360 Going to hold GTA:IV back?

  • 182 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for CwlHeddwyn
CwlHeddwyn

5314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 CwlHeddwyn
Member since 2005 • 5314 Posts
Vice City >>>> San Andreas
Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#52 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

[QUOTE="heretrix"][QUOTE="md108"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]Bigger =/= better

Vice City >>> San Andreas
Freebird8877

FACT.

OPINION.

STRICTLY opinion. But for me, Vice City had a killer sound track, whereas San An's was bleh. And the comedy was a little more funny in VC, and Tommy...

Tomy was a true badass.

To be honest, I loved all 3 for different reasons.

GTA 3 was an new experience and it was finally the full realization of what I always wanted. The Ability to roam freely through and entire city. No, it wasn't perfect, but it was something I always wanted in a game. Also the radio stations were hilarious.

GTA Vice City was cool because of the setting and the addition of motorcycles, flight and swimming. The soundtrack is probably undeniably one of the best, and the cast of characters and voice talent is of the same quality. The radio stations are still hilarious.

GTA San Andreas, love it or hate it, is a technical marvel with incredibly large game area with tons of stuff to do in it. The addition of parachuting, the casino games and the jetpack are really cool additions to the game... I really don't understand the hate that these games recieve. The stories are good, the voice acting is probably the best in the industry (Dennis Hopper, Samuel L.Jackson, Peter Fonda, Burt Reynolds, etc) and the gameplay is incredibly varied..These games are long and continue to be playable even after you finish them. I truly believe that a lot of people in System wars and on the internet in general that hate on GTA are posers trying to give themselves some sort of credibilty..

End rant.

Avatar image for CarlosPontinas
CarlosPontinas

923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 CarlosPontinas
Member since 2007 • 923 Posts

agreed. DVD 9 limits developers.

360 is a next-gen console with a last gen format.


xxThyLordxx
You don't know what you're talking about. The PS2 had memory cards while the Xbox1 had a HDD. Did ther PS2 hold GTA back for Xbox users? Nope.

In fact GTA was better on the Xbox.

This time around will it be held back? Nope. Why not? Well, if you ever try to fill a 9GB space with custom made textures, sounds, code etc., you'll appreciate just how much hard work goes into making video games. I know because I've done it. I worked for 6 months and barely filled a space of 2GB.

9 GB is plenty. It will be a while before DVD9 becomes obsolete.

Avatar image for JayPee89
JayPee89

3488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 JayPee89
Member since 2005 • 3488 Posts
Bigger =/= better

Vice City's story >>> San Andreas' story
foxhound_fox
Fixed. :-)
Avatar image for JayPee89
JayPee89

3488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 JayPee89
Member since 2005 • 3488 Posts
Vice City >>>> San AndreasCwlHeddwyn
Why?  Is it because the main character in Vice City was white?
Avatar image for CarlosPontinas
CarlosPontinas

923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 CarlosPontinas
Member since 2007 • 923 Posts
I think so. It would have been nice to see Rockstar fully explore blu-ray, but it looks like they won't be able to because of the 360's DVD-9 restraints. I am sure Rockstar will take full advantage of everything else on the PS3 though.KeyWii
Another person who knows nothing about video game creation. You don't start out saying I want to fill 50GB. You make your game without thinking how it's going to fit. If it's too big you trim it down. If there's space (which is usually the case), you put in extras -- continuing to work for as long as your budget allows. It would take 6 years and many artists to fill 50GB. Your costs would exceed anything reasonable.
Avatar image for killab2oo5
killab2oo5

13621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 killab2oo5
Member since 2005 • 13621 Posts
[QUOTE="Freebird8877"]

We all know the PS3's Blu-Ray holds up to 50GB duel layer, but with DVD9, will 360 be holding PS3 GTA back from reaching it's full potential (ig: bigger map, more pedestrians,HD, sound) I'm just curious ;)

thinicer


If Mass Effect is able to fit on a DVD-9, then I'm sure that GTA IV will be able to do so as well.

If the developers felt that DVD-9 would limit them then they would not have brought it to the Xbox 360 in the first place.

Both are huge games...like the worlds and all,not tech wise.GTAIV could possibly have to have multiple disc,unless they use some mighy good compression techniques...like procedural synthesis or be neat with their work.But im just guessing that since they have Blu-Ray theyll make a sloppy game,that uses way more space than needed.Meaning the 360 version will get the port and they wont bother compressing it or anything.
Avatar image for MTBare
MTBare

5176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 MTBare
Member since 2006 • 5176 Posts
Actually 360 will have more content than the ps3 version.
Avatar image for thinicer
thinicer

3704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 thinicer
Member since 2006 • 3704 Posts
[QUOTE="thinicer"][QUOTE="Freebird8877"]

We all know the PS3's Blu-Ray holds up to 50GB duel layer, but with DVD9, will 360 be holding PS3 GTA back from reaching it's full potential (ig: bigger map, more pedestrians,HD, sound) I'm just curious ;)

iwishiwasrich


If Mass Effect is able to fit on a DVD-9, then I'm sure that GTA IV will be able to do so as well.

If the developers felt that DVD-9 would limit them then they would not have brought it to the Xbox 360 in the first place.

well look at blue dragon it is a 3 disc game and ea disc is dl so then they will make it into more disc.



Blue Dragon has lots of pre-rendered high-definition CGI movies - full motion video is the biggest hog of data space on a DVD. That's the chief reason why it spanned three discs. It doesn't matter though because Blue Dragon is a linear experience so switching discs is not a problem.

Mass Effect is all real-time and does not make use of FMV, and it is not linear. So there is a difference between the two games.
Avatar image for killab2oo5
killab2oo5

13621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 killab2oo5
Member since 2005 • 13621 Posts
[QUOTE="iwishiwasrich"][QUOTE="thinicer"][QUOTE="Freebird8877"]

We all know the PS3's Blu-Ray holds up to 50GB duel layer, but with DVD9, will 360 be holding PS3 GTA back from reaching it's full potential (ig: bigger map, more pedestrians,HD, sound) I'm just curious ;)

thinicer


If Mass Effect is able to fit on a DVD-9, then I'm sure that GTA IV will be able to do so as well.

If the developers felt that DVD-9 would limit them then they would not have brought it to the Xbox 360 in the first place.

well look at blue dragon it is a 3 disc game and ea disc is dl so then they will make it into more disc.



Blue Dragon has lots of pre-rendered high-definition CGI movies - full motion video is the biggest hog of data space on a DVD. That's the chief reason why it spanned three discs. It doesn't matter though because Blue Dragon is a linear experience so switching discs is not a problem.

Mass Effect is all real-time and does not make use of FMV, and it is not linear. So there is a difference between the two games.

With Blue Dragon I really think Mistwalker didnt fully compress the game.In the IGN interview they said..."Blue Dragon ships on three DVDs, making it bigger than any Xbox 360 title to date. According to Sakaguchi, the game required compression technology to fit onto the three disks. In uncompressed form, the game's data takes up over 30 Gigs of space!"...in uncompressed form it takes up over 30 gigs,3 discs=27gigs since theyre DVD-9's.Right before that sentenece they said the game required compression to fight on three disks,but im wondering if Mistwalker only compressed it enough so that it could fully fit 3 DVD's instead to save money or fit on 4 DVD's,one being only about 1 or 2/4 full...waisting money.Plus,if its a little bit bigger than 30 gigs,lets say 33,then they only compressed the game 6Gigs,thats nothing compared to what most developers compress.Uncompressed games could easily go up to 30 or 40 gigs,easily.Ahhh...just something to think about.
Avatar image for Me-Ur-Daddy
Me-Ur-Daddy

547

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 Me-Ur-Daddy
Member since 2007 • 547 Posts
[QUOTE="thinicer"]
If the developers felt that DVD-9 would limit them then they would not have brought it to the Xbox 360 in the first place.
cutmaclass1
Yes.

if you got millions of dollars offered to you by the richest company of all time you would make it happen no matter what it takes.
Avatar image for Me-Ur-Daddy
Me-Ur-Daddy

547

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Me-Ur-Daddy
Member since 2007 • 547 Posts

[QUOTE="xxThyLordxx"]agreed. DVD 9 limits developers.

360 is a next-gen console with a last gen format.


CarlosPontinas

You don't know what you're talking about. The PS2 had memory cards while the Xbox1 had a HDD. Did ther PS2 hold GTA back for Xbox users? Nope.

In fact GTA was better on the Xbox.

This time around will it be held back? Nope. Why not? Well, if you ever try to fill a 9GB space with custom made textures, sounds, code etc., you'll appreciate just how much hard work goes into making video games. I know because I've done it. I worked for 6 months and barely filled a space of 2GB.

9 GB is plenty. It will be a while before DVD9 becomes obsolete.

lemmings live in a different dimension where they make videogames now lol he made a videogame all by his lonesome self and made 2 gb worth of data that makes sense ! hey buddy http://www.gamespot.com/ps2/action/gta4/index.html it says best on ps2, you just got owned...
Avatar image for jd7-03
jd7-03

6140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#63 jd7-03
Member since 2003 • 6140 Posts
Nah, the PS3 is holding the 360 version back with its lesser graphics.
Avatar image for thinicer
thinicer

3704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 thinicer
Member since 2006 • 3704 Posts
[QUOTE="cutmaclass1"][QUOTE="thinicer"]
If the developers felt that DVD-9 would limit them then they would not have brought it to the Xbox 360 in the first place.
Me-Ur-Daddy
Yes.

if you got millions of dollars offered to you by the richest company of all time you would make it happen no matter what it takes.



If the richest company of all time (and Microsoft is not) had all these millions of dollars offered to Rockstar, why didn't they lock up GTA as an exclusive instead of merely making it a multi-plat?

So you really believe that the only reason the GTA IV is coming to the Xbox 360 is because Microsoft paid off Rockstar? The 360 install base had nothing to do with it?
Avatar image for TheManOfChoice
TheManOfChoice

4148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 TheManOfChoice
Member since 2003 • 4148 Posts

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]Bigger =/= better

Vice City >>> San Andreas
Freebird8877

I have to disagree with you big time, In Vice City, the area was so small that it felt like i was restrained all the time, and with the loading screens between islands, that just killed it.  But in SA, i felt more free, especially without the loading screens. IMO, bigger is better, more freedom, more fun.

The quality of the game itself was better in Vice though. I could have fun in Vice just sitting in a car listening to the radio, or driving around seeing all the cool sights. San Andreas was so drab, even the Las Vegas strip at night was boring.

Avatar image for the-very-best
the-very-best

14486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#66 the-very-best
Member since 2006 • 14486 Posts
God, I hope not.

I've worried so much about this but I have a lot of faith in Rockstar and I know they're going to amaze me. They continue to do it every time they release a new GTA so I don't see why this time will be an exception.

This is the major reason I don't like games going multiplat.
Avatar image for Kahuna_1
Kahuna_1

7948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Kahuna_1
Member since 2006 • 7948 Posts

[QUOTE="Me-Ur-Daddy"][QUOTE="cutmaclass1"][QUOTE="thinicer"]
If the developers felt that DVD-9 would limit them then they would not have brought it to the Xbox 360 in the first place.
thinicer
Yes.

if you got millions of dollars offered to you by the richest company of all time you would make it happen no matter what it takes.



If the richest company of all time (and Microsoft is not) had all these millions of dollars offered to Rockstar, why didn't they lock up GTA as an exclusive instead of merely making it a multi-plat?

So you really believe that the only reason the GTA IV is coming to the Xbox 360 is because Microsoft paid off Rockstar? The 360 install base had nothing to do with it?

because rockstar was committed to sony

Avatar image for DaddyDC650
DaddyDC650

1241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 DaddyDC650
Member since 2007 • 1241 Posts
I'm betting the farm that somehow the PS3 version will have some extras that the 360 version won't have. I'm sure Sony is all over Rockstar and they're not about to let them create a non-optimized PS3 version of GTA 4. This is only my opinion though. We'll just have to wait and see.
Avatar image for thinicer
thinicer

3704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 thinicer
Member since 2006 • 3704 Posts

[QUOTE="thinicer"][QUOTE="Me-Ur-Daddy"][QUOTE="cutmaclass1"][QUOTE="thinicer"]
If the developers felt that DVD-9 would limit them then they would not have brought it to the Xbox 360 in the first place.
Kahuna_1

Yes.

if you got millions of dollars offered to you by the richest company of all time you would make it happen no matter what it takes.



If the richest company of all time (and Microsoft is not) had all these millions of dollars offered to Rockstar, why didn't they lock up GTA as an exclusive instead of merely making it a multi-plat?

So you really believe that the only reason the GTA IV is coming to the Xbox 360 is because Microsoft paid off Rockstar? The 360 install base had nothing to do with it?

because rockstar was committed to sony



Just like Ubisoft was for Assasin's Creed?
Avatar image for DaddyDC650
DaddyDC650

1241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 DaddyDC650
Member since 2007 • 1241 Posts
Nah, the PS3 is holding the 360 version back with its lesser graphics. jd7-03
Lesser graphics.... ummm. k! LoL!
Avatar image for haxzor00110001
haxzor00110001

345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 haxzor00110001
Member since 2006 • 345 Posts

The answer is still no.DaysAirlines

yup but i never even liked GTA in the first place.

Avatar image for jd7-03
jd7-03

6140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#73 jd7-03
Member since 2003 • 6140 Posts
[QUOTE="jd7-03"]Nah, the PS3 is holding the 360 version back with its lesser graphics. DaddyDC650
Lesser graphics.... ummm. k! LoL!

Its true, 360 games look better, its already been proven over and over again.
Avatar image for CarlosPontinas
CarlosPontinas

923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 CarlosPontinas
Member since 2007 • 923 Posts
[QUOTE="CarlosPontinas"]

[QUOTE="xxThyLordxx"]agreed. DVD 9 limits developers.

360 is a next-gen console with a last gen format.


Me-Ur-Daddy

You don't know what you're talking about. The PS2 had memory cards while the Xbox1 had a HDD. Did ther PS2 hold GTA back for Xbox users? Nope.

In fact GTA was better on the Xbox.

This time around will it be held back? Nope. Why not? Well, if you ever try to fill a 9GB space with custom made textures, sounds, code etc., you'll appreciate just how much hard work goes into making video games. I know because I've done it. I worked for 6 months and barely filled a space of 2GB.

9 GB is plenty. It will be a while before DVD9 becomes obsolete.

lemmings live in a different dimension where they make videogames now lol he made a videogame all by his lonesome self and made 2 gb worth of data that makes sense ! hey buddy http://www.gamespot.com/ps2/action/gta4/index.html it says best on ps2, you just got owned...

What was the point of your response?

Avatar image for Kahuna_1
Kahuna_1

7948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 Kahuna_1
Member since 2006 • 7948 Posts
[QUOTE="Kahuna_1"]

[QUOTE="thinicer"][QUOTE="Me-Ur-Daddy"][QUOTE="cutmaclass1"][QUOTE="thinicer"]
If the developers felt that DVD-9 would limit them then they would not have brought it to the Xbox 360 in the first place.
thinicer

Yes.

if you got millions of dollars offered to you by the richest company of all time you would make it happen no matter what it takes.



If the richest company of all time (and Microsoft is not) had all these millions of dollars offered to Rockstar, why didn't they lock up GTA as an exclusive instead of merely making it a multi-plat?

So you really believe that the only reason the GTA IV is coming to the Xbox 360 is because Microsoft paid off Rockstar? The 360 install base had nothing to do with it?

because rockstar was committed to sony



Just like Ubisoft was for Assasin's Creed?

first of all, the story behind that game is confusing...second of all, i was talking about GTA GTA2 GTA3 GTA VC and GTA SA all being on sonys system first.

Avatar image for AvIdGaMeR444
AvIdGaMeR444

7031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 AvIdGaMeR444
Member since 2004 • 7031 Posts
Yes, the 360 will hold back GTAIV....GTAIV will still be an incredible game, but there will be sacrifices made to fit everything on DVD9.  San Andreas for the PS2 nearly took up all the space right?  Even with much better compression methods being used nowadays, RockStar will have to scale down aspects of the game to fit on the 360 DVD.
Avatar image for CarlosPontinas
CarlosPontinas

923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 CarlosPontinas
Member since 2007 • 923 Posts

God, I hope not.

I've worried so much about this but I have a lot of faith in Rockstar and I know they're going to amaze me. They continue to do it every time they release a new GTA so I don't see why this time will be an exception.

This is the major reason I don't like games going multiplat.
the-very-best

You act as if the dynamic is in PS's favor!! Truth be told it's the 360 owners who should be worried about getting a delayed version with washed out mapping and terrible draw distances, just so as to placate the cows. 

Avatar image for Nedemis
Nedemis

10715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#78 Nedemis
Member since 2002 • 10715 Posts
seeing how Oblivion, Mass Effect, Saints Row, Crackdown and many other games fit easily onto a single DL DVD-9, i'm not worried about GTA4. Not one bit...
Avatar image for killaj2786
killaj2786

2531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 killaj2786
Member since 2006 • 2531 Posts
Yes, the 360 will hold back GTAIV....GTAIV will still be an incredible game, but there will be sacrifices made to fit everything on DVD9. San Andreas for the PS2 nearly took up all the space right? Even with much better compression methods being used nowadays, RockStar will have to scale down aspects of the game to fit on the 360 DVD.AvIdGaMeR444
San Andreas took only  3.9  GBs... less than.half of a DVD9.....and u saw that world... think wut they would do for GTA4...
Avatar image for CarlosPontinas
CarlosPontinas

923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 CarlosPontinas
Member since 2007 • 923 Posts

I'll be interested to see how this works out. To tell the truth, Im confused how Rockstar will handle this. Does the PS3 get the higher res textures and more sound clips? 50GB is a lot after allflamingschmoes2
It doesn't work like that. 50GB is maximum space on a BR. It's useless in terms of production values as its access speed is slow. You can't use it to update your scenes without jerky frame dropping. glitiches and delays.

To have nice textures and a smooth flowing game you need RAM. The 360 has twice as much as the PS3.

Avatar image for Nedemis
Nedemis

10715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#81 Nedemis
Member since 2002 • 10715 Posts
Yes, the 360 will hold back GTAIV....GTAIV will still be an incredible game, but there will be sacrifices made to fit everything on DVD9. San Andreas for the PS2 nearly took up all the space right? Even with much better compression methods being used nowadays, RockStar will have to scale down aspects of the game to fit on the 360 DVD.AvIdGaMeR444
San Andreas only took up 4GB of space....:| GTA4 should be no problem. :)
Avatar image for DaddyDC650
DaddyDC650

1241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 DaddyDC650
Member since 2007 • 1241 Posts
[QUOTE="DaddyDC650"][QUOTE="jd7-03"]Nah, the PS3 is holding the 360 version back with its lesser graphics. jd7-03
Lesser graphics.... ummm. k! LoL!

Its true, 360 games look better, its already been proven over and over again.

Even the editor-in-chief of Xbox 360 over @ IGN admitted that the PS3 WILL have superior looking games when compared to the 360. I'm sure he speaks with developers all of the time. Otherwise, why would he put down the 360 if it was not true? I can find you the link if you'd like. =P
Avatar image for Me-Ur-Daddy
Me-Ur-Daddy

547

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Me-Ur-Daddy
Member since 2007 • 547 Posts
[QUOTE="thinicer"][QUOTE="Kahuna_1"]

[QUOTE="thinicer"][QUOTE="Me-Ur-Daddy"][QUOTE="cutmaclass1"][QUOTE="thinicer"]
If the developers felt that DVD-9 would limit them then they would not have brought it to the Xbox 360 in the first place.
Kahuna_1

Yes.

if you got millions of dollars offered to you by the richest company of all time you would make it happen no matter what it takes.



If the richest company of all time (and Microsoft is not) had all these millions of dollars offered to Rockstar, why didn't they lock up GTA as an exclusive instead of merely making it a multi-plat?

So you really believe that the only reason the GTA IV is coming to the Xbox 360 is because Microsoft paid off Rockstar? The 360 install base had nothing to do with it?

because rockstar was committed to sony



Just like Ubisoft was for Assasin's Creed?

first of all, the story behind that game is confusing...second of all, i was talking about GTA GTA2 GTA3 GTA VC and GTA SA all being on sonys system first.

assasins creed was shown as an xbox game first of all at x05 or whatever, then they wanted to make it exclusive to ps3 but sony didnt see to much promise in it so they didnt shell out the dough. rockstar is and always has been commited to sony, they got the tope selling game of all time in GTA:SA on ps2, they were ready to take losses if they had to for a ps3 version, cus they had so much success with sony in the past. they even made bully exclusive while they just shell out that ping pong game, which isnt really a finished game, just a tech demo for next generation console. there was a video of sam houser expressing how commited he was to ps3 but was removed from youtube for some reason :(
Avatar image for CarlosPontinas
CarlosPontinas

923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 CarlosPontinas
Member since 2007 • 923 Posts
[QUOTE="jd7-03"][QUOTE="DaddyDC650"][QUOTE="jd7-03"]Nah, the PS3 is holding the 360 version back with its lesser graphics. DaddyDC650
Lesser graphics.... ummm. k! LoL!

Its true, 360 games look better, its already been proven over and over again.

Even the editor-in-chief of Xbox 360 over @ IGN admitted that the PS3 WILL have superior looking games when compared to the 360. I'm sure he speaks with developers all of the time. Otherwise, why would he put down the 360 if it was not true? I can find you the link if you'd like. =P

It's probably sarcasm.
Avatar image for Me-Ur-Daddy
Me-Ur-Daddy

547

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 Me-Ur-Daddy
Member since 2007 • 547 Posts
[QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]Yes, the 360 will hold back GTAIV....GTAIV will still be an incredible game, but there will be sacrifices made to fit everything on DVD9. San Andreas for the PS2 nearly took up all the space right? Even with much better compression methods being used nowadays, RockStar will have to scale down aspects of the game to fit on the 360 DVD.Nedemis
San Andreas only took up 4GB of space....:| GTA4 should be no problem. :)

uh wasnt san andreas on a dual layer dvd :)
Avatar image for tool_rage
tool_rage

756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#86 tool_rage
Member since 2005 • 756 Posts
The same argument could be made with the PS3 holding back GTA:IV.  With it being so hard to develop for, the time spent figuring out the PS3 at Rockstar could be time spend adding more features.

Lame thread.
Avatar image for killaj2786
killaj2786

2531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 killaj2786
Member since 2006 • 2531 Posts
[QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]Yes, the 360 will hold back GTAIV....GTAIV will still be an incredible game, but there will be sacrifices made to fit everything on DVD9. San Andreas for the PS2 nearly took up all the space right? Even with much better compression methods being used nowadays, RockStar will have to scale down aspects of the game to fit on the 360 DVD.Me-Ur-Daddy
San Andreas only took up 4GB of space....:| GTA4 should be no problem. :)

uh wasnt san andreas on a dual layer dvd :)

dude....incase u havent noticed....DVD9 is dual layer DVD....
Avatar image for Me-Ur-Daddy
Me-Ur-Daddy

547

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 Me-Ur-Daddy
Member since 2007 • 547 Posts
seeing how Oblivion, Mass Effect, Saints Row, Crackdown and many other games fit easily onto a single DL DVD-9, i'm not worried about GTA4. Not one bit...Nedemis
mass effect barely fits

[QUOTE="flamingschmoes2"]I'll be interested to see how this works out. To tell the truth, Im confused how Rockstar will handle this. Does the PS3 get the higher res textures and more sound clips? 50GB is a lot after allCarlosPontinas

It doesn't work like that. 50GB is maximum space on a BR. It's useless in terms of production values as its access speed is slow. You can't use it to update your scenes without jerky frame dropping. glitiches and delays.

To have nice textures and a smooth flowing game you need RAM. The 360 has twice as much as the PS3.

now he resorts to spewing lies after getting owned saying xbox GTA is better :lol:
Avatar image for Me-Ur-Daddy
Me-Ur-Daddy

547

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 Me-Ur-Daddy
Member since 2007 • 547 Posts
[QUOTE="Me-Ur-Daddy"][QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]Yes, the 360 will hold back GTAIV....GTAIV will still be an incredible game, but there will be sacrifices made to fit everything on DVD9. San Andreas for the PS2 nearly took up all the space right? Even with much better compression methods being used nowadays, RockStar will have to scale down aspects of the game to fit on the 360 DVD.killaj2786
San Andreas only took up 4GB of space....:| GTA4 should be no problem. :)

uh wasnt san andreas on a dual layer dvd :)

dude....incase u havent noticed....DVD9 is dual layer DVD....

uh thats my point sherlock, he said its 4gb, that fits on a single layer, but san andreas is not on a single layer dvd :|
Avatar image for DaddyDC650
DaddyDC650

1241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 DaddyDC650
Member since 2007 • 1241 Posts
[QUOTE="DaddyDC650"][QUOTE="jd7-03"][QUOTE="DaddyDC650"][QUOTE="jd7-03"]Nah, the PS3 is holding the 360 version back with its lesser graphics. CarlosPontinas
Lesser graphics.... ummm. k! LoL!

Its true, 360 games look better, its already been proven over and over again.

Even the editor-in-chief of Xbox 360 over @ IGN admitted that the PS3 WILL have superior looking games when compared to the 360. I'm sure he speaks with developers all of the time. Otherwise, why would he put down the 360 if it was not true? I can find you the link if you'd like. =P

It's probably sarcasm.

No sarcasm. He was dead serious. It's a video interview btw. I can find the link if you want to get owned...errr... I mean, would like to see it.
Avatar image for the-very-best
the-very-best

14486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#91 the-very-best
Member since 2006 • 14486 Posts

[QUOTE="the-very-best"]God, I hope not.

I've worried so much about this but I have a lot of faith in Rockstar and I know they're going to amaze me. They continue to do it every time they release a new GTA so I don't see why this time will be an exception.

This is the major reason I don't like games going multiplat.
CarlosPontinas

You act as if the dynamic is in PS's favor!! Truth be told it's the 360 owners who should be worried about getting a delayed version with washed out mapping and terrible draw distances, just so as to placate the cows.



SA, a last gen game with rather mediocre graphics took up 4GB from memory.

I don't want Rockstar to feel constrained to have to try and fit GTAIV in 9GB when they have the potential for so much more. There's rumours GTAIV will be (or was supposed to be) 9 times the size of SA.

I want GTAIV to be the best it can be, and I don't feel it's going to be now that it's on 2 platforms from day one but I'd love to be proved wrong by Rockstar because GTAIV is by far my most anticipated game of this year.
Avatar image for CarlosPontinas
CarlosPontinas

923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 CarlosPontinas
Member since 2007 • 923 Posts
[QUOTE="Nedemis"]seeing how Oblivion, Mass Effect, Saints Row, Crackdown and many other games fit easily onto a single DL DVD-9, i'm not worried about GTA4. Not one bit...Me-Ur-Daddy
mass effect barely fits

[QUOTE="flamingschmoes2"]I'll be interested to see how this works out. To tell the truth, Im confused how Rockstar will handle this. Does the PS3 get the higher res textures and more sound clips? 50GB is a lot after allCarlosPontinas

It doesn't work like that. 50GB is maximum space on a BR. It's useless in terms of production values as its access speed is slow. You can't use it to update your scenes without jerky frame dropping. glitiches and delays.

To have nice textures and a smooth flowing game you need RAM. The 360 has twice as much as the PS3.

now he resorts to spewing lies after getting owned saying xbox GTA is better :lol:

Where am I lying? FYI the Xbox versions of GTA3 and GTA VC are IMO better than the crude PS2 versions. I own them.

Avatar image for killaj2786
killaj2786

2531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 killaj2786
Member since 2006 • 2531 Posts
[QUOTE="killaj2786"][QUOTE="Me-Ur-Daddy"][QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]Yes, the 360 will hold back GTAIV....GTAIV will still be an incredible game, but there will be sacrifices made to fit everything on DVD9. San Andreas for the PS2 nearly took up all the space right? Even with much better compression methods being used nowadays, RockStar will have to scale down aspects of the game to fit on the 360 DVD.Me-Ur-Daddy
San Andreas only took up 4GB of space....:| GTA4 should be no problem. :)

uh wasnt san andreas on a dual layer dvd :)

dude....incase u havent noticed....DVD9 is dual layer DVD....

uh thats my point sherlock, he said its 4gb, that fits on a single layer, but san andreas is not on a single layer dvd :|

  Yooo sherlock: 4.7 GB of free Hard Disk space for full install ( on PC version but basically the same goes for all versions) http://www.take2.co.za/product.php?id=52776

That's why it's double layered...
Avatar image for toxicmog
toxicmog

6355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 toxicmog
Member since 2006 • 6355 Posts
Pffft. The last instalment was around 4 gigs :roll: The game isn't graphic heavy :S And is mostly repeated textures and buildings. Worked in with very advanced coding. Look at Oblvion, as many people have said. Any 'sandbox world', that looks huge. Takes up very little space in reality ;)
Avatar image for CarlosPontinas
CarlosPontinas

923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 CarlosPontinas
Member since 2007 • 923 Posts
[QUOTE="CarlosPontinas"]

[QUOTE="the-very-best"]God, I hope not.

I've worried so much about this but I have a lot of faith in Rockstar and I know they're going to amaze me. They continue to do it every time they release a new GTA so I don't see why this time will be an exception.

This is the major reason I don't like games going multiplat.
the-very-best

You act as if the dynamic is in PS's favor!! Truth be told it's the 360 owners who should be worried about getting a delayed version with washed out mapping and terrible draw distances, just so as to placate the cows.



SA, a last gen game with rather mediocre graphics took up 4GB from memory.

I don't want Rockstar to feel constrained to have to try and fit GTAIV in 9GB when they have the potential for so much more. There's rumours GTAIV will be (or was supposed to be) 9 times the size of SA.

I want GTAIV to be the best it can be, and I don't feel it's going to be now that it's on 2 platforms from day one but I'd love to be proved wrong by Rockstar because GTAIV is by far my most anticipated game of this year.

The problem here is you don't understand what it takes to fill GBs of disk space. If SA is 4GB (and that's a huge game BTW), then what makes you think RS needs more than twice that space for GTA IV? What are you expecting-- photorealism? Also what makes you think your PS3 could handle that? It only has 256mb of RAM.
Avatar image for toxicmog
toxicmog

6355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 toxicmog
Member since 2006 • 6355 Posts
[QUOTE="mido275"][QUOTE="Freebird8877"]

We all know the PS3's Blu-Ray holds up to 50GB duel layer, but with DVD9, will 360 be holding PS3 GTA back from reaching it's full potential (ig: bigger map, more pedestrians,HD, sound) I'm just curious ;)

nextgengaming18
dont worry guys , MS is preparing a nasty surprize. they wont live with dvd for long. HDDVD is comming. we will all have to buy the drive.

GTA 3 san andreas took all the space of the ps2 disc.

Really :O My PC says 4 gig on my San Andreas folder. Obviously you never had DVD 9's....
Avatar image for toxicmog
toxicmog

6355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 toxicmog
Member since 2006 • 6355 Posts
[QUOTE="CarlosPontinas"]

[QUOTE="the-very-best"]God, I hope not.

I've worried so much about this but I have a lot of faith in Rockstar and I know they're going to amaze me. They continue to do it every time they release a new GTA so I don't see why this time will be an exception.

This is the major reason I don't like games going multiplat.
the-very-best

You act as if the dynamic is in PS's favor!! Truth be told it's the 360 owners who should be worried about getting a delayed version with washed out mapping and terrible draw distances, just so as to placate the cows.



SA, a last gen game with rather mediocre graphics took up 4GB from memory.

I don't want Rockstar to feel constrained to have to try and fit GTAIV in 9GB when they have the potential for so much more. There's rumours GTAIV will be (or was supposed to be) 9 times the size of SA.

I want GTAIV to be the best it can be, and I don't feel it's going to be now that it's on 2 platforms from day one but I'd love to be proved wrong by Rockstar because GTAIV is by far my most anticipated game of this year.

9 times the size. The last GTA was filled with open fields, of garbage... It was stupidly big. Give me a reworked GTA 3 any day ;)
Avatar image for mentzer
mentzer

1242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 mentzer
Member since 2007 • 1242 Posts
[QUOTE="the-very-best"][QUOTE="CarlosPontinas"]

[QUOTE="the-very-best"]God, I hope not.

I've worried so much about this but I have a lot of faith in Rockstar and I know they're going to amaze me. They continue to do it every time they release a new GTA so I don't see why this time will be an exception.

This is the major reason I don't like games going multiplat.
CarlosPontinas

You act as if the dynamic is in PS's favor!! Truth be told it's the 360 owners who should be worried about getting a delayed version with washed out mapping and terrible draw distances, just so as to placate the cows.



SA, a last gen game with rather mediocre graphics took up 4GB from memory.

I don't want Rockstar to feel constrained to have to try and fit GTAIV in 9GB when they have the potential for so much more. There's rumours GTAIV will be (or was supposed to be) 9 times the size of SA.

I want GTAIV to be the best it can be, and I don't feel it's going to be now that it's on 2 platforms from day one but I'd love to be proved wrong by Rockstar because GTAIV is by far my most anticipated game of this year.

The problem here is you don't understand what it takes to fill GBs of disk space. If SA is 4GB (and that's a huge game BTW), then what makes you think RS needs more than twice that space for GTA IV? What are you expecting-- photorealism? Also what makes you think your PS3 could handle that? It only has 256mb of RAM.

PS3 has 512MB of RAM. 

I do see possible problems that R* could face on the 360 version due to the media, since Blu-Ray allows for so much content and doesn't burden the developer with having to make sacrifices due to needed compression routines.

GTA is all about content, content and content.  I'm sure R* is smiling about Blu-Ray and frowning about DVD9.

Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#99 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts
[QUOTE="CarlosPontinas"][QUOTE="the-very-best"][QUOTE="CarlosPontinas"]

[QUOTE="the-very-best"]God, I hope not.

I've worried so much about this but I have a lot of faith in Rockstar and I know they're going to amaze me. They continue to do it every time they release a new GTA so I don't see why this time will be an exception.

This is the major reason I don't like games going multiplat.
mentzer

You act as if the dynamic is in PS's favor!! Truth be told it's the 360 owners who should be worried about getting a delayed version with washed out mapping and terrible draw distances, just so as to placate the cows.



SA, a last gen game with rather mediocre graphics took up 4GB from memory.

I don't want Rockstar to feel constrained to have to try and fit GTAIV in 9GB when they have the potential for so much more. There's rumours GTAIV will be (or was supposed to be) 9 times the size of SA.

I want GTAIV to be the best it can be, and I don't feel it's going to be now that it's on 2 platforms from day one but I'd love to be proved wrong by Rockstar because GTAIV is by far my most anticipated game of this year.

The problem here is you don't understand what it takes to fill GBs of disk space. If SA is 4GB (and that's a huge game BTW), then what makes you think RS needs more than twice that space for GTA IV? What are you expecting-- photorealism? Also what makes you think your PS3 could handle that? It only has 256mb of RAM.

PS3 has 512MB of RAM.

I do see possible problems that R* could face on the 360 version due to the media, since Blu-Ray allows for so much content and doesn't burden the developer with having to make sacrifices due to needed compression routines.

GTA is all about content, content and content. I'm sure R* is smiling about Blu-Ray and frowning about DVD9.

if rockstar felt that way towards the DVD9 and the 360 they wouldn't be wasting their time making it for it
Avatar image for Ipik_Fenris
Ipik_Fenris

3627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 Ipik_Fenris
Member since 2005 • 3627 Posts
[QUOTE="Freebird8877"]

We all know the PS3's Blu-Ray holds up to 50GB duel layer, but with DVD9, will 360 be holding PS3 GTA back from reaching it's full potential (ig: bigger map, more pedestrians,HD, sound) I'm just curious ;)

thinicer



If Mass Effect is able to fit on a DVD-9, then I'm sure that GTA IV will be able to do so as well.

If the developers felt that DVD-9 would limit them then they would not have brought it to the Xbox 360 in the first place.

yeah , i think you are right, and i also believe that Mass Effect will be bigger or if not the same size in terms of map space, and all that.......