30fps = Next Gen Standard.........Here's Why

  • 122 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for cain006
cain006

8625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#101 cain006
Member since 2008 • 8625 Posts

30fps is NOT enough, cant believe so many here think it is playable. Fast-paced games is a hell play with that low frame-rate, you really begging for eyestrain.

If 30fps is standard i wish it is an option for lower the detail for 60fps....oh wait...i can already do that on PC :lol:

aroxx_ab

I'm fine with it on consoles because I always keep the sensitivity really low because I'm awful with the controller. If I tried to pretty much any fps on pc with 30 fps, it would be awful.

Avatar image for dontshackzmii
dontshackzmii

6026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#102 dontshackzmii
Member since 2009 • 6026 Posts

30 fps looks fine movies are even shot at 24. I find games running at 60 fps have a soap opera effect on them. The movments dont look that real anymore. Kinda like those old world war one reels

Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

next gen is all about detail and devs and gonna want to push as many things on screen as possible. sure next gen consoles can easily do 1080p 60fps but it will still only look this gen. 30fps is absolutely playable and even have its own benefits over 60fps. the best looking console games next gen are most likely going to be 30fps, allowing max detail and maximum polish. killu-later

Indeed, that is exactly how it will be

Who wants to halve his game visuals, just to increase frame rate that only 1% of gamers may notice and is only 1% as important (when they do notice it) as having double the detail, lighting passes and effects on screen instead

Same can be said about resolution, why halve his game visuals, just to increase resolution that only 2% of gamers may notice and is only 5% as important (when they do notice it) as having double the detail, lighting passes and effects on screen instead

Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

30 fps looks fine movies are even shot at 24. I find games running at 60 fps have a soap opera effect on them. The movments dont look that real anymore. Kinda like those old world war one reels

dontshackzmii

Movies have motion blur hardcoded (by the way cameras work) and that is why they look fine in 24fps

If games can replicate motion blur properly, then 24fps will look like the best Hollywood movie and 60fps will be totally useless

Avatar image for Inconsistancy
Inconsistancy

8094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 Inconsistancy
Member since 2004 • 8094 Posts

[QUOTE="dontshackzmii"]

30 fps looks fine movies are even shot at 24. I find games running at 60 fps have a soap opera effect on them. The movments dont look that real anymore. Kinda like those old world war one reels

loosingENDS

Movies have motion blur hardcoded (by the way cameras work) and that is why they look fine in 24fps

If games can replicate motion blur properly, then 24fps will look like the best Hollywood movie and 60fps will be totally useless

Uh, no... even with perfect implementation there are plenty of types of games that you really really want to be sitting at 60fps. Like SC2, Quake, Bayonetta(which Is a pain on ps3 due to the inconsistent fps) 'n such.
Avatar image for SW__Troll
SW__Troll

1687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 SW__Troll
Member since 2011 • 1687 Posts
[QUOTE="killu-later"]next gen is all about detail and devs and gonna want to push as many things on screen as possible. sure next gen consoles can easily do 1080p 60fps but it will still only look this gen. 30fps is absolutely playable and even have its own benefits over 60fps. the best looking console games next gen are most likely going to be 30fps, allowing max detail and maximum polish. charizard1605
Wrong. The Wii U, which many consider will be to the next generation what the Wii was to this generation, can do 60 fps at 1080p, so there is no reason why the next Xbox and Playstation won't be able to do it, unless they are patently weaker than the Wii U.

Umm, any system can do 60fps at 1080p. Even if Wii U was weaker than the 360/PS3 it could do it. Nobody is going to sacrifice the detail to do that, however.
Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="dontshackzmii"]

30 fps looks fine movies are even shot at 24. I find games running at 60 fps have a soap opera effect on them. The movments dont look that real anymore. Kinda like those old world war one reels

Inconsistancy

Movies have motion blur hardcoded (by the way cameras work) and that is why they look fine in 24fps

If games can replicate motion blur properly, then 24fps will look like the best Hollywood movie and 60fps will be totally useless

Uh, no... even with perfect implementation there are plenty of types of games that you really really want to be sitting at 60fps. Like SC2, Quake, Bayonetta(which Is a pain on ps3 due to the inconsistent fps) 'n such.

Maybe the very fast ones would benefit, depends on how well motion blur can be impemented though, racing games probably would need more than 30fps

But good motion blur could cover for the lower frame rate, like in movies

Avatar image for Devil-Itachi
Devil-Itachi

4387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 Devil-Itachi
Member since 2005 • 4387 Posts
Obviously the standard is not going up to 60 fps that much is obvious. Though I am wondering what sort of visual stimulus is going to be the selling point of next generation. Right now from the looks of things its going to be like the 32 bit generation without 3D. Is it just going to be 3D/1080p.
Avatar image for amaneuvering
amaneuvering

4815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#109 amaneuvering
Member since 2009 • 4815 Posts
next gen is all about detail and devs and gonna want to push as many things on screen as possible. sure next gen consoles can easily do 1080p 60fps but it will still only look this gen. 30fps is absolutely playable and even have its own benefits over 60fps. the best looking console games next gen are most likely going to be 30fps, allowing max detail and maximum polish. killu-later
Probably true. I still wish they'd just cut back a tiny wee bit and lock the framerates at 60fps but that's probably not likely to happen with the mentality of most developers and consumers to be honest.
Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

[QUOTE="killu-later"]next gen is all about detail and devs and gonna want to push as many things on screen as possible. sure next gen consoles can easily do 1080p 60fps but it will still only look this gen. 30fps is absolutely playable and even have its own benefits over 60fps. the best looking console games next gen are most likely going to be 30fps, allowing max detail and maximum polish. amaneuvering
Probably true. I still wish they'd just cut back a tiny wee bit and lock the framerates at 60fps but that's probably not likely to happen with the mentality of most developers and consumers to be honest.

Indeed, why would anyone want a 60fps game instead of a 2x better looking 30fps one ?

Avatar image for lightleggy
lightleggy

16090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 65

User Lists: 0

#111 lightleggy
Member since 2008 • 16090 Posts

[QUOTE="lightleggy"][QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"] I'm not a fan of screen tearing.i5750at4Ghz

and if you dont get more frames than your monitor's refresh rate, then chances are you wont be getting much screen tearing

Thats not true. I was running Counter Strike at like 300 fps and any quick movements the screen was tearing badly.

emmm...yeah...thats exactly the point...you were getting 300 fps, and your monitor refresh rate is what, 75 hz as much? you are 225 frames above the limit. if you are getting like 30 frames in a game and your monitor refresh rate is 75 hz, you wont be getting much screen tearing...
Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts
[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"]

[QUOTE="lightleggy"] and if you dont get more frames than your monitor's refresh rate, then chances are you wont be getting much screen tearinglightleggy

Thats not true. I was running Counter Strike at like 300 fps and any quick movements the screen was tearing badly.

emmm...yeah...thats exactly the point...you were getting 300 fps, and your monitor refresh rate is what, 75 hz as much? you are 225 frames above the limit. if you are getting like 30 frames in a game and your monitor refresh rate is 75 hz, you wont be getting much screen tearing...

AH I see what you're saying. Yeah I don't run any games that low.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f26ed7cf0697
deactivated-5f26ed7cf0697

7110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#113 deactivated-5f26ed7cf0697
Member since 2002 • 7110 Posts

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't next gen hardware benefit with a slight increase in RAM, let's say 6-8 gigs and an efficient unified GPU/CPU, using quad cores? I don't think pumping out 1080p at 60fps would be a problem next gen if they were to have these, right?

Avatar image for Moriarity_
Moriarity_

1332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 Moriarity_
Member since 2011 • 1332 Posts

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't next gen hardware benefit with a slight increase in RAM, let's say 6-8 gigs and an efficient unified GPU/CPU, using quad cores? I don't think pumping out 1080p at 60fps would be problem next gen if they were to have these, right?

VERTIGO47
Except they won't. Not at least if they want to keep consoles cheap.
Avatar image for dovberg
dovberg

3348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#115 dovberg
Member since 2009 • 3348 Posts

So even though 3ds already does 60 fps and Iwata asks says Wii U will have 60 fps then xbox and sony will do 30 and at the same time believe that Wii U will look the same as PS3/360...interesting logic.

Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't next gen hardware benefit with a slight increase in RAM, let's say 6-8 gigs and an efficient unified GPU/CPU, using quad cores? I don't think pumping out 1080p at 60fps would be a problem next gen if they were to have these, right?

VERTIGO47

They will be able to easilly do 1080p and 60fps, yet noone will ever use those instead of making a 4x better looking game at 720p and 30fps

Avatar image for MK-Professor
MK-Professor

4218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#117 MK-Professor
Member since 2009 • 4218 Posts

The main reason is, that console games give more attention to graphics instead of gameplay

30fps = bad gameplay

60fps = superior gameplay

pretty much this is the reason why cod's (that run with 60fps on console) destroys every other console game.


Avatar image for nismo8000
nismo8000

1000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 nismo8000
Member since 2007 • 1000 Posts

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"]

[QUOTE="BlbecekBobecek"]


Thats what I was thinking but then I realized Im missing some GREAT games when ignoring consoles...

BlbecekBobecek

Yeah, the only ones I'm really glad I bought a console for was Demon's/Dark Souls. Otherwise, I could have lived without any of the others(Uncharted, Gears, MGS4, etc).

Agreed Demons Souls/Dark souls are pinnacle of gaming (but so are some recent PC-only games like Witcher 2).

Also those Nintendo exclusives like Metroid Prime and Zelda are worth picking up, and Valkyria Chronicles is up there too.

LOL@ bold. LOLOLOLOL. yeah, 15fps, no storyline with cheap deaths is really the highest achievement of gaming ever!

Avatar image for sethman410
sethman410

2967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 sethman410
Member since 2008 • 2967 Posts
[QUOTE="nismo8000"]

[QUOTE="BlbecekBobecek"]

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"] Yeah, the only ones I'm really glad I bought a console for was Demon's/Dark Souls. Otherwise, I could have lived without any of the others(Uncharted, Gears, MGS4, etc).

Agreed Demons Souls/Dark souls are pinnacle of gaming (but so are some recent PC-only games like Witcher 2).

Also those Nintendo exclusives like Metroid Prime and Zelda are worth picking up, and Valkyria Chronicles is up there too.

LOL@ bold. LOLOLOLOL. yeah, 15fps, no storyline with cheap deaths is really the highest achievement of gaming ever!

It's because you must be 10 years old and don't know what 90s gaming was like.
Avatar image for nismo8000
nismo8000

1000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 nismo8000
Member since 2007 • 1000 Posts

i'm 28 and i know exactly how it was. i'm just not blinded by nostalgia like most of my generation and i can appreciate progress. dark souls is mediocre at best.

Avatar image for sethman410
sethman410

2967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 sethman410
Member since 2008 • 2967 Posts

i'm 28 and i know exactly how it was. i'm just not blinded by nostalgia like most of my generation and i can appreciate progress. dark souls is mediocre at best.

nismo8000
im not either.... and yet i enjoy demon's souls. It's called tastes. It runs at 30fps. Cheap deaths? There was alot in 90s gaming, u sure you remember how it was? No storyline? Again, do you remember 90s gaming correctly?
Avatar image for nismo8000
nismo8000

1000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 nismo8000
Member since 2007 • 1000 Posts

[QUOTE="nismo8000"]

i'm 28 and i know exactly how it was. i'm just not blinded by nostalgia like most of my generation and i can appreciate progress. dark souls is mediocre at best.

sethman410

im not either.... and yet i enjoy demon's souls. It's called tastes. It runs at 30fps. Cheap deaths? There was alot in 90s gaming, u sure you remember how it was? No storyline? Again, do you remember 90s gaming correctly?

yeah, i remember it, and it sucked for the most part. i never said i liked it. in fact, i only owned like 8 games for the NES and about 7 for the SNES. the only game from that era that has really stuck with me is FF3 for SNES, all of the others were just throwaways. i never loved any NES games and i had fun with a lot of SNES games but only a few of them really left an impression on me. they were mainly mindless blasting/punching/jumping etc...

my current games library is 3 times bigger then both my NES and SNES combined. not because i have more money now, but because there are way more good games now.

30fps? pfthhhh, for like 40% of the time, the frame rates dips to 12fps regularly, it probably averages somewhere around 20fps. i can't find the link right now, maybe someone will post it.