5 things system wars HAS to agree with.

Number 1-5:

NINTENDO DID EVERYTHING FIRST.

NINTENDO WON THIS GEN BY ALL MEASURES.

Number 1-5:

NINTENDO DID EVERYTHING FIRST.

NINTENDO WON THIS GEN BY ALL MEASURES.

GCwasthebestsys

^^^^ agreed.

ftw.

siihb.

[QUOTE="GCwasthebestsys"]

Number 1-5:

NINTENDO DID EVERYTHING FIRST.

NINTENDO WON THIS GEN BY ALL MEASURES.

GCwasthebestsys

^^^^ agreed.

ftw.

siihb.

6. XBL is not worth $50

Number 1-5:

NINTENDO DID EVERYTHING FIRST.

NINTENDO WON THIS GEN BY ALL MEASURES.

what do you mean by wii HAS been casualized? are u implying that it wasnt casual to begin with?campzor

PS3 has the best tech? What an insult to the PC Gaming master race. I can live with your other points though,

The only thing I don't agree with is #4 and #5. Steam is better than Xbox Live. PC tech > PS3 tech.

[QUOTE="LegatoSkyheart"]

only 1 thing System Wars agrees is that Single Player Games MUST NEVER DIE!

IAMSERIAL

you should be shot for saying this...multi is cool but i like a good story.not your flavour of the month shooter or online fad.

5. PC's will always be miles ahead of any console that gets dished out. Sorry.

4. Absolutely

3. Duh.

2. Duh...?

1. Duh......?

Nintendo did HD first?gamebreakerz__

Nope. Simpsons did. =)

[QUOTE="IAMSERIAL"]I disagree with 5 and 1...especially 5finalstar2007

I disagree with 4 :oops:. Free >>>> payed.

3 IMO is way wrong. Most are opinions and some flatout wrong. For me, Consoles > PC. Now that I look deeper, I dont agree with 3 - 5 either. Might wanna check into how much integration there really is between the 360 and PC.

PC definitely has the best tech, but its also not the best value.

during the course of a console's life you generally have to buy 2 PCs to be able to play current games... assuming you buy budget PCs. If you do spend the $2000 to get a PC that will last you 7 years... then you only need one... but the value is greatly reduced.

also with consoles you buy game ownership rather than licenses, so if you resell your used games its quite a bit cheaper to buy games for consoles.

The truth is system wars only agrees on one thing ... which is that nobody agrees on anything here:P

PS3 has the best tech? What an insult to the PC Gaming master race. I can live with your other points though,

argetlam00

Pc is the best value in gaming??? nooooooo hell noLeo-Magic

Em...you dont know how to buy a computer then with the right parts. Thats really all there is to it

[QUOTE="Leo-Magic"]Pc is the best value in gaming??? nooooooo hell noedinsftw

Em...you dont know how to buy a computer then with the right parts. Thats really all there is to it

but a budget PC doesnt last for 7 years.

If you bought a top of the line PC in 2005... it would be struggling to play today's PC games. A 2005 budget PC wouldn't have a prayer. But a 2005 console, is still playing current games.

thats why the value argument falls apart.... you need to buy 2 PCs to match the lifecycle of a single console.

[QUOTE="edinsftw"]

[QUOTE="Leo-Magic"]Pc is the best value in gaming??? nooooooo hell nomarkinthedark

Em...you dont know how to buy a computer then with the right parts. Thats really all there is to it

but a budget PC doesnt last for 7 years.

If you bought a top of the line PC in 2005... it would be struggling to play today's PC games. A 2005 budget PC wouldn't have a prayer. But a 2005 console, is still playing current games.

thats why the value argument falls apart.... you need to buy 2 PCs to match the lifecycle of a single console.

Lets put it this way...you dont need to play games on max, you just upgrade gpu...it cost only about 100 more than a console if you plan it right. You pay much less for computer games, and if you buy enough of them it cost less than the same ammount of games on console

I don't agree with several points you made:

1. PC isn't the best value if I'm not interested in the games it has.

Bigboi500

only 1 thing System Wars agrees is that Single Player Games MUST NEVER DIE!

LegatoSkyheart

I'll jump on that bandwagon.

[QUOTE="markinthedark"]

[QUOTE="edinsftw"]

Em...you dont know how to buy a computer then with the right parts. Thats really all there is to it

edinsftw

but a budget PC doesnt last for 7 years.

If you bought a top of the line PC in 2005... it would be struggling to play today's PC games. A 2005 budget PC wouldn't have a prayer. But a 2005 console, is still playing current games.

thats why the value argument falls apart.... you need to buy 2 PCs to match the lifecycle of a single console.

Lets put it this way...you dont need to play games on max, you just upgrade gpu...it cost only about 100 more than a console if you plan it right. You pay much less for computer games, and if you buy enough of them it cost less than the same ammount of games on console

maybe, but a budget build in 2005 probably has an AGP slot, so you need a new mobo. Or if its PCI-e 1.0 you need a new mobo to take advantage of the PCI-e 2.0 cards.... either scenario usually requires upgrading all components as its difficult to find a mobo that will have new graphics slots and old chipsets/ram slots... so you generally need an entirely new build.

so while in theory it might be as easy as buying a new gpu, from my experiences it rarely is.

PS3 has better tech in the way that is more reliable, nothing more. Other than that i think 360 has the better tech, it´s equally capable and more versatille.

[QUOTE="edinsftw"]

[QUOTE="markinthedark"]

but a budget PC doesnt last for 7 years.

If you bought a top of the line PC in 2005... it would be struggling to play today's PC games. A 2005 budget PC wouldn't have a prayer. But a 2005 console, is still playing current games.

thats why the value argument falls apart.... you need to buy 2 PCs to match the lifecycle of a single console.

markinthedark

Lets put it this way...you dont need to play games on max, you just upgrade gpu...it cost only about 100 more than a console if you plan it right. You pay much less for computer games, and if you buy enough of them it cost less than the same ammount of games on console

maybe, but a budget build in 2005 probably has an AGP slot, so you need a new mobo. Or if its PCI-e 1.0 you need a new mobo to take advantage of the PCI-e 2.0 cards.... either scenario usually requires upgrading all components as its difficult to find a mobo that will have new graphics slots and old chipsets/ram slots... so you generally need an entirely new build.

so while in theory it might be as easy as buying a new gpu, from my experiences it rarely is.

Well, it hasnt been 7 years yet so we will see lol

I think mentioning that the Wii is winning in terms of console sales is something that lemmings and cows always skirt around.

i'd say the PS2 is the best value in gaming-The-G-Man-

only 1 thing System Wars agrees is that Single Player Games MUST NEVER DIE!

LegatoSkyheart

i can honestly say i disagree with that pretty much wholeheartedly. all my best gaming experiences, video gaming or otherwise, are multiplayer based (mostly street fighter, bishudo blade 2 and tfc). if i want to do something alone i have other hobbies.

single player games are cute time wasters but not much more.

[QUOTE="LegatoSkyheart"]

only 1 thing System Wars agrees is that Single Player Games MUST NEVER DIE!

IAMSERIAL

PS3 has better tech in the way that is more reliable, nothing more. Other than that i think 360 has the better tech, it´s equally capable and more versatille.

PAL360

but that's the point.

you aren't excluding any positive factors.

I have to say, I strongly agree with this.

Wii is good but it is casualized

I think mentioning that the Wii is winning in terms of console sales is something that lemmings and cows always skirt around.

dommeus