30 frames vs 60 frames

  • 152 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for hamzah1235
hamzah1235

1189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 hamzah1235
Member since 2008 • 1189 Posts

I dont mind and notice, though since KZ3 needs to have a constant lock on the 30 FPS for the 3D tech, it appears to be 60 FPS.

Avatar image for dkjestrup
dkjestrup

1214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 dkjestrup
Member since 2007 • 1214 Posts
Simply depends. An RPG like Oblivion? No. Anything that is fast paced/relies on animations needs a good 45+ frame rate, preferably 60. Basically, action games, shooters, sports games need 60.
Avatar image for firefluff3
firefluff3

2073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 firefluff3
Member since 2010 • 2073 Posts

COD4 was 60fps? Damn you guys, now i'll pay attention to frame rates and i wont be able to get used to 30 again :(#

EDIT: Whats bad company 2's frame rate?

Avatar image for blues35301
blues35301

2680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 blues35301
Member since 2008 • 2680 Posts

[QUOTE="Teufelhuhn"]

yeah, thats true. Some games are even broke and are constantly switching between 30 and 60 with nothing in between like in SH3 on PC. I played it with a framelocker @ 30. It was just annoying when ever you got into a new room its going from 60 to 30.

[QUOTE="GTSaiyanjin2"]

I run 120 refresh rate myself :P makes games more smooth imo

HFkami

me too its awesome for old classics like doom and hexen.

Are those videos supposed to be examples of each? If so MEGA fail. It's the same video running at different speeds. That's not how it works. Video framerate isn't the same as game and animation framerate...In movies its speed in games its fluidity.

blues35301

No they are real check out the frames with fraps or something. Youtube doesnt allow more than 35 frames.

Yeah, but its the exact same video. Meaning the game was only played once at a certain gameplay framerate. Probably 30 fps. Then the video was edited to run faster at 60fps. You can tell because the second one just seems faster. Its not the same thing as in game framerate. Games framerate makes for more fluidity.

A faster running movie/video is just faster running. In movies and videos its speed. Less frames is slomo and so on. In games its just smoothness of animation and such.

If you want to showcase a game running in each you need to play a pc game such as crysis at settings to run around 30 fps. And then replay again with lowered settings (maybe resolution and a few other settings) to get near 60fps. And record each session. The videos wouldn't be identical but then you'd see the diff between a game running at 60fps and 30fps.

Avatar image for nintendog66
nintendog66

2300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 nintendog66
Member since 2006 • 2300 Posts
120 FPS minimum... It's just so smooth.
Avatar image for nintendog66
nintendog66

2300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 nintendog66
Member since 2006 • 2300 Posts

Less frames is slomo and so on.

blues35301

Slow motion video actually REQUIRES an incredibly high frame rater when capturing it and displaying because animation fluidity is the top most priority.

Avatar image for HFkami
HFkami

855

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#107 HFkami
Member since 2009 • 855 Posts

Yeah, but its the exact same video. Meaning the game was only played once at a certain gameplay framerate. Probably 30 fps. Then the video was edited to run faster at 60fps. You can tell because the second one just seems faster. Its not the same thing as in game framerate. Games framerate makes for more fluidity.

A faster running movie/video is just faster running. In movies and videos its speed. Less frames is slomo and so on. In games its just smoothness of animation and such.

If you want to showcase a game running in each you need to play a pc game such as crysis at settings to run around 30 fps. And then replay again with lowered settings (maybe resolution and a few other settings) to get near 60fps. And record each session. The videos wouldn't be identical but then you'd see the diff between a game running at 60fps and 30fps.

blues35301

the mp4 video itself and the actual gameplay were 60 frames, i just uploaded the same video in different pages with different maximums for framerates. I did nothing speed up.

Avatar image for king_bobo
king_bobo

2099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#108 king_bobo
Member since 2007 • 2099 Posts
I don't Resident Evil needs 60 FPS at all, but that's just me. Generally though, it depends on the game.
Avatar image for Hakkai007
Hakkai007

4905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 Hakkai007
Member since 2005 • 4905 Posts

30 is fine for me but 60 is nice.

I usually build a new PC which start with 60 FPS but as the years go by it games get more demanding and I still wantto max them out.

I only build a new PC once there are enough games I cannot get close to maxing and keeping a 30 FPS count.

Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#110 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18126 Posts

[QUOTE="Metalscarz"]

30 is the lowest any game should hit. Higher is ALWAYS better. I can't ever see myself saying I wish this 60 FPS game ran at 30.

I can see turning down effects for better framerate. I can see putting up with 30 for the effects if the developers gave me no choice (consoles) or the leap from high to ultra is noticeable.

I can't imagine anyone saying, "I really like it when my games run slower".

GoGoGadget_

As we all know, movies are shot at 24 FPS. If a game mimics this (one that is cinematic mind you), then the game will seem a lot more cinematic and such.

No, there's a trick to that. The movie reel is shown at 24fps, but the shutter opens twice on each frame. So the screen is actually blinking at 24x2. :)

Avatar image for blues35301
blues35301

2680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 blues35301
Member since 2008 • 2680 Posts

[QUOTE="blues35301"]

Yeah, but its the exact same video. Meaning the game was only played once at a certain gameplay framerate. Probably 30 fps. Then the video was edited to run faster at 60fps. You can tell because the second one just seems faster. Its not the same thing as in game framerate. Games framerate makes for more fluidity.

A faster running movie/video is just faster running. In movies and videos its speed. Less frames is slomo and so on. In games its just smoothness of animation and such.

If you want to showcase a game running in each you need to play a pc game such as crysis at settings to run around 30 fps. And then replay again with lowered settings (maybe resolution and a few other settings) to get near 60fps. And record each session. The videos wouldn't be identical but then you'd see the diff between a game running at 60fps and 30fps.

HFkami

the mp4 video itself and the actual gameplay were 60 frames, i just uploaded the same video in different pages with different maximums for framerates. I did nothing speed up.

Exactly, the game itself is still running at the same framerate. Therefor your videos are show casing nothing. Game framerate is different than movie framerate for the last time. But yes in games more frames is always better.

Avatar image for blues35301
blues35301

2680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 blues35301
Member since 2008 • 2680 Posts

[QUOTE="blues35301"]

Less frames is slomo and so on.

nintendog66

Slow motion video actually REQUIRES an incredibly high frame rater when capturing it and displaying because animation fluidity is the top most priority.

Yea for modern slow mo that is ultra fluid. Old slomo was done just by playing at around 10 or so fps. Now adays they capture at an insane amount of frames and play them at normal speed. Either way video framerate does with speed and games its fluidity. 300fps in a game isn't 3 times faster than 100fps its 3 times smoother. Not that you can really notice :)
Avatar image for ExESGO
ExESGO

1895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 ExESGO
Member since 2010 • 1895 Posts

EDIT: Whats bad company 2's frame rate?firefluff3

Mine is 50-56 FPS on High.

Preferably though, I like 60 FPS, but if it drops to 30, I'm fine too.

Avatar image for viper-kid
viper-kid

811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 viper-kid
Member since 2007 • 811 Posts

[QUOTE="firefluff3"]EDIT: Whats bad company 2's frame rate?ExESGO

Mine is 50-56 FPS on High.

Preferably though, I like 60 FPS, but if it drops to 30, I'm fine too.

I think he meant on console. and the answer is 30 fps
Avatar image for Gen007
Gen007

11006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#115 Gen007
Member since 2006 • 11006 Posts

60FPS for sure everything always looks better that way much smoother and fluid. 30FPS is just the least amount you can have while having a enjoyable exp. Only reason you should be playing at that is if your PC cant handle 60FPS it or your playing on consoles.

Avatar image for NoobisMaxcimus
NoobisMaxcimus

2893

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 NoobisMaxcimus
Member since 2007 • 2893 Posts

Couldn't tell the difference in the two videos. I only notice it when there's slowdown.

Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts
[QUOTE="blues35301"][QUOTE="nintendog66"]

[QUOTE="blues35301"]

Less frames is slomo and so on.

Slow motion video actually REQUIRES an incredibly high frame rater when capturing it and displaying because animation fluidity is the top most priority.

Yea for modern slow mo that is ultra fluid. Old slomo was done just by playing at around 10 or so fps. Now adays they capture at an insane amount of frames and play them at normal speed. Either way video framerate does with speed and games its fluidity. 300fps in a game isn't 3 times faster than 100fps its 3 times smoother. Not that you can really notice :)

Video doesnt speed up with higher framerate. Its more fluid just like games. A video shot at 10fps would simply be choppy, not slo mo. Record video on a cheap cellphone and you'll see what I mean. A video shot at 30fps and played at 10fps would be slomo.
Avatar image for WasntAvailable
WasntAvailable

5605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 WasntAvailable
Member since 2008 • 5605 Posts

30 is good, but then with 60 you have an extra 30 on that 30. Frankly I'm not sure which is best.

Avatar image for Ringx55
Ringx55

5967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 Ringx55
Member since 2008 • 5967 Posts
Depends on the game really. you play a fast placed FPS such as CSS and not be running 60 FPS you're performance will suffer a bit. Then yougo and look at a platformer or RPG at 30 it really doesn't matter.
Avatar image for magnax1
magnax1

4605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#120 magnax1
Member since 2007 • 4605 Posts

I can't believe people can tell the difference. The only point it bugs me at is below 20 FPS, thats what I try to play all my PC games at, and it doesn't make a bit of difference on multiplayer (could1 twentieth of a second possiblymake a difference?)

Avatar image for Ringx55
Ringx55

5967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 Ringx55
Member since 2008 • 5967 Posts

I can't believe people can tell the difference. The only point it bugs me at is below 20 FPS, thats what I try to play all my PC games at, and it doesn't make a bit of difference on multiplayer (could1 twentieth of a second possiblymake a difference?)

magnax1
It's hard to gauge it form just looking at a video but when you play it you can tell. Especially a FPS that requires fast reflexes.
Avatar image for magnax1
magnax1

4605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#122 magnax1
Member since 2007 • 4605 Posts

[QUOTE="magnax1"]

I can't believe people can tell the difference. The only point it bugs me at is below 20 FPS, thats what I try to play all my PC games at, and it doesn't make a bit of difference on multiplayer (could1 twentieth of a second possiblymake a difference?)

Ringx55

It's hard to gauge it form just looking at a video but when you play it you can tell. Especially a FPS that requires fast reflexes.

I can't at all. I mean, I can tell a difference, but it doesn't make a difference in the experience of the game. I Didn't have any trouble reacting in COD2 when I ran it at 20 FPS, I still played very well.

Avatar image for sky_rend
sky_rend

207

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 sky_rend
Member since 2005 • 207 Posts

The higher the better of course but some games I prefer being at 30FPS while having some awesome graphics like Uncharted. On the other hand games like SF, GT5 & Wipeout should always be at 60FPS because of the game being fast paced and all..

Oh by the way, is Bayonetta 60FPS?

sanim02
Bayonetta I think averaged high 40 fps for xbox 360 and sub 30 fps for PS3. 60 fps is preferable, but I had no problems with 30+ fps on Uncharted 2 and GOW3.
Avatar image for Vesica_Prime
Vesica_Prime

7062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#124 Vesica_Prime
Member since 2009 • 7062 Posts

30 fps is good but I'd take 60 fps over 30 fps anyday.

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts
[QUOTE="hd5870corei7"]

30 fps > 60 fps. I see everyone above me only plays CSS and Cod games :O

TerrorRizzing
how can you justify that? 60 fps is always better, with the exception of some older games that have internal framerates, like old n64 games that are completely locked to 17 fps.

Would you trade it off for a greater level of graphical detail, say a more distant depth of field?
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

[QUOTE="hd5870corei7"][QUOTE="The__Havoc"]

You know fighters are on consoles as well right? And you know that the fighters on consoles almost universally run at 60fps right? Its the standard in fighting games.

TerrorRizzing

9/10 in this thread are saying 60 fps is a must, 30 fps is way worse or unplayable or whatever. 95% of all console games are in 30 fps. and I don't know a single PC gamer that plays 60 fps with his high end games like Crysis. I can run Crysis with 60 fps if I run all high in 720p no AA but I'd rather get 31 fps if I run all very high 1080p and 8 X AA....

ok, but how does that mean 30 fps is better? If I can get 60 fps without a major visual hit, im going for 60fps.

Simple. What if you can't reach 60fps without taking a significant graphical hit? Now you've got a tradeoff situation: smoother motion or more detail (either of which may actually be important depending on the game).
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts
I just hope with the next-gen consoles, 60 FPS will be more standard in games. I would love Halo so much if it was 60 FPS :P My friend has one of those anti-judder TVs though, it makes Bad Company 2 on 360 look as if it's running at a higher frame-rate!-RocBoys9489-
Those aren't recommended, though, because video processing creates display lag. Playing a game like Bad Company 2 on a TV like that may result in delayed reactions to your controls which can affect gameplay. PS. I'm waiting to see if a console maker will make an insistence on 1080p@60fps locked for nearly every game next gen.
Avatar image for Velocitas8
Velocitas8

10748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 Velocitas8
Member since 2006 • 10748 Posts

I need 50-60 fps for First/Third Person Shooters. Particularly online.

~30 is fine for everything else, really..but less than that starts to become a visual annoyance.

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts
60 FPS is much, much, much better. I'd easily give up stuff like "textures" and "lighting" for it. (And if it isn't already showing, I know nothing about graphics).nintendo-4life
What about depth of field? As in being able to see things from father away?
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

[QUOTE="Raymundo_Manuel"]

60 fps is where it's at. Dreamcast showed me that consoles shouldn't be limited in that regard, and yet 10 years later the consoles shifted back a few paces, and games are coming out at 30fps, and even lower at times......Luckily Nintendo didn't follow that trend.

Some games I just find are near unplayable at 30fps though.Once you've grown accustomed to 60fps in the majority of your games you will begin to notice the choppiness in games that don't run near that.

Nintendo_Ownes7

N64 had one game at 60 FPS F-Zero X. Most of Nintendo's games are usually 60 FPS. I can only think of a few that were 30 FPS last gen one of them being Super Mario Sunshine.

SMS needed to reduce the framerate because of increased graphical complexity (the constant fluid effects). Since that was a gameplay aspect, the tradeoff's understandable.

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

[QUOTE="GoGoGadget_"]

[QUOTE="Metalscarz"]

30 is the lowest any game should hit. Higher is ALWAYS better. I can't ever see myself saying I wish this 60 FPS game ran at 30.

I can see turning down effects for better framerate. I can see putting up with 30 for the effects if the developers gave me no choice (consoles) or the leap from high to ultra is noticeable.

I can't imagine anyone saying, "I really like it when my games run slower".

br0kenrabbit

As we all know, movies are shot at 24 FPS. If a game mimics this (one that is cinematic mind you), then the game will seem a lot more cinematic and such.

No, there's a trick to that. The movie reel is shown at 24fps, but the shutter opens twice on each frame. So the screen is actually blinking at 24x2. :)

That still counts as 24fps. The double shutter simply keeps the light from dimming as the film advances the frame (what's important is when the picture changes).
Avatar image for killerfist
killerfist

20155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#132 killerfist
Member since 2005 • 20155 Posts
I prefer stability over higher framerate, if possible.Teufelhuhn
This is what I was going to say.
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

I can't believe people can tell the difference. The only point it bugs me at is below 20 FPS, thats what I try to play all my PC games at, and it doesn't make a bit of difference on multiplayer (could1 twentieth of a second possiblymake a difference?)

magnax1
30 vs. 60fps can be pretty easy to see. Let's go historical here. One of the most noticable difference between Soul Edge/Blade and Soul Calibur was the framerate (30 vs. 60). I certainly noticed it right away when the latter game first appeared in arcades.
Avatar image for magnax1
magnax1

4605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#134 magnax1
Member since 2007 • 4605 Posts

[QUOTE="magnax1"]

I can't believe people can tell the difference. The only point it bugs me at is below 20 FPS, thats what I try to play all my PC games at, and it doesn't make a bit of difference on multiplayer (could1 twentieth of a second possiblymake a difference?)

HuusAsking

30 vs. 60fps can be pretty easy to see. Let's go historical here. One of the most noticable difference between Soul Edge/Blade and Soul Calibur was the framerate (30 vs. 60). I certainly noticed it right away when the latter game first appeared in arcades.

Like I said, I can notice, but it just makes 0 impact on the game, and it doesn't make it look much better. I'd much rather they push out better graphics then a higher framerate.

Avatar image for rolo107
rolo107

5469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#135 rolo107
Member since 2007 • 5469 Posts
I can play at 20, but I prefer 30, and around 45 I just don't care if it goes higher. At 60, I notice the difference, but it's nothing special for me.
Avatar image for Mercury_May2112
Mercury_May2112

2507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 Mercury_May2112
Member since 2007 • 2507 Posts

I can live with 30. Anything lower starts to get annoying really quickly.

Avatar image for mexicangordo
mexicangordo

8687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 mexicangordo
Member since 2005 • 8687 Posts

It honestly depends on the game. I agree with some that sometimes 30 fps are fine in some games but over all i enjoy smooth 60 fps.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#138 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts
[QUOTE="nintendo-4life"]60 FPS is much, much, much better. I'd easily give up stuff like "textures" and "lighting" for it. (And if it isn't already showing, I know nothing about graphics).HuusAsking
What about depth of field? As in being able to see things from father away?

Thats not depth of field that is view distance, depth of field blurs the stuff you arent focusing on.
Avatar image for TheMightyHoov
TheMightyHoov

2459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#139 TheMightyHoov
Member since 2009 • 2459 Posts

60fps. Runs smoother, and higher is always better.

Avatar image for AtariKidX
AtariKidX

7166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#140 AtariKidX
Member since 2010 • 7166 Posts
At least 60 frames.......with 60fps the games are super smooth,like the Dante's Inferno.
Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

How about steady frames? I'd much prefer playing a game running at a constant 30fps than one running at 80fps that decides to drop to 40fps when the action heats up.

Avatar image for TerrorRizzing
TerrorRizzing

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#142 TerrorRizzing
Member since 2010 • 4232 Posts

depends on the game.

19fps is the bare minimum i can handle. i know, i have a rediculously high tolderance for frame rates.

painguy1
n64 games ran at like 17 fps, people played them. I couldnt handle it though.
Avatar image for TerrorRizzing
TerrorRizzing

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#143 TerrorRizzing
Member since 2010 • 4232 Posts

How about steady frames? I'd much prefer playing a game running at a constant 30fps than one running at 80fps that decides to drop to 40fps when the action heats up.

Heirren
option 2 would feel much smoother.
Avatar image for TerrorRizzing
TerrorRizzing

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#144 TerrorRizzing
Member since 2010 • 4232 Posts

you know whats funny though, most console games cant even maintain 30 fps. I dont like 30 fps with dips in the low 20s high teens, which is why i game mostly on pc.

Avatar image for osan0
osan0

18275

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#145 osan0
Member since 2004 • 18275 Posts
for the vast majority of games im happy with 30. in mainly racing games though....60 does seem to make a difference. its not in terms of visual smoothness or anything....the game just feels more responsive at 60. its not a must though...im happy to play a racing game at 30 also.
Avatar image for CaptainHarley
CaptainHarley

2703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#146 CaptainHarley
Member since 2004 • 2703 Posts

any game below 60fps i wont buy, and if i accidentally do, i throw it out immediately when i find out. i also dont buy games from the developer anymore usually

Avatar image for fabz_95
fabz_95

15425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#147 fabz_95
Member since 2006 • 15425 Posts
I can take 30 FPS. Higher is always better but I can take it.
Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#148 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts

any game below 60fps i wont buy, and if i accidentally do, i throw it out immediately when i find out. i also dont buy games from the developer anymore usually

CaptainHarley
Yikes go get a life, what your doing is just unnecessary... i bet if you did a test with 3 or 4 games which ones are running at 30fps and 60fps you'd probably guess them wrong... It barely makes any impact as your eyes can only tell 20fps from 25fps anything higher is practically undetectable, hence the 1080p where the P means it usually runs 24fps no matter what you do.
Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

[QUOTE="Heirren"]

How about steady frames? I'd much prefer playing a game running at a constant 30fps than one running at 80fps that decides to drop to 40fps when the action heats up.

TerrorRizzing

option 2 would feel much smoother.

Well, it isn't smoother. Dips in framerate fiddle with timing, which is the most important part of a smooth playing game. Do you like playing laggy Street Fighter online?

Avatar image for EdenProxy
EdenProxy

1561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#150 EdenProxy
Member since 2010 • 1561 Posts

isnt crysis only 25