360 Could Win Sales The Next 2 Holiday Years and Sony Still Wins.

You 360 fanboys just don't get it, the PS2 is approaching the 10 year mark with the same original hardware and it's still kickin' butt to this day.

Now the PS3 is 10 times more better equipped with hardware specs than PS2 and it will out last every console on the market just like it's predecessor.

The first Xbox was an utter failure if not for Halo, but the system was still replaced 4 years after it's release, and all these 360 price drops that you guy's are so proud of, simply means that the 360 is getting cheaper to make, and pretty soon it won't even be worth the cost it takes to manufacture it.

Therefore Microsoft will announce it's successor to be released i'm sure by 2010, and i bet they put in the Blu-Ray drive, and then you'll have to spend another 4 to $500 bucks on their latest incarnation, and probably a hiked up Xbox Live fee as well and ya' better pray they learned from their RROD mistakes.

How ever our beloved PS3 will still be able to hold up to the 360's next incarnation and we'll all be home enjoying our free online play while you guy's are freezing your butts off all night on store lines only to shell out more money for Microsofts pockets.

The PS3 is in it for the long haul and not done by a long shot so you 360 boys tell yourselves what ever you want to help you sleep at night.

Therefore Microsoft will announce it's successor to be released i'm sure by 2010, and i bet they put in the Blu-Ray drive, and then you'll have to spend another 4 to $500 bucks on their latest incarnation, and probably a hiked up Xbox Live fee as wellPS3nut

your ignorance disgusts me blu-ray is going no where sony has dropped the price of the ps3 just as much as ms did with the 360 360 is profitable 360 is selling more hardware and software than ps3 epic failBIOWAREISKING

[QUOTE="BIOWAREISKING"]your ignorance disgusts me blu-ray is going no where sony has dropped the price of the ps3 just as much as ms did with the 360 360 is profitable 360 is selling more hardware and software than ps3 epic fail360-ps3-wii-pc

microsoft said no new xbox until 2011-2012... and as for the rest.... PC's already do more then the PS3 could ever dream of... so nost1ka

why do 360 fan boys keep talking about sales. Windows sells more than Mac but that doesn't mean its better. and also if its all about sells then wii is sellin more hardware and software than 360 so i guess its the best console out there then.Munasha

oh and playing my games on vista> paying $50 for quake 4 on a mac

why do 360 fan boys keep talking about sales. Windows sells more than Mac but that doesn't mean its better. and also if its all about sells then wii is sellin more hardware and software than 360 so i guess its the best console out there then.Munasha

[QUOTE="st1ka"]microsoft said no new xbox until 2011-2012... and as for the rest.... PC's already do more then the PS3 could ever dream of... so noSemiMaster

why do 360 fan boys keep talking about sales. Windows sells more than Mac but that doesn't mean its better. and also if its all about sells then wii is sellin more hardware and software than 360 so i guess its the best console out there then.Munasha

[QUOTE="Munasha"]why do 360 fan boys keep talking about sales. Windows sells more than Mac but that doesn't mean its better. and also if its all about sells then wii is sellin more hardware and software than 360 so i guess its the best console out there then.360-ps3-wii-pc

Ps2- 130 Million Xbox - 25 Million Ps3 - 17 million+ 360 - 24 Million + Gigantic difference in previous marketshare. MS are pissing on Sony at the moment.Kratos_OMEGA

[QUOTE="st1ka"]microsoft said no new xbox until 2011-2012... and as for the rest.... PC's already do more then the PS3 could ever dream of... so noSemiMaster

[QUOTE="360-ps3-wii-pc"][QUOTE="Munasha"]why do 360 fan boys keep talking about sales. Windows sells more than Mac but that doesn't mean its better. and also if its all about sells then wii is sellin more hardware and software than 360 so i guess its the best console out there then.BIOWAREISKING

[QUOTE="SemiMaster"][QUOTE="st1ka"]microsoft said no new xbox until 2011-2012... and as for the rest.... PC's already do more then the PS3 could ever dream of... so nodotWithShoes

[QUOTE="BIOWAREISKING"][QUOTE="360-ps3-wii-pc"] I would say that too if my favorite system was selling in last place. PS3nut

run along now

[QUOTE="BIOWAREISKING"][QUOTE="360-ps3-wii-pc"] I would say that too if my favorite system was selling in last place. PS3nut

your sure by 2010 they'll have a new xbox? haha u failjohnnyblazed88

At least back up your 'fail' remark with evidence. YOU fail :P

so whats Sony gonna do next gen when it doesnt have a 120million userbase to carry an incredibly overpriced system with almost no games for its 1st year? If you think this gen is bad for Sony wait till next gen when MS actually has alot more respect in the industry then it did with the xbox.

Never said Sony was going to go cell next time around.dotWithShoes

oh and sony has already started development on the "ps4" since they have already stated it would use a new cell cpu which is in the oven.BIOWAREISKING

[QUOTE="johnnyblazed88"]your sure by 2010 they'll have a new xbox? haha u failsuper_biohazard

At least back up your 'fail' remark with evidence. YOU fail :P

You 360 fanboys just don't get it, the PS2 is approaching the 10 year mark with the same original hardware and it's still kickin' butt to this day.

Now the PS3 is 10 times more better equipped with hardware specs than PS2 and it will out last every console on the market just like it's predecessor.

The first Xbox was an utter failure if not for Halo, but the system was still replaced 4 years after it's release, and all these 360 price drops that you guy's are so proud of, simply means that the 360 is getting cheaper to make, and pretty soon it won't even be worth the cost it takes to manufacture it.

Therefore Microsoft will announce it's successor to be released i'm sure by 2010, and i bet they put in the Blu-Ray drive, and then you'll have to spend another 4 to $500 bucks on their latest incarnation, and probably a hiked up Xbox Live fee as well and ya' better pray they learned from their RROD mistakes.

How ever our beloved PS3 will still be able to hold up to the 360's next incarnation and we'll all be home enjoying our free online play while you guy's are freezing your butts off all night on store lines only to shell out more money for Microsofts pockets.

The PS3 is in it for the long haul and not done by a long shot so you 360 boys tell yourselves what ever you want to help you sleep at night.

PS3nut

Oh geez, there are so many things wrong with this post that I don't know where to start...

The PS3 is ten times more better (someone needs to brush up on his sentence structure...) equipped than the PS2? Did it hurt when you pulled that figure out of your ass? Secondly, Microsoft could have a ten year life cycle in store for the Xbox 360. If you'll recall, they've already said they'll continue to make it as long as its profitable.

Check the links here and here if you don't believe me.

Now hold on. According to you, the Xbox was an "utter failure" but in the same breath, you admonish MS for taking it off the market after 4 years? Contradictory much? :? Second, yeah, the Xbox 360 is getting cheaper to make, just like the PS2 is. Because of that, the cheaper it gets to make, the more money MS stands to make from it. It's never going to get so cheap that it's not worth manufactuing any more until long after the next Xbox is released and as far as we know, that could be another five years from now. Again, as long as it's selling, MS is going to manufacture it as it just equals more money in their wallets. I don't know where you're getting your logic from.

Microsoft also stated that the next Xbox will not release until around 2011 - 2012. Unless you've forgotten, that's the same lifecycle as the PS2. The PS2 was released in 2000 and the PS3 was released in 2006. If the next Xbox releases in November of 2011, that'll be six years, just like the PS2 and PS3 so unless you constitute the PS3 being a rip off back in 2006, your point fails. The price of Xbox Live didn't increase when the Xbox 360 released so why would it increase when the next Xbox is released? Oh, and by the way, you don't honestly think Sony isn't going to release the PS4 around 2012 do you?

The Xbox 360 is in it for the long haul as well. You can believe it or not but you'll see how wrong you are in a few years. :wink:

EDIT: Added links.

You 360 fanboys just don't get it, the PS2 is approaching the 10 year mark with the same original hardware and it's still kickin' butt to this day.

Now the PS3 is 10 times more better equipped with hardware specs than PS2 and it will out last every console on the market just like it's predecessor.

The first Xbox was an utter failure if not for Halo, but the system was still replaced 4 years after it's release, and all these 360 price drops that you guy's are so proud of, simply means that the 360 is getting cheaper to make, and pretty soon it won't even be worth the cost it takes to manufacture it.

Therefore Microsoft will announce it's successor to be released i'm sure by 2010, and i bet they put in the Blu-Ray drive, and then you'll have to spend another 4 to $500 bucks on their latest incarnation, and probably a hiked up Xbox Live fee as well and ya' better pray they learned from their RROD mistakes.

How ever our beloved PS3 will still be able to hold up to the 360's next incarnation and we'll all be home enjoying our free online play while you guy's are freezing your butts off all night on store lines only to shell out more money for Microsofts pockets.

The PS3 is in it for the long haul and not done by a long shot so you 360 boys tell yourselves what ever you want to help you sleep at night.

PS3nut

No more support for 360 after 2009

It seems this totally illogical statement is making a huge comeback. I have seen 3 or 4 thread in the last three days with some reference to it. Can we please just kill this mistaken belief already. The reason Sony still supports the PS2 and MS stopped supporting XBox is very simple:

The PS2 is a cash cow for Sony so why would they kill it off? They own all the components so were able to decrease costs to the point where they are making a profit while selling it for $129. The original XBox was made of all third party components which MS has no control over - therefore making it unprofitable even at$170, so of course they stopped production when the 360 began.

With the 360 MS owns the components and will be able to reduce cost in the same way as SONY did with PS2 and will with PS3.

Do you really think if the PS2 was unprofitable at this point Sony would still be producing and backing it?

The fact is PS2 is at this time subsidizing the PS3, why would Sony kill off what at this point is keeping them afloat. On the other hand original Xbox at this point would be an anchor around MS's ankle. 360 after two years has become profitable on the hardware side, they will not kill it off immediately as it will subsidize the next Xbox in its first two years of existence.

The only reason the PS2 is still supported is because it is profitable, not because Sony loves you.

[QUOTE="st1ka"]microsoft said no new xbox until 2011-2012... and as for the rest.... PC's already do more then the PS3 could ever dream of... so noSemiMaster

How do you know that? You don't have any proof to back up your claims. As far as you or I know, Sony could've started development on the PS4 months ago and we just haven't heard of it yet.

[QUOTE="PS3nut"][QUOTE="BIOWAREISKING"]he's just mad he paid more for the inferior video game consoleHuusAsking

I never said the PS3 architecture was easy to master, it's not, it's much harder to program for than the 360, mostly because the 360's architecture is very similar to that of a PC and that's what most games are developed on, so of course the 360 will be easier to develop for, but it doesn't mean it's the preference, if i may use an analogy here :

It's like in the movie the Matrix, in the beginning Neo was told he was the one, but didn't quite believe it or had any kind of power over the Matrix, as with the first generation of PS3 games, they looked inferior to 360 titles in almost every way, because dev's were'nt familiar with the architecture :

In the scene on the roof when Neo dodges bullets for the first time at the same speed the agents do, he begins to understand more about the Matrix and manipulating the rules. The second generation of PS3 games are looking equal to 360, because dev's had a years time to familiarize themselves with the architecture :

Now we are at the scene where Neo and Trinity are attempting to rescue Morpheus and Neo has gained confidence and mastered his martial arts ,and after rescuing Morpheus, slows the explosion of the helicopter into the building so trinity can escape.

Now were approaching PS3's 3rd gen of gaming and titles like Killzone 2 and God of War 3 are exceeding 360 games in graphical performance :

Finally at the end when Neo comes alive and easily defeats the agent and for warns the machines that he is waiting for them and fly's off in the Matrix world, then we will see dev's everywhere unlocking the full potential of the PS3 and everyone will be amazed at what the PS3 can do.,

[QUOTE="HuusAsking"][QUOTE="PS3nut"] Inferior game console ? why don't you go get a side by side tech spec sheet of each and give us the link. Don't worry i won't blame you if you don't want to do it and embarrass the 360, because excluding sales, the PS3 is the most technologically advanced console on the market.PS3nut

I never said the PS3 architecture was easy to master, it's not, it's much harder to program for than the 360, mostly because the 360's architecture is very similar to that of a PC and that's what most games are developed on, so of course the 360 will be easier to develop for, but it doesn't mean it's the preference, if i may use an analogy here :

It's like in the movie the Matrix, in the beginning Neo was told he was the one, but didn't quite believe it or had any kind of power over the Matrix, as with the first generation of PS3 games, they looked inferior to 360 titles in almost every way, because dev's were'nt familiar with the architecture :

In the scene on the roof when Neo dodges bullets for the first time at the same speed the agents do, he begins to understand more about the Matrix and manipulating the rules. The second generation of PS3 games are looking equal to 360, because dev's had a years time to familiarize themselves with the architecture :

Now we are at the scene where Neo and Trinity are attempting to rescue Morpheus and Neo has gained confidence and mastered his martial arts ,and after rescuing Morpheus, slows the explosion of the helicopter into the building so trinity can escape.

Now were approaching PS3's 3rd gen of gaming and titles like Killzone 2 and God of War 3 are exceeding 360 games in graphical performance :

Finally at the end when Neo comes alive and easily defeats the agent and for warns the machines that he is waiting for them and fly's off in the Matrix world, then we will see dev's everywhere unlocking the full potential of the PS3 and everyone will be amazed at what the PS3 can do.,

oh my god :lol: this entire post is sig worthy :lol:

[QUOTE="HuusAsking"][QUOTE="PS3nut"] Inferior game console ? why don't you go get a side by side tech spec sheet of each and give us the link. Don't worry i won't blame you if you don't want to do it and embarrass the 360, because excluding sales, the PS3 is the most technologically advanced console on the market.PS3nut

I never said the PS3 architecture was easy to master, it's not, it's much harder to program for than the 360, mostly because the 360's architecture is very similar to that of a PC and that's what most games are developed on, so of course the 360 will be easier to develop for, but it doesn't mean it's the preference, if i may use an analogy here :

It's like in the movie the Matrix, in the beginning Neo was told he was the one, but didn't quite believe it or had any kind of power over the Matrix, as with the first generation of PS3 games, they looked inferior to 360 titles in almost every way, because dev's were'nt familiar with the architecture :

In the scene on the roof when Neo dodges bullets for the first time at the same speed the agents do, he begins to understand more about the Matrix and manipulating the rules. The second generation of PS3 games are looking equal to 360, because dev's had a years time to familiarize themselves with the architecture :

Now we are at the scene where Neo and Trinity are attempting to rescue Morpheus and Neo has gained confidence and mastered his martial arts ,and after rescuing Morpheus, slows the explosion of the helicopter into the building so trinity can escape.

Now were approaching PS3's 3rd gen of gaming and titles like Killzone 2 and God of War 3 are exceeding 360 games in graphical performance :

Finally at the end when Neo comes alive and easily defeats the agent and for warns the machines that he is waiting for them and fly's off in the Matrix world, then we will see dev's everywhere unlocking the full potential of the PS3 and everyone will be amazed at what the PS3 can do.,

[QUOTE="PS3nut"]

[QUOTE="HuusAsking"]And yet it's so difficult to use that no one wants to bother with it. It's PlayStation vs. Saturn, only the wrong shoe is on Sony's foot. Power means nothing if you can't employ it right. It's like a muscle car with bad intakes and shoddy tires.The_Game21x

I never said the PS3 architecture was easy to master, it's not, it's much harder to program for than the 360, mostly because the 360's architecture is very similar to that of a PC and that's what most games are developed on, so of course the 360 will be easier to develop for, but it doesn't mean it's the preference, if i may use an analogy here :

It's like in the movie the Matrix, in the beginning Neo was told he was the one, but didn't quite believe it or had any kind of power over the Matrix, as with the first generation of PS3 games, they looked inferior to 360 titles in almost every way, because dev's were'nt familiar with the architecture :

In the scene on the roof when Neo dodges bullets for the first time at the same speed the agents do, he begins to understand more about the Matrix and manipulating the rules. The second generation of PS3 games are looking equal to 360, because dev's had a years time to familiarize themselves with the architecture :

Now we are at the scene where Neo and Trinity are attempting to rescue Morpheus and Neo has gained confidence and mastered his martial arts ,and after rescuing Morpheus, slows the explosion of the helicopter into the building so trinity can escape.

Now were approaching PS3's 3rd gen of gaming and titles like Killzone 2 and God of War 3 are exceeding 360 games in graphical performance :

Finally at the end when Neo comes alive and easily defeats the agent and for warns the machines that he is waiting for them and fly's off in the Matrix world, then we will see dev's everywhere unlocking the full potential of the PS3 and everyone will be amazed at what the PS3 can do.,

doesn't NEO die in the end on the third movie? and by end i mean when they actually reach a TIE in the war

[QUOTE="PS3nut"]

[QUOTE="HuusAsking"]And yet it's so difficult to use that no one wants to bother with it. It's PlayStation vs. Saturn, only the wrong shoe is on Sony's foot. Power means nothing if you can't employ it right. It's like a muscle car with bad intakes and shoddy tires.st1ka

I never said the PS3 architecture was easy to master, it's not, it's much harder to program for than the 360, mostly because the 360's architecture is very similar to that of a PC and that's what most games are developed on, so of course the 360 will be easier to develop for, but it doesn't mean it's the preference, if i may use an analogy here :

It's like in the movie the Matrix, in the beginning Neo was told he was the one, but didn't quite believe it or had any kind of power over the Matrix, as with the first generation of PS3 games, they looked inferior to 360 titles in almost every way, because dev's were'nt familiar with the architecture :

In the scene on the roof when Neo dodges bullets for the first time at the same speed the agents do, he begins to understand more about the Matrix and manipulating the rules. The second generation of PS3 games are looking equal to 360, because dev's had a years time to familiarize themselves with the architecture :

Now we are at the scene where Neo and Trinity are attempting to rescue Morpheus and Neo has gained confidence and mastered his martial arts ,and after rescuing Morpheus, slows the explosion of the helicopter into the building so trinity can escape.

Now were approaching PS3's 3rd gen of gaming and titles like Killzone 2 and God of War 3 are exceeding 360 games in graphical performance :

Finally at the end when Neo comes alive and easily defeats the agent and for warns the machines that he is waiting for them and fly's off in the Matrix world, then we will see dev's everywhere unlocking the full potential of the PS3 and everyone will be amazed at what the PS3 can do.,

oh my god :lol: this entire post is sig worthy :lol:

Wow, reading this just made my brain hurt. I need to relieve the pressure, wheres my drill?

[QUOTE="HuusAsking"][QUOTE="PS3nut"] Inferior game console ? why don't you go get a side by side tech spec sheet of each and give us the link. Don't worry i won't blame you if you don't want to do it and embarrass the 360, because excluding sales, the PS3 is the most technologically advanced console on the market.PS3nut

I never said the PS3 architecture was easy to master, it's not, it's much harder to program for than the 360, mostly because the 360's architecture is very similar to that of a PC and that's what most games are developed on, so of course the 360 will be easier to develop for, but it doesn't mean it's the preference, if i may use an analogy here :

It's like in the movie the Matrix, in the beginning Neo was told he was the one, but didn't quite believe it or had any kind of power over the Matrix, as with the first generation of PS3 games, they looked inferior to 360 titles in almost every way, because dev's were'nt familiar with the architecture :

In the scene on the roof when Neo dodges bullets for the first time at the same speed the agents do, he begins to understand more about the Matrix and manipulating the rules. The second generation of PS3 games are looking equal to 360, because dev's had a years time to familiarize themselves with the architecture :

Now we are at the scene where Neo and Trinity are attempting to rescue Morpheus and Neo has gained confidence and mastered his martial arts ,and after rescuing Morpheus, slows the explosion of the helicopter into the building so trinity can escape.

Now were approaching PS3's 3rd gen of gaming and titles like Killzone 2 and God of War 3 are exceeding 360 games in graphical performance :

Finally at the end when Neo comes alive and easily defeats the agent and for warns the machines that he is waiting for them and fly's off in the Matrix world, then we will see dev's everywhere unlocking the full potential of the PS3 and everyone will be amazed at what the PS3 can do.,

You 360 fanboys just don't get it, the PS2 is approaching the 10 year mark with the same original hardware and it's still kickin' butt to this day.

Now the PS3 is 10 times more better equipped with hardware specs than PS2 and it will out last every console on the market just like it's predecessor.

The first Xbox was an utter failure if not for Halo, but the system was still replaced 4 years after it's release, and all these 360 price drops that you guy's are so proud of, simply means that the 360 is getting cheaper to make, and pretty soon it won't even be worth the cost it takes to manufacture it.

Therefore Microsoft will announce it's successor to be released i'm sure by 2010, and i bet they put in the Blu-Ray drive, and then you'll have to spend another 4 to $500 bucks on their latest incarnation, and probably a hiked up Xbox Live fee as well and ya' better pray they learned from their RROD mistakes.

How ever our beloved PS3 will still be able to hold up to the 360's next incarnation and we'll all be home enjoying our free online play while you guy's are freezing your butts off all night on store lines only to shell out more money for Microsofts pockets.

The PS3 is in it for the long haul and not done by a long shot so you 360 boys tell yourselves what ever you want to help you sleep at night.

[QUOTE="BIOWAREISKING"][QUOTE="360-ps3-wii-pc"] I would say that too if my favorite system was selling in last place. PS3nut

[QUOTE="SemiMaster"][QUOTE="st1ka"]microsoft said no new xbox until 2011-2012... and as for the rest.... PC's already do more then the PS3 could ever dream of... so nodotWithShoes

I never said the PS3 architecture was easy to master, it's not, it's much harder to program for than the 360, mostly because the 360's architecture is very similar to that of a PC and that's what most games are developed on, so of course the 360 will be easier to develop for, but it doesn't mean it's the preference, if i may use an analogy here :

It's like in the movie the Matrix, in the beginning Neo was told he was the one, but didn't quite believe it or had any kind of power over the Matrix, as with the first generation of PS3 games, they looked inferior to 360 titles in almost every way, because dev's were'nt familiar with the architecture :

In the scene on the roof when Neo dodges bullets for the first time at the same speed the agents do, he begins to understand more about the Matrix and manipulating the rules. The second generation of PS3 games are looking equal to 360, because dev's had a years time to familiarize themselves with the architecture :

Now we are at the scene where Neo and Trinity are attempting to rescue Morpheus and Neo has gained confidence and mastered his martial arts ,and after rescuing Morpheus, slows the explosion of the helicopter into the building so trinity can escape.

Now were approaching PS3's 3rd gen of gaming and titles like Killzone 2 and God of War 3 are exceeding 360 games in graphical performance :

Finally at the end when Neo comes alive and easily defeats the agent and for warns the machines that he is waiting for them and fly's off in the Matrix world, then we will see dev's everywhere unlocking the full potential of the PS3 and everyone will be amazed at what the PS3 can do.,

PS3nut

If only a movie analogy could actually make "teh hidden powerz of teh cell" come to life... I wonder how hard it would be to think of a movie analogy where an over-arrogant blowhard throws it's weight around, only to be dealt a huge comeuppance at the end. Something in the vein of Caddyshack, maybe?

Sorry to say, recounting scenes from your favourite movie makes for poor evidence in a debate, and runs the risk of having to relive the exploits of Paulie Shore if you're not careful.