360 games library is wayyy better then the PS3 lineup : FACT

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for GranReyUno
GranReyUno

1542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#51 GranReyUno
Member since 2007 • 1542 Posts
[QUOTE="GranReyUno"]Every time I read a thread like this I wonder how many people only own one gaming console/device. Who cares who has more AA, AAA or AAAA's? I have enjoyed A rated games over AAA games and I know I can't be the only one.Stevo_the_gamer
Who cares? You should. The more quality titles available, that's the more options you have as a gamer. :|

More quality titles are goos but what I was trying to say is do critic scores really matter if you own more than one gaming console/device? Because at the end of the day an A, AA or AAA is just a rating that is given by a reviewer(s). Look at Haze, it sold better than some AAA titles and Too Human may get a sequel. So no a rating (opinion) do not guarantee more quality titles.
Avatar image for eklineage
eklineage

2413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 eklineage
Member since 2008 • 2413 Posts
I had an intimate relationship relationship with my three lovers... the 360, ps3 and the wii. Whenever I had children with 360,. the offspring would die after a year or two. When I had children with the ps3, the offspring were born 2 years after the expected date... and for the wii, well... they are living still... but they are missing a few features that make them human... a missing eye, two genitals, a misplaced nose.
Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#53 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50081 Posts

More quality titles are goos but what I was trying to say is do critic scores really matter if you own more than one gaming console/device? Because at the end of the day an A, AA or AAA is just a rating that is given by a reviewer(s). Look at Haze, it sold better than some AAA titles and Too Human may get a sequel. So no a rating (opinion) do not guarantee more quality titles.GranReyUno
They shouldn't, but they can give some great incite on what games do good in whatever their respective genre is -- and platform. Will you ever disagree with a reviewer? Of course! But all they do is review the quality of the titles itself within it's respective genre and the system it's on. If you really want a shooter, and you see a score off 6.5 out of 10 on a specific title you were interested in, sure that might turn you off... but by no means should you automatically dismiss it... read the review and find out why it received that numerical value. Most people here just take a glance at the score and tout and/or pout about it, never even giving a slightest glance in the direction of what that number reflects.

Did I ever say it did? No, reviews give you incite what's good out there and what isn't. Buy what interests you, and what's fun for you -- I look at reviews and read the reviews because it'll give me a quick blirp what to expect when I buy and/or rent the game I'm anticipating. The number of quality titles, and the scores which reflect those titles, come from professional reviews ... it's their opinion on how well that game does within it's respective genre and system. Every reviewer and major gaming site has a set a standards and they judge the quality of the titles within those standards -- hence why when you see those scores, and read the reviews themselves, it'll give you great incite what you buy and certainly what to just "look" at.

So lastly, the more quality titles you see... the more options you'll have.

Avatar image for metalgear-solid
metalgear-solid

7001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#54 metalgear-solid
Member since 2004 • 7001 Posts
Fact: PS3 blew away the competition this year. No one ever stood a chance against the PS1 and PS2 library and things aren't going to be much different with the PS3. Only fans try to deny that but it doesn't matter. PS3 has had a mighty awesome year and by the looks of it, will go into 2009 as the clear favourite.
Avatar image for Shadow2k6
Shadow2k6

2283

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#55 Shadow2k6
Member since 2005 • 2283 Posts

[QUOTE="Corey_Barlog_SM"]A company that releases Wii Music, Animal Crossing: City Folk, and a weak headset during the same period as Gears 2, LittleBigPlanet, and Fallout 3, and expects anyone to be impressed. A company that refuses to upgrade or integrate anything new into its star franchises aside from motion controls that just can't compete with a mouse. A company that generally endorses mediocrity while insisting it's the greatest thing since Mega Man 2.Stevo_the_gamer
That "company" has forced Microsoft and Sony to evolve old strategies -- create new ones -- and move into new boundaries and reach out to more audiences. That "company" is kicking Sony and Microsoft's asses.

That "company" has also sold out to non-gamers and casuals, and putting casuals before cores.

Avatar image for Nerd_Man
Nerd_Man

13819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Nerd_Man
Member since 2007 • 13819 Posts
Like ok, dude. *Goes back to playing LBP*
Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#57 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50081 Posts
That "company" has also sold out to non-gamers and casuals, and putting casuals before cores.

Shadow2k6
Indeed. That marketing worked for Nintendo, their new "approach" it seems has payed off for them.
Avatar image for Jekken6
Jekken6

2642

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#58 Jekken6
Member since 2008 • 2642 Posts

The topic title is "360 games library is way better than the PS3 lineup"

You can't compare the 360 library to the PS3 lineup because the PS3's lineup is not released yet, while looking promising.

FACT: PC game library is way better than 360/PS3 library

Avatar image for Al3x_n90
Al3x_n90

2561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#59 Al3x_n90
Member since 2007 • 2561 Posts

Is this thread a response to you know who winning GOTY?

Also in terms of this year, i'd easily pick the ps3's line-up. The only game that is a must get this year on the 360 is gears2.That and NG2 were all that i got on my 360 this year :P the rest on my PC and ps3.

Avatar image for njean777
njean777

3807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 njean777
Member since 2007 • 3807 Posts
Doesnt matter what you post says you can still get most of the exclusives on another platform so you argument is flawed good try though
Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#61 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50081 Posts
Doesnt matter what you post says you can still get most of the exclusives on another platform so you argument is flawed good try thoughnjean777
... Xbox 360 still has more exclusive titles than the PS3. :?
Avatar image for dream431ca
dream431ca

10165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 dream431ca
Member since 2003 • 10165 Posts

[QUOTE="njean777"]Doesnt matter what you post says you can still get most of the exclusives on another platform so you argument is flawed good try thoughStevo_the_gamer
... Xbox 360 still has more exclusive titles than the PS3. :?

If your counting the 360 and PC games as well, there's a problem.

Avatar image for GranReyUno
GranReyUno

1542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#63 GranReyUno
Member since 2007 • 1542 Posts

[QUOTE="GranReyUno"]More quality titles are goos but what I was trying to say is do critic scores really matter if you own more than one gaming console/device? Because at the end of the day an A, AA or AAA is just a rating that is given by a reviewer(s). Look at Haze, it sold better than some AAA titles and Too Human may get a sequel. So no a rating (opinion) do not guarantee more quality titles.Stevo_the_gamer

They shouldn't, but they can give some great incite on what games do good in whatever their respective genre is -- and platform. Will you ever disagree with a reviewer? Of course! But all they do is review the quality of the titles itself within it's respective genre and the system it's on. If you really want a shooter, and you see a score off 6.5 out of 10 on a specific title you were interested in, sure that might turn you off... but by no means should you automatically dismiss it... read the review and find out why it received that numerical value. Most people here just take a glance at the score and tout and/or pout about it, never even giving a slightest glance in the direction of what that number reflects.

Did I ever say it did? No, reviews give you incite what's good out there and what isn't. Buy what interests you, and what's fun for you -- I look at reviews and read the reviews because it'll give me a quick blirp what to expect when I buy and/or rent the game I'm anticipating. The number of quality titles, and the scores which reflect those titles, come from professional reviews ... it's their opinion on how well that game does within it's respective genre and system. Every reviewer and major gaming site has a set a standards and they judge the quality of the titles within those standards -- hence why when you see those scores, and read the reviews themselves, it'll give you great incite what you buy and certainly what to just "look" at.

So lastly, the more quality titles you see... the more options you'll have.

Stevo, I agree with you fully but this is not what the TC's thread was aiming for and that is what I was trying to point out. Basically the TC was saying, Fact that the 360's library is superior to the PS3's because Gamespot have more A, AA, and AAA titles rated for it. Though it is a fact that the 360 has more A, AA, and AAA games on gamespot it doesn't mean that I will like those games. You are right on how reviews can help you decide on how a game may turnout. To be honest I rarely use reviews in this case but I know a lot of people who do and I don't blame them.
Avatar image for cuddlesofwar
cuddlesofwar

1138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 cuddlesofwar
Member since 2008 • 1138 Posts
Facts based on opinion isn't a fact. It's just an opinion with clout.
Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#65 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50081 Posts

If your counting the 360 and PC games as well, there's a problem. dream431ca
You do know the meaning of the term, "exclusive"; correct?



Stevo, I agree with you fully but this is not what the TC's thread was aiming for and that is what I was trying to point out. Basically the TC was saying, Fact that the 360's library is superior to the PS3's because Gamespot have more A, AA, and AAA titles rated for it. Though it is a fact that the 360 has more A, AA, and AAA games on gamespot it doesn't mean that I will like those games. You are right on how reviews can help you decide on how a game may turnout. To be honest I rarely use reviews in this case but I know a lot of people who do and I don't blame them. GranReyUno

Ah, I see. Technically speaking, it is a "fact" that the Xboox 360 has more "quality" (A, AA, AAA, AAAA) titles than the PS3 does here at Gamespot, and I guess it might be reasonable for one to use that to infer the Xbox 360's library is superior here at Gamespot. And I basically just reiterated what you aready said. Shoot. Pays to read the whole post first before responding.

I really wish some people did. I was just checking to make sure.dream431ca

Well, alright den'!

Avatar image for dream431ca
dream431ca

10165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 dream431ca
Member since 2003 • 10165 Posts

[QUOTE="dream431ca"]If your counting the 360 and PC games as well, there's a problem. Stevo_the_gamer
You do know the meaning of the term, "exclusive"; correct?

I really wish some people did. I was just checking to make sure.

Avatar image for dream431ca
dream431ca

10165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 dream431ca
Member since 2003 • 10165 Posts

[QUOTE="njean777"]Doesnt matter what you post says you can still get most of the exclusives on another platform so you argument is flawed good try thoughStevo_the_gamer
... Xbox 360 still has more exclusive titles than the PS3. :?

360 may have more exclusives, but PS3 has better exclusives ;)

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#68 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50081 Posts

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="njean777"]Doesnt matter what you post says you can still get most of the exclusives on another platform so you argument is flawed good try thoughdream431ca

... Xbox 360 still has more exclusive titles than the PS3. :?

360 may have more exclusives, but PS3 has better exclusives ;)

Ah! I beg to differ, mate. :P
Avatar image for dream431ca
dream431ca

10165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 dream431ca
Member since 2003 • 10165 Posts
[QUOTE="dream431ca"]

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"] ... Xbox 360 still has more exclusive titles than the PS3. :?Stevo_the_gamer

360 may have more exclusives, but PS3 has better exclusives ;)

Ah! I beg to differ, mate. :P

You can, everyone has their opinions. I wish some people knew what opinion meant in the first place ;)

Avatar image for Sword-Demon
Sword-Demon

7007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#70 Sword-Demon
Member since 2008 • 7007 Posts

ps3 owners cant hype 09 because the 360... has games?

sounds like this lemming is a basher..

Avatar image for SmashingX
SmashingX

625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#71 SmashingX
Member since 2007 • 625 Posts
opin
[QUOTE="jon_cia"]

Fact: 360 was out a year before the ps3

Fact: During that year lots of games came out hence the bigger library

Fact: Games that scored AA or AAA in the first year of the 360's release dont stand up against AA, AAA or AAAA games of 2008

Seriously, when reccomending your precious 360 to your friends do you make sure to let them know that you can buy Kameo, or PDZ because they are AA games. btw do stores even sell those games anymore???

Erik_Lensherr

Boo Hoo I'm upset the 360 had a year head start , guess what IT DOESN"T MATTTER the 360 still has a higher rated library compared ONLY to PS3 no spin no excusees just FACTS if I'm wong tell me how..oh and excuses don't count

Why would anyone want xboxlive when ppl with your rudeness play it? but anyway IMO you are wrong because you base this on 1 website and your OPINION. It may be true that 360 has more games but that's because of timing and the dollar not the player. Take this into account. PS3 is harder to develop for right? Right. The 360 came along an entire year before the PS3 and as a result of being the worlds first full HD graphics and 7th gen gaming console was very popular. By the time PS3 released, the 360 allready had a sizeable install base and developers were allready used to it's architecture and preferred not to learn a new hardware and take the easier path with a console that is still flawled to this day. I fail to see this lack of support, unless epic, bungie, and lionhead has the ability to develop for ps3 if they're willing. The ps3 has a robust install base now and it's no jump off a cliff to develop for (except in valve's case). i don't know for sure but i'm guessing halo3, gears, and fable 2 are there top money making exclusives. 2 sci-fi shooters and an open world rpg/hero sim. Wow. Let's see your "fact" proven with a full comprehensive side by side of exclusives that aren't yanked from google. Name one exclusive that went with an original concept. Does 360 have a platforming shooter?(uncharted) A user-content generating platformer?(LBP) A decent strategy game? (Valkyria Chronicles) Or hideo kojima support? (metal gear solid is an undeniable masterpiece. Those are all the examples I can think of. MY opinion certainly not fact.
Avatar image for Iqen
Iqen

551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#72 Iqen
Member since 2007 • 551 Posts
Comparison of game libraries between two different consoles is OPINION. Period.
Avatar image for nitekids2004
nitekids2004

2981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 nitekids2004
Member since 2005 • 2981 Posts
you have to understand that in SW exclusives matter ALOT.
Avatar image for Games4thewin
Games4thewin

148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 Games4thewin
Member since 2008 • 148 Posts

boo hoo hoo,

btw did you hear that metal gear solid 4 won game of the year??

jon_cia

Yes. I've also heard that Halo 3 outsold that game and that PS3 software sales are terrible and that Xbox 360 outsells PlayStation 3.

But what have these things with the topic to do?

Avatar image for ahmedkandil
ahmedkandil

2328

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 ahmedkandil
Member since 2004 • 2328 Posts
so? PS3 has a GOTY game and 360 has a GOTY game...
Avatar image for Games4thewin
Games4thewin

148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Games4thewin
Member since 2008 • 148 Posts

Fact: PS3 blew away the competition this year. No one ever stood a chance against the PS1 and PS2 library and things aren't going to be much different with the PS3. Only fans try to deny that but it doesn't matter. PS3 has had a mighty awesome year and by the looks of it, will go into 2009 as the clear favourite.metalgear-solid

Actually, if you haven't noticed, things gave changed.

The PlayStation 2 had everything.

It crushed everything in its path in sales. 140M and still selling.

It crushed everything in its path in games. More critically acclaimed games than all other systems any year. Only Xbox came close, but still got trumped.

PS2 had sales and games and popularity. Everybody loved it. Wii has only sales. That's what made PS2 so good and Wii not so good.

However, now, Xbox 360 has more critically acclaimed games than PS3.

PS2 had 100% domination. Neither Wii, PS3 nor Xbox 360 has that now.

Wii has tremendous sales, popularity.

Xbox 360 has a very good library and good sales.

PS3 has very good exclusive games and a good future.

PS2 had all.

So, my friend, PS2 =/= PS3.

Avatar image for EuroMafia
EuroMafia

7026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#77 EuroMafia
Member since 2008 • 7026 Posts
[QUOTE="jon_cia"]

boo hoo hoo,

btw did you hear that metal gear solid 4 won game of the year??

Erik_Lensherr

Boo hoo sameone is mad and can't explain the thread topic , 360 has a better library then ps3 this is fact by gamespot and every other web site only including aaa, aa, and a games 360 wins by far this is of course comparing ONLY 360 and ps3's library ..............now what?

Bu... buh... MGS4 goty?
Avatar image for nitekids2004
nitekids2004

2981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 nitekids2004
Member since 2005 • 2981 Posts
Every gen is like a restart button. comparing the ps2 era to this era is pretty useless imo.
Avatar image for Supafly1
Supafly1

4441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 Supafly1
Member since 2003 • 4441 Posts
Your thread title is an opinion, not a fact : FACTMaxyboy13
Actually, it is a fact that X-box 360 has more AA and AAA games at the moment.
Avatar image for knight-k
knight-k

2596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#80 knight-k
Member since 2005 • 2596 Posts
[QUOTE="jon_cia"]

Fact: 360 was out a year before the ps3

Fact: During that year lots of games came out hence the bigger library

Fact: Games that scored AA or AAA in the first year of the 360's release dont stand up against AA, AAA or AAAA games of 2008

Seriously, when reccomending your precious 360 to your friends do you make sure to let them know that you can buy Kameo, or PDZ because they are AA games. btw do stores even sell those games anymore???

Ah someone who tells truth. And the truth is also that 360 lost 08 with all the flops, RROD and getting ripped-off with live. PS3 has the better library and will also have the best games in the future. So have fun playing your sales lemmingz, lol everyday you look more like sheep.
Avatar image for Games4thewin
Games4thewin

148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 Games4thewin
Member since 2008 • 148 Posts

[QUOTE="Maxyboy13"]Your thread title is an opinion, not a fact : FACTSupafly1
Actually, it is a fact that X-box 360 has more AA and AAA games at the moment.

Yup. This year, overall, they had more, and last year, too. How was it in 2006?

Avatar image for jonnyt61
jonnyt61

2147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 jonnyt61
Member since 2003 • 2147 Posts
Well, since I have a very capable PC, I don't need to worry about any "360/PC" titles in comparison to my PS3's lineup. Not that it matters, as most -good- multiplats reach PS3 also. Left 4 Dead probably being one of the only games I'm interested in, that didn't... Let's see that change within the next year. Of course, I have it for PC anyway, so no worries there. I honestly can't think of much else that is PC/360 only, which isn't on PS3... Gears of War/Halo don't interest me in the slightest. Two of the most over rated games in existance. You'd think it was the fountain of youth :| So... There's umm... Nothing? Now, there's plenty of PC exclusive titles that interest me. Hence why I have a PC that can handle some of the later games. Honestly, Lemmings go on about all these shared PC/360 "exclusives" [Oxymoron much?] and there's barely any to see :| It's strange. People need to realize on this board, that the majority of games that are Multiplat actually end up on PS3, with the only games not making it -right away- being made by biased, ignorant devs, such as Valve. The only exclusives that any console is guaranteed is ones made by a 1st/2nd party dev. Guess who has the upper hand in that catergory? PS3. Sony played it smart, and rather than buying out a tonne of dev studios, just to get a multiplat, they invested more in their own studios, so come next year, when some really nice games are released -exclusively- for PS3, while 360 gets multiplats galore, that are shared with PS3. Really, what would you rather have? The system that has games you can't play anywhere else and the vast majority of titles the other ones do too, or the system that gets to -share- practically EVERY game? I'm just glad I got a Ps3, all the games, and then some sounds great to me :)
Avatar image for Games4thewin
Games4thewin

148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Games4thewin
Member since 2008 • 148 Posts

Well, since I have a very capable PC, I don't need to worry about any "360/PC" titles in comparison to my PS3's lineup. Not that it matters, as most -good- multiplats reach PS3 also. Left 4 Dead probably being one of the only games I'm interested in, that didn't... Let's see that change within the next year. Of course, I have it for PC anyway, so no worries there. I honestly can't think of much else that is PC/360 only, which isn't on PS3... Gears of War/Halo don't interest me in the slightest. Two of the most over rated games in existance. You'd think it was the fountain of youth :| So... There's umm... Nothing? Now, there's plenty of PC exclusive titles that interest me. Hence why I have a PC that can handle some of the later games. Honestly, Lemmings go on about all these shared PC/360 "exclusives" [Oxymoron much?] and there's barely any to see :| It's strange. People need to realize on this board, that the majority of games that are Multiplat actually end up on PS3, with the only games not making it -right away- being made by biased, ignorant devs, such as Valve. The only exclusives that any console is guaranteed is ones made by a 1st/2nd party dev. Guess who has the upper hand in that catergory? PS3. Sony played it smart, and rather than buying out a tonne of dev studios, just to get a multiplat, they invested more in their own studios, so come next year, when some really nice games are released -exclusively- for PS3, while 360 gets multiplats galore, that are shared with PS3. Really, what would you rather have? The system that has games you can't play anywhere else and the vast majority of titles the other ones do too, or the system that gets to -share- practically EVERY game? I'm just glad I got a Ps3, all the games, and then some sounds great to me :)jonnyt61

Yes, of course someone had to bring up PC and use it combined with the PS3 to beat Xbox 360. :P

Avatar image for jonnyt61
jonnyt61

2147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 jonnyt61
Member since 2003 • 2147 Posts

[QUOTE="jonnyt61"]Well, since I have a very capable PC, I don't need to worry about any "360/PC" titles in comparison to my PS3's lineup. Not that it matters, as most -good- multiplats reach PS3 also. Left 4 Dead probably being one of the only games I'm interested in, that didn't... Let's see that change within the next year. Of course, I have it for PC anyway, so no worries there. I honestly can't think of much else that is PC/360 only, which isn't on PS3... Gears of War/Halo don't interest me in the slightest. Two of the most over rated games in existance. You'd think it was the fountain of youth :| So... There's umm... Nothing? Now, there's plenty of PC exclusive titles that interest me. Hence why I have a PC that can handle some of the later games. Honestly, Lemmings go on about all these shared PC/360 "exclusives" [Oxymoron much?] and there's barely any to see :| It's strange. People need to realize on this board, that the majority of games that are Multiplat actually end up on PS3, with the only games not making it -right away- being made by biased, ignorant devs, such as Valve. The only exclusives that any console is guaranteed is ones made by a 1st/2nd party dev. Guess who has the upper hand in that catergory? PS3. Sony played it smart, and rather than buying out a tonne of dev studios, just to get a multiplat, they invested more in their own studios, so come next year, when some really nice games are released -exclusively- for PS3, while 360 gets multiplats galore, that are shared with PS3. Really, what would you rather have? The system that has games you can't play anywhere else and the vast majority of titles the other ones do too, or the system that gets to -share- practically EVERY game? I'm just glad I got a Ps3, all the games, and then some sounds great to me :)Games4thewin

Yes, of course someone had to bring up PC and use it combined with the PS3 to beat Xbox 360. :P

Did you even read? :| It -really- does matter about exclusives, whether you lemmings like to admit it or not. It's the only thing that defines a system, something that plays to its strengths and can -only- be played on that system It's not hiding behind PC, it's actually looking who's got the stronger exclusive line up, as believe it or not, eventually most PC/360 game will go to PS3, and the majority of the 360's "exclusives" will too... Know what that means? That the 360 will have a VASTLY similar lineup to PS3, with the big kicker being the fact that Sony invested HEAVILY into 1st/2nd studios, while MS has went about spending money to get -even more- multiplats. It's mind boggling how Lems don't see this... :|
Avatar image for Shensolidus
Shensolidus

931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#85 Shensolidus
Member since 2003 • 931 Posts
I like how the TC is running around screaming "FACT" at people when his argument has already been destroyed. Metacritic as an end of the year survey, released the figures of averages of all games rated that have come out on all 3 systems this year and the PS3 edged out the 360. So, it looks like your 'fact' was nothing but lies.
Avatar image for Games4thewin
Games4thewin

148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 Games4thewin
Member since 2008 • 148 Posts
[QUOTE="Games4thewin"]

[QUOTE="jonnyt61"]Well, since I have a very capable PC, I don't need to worry about any "360/PC" titles in comparison to my PS3's lineup. Not that it matters, as most -good- multiplats reach PS3 also. Left 4 Dead probably being one of the only games I'm interested in, that didn't... Let's see that change within the next year. Of course, I have it for PC anyway, so no worries there. I honestly can't think of much else that is PC/360 only, which isn't on PS3... Gears of War/Halo don't interest me in the slightest. Two of the most over rated games in existance. You'd think it was the fountain of youth :| So... There's umm... Nothing? Now, there's plenty of PC exclusive titles that interest me. Hence why I have a PC that can handle some of the later games. Honestly, Lemmings go on about all these shared PC/360 "exclusives" [Oxymoron much?] and there's barely any to see :| It's strange. People need to realize on this board, that the majority of games that are Multiplat actually end up on PS3, with the only games not making it -right away- being made by biased, ignorant devs, such as Valve. The only exclusives that any console is guaranteed is ones made by a 1st/2nd party dev. Guess who has the upper hand in that catergory? PS3. Sony played it smart, and rather than buying out a tonne of dev studios, just to get a multiplat, they invested more in their own studios, so come next year, when some really nice games are released -exclusively- for PS3, while 360 gets multiplats galore, that are shared with PS3. Really, what would you rather have? The system that has games you can't play anywhere else and the vast majority of titles the other ones do too, or the system that gets to -share- practically EVERY game? I'm just glad I got a Ps3, all the games, and then some sounds great to me :)jonnyt61

Yes, of course someone had to bring up PC and use it combined with the PS3 to beat Xbox 360. :P

Did you even read? :| It -really- does matter about exclusives, whether you lemmings like to admit it or not. It's the only thing that defines a system, something that plays to its strengths and can -only- be played on that system It's not hiding behind PC, it's actually looking who's got the stronger exclusive line up, as believe it or not, eventually most PC/360 game will go to PS3, and the majority of the 360's "exclusives" will too... Know what that means? That the 360 will have a VASTLY similar lineup to PS3, with the big kicker being the fact that Sony invested HEAVILY into 1st/2nd studios, while MS has went about spending money to get -even more- multiplats. It's mind boggling how Lems don't see this... :|

I couldn't actually give a damn, since I have played more PS3 exclusive games this year than 360 games, but 360 has more games, and that's matters, in my opinion. It also has more critically acclaimed and it outsells PS3.

Avatar image for naruske101
naruske101

1062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#87 naruske101
Member since 2007 • 1062 Posts

360 library mostly shooters and family games now

ps3- has shooters and action adeventure game (uncharted ratchet and clank, infamous mgs4)

Avatar image for Enosh88
Enosh88

1728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 Enosh88
Member since 2008 • 1728 Posts

The thing is most of the 306's top games in its "library" can be played elsewhere. I can play Gears of War, Bioshock, GTA4, Left For Dead, Call Of Duty 4+5 (soon you can add Braid, and proberly Halo 3 and Gears 2 although no announcements have been made yet) on my pc (and even some of them on my ps3)

jon_cia

so **** what? this discussion has nothing to do with the PC, last time I checked the vs here is 360 vs ps3, you see PC writen anywhere? God, ps3 fanboys hiding behind the PC again

Avatar image for Zweihand
Zweihand

608

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 Zweihand
Member since 2008 • 608 Posts

boo hoo hoo,

btw did you hear that metal gear solid 4 won game of the year??

jon_cia
btw, did you hear that Metal Gear Solid 4 is an overrated movie masquerading itself as a game?
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#90 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
FACT: Threads that have FACT in the title rarely are, in fact, based on, or consist of, facts.
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#91 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
[QUOTE="jon_cia"]

boo hoo hoo,

btw did you hear that metal gear solid 4 won game of the year??

Zweihand
btw, did you hear that Metal Gear Solid 4 is an overrated movie masquerading itself as a game?

It could have fooled me...
Avatar image for johnlennon28
johnlennon28

2158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 johnlennon28
Member since 2008 • 2158 Posts
[QUOTE="jon_cia"]

boo hoo hoo,

btw did you hear that metal gear solid 4 won game of the year??

Zweihand
btw, did you hear that Metal Gear Solid 4 is an overrated movie masquerading itself as a game?

its probly the first movie ever made that you get to control the scenes, lol, awesome some people just cant get over it. mgs4 won period.
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#94 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
[QUOTE="Zweihand"][QUOTE="jon_cia"]

boo hoo hoo,

btw did you hear that metal gear solid 4 won game of the year??

johnlennon28
btw, did you hear that Metal Gear Solid 4 is an overrated movie masquerading itself as a game?

its probly the first movie ever made that you get to control the scenes, lol, awesome some people just cant get over it. mgs4 won period.

Oh, I didn't even know it won. GameSpot has been irrelevant to me for a long time in terms of scores and reviews, but congrats to MGS4. Its not my kind of game, but I certainly appreciated the time and effort. And I enjoyed the cutscenes, as unpopular as that is to say, even while I did not care for the game proper.
Avatar image for dual_boot
dual_boot

312

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#95 dual_boot
Member since 2008 • 312 Posts
The 360 had a one year head start, just so you know. The PS3's second year easily does better than the 360's third year, which is pretty sad.
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#96 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
The 360 had a one year head start, just so you know. The PS3's second year easily does better than the 360's third year, which is pretty sad.dual_boot
In your opinion. Its not universal.
Avatar image for dual_boot
dual_boot

312

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#97 dual_boot
Member since 2008 • 312 Posts

[QUOTE="dual_boot"]The 360 had a one year head start, just so you know. The PS3's second year easily does better than the 360's third year, which is pretty sad.SpruceCaboose
In your opinion. Its not universal.

I'm pretty sure it's a widely accepted fact.

Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#98 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="dual_boot"]The 360 had a one year head start, just so you know. The PS3's second year easily does better than the 360's third year, which is pretty sad.dual_boot

In your opinion. Its not universal.

I'm pretty sure it's a widely accepted fact.

That cannot ever be a fact, so I think you are incorrect. Better is always and will always be subjective, and by definition, something subjective cannot be a universal fact.
Avatar image for dual_boot
dual_boot

312

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#99 dual_boot
Member since 2008 • 312 Posts
[QUOTE="dual_boot"]

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"] In your opinion. Its not universal.SpruceCaboose

I'm pretty sure it's a widely accepted fact.

That cannot ever be a fact, so I think you are incorrect. Better is always and will always be subjective, and by definition, something subjective cannot be a universal fact.

That's just your opinion. :P

Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#100 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts

That's just your opinion. :P

dual_boot
Not really. My opinion is that 2009 will be another great year, and I look forward to games on all the systems. As for which had a better year in my opinion, I will make that call about this time next year....