360 games library is wayyy better then the PS3 lineup : FACT

[QUOTE="-Ninja_Dog-"][QUOTE="XMaster28"]Man will you people just stop this meaningless debate! PS3 is the best and some people just can't accept it! Let it go PS3 fanboys...we don't even have to fight, cause we know we made the right choice. 360 fanboys just need to bash cause of their insecurityGodofBigMacs

"Your HTML is not well-formed - please check for unclosed tags."-Yeah, please, quit showing me that "error" message when nothing is wrong, mm k...ditto.

Look I hope KZ2 and Uncharted 2 are better than their predecessors. I'm just saying I was expecting this huge difference in graphics and gameplay and that is just not the case with the games I've tried so far with my new 80gb PS3.

GodofBigMacs, what's the deal with Killzone 2, while I read positive previews and heard the multiplayer beta was awesome, I watched videos of the game on gamersryde.com and youtube.com and I'm not too impressed with the gameplay, plus the a.i. needed some work. I don't hate it, I don't see the hype for that game besides the graphics and previews.

The other PS3 esclusives for 2009 look great however.

GodofBigMacs, what's the deal with Killzone 2, while I read positive previews and heard the multiplayer beta was awesome, I watched videos of the game on gamersryde.com and youtube.com and I'm not too impressed with the gameplay, plus the a.i. needed some work. I don't hate it, I don't see the hype for that game besides the graphics and previews.mitu123

[QUOTE="mitu123"]GodofBigMacs, what's the deal with Killzone 2, while I read positive previews and heard the multiplayer beta was awesome, I watched videos of the game on gamersryde.com and youtube.com and I'm not too impressed with the gameplay, plus the a.i. needed some work. I don't hate it, I don't see the hype for that game besides the graphics and previews.GodofBigMacs

Yes, that "decent" game won 7 game of the year awards and THE game of the year award, and got a 10 from the two biggest review outlets in the world: Gamespot and IGN. Which exclusives on the 360 say that? The 360 RELIES on the fact that M$ has a lot of money. The only reason, ONLY REASON, it got exclusives such as Gears, Halo, Bioshock (which is no longer exclusive... since money doesn't solve everything for the long run, M$), and exclusive content from GTAIV is because they PAID for it. They are ANTI-COMPETITIVE. Does Sony do that? No. They have had developers who DON'T actually fail at life and take what could be considered a bribe such as Insomniac, Naughty Dog, Zipper Interactive, Kojima Productions, Quantic Dream, Polyphony Digital, Media Molecule, and even more, with a lot of them dating all the way back to the PS1 days. Has the 360 and M$ been able to say that? I cannot stress how much the 360 relies on money from M$. Remember in the Immersion case? They sued, saying that Sony and M$'s rumble technology were rip offs of their patented product, while M$ just decided to buy 10% of their shares from Immersion to get out of the case, Sony, like someone who actually is somewhat decent at life, went on to defend the case. Interesting, is it not? Our "laughing stock" of a system includes exclusives that the 360 will never ever touch and never will either such as MGS4, LittleBigPlanet, Resistance 2, Killzone 2, God of War 3, Heavy Rain, Gran Turismo 5, White Knight Chronicles, inFAMOUS, MAG, Uncharted 2, and another possible Ratchet and Clank. I would throw a bunch of quotes at you about how the PS3 is more powerful than the 360, but I decided to be nice today. Arrogant X-Bots. They're funny. "Your HTML is not well-formed - please check for unclosed tags."-Yeah, please, quit showing me that "error" message when nothing is wrong, mm k?GodofBigMacs

The 360 relies on the fact that MS has a lot of money. Yeah and? The Playstation brand was built on money.

Money doesn't solve everything in the long run? It worked for Sony look at the PS2.

Tell me how is Microsoft Anti Competitive for paying for things? That makes them more competitive and Sony less Anti Competitive as they stated they won't compete for 3rd Party exclusives.

And Sony doesn't do it? Wtf? Do you know how the Playstation brand started out? You're telling me they didn't pay for anything lol get real.

Developers who don't fail at life? Wow now your just in the Maverick area (aka Fanboy)

Bribes? Please for the love of humanity take a business or economics course. You act like Sony didn't do this with Psyignosis and Square Enix? Even you say it. Dating back to the PS1 days.

So you're saying that since MS bought 10% of immerision and settled out of court what Sony did was better and more decent at life? You're telling me that Bull crapping me about rumble being last gen and giving the consumer a rumbless controller decent at life LOL. Get off your fanboy high horse.

.

Resorting to list wars? I don't know why. Everyone knows that the 360 has much more critically acclaimed games then the PS3 so listing games isn't exactly proving anything.

Arrogant X-bots are funny?

Indeed they are but definately not as entertaining as you

Better = matter of opinion. Wasdie

I noticed all the Cows making threads about games lineup and excluding 360/pc games because the thread said "exclusive" lineup.

Well this is a thread about who's game library is superior, no spin , no criteria or reason why a game "doesn't count". but a simple reason why a game library is superioir to another.

THE 360 GAME LIBRARY CONSISTES OF MORE AAA, AA, AND A GAMES THEN THE PS3 BY ALOT. these games are not categorized by anything but the FACT that they are not on the ps3 but the 360 and not the ps3. this is the thread that the the 360 library = more of these games(AAA,AA,A) than the PS3 by alot. It does not matter if they are on the PC or not this is a thread about 360 VS ps3 game library....go ahead cows dispute this if you can..well you can't this is the reason the 360 has BETTER GAMES THEN PS3

*edit* this is based on the rules that gamespot scores = fact

Erik_Lensherr

[QUOTE="GodofBigMacs"]Yes, that "decent" game won 7 game of the year awards and THE game of the year award, and got a 10 from the two biggest review outlets in the world: Gamespot and IGN. Which exclusives on the 360 say that? The 360 RELIES on the fact that M$ has a lot of money. The only reason, ONLY REASON, it got exclusives such as Gears, Halo, Bioshock (which is no longer exclusive... since money doesn't solve everything for the long run, M$), and exclusive content from GTAIV is because they PAID for it. They are ANTI-COMPETITIVE. Does Sony do that? No. They have had developers who DON'T actually fail at life and take what could be considered a bribe such as Insomniac, Naughty Dog, Zipper Interactive, Kojima Productions, Quantic Dream, Polyphony Digital, Media Molecule, and even more, with a lot of them dating all the way back to the PS1 days. Has the 360 and M$ been able to say that? I cannot stress how much the 360 relies on money from M$. Remember in the Immersion case? They sued, saying that Sony and M$'s rumble technology were rip offs of their patented product, while M$ just decided to buy 10% of their shares from Immersion to get out of the case, Sony, like someone who actually is somewhat decent at life, went on to defend the case. Interesting, is it not? Our "laughing stock" of a system includes exclusives that the 360 will never ever touch and never will either such as MGS4, LittleBigPlanet, Resistance 2, Killzone 2, God of War 3, Heavy Rain, Gran Turismo 5, White Knight Chronicles, inFAMOUS, MAG, Uncharted 2, and another possible Ratchet and Clank. I would throw a bunch of quotes at you about how the PS3 is more powerful than the 360, but I decided to be nice today. Arrogant X-Bots. They're funny. "Your HTML is not well-formed - please check for unclosed tags."-Yeah, please, quit showing me that "error" message when nothing is wrong, mm k?Blackbond

The 360 relies on the fact that MS has a lot of money. Yeah and? The Playstation brand was built on money.

Money doesn't solve everything in the long run? It worked for Sony look at the PS2.

Tell me how is Microsoft Anti Competitive for paying for things? That makes them more competitive and Sony less Anti Competitive as they stated they won't compete for 3rd Party exclusives.

And Sony doesn't do it? Wtf? Do you know how the Playstation brand started out? You're telling me they didn't pay for anything lol get real.

Developers who don't fail at life? Wow now your just in the Maverick area (aka Fanboy)

Bribes? Please for the love of humanity take a business or economics course. You act like Sony didn't do this with Psyignosis and Square Enix? Even you say it. Dating back to the PS1 days.

So you're saying that since MS bought 10% of immerision and settled out of court what Sony did was better and more decent at life? You're telling me that Bull crapping me about rumble being last gen and giving the consumer a rumbless controller decent at life LOL. Get off your fanboy high horse.

.

Resorting to list wars? I don't know why. Everyone knows that the 360 has much more critically acclaimed games then the PS3 so listing games isn't exactly proving anything.

Arrogant X-bots are funny?

Indeed they are but definately not as entertaining as you

Let's start with knowing what anti-competitive even means. Since evidently, in your post, you do not. Anti-Competitive. Avoiding competition. So yeah, M$ pays for exclusives, right? And that makes them anti-competitive because, well, it's not as bad as this, but it's just like bribing away a court case. And you say that's competitve? I see. I see. I guess next time I get sued for murder, I'll buy away the case, and that'd be considered competitive. Also, the only reason I say things harsh like "failing at life" is because the contender said something just as harsh or more. Remember when he said I'm a laughing stock on dah int3w3bz? Oh yeah I'm just gonna take that alright. Also, I don't recall when Sony bought every exclusive possible they had for the PS2. Also, I'll go back to my bribe analogy. You're saying that buying away a court case is better and the more decent thing to do than defending it? GTFO. And I don't remember what was so bad about crticizing soemthing and going against it. See, we do it every day. Oh no, I feel like such a sinner now. Help me sweet baby Jesus! I must atone for my sins!

Well 360 has:

More A, AA, and AAA, regardless if they are exclusive or not. Exclusive, 2-3 year old games, or 360/PC, they are all A-AAA games not on PS3.

All though not counted, XBLA has way more releases and thus A, AA, and AAA then any of PSNs offerings.

So in terms of reviewed quality the 360 library is factually better.

[QUOTE="Blackbond"]

[QUOTE="GodofBigMacs"]Yes, that "decent" game won 7 game of the year awards and THE game of the year award, and got a 10 from the two biggest review outlets in the world: Gamespot and IGN. Which exclusives on the 360 say that? The 360 RELIES on the fact that M$ has a lot of money. The only reason, ONLY REASON, it got exclusives such as Gears, Halo, Bioshock (which is no longer exclusive... since money doesn't solve everything for the long run, M$), and exclusive content from GTAIV is because they PAID for it. They are ANTI-COMPETITIVE. Does Sony do that? No. They have had developers who DON'T actually fail at life and take what could be considered a bribe such as Insomniac, Naughty Dog, Zipper Interactive, Kojima Productions, Quantic Dream, Polyphony Digital, Media Molecule, and even more, with a lot of them dating all the way back to the PS1 days. Has the 360 and M$ been able to say that? I cannot stress how much the 360 relies on money from M$. Remember in the Immersion case? They sued, saying that Sony and M$'s rumble technology were rip offs of their patented product, while M$ just decided to buy 10% of their shares from Immersion to get out of the case, Sony, like someone who actually is somewhat decent at life, went on to defend the case. Interesting, is it not? Our "laughing stock" of a system includes exclusives that the 360 will never ever touch and never will either such as MGS4, LittleBigPlanet, Resistance 2, Killzone 2, God of War 3, Heavy Rain, Gran Turismo 5, White Knight Chronicles, inFAMOUS, MAG, Uncharted 2, and another possible Ratchet and Clank. I would throw a bunch of quotes at you about how the PS3 is more powerful than the 360, but I decided to be nice today. Arrogant X-Bots. They're funny. "Your HTML is not well-formed - please check for unclosed tags."-Yeah, please, quit showing me that "error" message when nothing is wrong, mm k?GodofBigMacs

The 360 relies on the fact that MS has a lot of money. Yeah and? The Playstation brand was built on money.

Money doesn't solve everything in the long run? It worked for Sony look at the PS2.

Tell me how is Microsoft Anti Competitive for paying for things? That makes them more competitive and Sony less Anti Competitive as they stated they won't compete for 3rd Party exclusives.

And Sony doesn't do it? Wtf? Do you know how the Playstation brand started out? You're telling me they didn't pay for anything lol get real.

Developers who don't fail at life? Wow now your just in the Maverick area (aka Fanboy)

Bribes? Please for the love of humanity take a business or economics course. You act like Sony didn't do this with Psyignosis and Square Enix? Even you say it. Dating back to the PS1 days.

So you're saying that since MS bought 10% of immerision and settled out of court what Sony did was better and more decent at life? You're telling me that Bull crapping me about rumble being last gen and giving the consumer a rumbless controller decent at life LOL. Get off your fanboy high horse.

.

Resorting to list wars? I don't know why. Everyone knows that the 360 has much more critically acclaimed games then the PS3 so listing games isn't exactly proving anything.

Arrogant X-bots are funny?

Indeed they are but definately not as entertaining as you

Let's start with knowing what anti-competitive even means. Since evidently, in your post, you do not. Anti-Competitive. Avoiding competition. So yeah, M$ pays for exclusives, right? And that makes them anti-competitive because, well, it's not as bad as this, but it's just like bribing away a court case. And you say that's competitve? I see. I see. I guess next time I get sued for murder, I'll buy away the case, and that'd be considered competitive. Also, the only reason I say things harsh like "failing at life" is because the contender said something just as harsh or more. Remember when he said I'm a laughing stock on dah int3w3bz? Oh yeah I'm just gonna take that alright. Also, I don't recall when Sony bought every exclusive possible they had for the PS2. Also, I'll go back to my bribe analogy. You're saying that buying away a court case is better and the more decent thing to do than defending it? GTFO. And I don't remember what was so bad about crticizing soemthing and going against it. See, we do it every day. Oh no, I feel like such a sinner now. Help me sweet baby Jesus! I must atone for my sins!

Oh Boo hoo! Microsoft is paying devs to make games on their console! They are evil! THEY PROBABLY EAT BABIES AND GAVE BIRTH TO HITLER Waahh Wahh WAAAHH:cry:

Listen kid, this is all business. There is nothing wrong with it ok? It's not against the law. It's not murder and it's not stealing/bribe. If you don't like it go cry to MS.

how about you show me some proof instead of just saying......= Factbufu21

He made a fair argument.....all the proof is right on gamespot.

360 factually has more reviewed A-AAA games then PS3.

[QUOTE="GodofBigMacs"][QUOTE="Blackbond"]

The 360 relies on the fact that MS has a lot of money. Yeah and? The Playstation brand was built on money.

Money doesn't solve everything in the long run? It worked for Sony look at the PS2.

Tell me how is Microsoft Anti Competitive for paying for things? That makes them more competitive and Sony less Anti Competitive as they stated they won't compete for 3rd Party exclusives.

And Sony doesn't do it? Wtf? Do you know how the Playstation brand started out? You're telling me they didn't pay for anything lol get real.

Developers who don't fail at life? Wow now your just in the Maverick area (aka Fanboy)

Bribes? Please for the love of humanity take a business or economics course. You act like Sony didn't do this with Psyignosis and Square Enix? Even you say it. Dating back to the PS1 days.

So you're saying that since MS bought 10% of immerision and settled out of court what Sony did was better and more decent at life? You're telling me that Bull crapping me about rumble being last gen and giving the consumer a rumbless controller decent at life LOL. Get off your fanboy high horse.

.

Resorting to list wars? I don't know why. Everyone knows that the 360 has much more critically acclaimed games then the PS3 so listing games isn't exactly proving anything.

Arrogant X-bots are funny?

Indeed they are but definately not as entertaining as you

SpinoRaptor24

Let's start with knowing what anti-competitive even means. Since evidently, in your post, you do not. Anti-Competitive. Avoiding competition. So yeah, M$ pays for exclusives, right? And that makes them anti-competitive because, well, it's not as bad as this, but it's just like bribing away a court case. And you say that's competitve? I see. I see. I guess next time I get sued for murder, I'll buy away the case, and that'd be considered competitive. Also, the only reason I say things harsh like "failing at life" is because the contender said something just as harsh or more. Remember when he said I'm a laughing stock on dah int3w3bz? Oh yeah I'm just gonna take that alright. Also, I don't recall when Sony bought every exclusive possible they had for the PS2. Also, I'll go back to my bribe analogy. You're saying that buying away a court case is better and the more decent thing to do than defending it? GTFO. And I don't remember what was so bad about crticizing soemthing and going against it. See, we do it every day. Oh no, I feel like such a sinner now. Help me sweet baby Jesus! I must atone for my sins!

Oh Boo hoo! Microsoft is paying devs to make games on their console! They are evil! THEY PROBABLY EAT BABIES AND GAVE BIRTH TO HITLER Waahh Wahh WAAAHH:cry:

Listen kid, this is all business. There is nothing wrong with it ok? It's not against the law. It's not murder and it's not stealing/bribe. If you don't like it go cry to MS.

It's wrong, dude. I'm not the only critic. The US Department of Justice believed that M$ used, on the inside, the motto "Embrace, extend, and extinguish". Really? Really, M$? I expected more out of your developer whoring company.

It's all a matter of prefences one things for sure the 360 offers VAREITY in there gaming library ,The PS3 library are made up of mostly Shooters, it's kinda sad how SONY is trying to lure the shooting crowd to the PS3...And it really isn't working because MS as Halo as the aresnal.FACTforeverflame890

FACT your opinion is not a fact. And other then fable 2, and geow 1,2 I see nothing I really wish the ps3 had.PrinceofSarcasm

well it is fact that 360 has more A-AAA games reviewed on any review site, not just gamespot.

And you gotta seriously browse the A-AAA games on gamespot (theres a section called "top games") to see what your missing.

FACT your opinion is not a fact. And other then fable 2, and geow 1,2 I see nothing I really wish the ps3 had.PrinceofSarcasm

[QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"]FACT your opinion is not a fact. And other then fable 2, and geow 1,2 I see nothing I really wish the ps3 had.Cole-Protocal

well it is fact that 360 has more A-AAA games reviewed on any review site, not just gamespot.

And you gotta seriously browse the A-AAA games on gamespot (theres a section called "top games") to see what your missing.

[QUOTE="Cole-Protocal"]

[QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"]FACT your opinion is not a fact. And other then fable 2, and geow 1,2 I see nothing I really wish the ps3 had.GodofBigMacs

well it is fact that 360 has more A-AAA games reviewed on any review site, not just gamespot.

And you gotta seriously browse the A-AAA games on gamespot (theres a section called "top games") to see what your missing.

well thats really all that needs to be said. 360 has both quality and quantity. Nuff said.

[QUOTE="GodofBigMacs"][QUOTE="Cole-Protocal"]

well it is fact that 360 has more A-AAA games reviewed on any review site, not just gamespot.

And you gotta seriously browse the A-AAA games on gamespot (theres a section called "top games") to see what your missing.

Cole-Protocal

well thats really all that needs to be said. 360 has both quality and quantity. Nuff said.

And the hardware failure rate doesn't matter? It doesn't matter how XBL actually has a fee? Not only that, but the 360 doesn't have the quantity (exclusive wise), the PS3 does. But if you're talking in general, it would be obvious it does, as it's been out for more than a year more. The 360 had its peak, arguably. And the PS3... is almost at it, with titles like KZ2 and GoW3 coming up, and MGS4 already out.

[QUOTE="Cole-Protocal"][QUOTE="GodofBigMacs"] Wow that's the only argument you use, dude... In all of your posts onthis board so far, that's the only argument I"ve seen. GodofBigMacs

well thats really all that needs to be said. 360 has both quality and quantity. Nuff said.

And the hardware failure rate doesn't matter? It doesn't matter how XBL actually has a fee? Not only that, but the 360 doesn't have the quantity (exclusive wise), the PS3 does. But if you're talking in general, it would be obvious it does, as it's been out for more than a year more. The 360 had its peak, arguably. And the PS3... is almost at it, with titles like KZ2 and GoW3 coming up, and MGS4 already out.

were talking games, not hardware. As for online, LIVEs features arguably offset the trivial $50 per year.

Even without PC/360 games, 360 has more AA and AAA, and A games that more then make up for 4 AAAAs (MGS4). But when you factor in not-on-PS3 games like Left 4 Dead, Mass Effect etc, the 360 has even more to offer then the PS3.

I say the 360 is peaking about now with the vastly improved Euro performance and such. Hopefully it can keep it up.

[QUOTE="GodofBigMacs"][QUOTE="Cole-Protocal"]

well thats really all that needs to be said. 360 has both quality and quantity. Nuff said.

Cole-Protocal

And the hardware failure rate doesn't matter? It doesn't matter how XBL actually has a fee? Not only that, but the 360 doesn't have the quantity (exclusive wise), the PS3 does. But if you're talking in general, it would be obvious it does, as it's been out for more than a year more. The 360 had its peak, arguably. And the PS3... is almost at it, with titles like KZ2 and GoW3 coming up, and MGS4 already out.

were talking games, not hardware. As for online, LIVEs features arguably offset the trivial $50 per year.

Even without PC/360 games, 360 has more AA and AAA, and A games that more then make up for 4 AAAAs (MGS4). But when you factor in not-on-PS3 games like Left 4 Dead, Mass Effect etc, the 360 has even more to offer then the PS3.

I say the 360 is peaking about now with the vastly improved Euro performance and such. Hopefully it can keep it up.

Actually it's the other way around and if you state those games I have a PS 3 and don't have to get a 360, because I already have those games on my PC.

Like ever1s telling you the 360 had a 1 year head start that's the only reason it has more AAA but so far it hasn't been able to even get 1 AAAA exclusive like PS 3 has.

Let's start with knowing what anti-competitive even means. Since evidently, in your post, you do not. Anti-Competitive. Avoiding competition. So yeah, M$ pays for exclusives, right? And that makes them anti-competitive because, well, it's not as bad as this, but it's just like bribing away a court case. And you say that's competitve? I see. I see. I guess next time I get sued for murder, I'll buy away the case, and that'd be considered competitive. Also, the only reason I say things harsh like "failing at life" is because the contender said something just as harsh or more. Remember when he said I'm a laughing stock on dah int3w3bz? Oh yeah I'm just gonna take that alright. Also, I don't recall when Sony bought every exclusive possible they had for the PS2. Also, I'll go back to my bribe analogy. You're saying that buying away a court case is better and the more decent thing to do than defending it? GTFO. And I don't remember what was so bad about crticizing soemthing and going against it. See, we do it every day. Oh no, I feel like such a sinner now. Help me sweet baby Jesus! I must atone for my sins!

GodofBigMacs

So Microsoft avoids competition? Since when? MS goes after anything and everything and is overly competitive they are not avoiding being competitive in the slightest. You want to talk about avoiding competition then talk about Sony ignoring Wii and the 360 for so long.

Sony pays for exclusives just like MS does. It is not liking bribing away a court case its called business. Please for you won good read an economics or business book even on a basic level. Using your money to be competitive is not anti competitive.

There is no business involved in a murder trial and doing good business is not a crime. You're analogy is rather poor.

Listen I don't care what you want to take or don't want to take. If you feel like you have to use a retort because of "Oh yeah I'm just gonna take that alright." Then you are obviously taking the internet too seriously as you are letting it affect you on a personal level.

You don't recall when Sony bought every exclusive possible they had it for PS2? Um did you just start gaming with the PS2? Where you not there with the PS1?

Your bribe analogy doesn't fit point blank period because business is business and if you can't accept good business strategy and tactics again I suggest you take a basic level business course to educate yourself on the matter.

Buying a court case is illegal. Doing good business is not.

Word Life, this is basic economics. Base-base-basic economics

It's wrong, dude. I'm not the only critic. The US Department of Justice believed that M$ used, on the inside, the motto "Embrace, extend, and extinguish". Really? Really, M$? I expected more out of your developer whoring company.

GodofBigMacs

So wait doing good business is wrong and you're not the only critic? The majority of the critics are nothing but fanboy/maverick/irregulars who know very little about the concepts of business.

You obviously don't remember Nintendo's strangle hold monopoly on the industry with the NES

You obviously don't remember Sony literally buying their way into console gaming with the PS1.

But all of a sudden you're whining over MS doing what Sony did in the past? Call it quits.

[QUOTE="GodofBigMacs"]

It's wrong, dude. I'm not the only critic. The US Department of Justice believed that M$ used, on the inside, the motto "Embrace, extend, and extinguish". Really? Really, M$? I expected more out of your developer whoring company.

Blackbond

So wait doing good business is wrong and you're not the only critic? The majority of the critics are nothing but fanboy/maverick/irregulars who know very little about the concepts of business.

You obviously don't remember Nintendo's strangle hold monopoly on the industry with the NES

You obviously don't remember Sony literally buying their way into console gaming with the PS1.

But all of a sudden you're whining over MS doing what Sony did in the past? Call it quits.

+30 points for reaching back to PS1

+970 points for reaching back to NES

+99000 points for pointing out the nature of fanboyism

x10 multipler. 1 million point post.

It's all a matter of prefences one things for sure the 360 offers VAREITY in there gaming library ,The PS3 library are made up of mostly Shooters, it's kinda sad how SONY is trying to lure the shooting crowd to the PS3...And it really isn't working because MS as Halo as the aresnal.FACTforeverflame890

Your thread title is an opinion, not a fact : FACTMaxyboy13

Its an opinion, not a fact. Honestly, i'd prefer Metal Gear Solid 4 over 360's whole lineup of games. I still think the 360 owns PS3, but MGS4 is really awesome. I could die happy knowing I played that game. I really really like MGS4.DennisHopperz

"i'd prefer Metal Gear Solid 4 over 360's whole lineup of games"

some people think this isnt possible.....but i firmly believe in WRONG opinions.

[QUOTE="DennisHopperz"]Its an opinion, not a fact. Honestly, i'd prefer Metal Gear Solid 4 over 360's whole lineup of games. I still think the 360 owns PS3, but MGS4 is really awesome. I could die happy knowing I played that game. I really really like MGS4.Cole-Protocal

"i'd prefer Metal Gear Solid 4 over 360's whole lineup of games"

some people think this isnt possible.....but i firmly believe in WRONG opinions.

[QUOTE="DennisHopperz"]Its an opinion, not a fact. Honestly, i'd prefer Metal Gear Solid 4 over 360's whole lineup of games. I still think the 360 owns PS3, but MGS4 is really awesome. I could die happy knowing I played that game. I really really like MGS4.Cole-Protocal

"i'd prefer Metal Gear Solid 4 over 360's whole lineup of games"

some people think this isnt possible.....but i firmly believe in WRONG opinions.

Fact: 360 was out a year before the ps3

Fact: During that year lots of games came out hence the bigger library

Fact: Games that scored AA or AAA in the first year of the 360's release dont stand up against AA, AAA or AAAA games of 2008

Seriously, when reccomending your precious 360 to your friends do you make sure to let them know that you can buy Kameo, or PDZ because they are AA games. btw do stores even sell those games anymore???

are you kidding? most of the people i know with 360's have never heard of kameo

Most of my friends that have PS3's didn't know the PS3 could play games.

[QUOTE="Erik_Lensherr"][QUOTE="jon_cia"]

Fact: 360 was out a year before the ps3

Fact: During that year lots of games came out hence the bigger library

Fact: Games that scored AA or AAA in the first year of the 360's release dont stand up against AA, AAA or AAAA games of 2008

Seriously, when reccomending your precious 360 to your friends do you make sure to let them know that you can buy Kameo, or PDZ because they are AA games. btw do stores even sell those games anymore???

jon_cia

Boo Hoo I'm upset the 360 had a year head start , guess what IT DOESN"T MATTTER the 360 still has a higher rated library compared ONLY to PS3 no spin no excusees just FACTS if I'm wong tell me how..oh and excuses don't count

The thing is most of the 306's top games in its "library" can be played elsewhere. I can play Gears of War, Bioshock, GTA4, Left For Dead, Call Of Duty 4+5 (soon you can add Braid, and proberly Halo 3 and Gears 2 although no announcements have been made yet) on my pc (and even some of them on my ps3)

Were comparing ps3 and 360. and whats a 306? O.O

[QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"]

Fact: Lemmings like to talk about how their library is bigger, but when asked to list these games that set itself apart from the PS3 the room goes silent.

campbell1874

Am not a lemming but to the people who think the 360 has no games.

These are some games I think will be out on the 360 and not the PS3 next year. Am sure someone will correct me if there are any mistakes.

Mass Effect 2

Alan Wake

Halo 3: Recon

Ninety-Nine Nights 2

Ninja Blade

All Points Bulletin

Huxley

Halo Wars

Project Forza 3

GTA 4 Episode 1 & 2

Fallout 3 DLC

Star Ocean 4

Race Pro

Chronicles of Riddick: Dark Athena

Am not sure about Mafia 2 and Godfather 2.

There will still be a few unannouced games that will come out on the 360 and other games i cant think of.

Am not saying it going to be a bigger libary but the 360 does have games next year.

I cant believe you mentioned these games lol first PS 3 took your exclusive Chronicles of Riddick Dark Athena that's going to be on PS 3 and PC.

Mass Effect 2 will arrive on PC, Ninety Nine Nights got a 5.9 ouch, Alan Wake is also coming to the PC, Huxley is coming for PC, Mafia 2 is going to be on PS 3 and so is the God Father 2 so basically your list of exclusive 360 titles should be

Halo 3 recon

Ninja Blade

All Points Bulletin

Halo Wars

Project Forza 3

Star Ocean 4

Race Pro

so this is the contendor against the PS 3 exclusives ? even wii has better games coming out.

PS 3

GOD OF WAR 3

UNCHARTED 2

KILLZONE 2

TWISTED METAL

WIPEOUT PS 3

LITTLE BIG PLANET 2

LA NOIR

FINAL FANTASY XII VERSUS

FLOWER

GRAN TURISMO 5

RIDGE RACER

inFAMOUS

METAL GEAR SOLID ONLINE

RED DEAD REVOLVER 2

TIME CRISIS 4

MAG

GRAN TURISMO HD

GRADIUS PS 3

KINGDOM HEARTS 3

HOT SHOTS GOLF 5

THE GETAWAY 3

WHITE KNIGHT CHRONICLES

HEAVY RAIN

VALKYRIA CHRONICLES

YAKUZA 3

I guess we'll be having alot to play 2009

[QUOTE="campbell1874"][QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"]

Fact: Lemmings like to talk about how their library is bigger, but when asked to list these games that set itself apart from the PS3 the room goes silent.

tek91

Am not a lemming but to the people who think the 360 has no games.

These are some games I think will be out on the 360 and not the PS3 next year. Am sure someone will correct me if there are any mistakes.

Mass Effect 2

Alan Wake

Halo 3: Recon

Ninety-Nine Nights 2

Ninja Blade

All Points Bulletin

Huxley

Halo Wars

Project Forza 3

GTA 4 Episode 1 & 2

Fallout 3 DLC

Star Ocean 4

Race Pro

Chronicles of Riddick: Dark Athena

Am not sure about Mafia 2 and Godfather 2.

There will still be a few unannouced games that will come out on the 360 and other games i cant think of.

Am not saying it going to be a bigger libary but the 360 does have games next year.

I cant believe you mentioned these games lol first PS 3 took your exclusive Chronicles of Riddick Dark Athena that's going to be on PS 3 and PC.

Mass Effect 2 will arrive on PC, Ninety Nine Nights got a 5.9 ouch, Alan Wake is also coming to the PC, Huxley is coming for PC, Mafia 2 is going to be on PS 3 and so is the God Father 2 so basically your list of exclusive 360 titles should be

Halo 3 recon

Ninja Blade

All Points Bulletin

Halo Wars

Project Forza 3

Star Ocean 4

Race Pro

so this is the contendor against the PS 3 exclusives ? even wii has better games coming out.

PS 3

GOD OF WAR 3

UNCHARTED 2

KILLZONE 2

TWISTED METAL

WIPEOUT PS 3

LITTLE BIG PLANET 2

LA NOIR

FINAL FANTASY XII VERSUS

FLOWER

GRAN TURISMO 5

RIDGE RACER

inFAMOUS

METAL GEAR SOLID ONLINE

RED DEAD REVOLVER 2

TIME CRISIS 4

MAG

GRAN TURISMO HD

GRADIUS PS 3

KINGDOM HEARTS 3

HOT SHOTS GOLF 5

THE GETAWAY 3

WHITE KNIGHT CHRONICLES

HEAVY RAIN

VALKYRIA CHRONICLES

YAKUZA 3

I guess we'll be having alot to play 2009

lol after all Sonys taught you.....youd think cows learn that the PS3 is nicknamed the delaystation 3 for a reason.

well, Wendy's > Burger King : FACT.joopyme