This topic is locked from further discussion.
FACT. OPINION.[QUOTE="heretrix"][QUOTE="md108"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]Bigger =/= better
Vice City >>> San Andreas
Freebird8877
STRICTLY opinion. But for me, Vice City had a killer sound track, whereas San An's was bleh. And the comedy was a little more funny in VC, and Tommy...
Tomy was a true badass.
To be honest, I loved all 3 for different reasons.GTA 3 was an new experience and it was finally the full realization of what I always wanted. The Ability to roam freely through and entire city. No, it wasn't perfect, but it was something I always wanted in a game. Also the radio stations were hilarious.
GTA Vice City was cool because of the setting and the addition of motorcycles, flight and swimming. The soundtrack is probably undeniably one of the best, and the cast of characters and voice talent is of the same quality. The radio stations are still hilarious.
GTA San Andreas, love it or hate it, is a technical marvel with incredibly large game area with tons of stuff to do in it. The addition of parachuting, the casino games and the jetpack are really cool additions to the game... I really don't understand the hate that these games recieve. The stories are good, the voice acting is probably the best in the industry (Dennis Hopper, Samuel L.Jackson, Peter Fonda, Burt Reynolds, etc) and the gameplay is incredibly varied..These games are long and continue to be playable even after you finish them. I truly believe that a lot of people in System wars and on the internet in general that hate on GTA are posers trying to give themselves some sort of credibilty..
End rant.
agreed. DVD 9 limits developers.You don't know what you're talking about. The PS2 had memory cards while the Xbox1 had a HDD. Did ther PS2 hold GTA back for Xbox users? Nope.
360 is a next-gen console with a last gen format.
xxThyLordxx
In fact GTA was better on the Xbox.
This time around will it be held back? Nope. Why not? Well, if you ever try to fill a 9GB space with custom made textures, sounds, code etc., you'll appreciate just how much hard work goes into making video games. I know because I've done it. I worked for 6 months and barely filled a space of 2GB.
9 GB is plenty. It will be a while before DVD9 becomes obsolete.
I think so. It would have been nice to see Rockstar fully explore blu-ray, but it looks like they won't be able to because of the 360's DVD-9 restraints. I am sure Rockstar will take full advantage of everything else on the PS3 though.KeyWiiAnother person who knows nothing about video game creation. You don't start out saying I want to fill 50GB. You make your game without thinking how it's going to fit. If it's too big you trim it down. If there's space (which is usually the case), you put in extras -- continuing to work for as long as your budget allows. It would take 6 years and many artists to fill 50GB. Your costs would exceed anything reasonable.
[QUOTE="Freebird8877"]We all know the PS3's Blu-Ray holds up to 50GB duel layer, but with DVD9, will 360 be holding PS3 GTA back from reaching it's full potential (ig: bigger map, more pedestrians,HD, sound) I'm just curious ;)
thinicer
[QUOTE="thinicer"][QUOTE="Freebird8877"]We all know the PS3's Blu-Ray holds up to 50GB duel layer, but with DVD9, will 360 be holding PS3 GTA back from reaching it's full potential (ig: bigger map, more pedestrians,HD, sound) I'm just curious ;)
iwishiwasrich
[QUOTE="iwishiwasrich"][QUOTE="thinicer"][QUOTE="Freebird8877"]We all know the PS3's Blu-Ray holds up to 50GB duel layer, but with DVD9, will 360 be holding PS3 GTA back from reaching it's full potential (ig: bigger map, more pedestrians,HD, sound) I'm just curious ;)
thinicer
[QUOTE="thinicer"]Yes. if you got millions of dollars offered to you by the richest company of all time you would make it happen no matter what it takes.
If the developers felt that DVD-9 would limit them then they would not have brought it to the Xbox 360 in the first place.
cutmaclass1
You don't know what you're talking about. The PS2 had memory cards while the Xbox1 had a HDD. Did ther PS2 hold GTA back for Xbox users? Nope.[QUOTE="xxThyLordxx"]agreed. DVD 9 limits developers.
360 is a next-gen console with a last gen format.
CarlosPontinas
In fact GTA was better on the Xbox.
This time around will it be held back? Nope. Why not? Well, if you ever try to fill a 9GB space with custom made textures, sounds, code etc., you'll appreciate just how much hard work goes into making video games. I know because I've done it. I worked for 6 months and barely filled a space of 2GB.
9 GB is plenty. It will be a while before DVD9 becomes obsolete.
lemmings live in a different dimension where they make videogames now lol he made a videogame all by his lonesome self and made 2 gb worth of data that makes sense ! hey buddy http://www.gamespot.com/ps2/action/gta4/index.html it says best on ps2, you just got owned...[QUOTE="cutmaclass1"][QUOTE="thinicer"]Yes. if you got millions of dollars offered to you by the richest company of all time you would make it happen no matter what it takes.
If the developers felt that DVD-9 would limit them then they would not have brought it to the Xbox 360 in the first place.
Me-Ur-Daddy
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]Bigger =/= better
Vice City >>> San Andreas
Freebird8877
I have to disagree with you big time, In Vice City, the area was so small that it felt like i was restrained all the time, and with the loading screens between islands, that just killed it. But in SA, i felt more free, especially without the loading screens. IMO, bigger is better, more freedom, more fun.
The quality of the game itself was better in Vice though. I could have fun in Vice just sitting in a car listening to the radio, or driving around seeing all the cool sights. San Andreas was so drab, even the Las Vegas strip at night was boring.
[QUOTE="Me-Ur-Daddy"][QUOTE="cutmaclass1"][QUOTE="thinicer"]Yes. if you got millions of dollars offered to you by the richest company of all time you would make it happen no matter what it takes.
If the developers felt that DVD-9 would limit them then they would not have brought it to the Xbox 360 in the first place.
thinicer
because rockstar was committed to sony
Yes. if you got millions of dollars offered to you by the richest company of all time you would make it happen no matter what it takes.[QUOTE="thinicer"][QUOTE="Me-Ur-Daddy"][QUOTE="cutmaclass1"][QUOTE="thinicer"]
If the developers felt that DVD-9 would limit them then they would not have brought it to the Xbox 360 in the first place.
Kahuna_1
because rockstar was committed to sony
Nah, the PS3 is holding the 360 version back with its lesser graphics. jd7-03Lesser graphics.... ummm. k! LoL!
[QUOTE="CarlosPontinas"]You don't know what you're talking about. The PS2 had memory cards while the Xbox1 had a HDD. Did ther PS2 hold GTA back for Xbox users? Nope.[QUOTE="xxThyLordxx"]agreed. DVD 9 limits developers.
360 is a next-gen console with a last gen format.
Me-Ur-Daddy
In fact GTA was better on the Xbox.
This time around will it be held back? Nope. Why not? Well, if you ever try to fill a 9GB space with custom made textures, sounds, code etc., you'll appreciate just how much hard work goes into making video games. I know because I've done it. I worked for 6 months and barely filled a space of 2GB.
9 GB is plenty. It will be a while before DVD9 becomes obsolete.
lemmings live in a different dimension where they make videogames now lol he made a videogame all by his lonesome self and made 2 gb worth of data that makes sense ! hey buddy http://www.gamespot.com/ps2/action/gta4/index.html it says best on ps2, you just got owned...What was the point of your response?
[QUOTE="Kahuna_1"]Yes. if you got millions of dollars offered to you by the richest company of all time you would make it happen no matter what it takes.[QUOTE="thinicer"][QUOTE="Me-Ur-Daddy"][QUOTE="cutmaclass1"][QUOTE="thinicer"]
If the developers felt that DVD-9 would limit them then they would not have brought it to the Xbox 360 in the first place.
thinicer
because rockstar was committed to sony
first of all, the story behind that game is confusing...second of all, i was talking about GTA GTA2 GTA3 GTA VC and GTA SA all being on sonys system first.
God, I hope not.
I've worried so much about this but I have a lot of faith in Rockstar and I know they're going to amaze me. They continue to do it every time they release a new GTA so I don't see why this time will be an exception.
This is the major reason I don't like games going multiplat.
the-very-best
You act as if the dynamic is in PS's favor!! Truth be told it's the 360 owners who should be worried about getting a delayed version with washed out mapping and terrible draw distances, just so as to placate the cows.Â
Yes, the 360 will hold back GTAIV....GTAIV will still be an incredible game, but there will be sacrifices made to fit everything on DVD9. San Andreas for the PS2 nearly took up all the space right? Even with much better compression methods being used nowadays, RockStar will have to scale down aspects of the game to fit on the 360 DVD.AvIdGaMeR444San Andreas took only 3.9 GBs... less than.half of a DVD9.....and u saw that world... think wut they would do for GTA4...
I'll be interested to see how this works out. To tell the truth, Im confused how Rockstar will handle this. Does the PS3 get the higher res textures and more sound clips? 50GB is a lot after allflamingschmoes2It doesn't work like that. 50GB is maximum space on a BR. It's useless in terms of production values as its access speed is slow. You can't use it to update your scenes without jerky frame dropping. glitiches and delays.
To have nice textures and a smooth flowing game you need RAM. The 360 has twice as much as the PS3.
Yes, the 360 will hold back GTAIV....GTAIV will still be an incredible game, but there will be sacrifices made to fit everything on DVD9. San Andreas for the PS2 nearly took up all the space right? Even with much better compression methods being used nowadays, RockStar will have to scale down aspects of the game to fit on the 360 DVD.AvIdGaMeR444San Andreas only took up 4GB of space....:| GTA4 should be no problem. :)
[QUOTE="DaddyDC650"][QUOTE="jd7-03"]Nah, the PS3 is holding the 360 version back with its lesser graphics. jd7-03Lesser graphics.... ummm. k! LoL! Its true, 360 games look better, its already been proven over and over again. Even the editor-in-chief of Xbox 360 over @ IGN admitted that the PS3 WILL have superior looking games when compared to the 360. I'm sure he speaks with developers all of the time. Otherwise, why would he put down the 360 if it was not true? I can find you the link if you'd like. =P
[QUOTE="thinicer"][QUOTE="Kahuna_1"]Yes. if you got millions of dollars offered to you by the richest company of all time you would make it happen no matter what it takes.[QUOTE="thinicer"][QUOTE="Me-Ur-Daddy"][QUOTE="cutmaclass1"][QUOTE="thinicer"]
If the developers felt that DVD-9 would limit them then they would not have brought it to the Xbox 360 in the first place.
Kahuna_1
because rockstar was committed to sony
first of all, the story behind that game is confusing...second of all, i was talking about GTA GTA2 GTA3 GTA VC and GTA SA all being on sonys system first.
assasins creed was shown as an xbox game first of all at x05 or whatever, then they wanted to make it exclusive to ps3 but sony didnt see to much promise in it so they didnt shell out the dough. rockstar is and always has been commited to sony, they got the tope selling game of all time in GTA:SA on ps2, they were ready to take losses if they had to for a ps3 version, cus they had so much success with sony in the past. they even made bully exclusive while they just shell out that ping pong game, which isnt really a finished game, just a tech demo for next generation console. there was a video of sam houser expressing how commited he was to ps3 but was removed from youtube for some reason :([QUOTE="jd7-03"][QUOTE="DaddyDC650"][QUOTE="jd7-03"]Nah, the PS3 is holding the 360 version back with its lesser graphics. DaddyDC650Lesser graphics.... ummm. k! LoL! Its true, 360 games look better, its already been proven over and over again. Even the editor-in-chief of Xbox 360 over @ IGN admitted that the PS3 WILL have superior looking games when compared to the 360. I'm sure he speaks with developers all of the time. Otherwise, why would he put down the 360 if it was not true? I can find you the link if you'd like. =P It's probably sarcasm.
[QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]Yes, the 360 will hold back GTAIV....GTAIV will still be an incredible game, but there will be sacrifices made to fit everything on DVD9. San Andreas for the PS2 nearly took up all the space right? Even with much better compression methods being used nowadays, RockStar will have to scale down aspects of the game to fit on the 360 DVD.NedemisSan Andreas only took up 4GB of space....:| GTA4 should be no problem. :) uh wasnt san andreas on a dual layer dvd :)
[QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]Yes, the 360 will hold back GTAIV....GTAIV will still be an incredible game, but there will be sacrifices made to fit everything on DVD9. San Andreas for the PS2 nearly took up all the space right? Even with much better compression methods being used nowadays, RockStar will have to scale down aspects of the game to fit on the 360 DVD.Me-Ur-DaddySan Andreas only took up 4GB of space....:| GTA4 should be no problem. :) uh wasnt san andreas on a dual layer dvd :) dude....incase u havent noticed....DVD9 is dual layer DVD....
seeing how Oblivion, Mass Effect, Saints Row, Crackdown and many other games fit easily onto a single DL DVD-9, i'm not worried about GTA4. Not one bit...Nedemismass effect barely fits
It doesn't work like that. 50GB is maximum space on a BR. It's useless in terms of production values as its access speed is slow. You can't use it to update your scenes without jerky frame dropping. glitiches and delays.[QUOTE="flamingschmoes2"]I'll be interested to see how this works out. To tell the truth, Im confused how Rockstar will handle this. Does the PS3 get the higher res textures and more sound clips? 50GB is a lot after allCarlosPontinas
To have nice textures and a smooth flowing game you need RAM. The 360 has twice as much as the PS3.
now he resorts to spewing lies after getting owned saying xbox GTA is better :lol:[QUOTE="Me-Ur-Daddy"][QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]Yes, the 360 will hold back GTAIV....GTAIV will still be an incredible game, but there will be sacrifices made to fit everything on DVD9. San Andreas for the PS2 nearly took up all the space right? Even with much better compression methods being used nowadays, RockStar will have to scale down aspects of the game to fit on the 360 DVD.killaj2786San Andreas only took up 4GB of space....:| GTA4 should be no problem. :) uh wasnt san andreas on a dual layer dvd :) dude....incase u havent noticed....DVD9 is dual layer DVD.... uh thats my point sherlock, he said its 4gb, that fits on a single layer, but san andreas is not on a single layer dvd :|
[QUOTE="DaddyDC650"][QUOTE="jd7-03"][QUOTE="DaddyDC650"][QUOTE="jd7-03"]Nah, the PS3 is holding the 360 version back with its lesser graphics. CarlosPontinasLesser graphics.... ummm. k! LoL! Its true, 360 games look better, its already been proven over and over again. Even the editor-in-chief of Xbox 360 over @ IGN admitted that the PS3 WILL have superior looking games when compared to the 360. I'm sure he speaks with developers all of the time. Otherwise, why would he put down the 360 if it was not true? I can find you the link if you'd like. =P It's probably sarcasm. No sarcasm. He was dead serious. It's a video interview btw. I can find the link if you want to get owned...errr... I mean, would like to see it.
[QUOTE="the-very-best"]God, I hope not.
I've worried so much about this but I have a lot of faith in Rockstar and I know they're going to amaze me. They continue to do it every time they release a new GTA so I don't see why this time will be an exception.
This is the major reason I don't like games going multiplat.
CarlosPontinas
You act as if the dynamic is in PS's favor!! Truth be told it's the 360 owners who should be worried about getting a delayed version with washed out mapping and terrible draw distances, just so as to placate the cows.
[QUOTE="Nedemis"]seeing how Oblivion, Mass Effect, Saints Row, Crackdown and many other games fit easily onto a single DL DVD-9, i'm not worried about GTA4. Not one bit...Me-Ur-Daddymass effect barely fits
It doesn't work like that. 50GB is maximum space on a BR. It's useless in terms of production values as its access speed is slow. You can't use it to update your scenes without jerky frame dropping. glitiches and delays.[QUOTE="flamingschmoes2"]I'll be interested to see how this works out. To tell the truth, Im confused how Rockstar will handle this. Does the PS3 get the higher res textures and more sound clips? 50GB is a lot after allCarlosPontinas
To have nice textures and a smooth flowing game you need RAM. The 360 has twice as much as the PS3.
now he resorts to spewing lies after getting owned saying xbox GTA is better :lol: Where am I lying? FYI the Xbox versions of GTA3 and GTA VC are IMO better than the crude PS2 versions. I own them.[QUOTE="killaj2786"][QUOTE="Me-Ur-Daddy"][QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]Yes, the 360 will hold back GTAIV....GTAIV will still be an incredible game, but there will be sacrifices made to fit everything on DVD9. San Andreas for the PS2 nearly took up all the space right? Even with much better compression methods being used nowadays, RockStar will have to scale down aspects of the game to fit on the 360 DVD.Me-Ur-DaddySan Andreas only took up 4GB of space....:| GTA4 should be no problem. :) uh wasnt san andreas on a dual layer dvd :) dude....incase u havent noticed....DVD9 is dual layer DVD.... uh thats my point sherlock, he said its 4gb, that fits on a single layer, but san andreas is not on a single layer dvd :|Â Yooo sherlock: 4.7 GB of free Hard Disk space for full install ( on PC version but basically the same goes for all versions) http://www.take2.co.za/product.php?id=52776
[QUOTE="CarlosPontinas"][QUOTE="the-very-best"]God, I hope not.
I've worried so much about this but I have a lot of faith in Rockstar and I know they're going to amaze me. They continue to do it every time they release a new GTA so I don't see why this time will be an exception.
This is the major reason I don't like games going multiplat.
the-very-best
You act as if the dynamic is in PS's favor!! Truth be told it's the 360 owners who should be worried about getting a delayed version with washed out mapping and terrible draw distances, just so as to placate the cows.
[QUOTE="mido275"][QUOTE="Freebird8877"]dont worry guys , MS is preparing a nasty surprize. they wont live with dvd for long. HDDVD is comming. we will all have to buy the drive. GTA 3 san andreas took all the space of the ps2 disc. Really :O My PC says 4 gig on my San Andreas folder. Obviously you never had DVD 9's....We all know the PS3's Blu-Ray holds up to 50GB duel layer, but with DVD9, will 360 be holding PS3 GTA back from reaching it's full potential (ig: bigger map, more pedestrians,HD, sound) I'm just curious ;)
nextgengaming18
[QUOTE="CarlosPontinas"][QUOTE="the-very-best"]God, I hope not.
I've worried so much about this but I have a lot of faith in Rockstar and I know they're going to amaze me. They continue to do it every time they release a new GTA so I don't see why this time will be an exception.
This is the major reason I don't like games going multiplat.
the-very-best
You act as if the dynamic is in PS's favor!! Truth be told it's the 360 owners who should be worried about getting a delayed version with washed out mapping and terrible draw distances, just so as to placate the cows.
[QUOTE="the-very-best"][QUOTE="CarlosPontinas"][QUOTE="the-very-best"]God, I hope not.
I've worried so much about this but I have a lot of faith in Rockstar and I know they're going to amaze me. They continue to do it every time they release a new GTA so I don't see why this time will be an exception.
This is the major reason I don't like games going multiplat.
CarlosPontinas
You act as if the dynamic is in PS's favor!! Truth be told it's the 360 owners who should be worried about getting a delayed version with washed out mapping and terrible draw distances, just so as to placate the cows.
PS3 has 512MB of RAM.Â
I do see possible problems that R* could face on the 360 version due to the media, since Blu-Ray allows for so much content and doesn't burden the developer with having to make sacrifices due to needed compression routines.
GTA is all about content, content and content. I'm sure R* is smiling about Blu-Ray and frowning about DVD9.
[QUOTE="CarlosPontinas"][QUOTE="the-very-best"][QUOTE="CarlosPontinas"][QUOTE="the-very-best"]God, I hope not.
I've worried so much about this but I have a lot of faith in Rockstar and I know they're going to amaze me. They continue to do it every time they release a new GTA so I don't see why this time will be an exception.
This is the major reason I don't like games going multiplat.
mentzer
You act as if the dynamic is in PS's favor!! Truth be told it's the 360 owners who should be worried about getting a delayed version with washed out mapping and terrible draw distances, just so as to placate the cows.
PS3 has 512MB of RAM.
I do see possible problems that R* could face on the 360 version due to the media, since Blu-Ray allows for so much content and doesn't burden the developer with having to make sacrifices due to needed compression routines.
GTA is all about content, content and content. I'm sure R* is smiling about Blu-Ray and frowning about DVD9.
if rockstar felt that way towards the DVD9 and the 360 they wouldn't be wasting their time making it for it[QUOTE="Freebird8877"]We all know the PS3's Blu-Ray holds up to 50GB duel layer, but with DVD9, will 360 be holding PS3 GTA back from reaching it's full potential (ig: bigger map, more pedestrians,HD, sound) I'm just curious ;)
thinicer
yeah , i think you are right, and i also believe that Mass Effect will be bigger or if not the same size in terms of map space, and all that.......
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment