo. Moo Moo!
hahahah just because you say some fanboy bs doesn't mean is true. Microsoft has better lobby and match making times? bs. you are jst butthurt that teh microsoft cloud cannot surpass a free service like steam, so let's recap, it is better and it is free, yeah, STEAM WINS.
Nope, every game would look better at 60 fps, EVERY SINGLE ONE, you can keep drinking your cool laid and tell yourself it isn't true, but it is. For the record i played a few months ago silent hill 2 and 3 and they ran and looked great at 60 fps, just the bump in resolution and fps made them look better than their "hd release"
Ofc consolites will try to justify their lol 30 fps, just like you, kinda sad.
And every game is better with an excellent online experience such that Forza gives (and 5 club does not).
steam is better, and it's free, get jelly consolite. but thanks for showing us how salty you are to bring a completely different topic into discussion.
steam is not better. it's different. Microsoft blows steam away when it comes to match-making and lobby wait times. It ain't even close son. Pull your head out of your rear and get some air. Now as far as offering deals on games, steam is killing everybody. I'll give ya that. Hey, I love steam. Looove it. But let's be real here kiddo. The ps network is a distant, and I mean very distant 3rd. bwaaahahahahahaaaaa! Moo-Moo buck-a-roo. Moo Moo!
hahahah just because you say some fanboy bs doesn't mean is true. Microsoft has better lobby and match making times? bs. you are jst butthurt that teh microsoft cloud cannot surpass a free service like steam, so let's recap, it is better and it is free, yeah, STEAM WINS.
hahaha you can't handle the truth. hahahaha. you're the one butt-hurt. so let's stop talking about steam and ms and talk about dat ps-network. bwaaahahahahahaha!
Fixed the title for you.
u didn't fix it you're trying to justify your life savings being spent on a rig
or you're trying to justify your life savings being spent on crappy hardware that can't do 60fps?
consoles do 60 fps where its needed. go play cow simulator on your $5,000 rig LMFAO
bums
Fixed the title for you.
u didn't fix it you're trying to justify your life savings being spent on a rig
or you're trying to justify your life savings being spent on crappy hardware that can't do 60fps?
consoles do 60 fps where its needed. go play cow simulator on your $5,000 rig LMFAO
bums
Lol, no they don't.
No game in any universe is 30 FPS better. Only reason I can think of is if your console gamer and your eye brainwashed to 30fps thinking its the norm.
Nope, every game would look better at 60 fps, EVERY SINGLE ONE, you can keep drinking your cool laid and tell yourself it isn't true, but it is. For the record i played a few months ago silent hill 2 and 3 and they ran and looked great at 60 fps, just the bump in resolution and fps made them look better than their "hd release"
Ofc consolites will try to justify their lol 30 fps, just like you, kinda sad.
And every game is better with an excellent online experience such that Forza gives (and 5 club does not).
steam is better, and it's free, get jelly consolite. but thanks for showing us how salty you are to bring a completely different topic into discussion.
Microsoft blows steam away when it comes to match-making and lobby wait times
a person who "loves steam" wouldn't claim it did something it doesn't do.
Nope, every game would look better at 60 fps, EVERY SINGLE ONE, you can keep drinking your cool laid and tell yourself it isn't true, but it is. For the record i played a few months ago silent hill 2 and 3 and they ran and looked great at 60 fps, just the bump in resolution and fps made them look better than their "hd release"
Ofc consolites will try to justify their lol 30 fps, just like you, kinda sad.
And every game is better with an excellent online experience such that Forza gives (and 5 club does not).
steam is better, and it's free, get jelly consolite. but thanks for showing us how salty you are to bring a completely different topic into discussion.
Microsoft blows steam away when it comes to match-making and lobby wait times
a person who "loves steam" wouldn't claim it did something it doesn't do.
I made no claims about steam other than it has dazzling sales and discounts. it is what it is. it isn't what it isn't. fo shizzle.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment