3DS graphics comparison by (IGN)

I don't see what people aren't seeing in Zelda. The texture work is much improved and the clarity is increased also. Snake Eater looks amazing on the 3DS, That is the game that is making me want the 3DS so bad. TheColbert

I don't think they are claiming it looks bad, but moreso that more work could have been put into it. Considering that these games are rehashes, I can't really disagree with that. Part of it could be that RE looks unbelievably good--imagine seeing the Zelda remake and having your mind blown.

Chun li thighs......... It will be on my mind for a good while

[QUOTE="AmayaPapaya"]

OOT doesn't look like it is upgraded too much. Mario Kart looks amazing though.

lbjkurono23

But yeah MGS3DS spanks the Ps2 version's graphics around and Revelations is almost on par with RE5, and RE5 isn't a bad looking console game!

MGS looks amazing i'm difenetley getting the 3ds first day if RE revelations and MGS3 are launch games.johny300

[QUOTE="TheColbert"]I don't see what people aren't seeing in Zelda. The texture work is much improved and the clarity is increased also. Snake Eater looks amazing on the 3DS, That is the game that is making me want the 3DS so bad. Heirren

I don't think they are claiming it looks bad, but moreso that more work could have been put into it. Considering that these games are rehashes, I can't really disagree with that. Part of it could be that RE looks unbelievably good--imagine seeing the Zelda remake and having your mind blown.

cool mario kart 3ds

[QUOTE="windsquid9000"][QUOTE="oldkingallant"] Actually Snake Eater isn't being ported to the 3DS, Subsistence is :P. Sorry had to be a smart ass.oldkingallant

Weak hardware and a very very low resolution better be no more than $200 australianUltizer

Perhaps we need to reiterate....

Left is 3DS, right is RE5... considering this is a handheld versus an HD console, that's impressive.

MGS3-D vs. MGS3 on PS2. Wrecks it, not even a comparison. So it's at least beyond PS2 level graphics.

Looks about as good as Mario Kart Wii.

This is a port of a Zelda game on a handheld... a full 3-D Zelda on a handheld. The graphics will be better when they make one specifically for 3DS, but even pulling off Zelda on a handheld is impressive.

The fact that the SSFIV graphics even compete with those on the PS3 and 360 is a massive accomplishment in handheld tech.

Now think of the fact that they will all be in 3-D.

How is this weak tech for a handheld again?

Oh and just for emphasis:

[QUOTE="oldkingallant"][QUOTE="windsquid9000"] I thought it was Snake Eater with a free camera and new [handheld oriented] content.windsquid9000

and might i remember that motion always looks better than still images. the street fighter 4 trailer that capcom's been showing around since the 29th is absurdly beautiful... and where are those "RE: revelations VS 5" gifs? because revelations is one of the most impressive-looking games announced so far.BrunoBRS

[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"]and might i remember that motion always looks better than still images. the street fighter 4 trailer that capcom's been showing around since the 29th is absurdly beautiful... and where are those "RE: revelations VS 5" gifs? because revelations is one of the most impressive-looking games announced so far.oldkingallant

[QUOTE="windsquid9000"][QUOTE="oldkingallant"] Actually Snake Eater isn't being ported to the 3DS, Subsistence is :P. Sorry had to be a smart ass.oldkingallant

Of course it's subsistence. Birds-eye view worked for the older games but the jungle setting was pretty awful with it. . I've tried both versions and Subsistence is the version to get/port.

[QUOTE="oldkingallant"][QUOTE="windsquid9000"] I thought it was Snake Eater with a free camera and new [handheld oriented] content.Epak_

Of course it's subsistence. Birds-eye view worked for the older games but the jungle setting was pretty awful with it. . I've tried both versions and Subsistence is the version to get/port.

[QUOTE="Epak_"]

[QUOTE="oldkingallant"] To my knowledge it looks like Subsistence. Just going off the camera, and at least to me if it's not top down it's not Snake Eater. God I'm glad they released Subsistence, playing with the top down camera got annoying when there was an enemy 2 feet in front of me and I'd walk around the corner, thinking it was clear, just to end up in a big fight.BrunoBRS

Of course it's subsistence. Birds-eye view worked for the older games but the jungle setting was pretty awful with it. . I've tried both versions and Subsistence is the version to get/port.

So it wouldn't hurt if I played through Subsistence? I was going to save it for the 3DS since my second OOT playthrough is almost finished.

Of course it's subsistence. Birds-eye view worked for the older games but the jungle setting was pretty awful with it. . I've tried both versions and Subsistence is the version to get/port.

Epak_

[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"][QUOTE="Epak_"]

Of course it's subsistence. Birds-eye view worked for the older games but the jungle setting was pretty awful with it. . I've tried both versions and Subsistence is the version to get/port.

Epak_

So it wouldn't hurt if I played through Subsistence? I was going to save it for the 3DS since my second OOT playthrough is almost finished.

the best graphics looks like a downgraded port to the PSPrunbleduck

[QUOTE="runbleduck"]the best graphics looks like a downgraded port to the PSPWilly105

Man, just the concept of RE Mercenaries sounded great to me (even better if it has multiplayer), and seeing how good it looks too, its even better. Also, I forgot how MGS3 on PS2 looked. Holy crap does it look better on 3DS.Skittles_McGee

I really don't care about anything. Bring me Smash Bros and I'll buy this Nintendo.

[QUOTE="Willy105"][QUOTE="runbleduck"]the best graphics looks like a downgraded port to the PSPSakusEnvoy

I think what rly distinguishes those 2 pictures the most is the higher contrast in the 1st pic. Thats nothing more than a postproccessing effect.

[QUOTE="SakusEnvoy"]

[QUOTE="Willy105"] Actually, that's it at it worse. At it's best, it looks like RE5.painguy1

I think what rly distinguishes those 2 pictures the most is the higher contrast in the 1st pic. Thats nothing more than a postproccessing effect.