360 GEOW>>>>>PC GEOW????

  • 79 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60812

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60812 Posts
9.6>9.0??? How can this be??? Gears of war is a year old game and the new PC game cant beat it? I'll probably still get the PC version because I'm a fan of the series. New chapters added to this version don't fit quite so well with the old ones? Did they rush it out? What are your thoughts?
Avatar image for cobrax25
cobrax25

9649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 cobrax25
Member since 2006 • 9649 Posts
actually read the review...they state rather clearly the PC version is the best one due to a lot of new content and far better graphics.
Avatar image for -Tretiak
-Tretiak

2416

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 -Tretiak
Member since 2007 • 2416 Posts
Try not to be naive. A year has passed, better games have been released, and standards have risen. The PC version is clearly better than the Xbox 360 one.
Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#4 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts

"The PC version of Gears of War is everything the 360 version was and more."

Please don't compare review scores cross-platform and cross-time.

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60812

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60812 Posts
No dedicated servers either...damn, that REALLY sucks
Avatar image for organic_machine
organic_machine

10143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 organic_machine
Member since 2004 • 10143 Posts
From now on, STOP comparing the old review system with the new one. The PC version, as usual, vastly surpasses the 360 version.
Avatar image for t3hTwinky
t3hTwinky

3701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 t3hTwinky
Member since 2005 • 3701 Posts

"The PC version of Gears of War is everything the 360 version was and more."

Please don't compare review scores cross-platform and cross-time.

subrosian

And cross rating system.

Avatar image for i-lick-monkeys
i-lick-monkeys

2971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 i-lick-monkeys
Member since 2007 • 2971 Posts
they state the pc version is better
Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60812

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60812 Posts

"The PC version of Gears of War is everything the 360 version was and more."

Please don't compare review scores cross-platform and cross-time.

subrosian
That is the tools in which GS gives us to work with. Maybe you should write up a soapbox about it.
Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts
This thread is an Epic failure.
Avatar image for Velocitas8
Velocitas8

10748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Velocitas8
Member since 2006 • 10748 Posts

No dedicated servers either...damn, that REALLY sucksHeil68

Sure does.

Same with the 360 version though..and you pay for your multiplayer :?

Edit: @ post below: Good to hear. I wasn't going to buy it unless it had dedicated servers. I see no reason for it not to.

Avatar image for WhySoCry
WhySoCry

689

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 WhySoCry
Member since 2005 • 689 Posts

No dedicated servers either...damn, that REALLY sucksHeil68

Uhh, where you hear that crap from? It was debunked.

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60812

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60812 Posts
they state the pc version is betteri-lick-monkeys
Then why not give it a 9.5?
Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts
It's pc, I thought on SW that meansit gets an automatic win. I didn't think folks here really argued that anymore.
Avatar image for Velocitas8
Velocitas8

10748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Velocitas8
Member since 2006 • 10748 Posts

[QUOTE="i-lick-monkeys"]they state the pc version is betterHeil68
Then why not give it a 9.5?

Because they scored it relative to current PC game standards. Simple, huh?

Avatar image for WhySoCry
WhySoCry

689

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 WhySoCry
Member since 2005 • 689 Posts

[QUOTE="i-lick-monkeys"]they state the pc version is betterHeil68
Then why not give it a 9.5?

Standards? Hard to comprehend young one? Isn't it your bedtime right now?

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60812

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60812 Posts

[QUOTE="Heil68"]No dedicated servers either...damn, that REALLY sucksVelocitas8

Sure does.

Same with the 360 version though..and you pay for your multiplayer :?

I own all systems, i'm not singled out. I am buying it for the PC, whats wrong with wanting dedicated servers?
Avatar image for cobrax25
cobrax25

9649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 cobrax25
Member since 2006 • 9649 Posts

[QUOTE="i-lick-monkeys"]they state the pc version is betterHeil68
Then why not give it a 9.5?

because its been a year...and its hard to impress the PC community anymore with multiplayer from a 360 game...since they have pretty much seen it all.

Avatar image for XaosII
XaosII

16705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 XaosII
Member since 2003 • 16705 Posts

[QUOTE="i-lick-monkeys"]they state the pc version is betterHeil68
Then why not give it a 9.5?

Because Bioshock is a better singleplayer game, and The Orange Box is a better value? Why should GEOW score as well or better than these games?

Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#20 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts

Mandatory Reading

GS Review system is worth understanding better before addressing it

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60812

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60812 Posts

[QUOTE="Heil68"][QUOTE="i-lick-monkeys"]they state the pc version is betterWhySoCry

Then why not give it a 9.5?

Standards? Hard to comprehend young one? Isn't it your bedtime right now?

Really? Yes, pleas explain these things you call standards then, 'old' one.
Avatar image for organic_machine
organic_machine

10143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 organic_machine
Member since 2004 • 10143 Posts

[QUOTE="i-lick-monkeys"]they state the pc version is betterHeil68
Then why not give it a 9.5?

Do you have ANY idea about how things work? Gears is old. Games have come out and surpassed it. You can't look at the score based on the game/series alone. You have to look at the competition and all the games surrounding it. Ifgame A was great fun, then five years late, game B comes out, and scores less, does that make it a worse game? Not neccesarily. and that's where you fail, kind sir.

Avatar image for MikeE21286
MikeE21286

10405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 MikeE21286
Member since 2003 • 10405 Posts
it's better on PC....there is the lagged 1 year factor coupled with the new scoring system (and maybe coupled with PC's "higher standards" although sometimes I question that).
Avatar image for Velocitas8
Velocitas8

10748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Velocitas8
Member since 2006 • 10748 Posts

I am buying it for the PC, whats wrong with wanting dedicated servers?Heil68

Just what are you implying? Nothing is wrong with wanting dedicated servers.

In fact, I expect them in any online game, alot of other PC gamers feel the same.

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60812

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60812 Posts

[QUOTE="Heil68"][QUOTE="i-lick-monkeys"]they state the pc version is betterXaosII

Then why not give it a 9.5?

Because Bioshock is a better singleplayer game, and The Orange Box is a better value? Why should GEOW score as well or better than these games?

They score games on better values now? Since when?
Avatar image for darklord888
darklord888

8382

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 darklord888
Member since 2004 • 8382 Posts

[QUOTE="Heil68"]No dedicated servers either...damn, that REALLY sucksWhySoCry

Uhh, where you hear that crap from? It was debunked.



When was it debunked?
Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#27 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts
*musicalmac stares blankly at all the suckers in this all-too-obvious thread... EDIT: No offense! (*musicalmac uses the word "suckers" in the friendliest way possible :? )
Avatar image for naval
naval

11108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#28 naval
Member since 2003 • 11108 Posts

it's better on PC....there is the lagged 1 year factor coupled with the new scoring system (and maybe coupled with PC's "higher standards" although sometimes I question that).MikeE21286

higher pc standards are there, but 1 year factor is a big deal, with so many shooters which have come out and are going to come

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60812

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60812 Posts

[QUOTE="Heil68"][QUOTE="i-lick-monkeys"]they state the pc version is betterorganic_machine

Then why not give it a 9.5?

Do you have ANY idea about how things work? Gears is old. Games have come out and surpassed it. You can't look at the score based on the game/series alone. You have to look at the competition and all the games surrounding it. Ifgame A was great fun, then five years late, game B comes out, and scores less, does that make it a worse game? Not neccesarily. and that's where you fail, kind sir.

GEARS is barely 1 year old, factor in development time for a game, thats nothing in the age of a game. Scores are what drives SW's..yes or no?
Avatar image for organic_machine
organic_machine

10143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 organic_machine
Member since 2004 • 10143 Posts
[QUOTE="organic_machine"]

[QUOTE="Heil68"][QUOTE="i-lick-monkeys"]they state the pc version is betterHeil68

Then why not give it a 9.5?

Do you have ANY idea about how things work? Gears is old. Games have come out and surpassed it. You can't look at the score based on the game/series alone. You have to look at the competition and all the games surrounding it. Ifgame A was great fun, then five years late, game B comes out, and scores less, does that make it a worse game? Not neccesarily. and that's where you fail, kind sir.

GEARS is barely 1 year old, factor in development time for a game, thats nothing in the age of a game. Scores are what drives SW's..yes or no?

Don't make such generalizations. The review system works differently than before. You can't compare the old system with the new one. Yes, SW is about scores, but again, you CANNOT compare the old system with the new one. It creates all kinds of fail.

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60812

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60812 Posts
[QUOTE="Heil68"][QUOTE="organic_machine"]

[QUOTE="Heil68"][QUOTE="i-lick-monkeys"]they state the pc version is betterorganic_machine

Then why not give it a 9.5?

Do you have ANY idea about how things work? Gears is old. Games have come out and surpassed it. You can't look at the score based on the game/series alone. You have to look at the competition and all the games surrounding it. Ifgame A was great fun, then five years late, game B comes out, and scores less, does that make it a worse game? Not neccesarily. and that's where you fail, kind sir.

GEARS is barely 1 year old, factor in development time for a game, thats nothing in the age of a game. Scores are what drives SW's..yes or no?

Don't make such generalizations. The review system works differently than before. You can't compare the old system with the new one. Yes, SW is about scores, but again, you CANNOT compare the old system with the new one. It creates all kinds of fail.

How long does it take to develope a game then? Start till its on he shelf?
Avatar image for organic_machine
organic_machine

10143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 organic_machine
Member since 2004 • 10143 Posts
How long does it take to develope a game then? Start till its on he shelf?Heil68
thats not the freaking point. The point is that a year is PLENTY of time for better games to arrive and raise the standards.
Avatar image for naval
naval

11108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 naval
Member since 2003 • 11108 Posts

are scores all that matter ? Halo 2 - 9.4 HL 2 - 9.2, but HL 2 got goty !! so scores are not the only thing. read the review !!!

edit : i meant shooter of the year

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60812

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60812 Posts
[QUOTE="Heil68"]How long does it take to develope a game then? Start till its on he shelf?organic_machine
thats not the freaking point. The point is that a year is PLENTY of time for better games to arrive and raise the standards.

My point is, if the PC is so much better, why could EPIC take the time to make this game better? Sounds like they just rushed it out to me, which sucks. I'm still going to get it because I know I'll never see those extra maps on the 360.
Avatar image for IndianaJosh
IndianaJosh

5159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 IndianaJosh
Member since 2003 • 5159 Posts
.
Avatar image for organic_machine
organic_machine

10143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 organic_machine
Member since 2004 • 10143 Posts

[QUOTE="organic_machine"][QUOTE="Heil68"]How long does it take to develope a game then? Start till its on he shelf?Heil68
thats not the freaking point. The point is that a year is PLENTY of time for better games to arrive and raise the standards.

My point is, if the PC is so much better, why could EPIC take the time to make this game better? Sounds like they just rushed it out to me, which sucks. I'm still going to get it because I know I'll never see those extra maps on the 360.

Rushed it? How? The review states it's superior in every way. What more do you want? A full blown sequel? Listen, get the game, I think you're going to be pleasantly suprised at how finished and un-rushed it's going to be. Make some maps. Play some non-buggy online.

Avatar image for Velocitas8
Velocitas8

10748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Velocitas8
Member since 2006 • 10748 Posts

My point is, if the PC is so much better, why could EPIC take the time to make this game better?Heil68

What?..It is better. Try reading the review.

Avatar image for InsaneBasura
InsaneBasura

12591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#39 InsaneBasura
Member since 2005 • 12591 Posts
This is the definitive version of Gears of War. If you're looking to make a Gears of War related purchase and you have a PC that can handle it, this is very clearly the version to get.Jeff Gerstmann Video Review
.
Avatar image for oldskooler79
oldskooler79

1632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 oldskooler79
Member since 2004 • 1632 Posts

are scores all that matter ? Halo 2 - 9.4 HL 2 - 9.2, but HL 2 got goty !! so scores are not the only thing. read the review !!!naval

find something new.

Avatar image for white_sox
white_sox

17442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#41 white_sox
Member since 2006 • 17442 Posts
"This is the definitive version of Gears of War". - Jeff Gerstman.
Avatar image for organic_machine
organic_machine

10143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 organic_machine
Member since 2004 • 10143 Posts

[QUOTE="naval"]are scores all that matter ? Halo 2 - 9.4 HL 2 - 9.2, but HL 2 got goty !! so scores are not the only thing. read the review !!!oldskooler79

find something new.

Why shoud he have to? Facts are facts. Get used to hearing it, even though you hate hearing it.

Avatar image for Zeliard9
Zeliard9

6030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Zeliard9
Member since 2007 • 6030 Posts

[QUOTE="organic_machine"][QUOTE="Heil68"]How long does it take to develope a game then? Start till its on he shelf?Heil68
thats not the freaking point. The point is that a year is PLENTY of time for better games to arrive and raise the standards.

My point is, if the PC is so much better, why could EPIC take the time to make this game better? Sounds like they just rushed it out to me, which sucks. I'm still going to get it because I know I'll never see those extra maps on the 360.

The control's better, the graphics are better, and there's much more content. What were you expecting, Gears of War 2?

Avatar image for Velocitas8
Velocitas8

10748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Velocitas8
Member since 2006 • 10748 Posts

Hermits am cry againwok7

How so? Looks like it's the Lemmings on damage control tonight. Not all of them of course, just the desperately hopeless ones.

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

It iS clearly the best.

It is A YEAR OLD on PC :|

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
Hermits am cry againwok7
"This is the definitive version of Gears of War". - Jeff Gerstman.white_sox
Avatar image for naval
naval

11108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#47 naval
Member since 2003 • 11108 Posts

[QUOTE="naval"]are scores all that matter ? Halo 2 - 9.4 HL 2 - 9.2, but HL 2 got goty !! so scores are not the only thing. read the review !!!oldskooler79

find something new.

what does it matter ! fanboys who won't listen to this, will not listen to anything else

Avatar image for Unforgiven2870
Unforgiven2870

6386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 Unforgiven2870
Member since 2004 • 6386 Posts
Nothing wrong with the PC
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#49 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts
[QUOTE="Velocitas8"]

[QUOTE="Heil68"]No dedicated servers either...damn, that REALLY sucksHeil68

Sure does.

Same with the 360 version though..and you pay for your multiplayer :?

I own all systems, i'm not singled out. I am buying it for the PC, whats wrong with wanting dedicated servers?

With only 8 players in each game, it would be a waste of money to have dedicated servers. Any machine can run a smooth game with only 8 players max.

Avatar image for jechtshot78
jechtshot78

29851

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50 jechtshot78
Member since 2004 • 29851 Posts
Gears of war isn't that good in the first place when compared to other shooters.