This topic is locked from further discussion.
No dedicated servers either...damn, that REALLY sucksHeil68
Sure does.
Same with the 360 version though..and you pay for your multiplayer :?
Edit: @ post below: Good to hear. I wasn't going to buy it unless it had dedicated servers. I see no reason for it not to.
[QUOTE="i-lick-monkeys"]they state the pc version is betterHeil68Then why not give it a 9.5?
Because they scored it relative to current PC game standards. Simple, huh?
[QUOTE="Heil68"]No dedicated servers either...damn, that REALLY sucksVelocitas8
Sure does.
Same with the 360 version though..and you pay for your multiplayer :?
Then why not give it a 9.5?[QUOTE="Heil68"][QUOTE="i-lick-monkeys"]they state the pc version is betterWhySoCry
Standards? Hard to comprehend young one? Isn't it your bedtime right now?
Really? Yes, pleas explain these things you call standards then, 'old' one.[QUOTE="i-lick-monkeys"]they state the pc version is betterHeil68Then why not give it a 9.5?
Do you have ANY idea about how things work? Gears is old. Games have come out and surpassed it. You can't look at the score based on the game/series alone. You have to look at the competition and all the games surrounding it. Ifgame A was great fun, then five years late, game B comes out, and scores less, does that make it a worse game? Not neccesarily. and that's where you fail, kind sir.
I am buying it for the PC, whats wrong with wanting dedicated servers?Heil68
Just what are you implying? Nothing is wrong with wanting dedicated servers.
In fact, I expect them in any online game, alot of other PC gamers feel the same.
Then why not give it a 9.5?[QUOTE="Heil68"][QUOTE="i-lick-monkeys"]they state the pc version is betterXaosII
Because Bioshock is a better singleplayer game, and The Orange Box is a better value? Why should GEOW score as well or better than these games?
They score games on better values now? Since when?[QUOTE="Heil68"]No dedicated servers either...damn, that REALLY sucksWhySoCry
Uhh, where you hear that crap from? It was debunked.
it's better on PC....there is the lagged 1 year factor coupled with the new scoring system (and maybe coupled with PC's "higher standards" although sometimes I question that).MikeE21286
higher pc standards are there, but 1 year factor is a big deal, with so many shooters which have come out and are going to come
Then why not give it a 9.5?[QUOTE="Heil68"][QUOTE="i-lick-monkeys"]they state the pc version is betterorganic_machine
Do you have ANY idea about how things work? Gears is old. Games have come out and surpassed it. You can't look at the score based on the game/series alone. You have to look at the competition and all the games surrounding it. Ifgame A was great fun, then five years late, game B comes out, and scores less, does that make it a worse game? Not neccesarily. and that's where you fail, kind sir.
GEARS is barely 1 year old, factor in development time for a game, thats nothing in the age of a game. Scores are what drives SW's..yes or no?[QUOTE="organic_machine"]Then why not give it a 9.5?[QUOTE="Heil68"][QUOTE="i-lick-monkeys"]they state the pc version is betterHeil68
Do you have ANY idea about how things work? Gears is old. Games have come out and surpassed it. You can't look at the score based on the game/series alone. You have to look at the competition and all the games surrounding it. Ifgame A was great fun, then five years late, game B comes out, and scores less, does that make it a worse game? Not neccesarily. and that's where you fail, kind sir.
GEARS is barely 1 year old, factor in development time for a game, thats nothing in the age of a game. Scores are what drives SW's..yes or no?Don't make such generalizations. The review system works differently than before. You can't compare the old system with the new one. Yes, SW is about scores, but again, you CANNOT compare the old system with the new one. It creates all kinds of fail.
[QUOTE="Heil68"][QUOTE="organic_machine"]Then why not give it a 9.5?[QUOTE="Heil68"][QUOTE="i-lick-monkeys"]they state the pc version is betterorganic_machine
Do you have ANY idea about how things work? Gears is old. Games have come out and surpassed it. You can't look at the score based on the game/series alone. You have to look at the competition and all the games surrounding it. Ifgame A was great fun, then five years late, game B comes out, and scores less, does that make it a worse game? Not neccesarily. and that's where you fail, kind sir.
GEARS is barely 1 year old, factor in development time for a game, thats nothing in the age of a game. Scores are what drives SW's..yes or no?Don't make such generalizations. The review system works differently than before. You can't compare the old system with the new one. Yes, SW is about scores, but again, you CANNOT compare the old system with the new one. It creates all kinds of fail.
How long does it take to develope a game then? Start till its on he shelf?How long does it take to develope a game then? Start till its on he shelf?Heil68thats not the freaking point. The point is that a year is PLENTY of time for better games to arrive and raise the standards.
[QUOTE="Heil68"]How long does it take to develope a game then? Start till its on he shelf?organic_machinethats not the freaking point. The point is that a year is PLENTY of time for better games to arrive and raise the standards. My point is, if the PC is so much better, why could EPIC take the time to make this game better? Sounds like they just rushed it out to me, which sucks. I'm still going to get it because I know I'll never see those extra maps on the 360.
[QUOTE="organic_machine"][QUOTE="Heil68"]How long does it take to develope a game then? Start till its on he shelf?Heil68thats not the freaking point. The point is that a year is PLENTY of time for better games to arrive and raise the standards. My point is, if the PC is so much better, why could EPIC take the time to make this game better? Sounds like they just rushed it out to me, which sucks. I'm still going to get it because I know I'll never see those extra maps on the 360.
Rushed it? How? The review states it's superior in every way. What more do you want? A full blown sequel? Listen, get the game, I think you're going to be pleasantly suprised at how finished and un-rushed it's going to be. Make some maps. Play some non-buggy online.
My point is, if the PC is so much better, why could EPIC take the time to make this game better?Heil68
What?..It is better. Try reading the review.
This is the definitive version of Gears of War. If you're looking to make a Gears of War related purchase and you have a PC that can handle it, this is very clearly the version to get.Jeff Gerstmann Video Review.
are scores all that matter ? Halo 2 - 9.4 HL 2 - 9.2, but HL 2 got goty !! so scores are not the only thing. read the review !!!naval
find something new.
[QUOTE="naval"]are scores all that matter ? Halo 2 - 9.4 HL 2 - 9.2, but HL 2 got goty !! so scores are not the only thing. read the review !!!oldskooler79
find something new.
Why shoud he have to? Facts are facts. Get used to hearing it, even though you hate hearing it.
[QUOTE="organic_machine"][QUOTE="Heil68"]How long does it take to develope a game then? Start till its on he shelf?Heil68thats not the freaking point. The point is that a year is PLENTY of time for better games to arrive and raise the standards. My point is, if the PC is so much better, why could EPIC take the time to make this game better? Sounds like they just rushed it out to me, which sucks. I'm still going to get it because I know I'll never see those extra maps on the 360.
The control's better, the graphics are better, and there's much more content. What were you expecting, Gears of War 2?
Hermits am cry againwok7
How so? Looks like it's the Lemmings on damage control tonight. Not all of them of course, just the desperately hopeless ones.
[QUOTE="naval"]are scores all that matter ? Halo 2 - 9.4 HL 2 - 9.2, but HL 2 got goty !! so scores are not the only thing. read the review !!!oldskooler79
find something new.
what does it matter ! fanboys who won't listen to this, will not listen to anything else
[QUOTE="Velocitas8"][QUOTE="Heil68"]No dedicated servers either...damn, that REALLY sucksHeil68
Sure does.
Same with the 360 version though..and you pay for your multiplayer :?
With only 8 players in each game, it would be a waste of money to have dedicated servers. Any machine can run a smooth game with only 8 players max.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment