$652 PC Ran Warhead Demonstration!!!!

  • 160 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#151 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts
What CPU do you have? How much RAM?trix5817
E6750, 4 GB. It's not those, and as I've already pointed out fifteen thousand times, EVERYTHING ELSE RUNS FINE.
Avatar image for trix5817
trix5817

12252

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#152 trix5817
Member since 2004 • 12252 Posts

[QUOTE="trix5817"]What CPU do you have? How much RAM?lowe0
E6750, 4 GB. It's not those, and as I've already pointed out fifteen thousand times, EVERYTHING ELSE RUNS FINE.

I don't know what to tell you then. Look at all the benchmarks. The 8800GT runs it fine. At Toms Hardware it ran Crysis with an average of 36 fps @ 1600*1200 on High. Sucks for you I guess.

Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#153 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts

[QUOTE="lowe0"][QUOTE="trix5817"]What CPU do you have? How much RAM?trix5817

E6750, 4 GB. It's not those, and as I've already pointed out fifteen thousand times, EVERYTHING ELSE RUNS FINE.

I don't know what to tell you then. Look at all the benchmarks. The 8800GT runs it fine. At Toms Hardware it ran Crysis with an average of 36 fps @ 1600*1200 on High. Sucks for you I guess.

So you don't have any idea, yet you're perfectly happy telling me that I must have **** up. Seems somewhat hypocritical to me.

As for benchmarks, we've both posted a set supporting our argument. One of them is wrong, and I'm going with the one that agrees with what I've seen with my own eyes.

Avatar image for trix5817
trix5817

12252

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#154 trix5817
Member since 2004 • 12252 Posts
[QUOTE="trix5817"]

[QUOTE="lowe0"][QUOTE="trix5817"]What CPU do you have? How much RAM?lowe0

E6750, 4 GB. It's not those, and as I've already pointed out fifteen thousand times, EVERYTHING ELSE RUNS FINE.

I don't know what to tell you then. Look at all the benchmarks. The 8800GT runs it fine. At Toms Hardware it ran Crysis with an average of 36 fps @ 1600*1200 on High. Sucks for you I guess.

So you don't have any idea, yet you're perfectly happy telling me that I must have **** up. Seems somewhat hypocritical to me.

As for benchmarks, we've both posted a set supporting our argument. One of them is wrong, and I'm going with the one that agrees with what I've seen with my own eyes.

Yeah, I don't know what to tell you because benchmarks say otherwise and so do most 8800GT owners.....I can'tgo and do tests on your PC, so again, I don't know what to say. Just don't go claiming that Crysis runs like crap on a 8800GT, because it does not. Tomshardware is a very respected site. I'll trust them over a GS poster any day..

Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#155 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts

Tomshardware is a very respected site. I'll trust them over a GS poster any day..
trix5817
Yeah, because no one's heard of HardOCP...:roll: You don't have to trust me; just go read the benchmark I linked from [H]. It shows Crysis running like crap on an 8800 GTS (G92). That fits perfectly with my own observations of my 8800 GT.

Completely setting aside my system for the moment, if Crysis is so piss-poor (as the linked benchmark shows) on Medium/High on a 8800 GTS (G92), then how is is supposed to run on High on an 8800 GT?

Avatar image for trix5817
trix5817

12252

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#156 trix5817
Member since 2004 • 12252 Posts

[QUOTE="trix5817"]Tomshardware is a very respected site. I'll trust them over a GS poster any day..
lowe0
Yeah, because no one's heard of HardOCP...:roll:

I'd say TomsHardware is more reputable....

Not to mention the majority of benchmarking sites show that a 8800GT can run Crysis fine on High....

Avatar image for VendettaRed07
VendettaRed07

14012

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#157 VendettaRed07
Member since 2007 • 14012 Posts
if the cheapest one you can find to play that game is 652$.. thats alot of freaking money.
Avatar image for OhSnapitz
OhSnapitz

19282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#158 OhSnapitz
Member since 2002 • 19282 Posts

if the cheapest one you can find to play that game is 652$.. thats alot of freaking money.VendettaRed07

I thought it was just me.. :?

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#159 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

Im surprised everyone has having trouble running Crysis.....

have you got the 1.2 patch?

I played it again today 1240X1024, 0XAA, With the Natural Mod (that seriously looks much better than on very high), and the frame rate rarely dipped below 30, staying above almost constantly.

Remarkable stuff, and it looked a treat on my hardware (see sig).... which isnt exactly a 'hardcore zomg gaming rig'.... Im still astounded how good the game looks and how much fun it still is to play (going through it again on delta).Another thing.. the sound in the game is seriously amazing (effects, music, voices)... very underrated...

(resised mind you)

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#160 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator  Online
Member since 2004 • 50164 Posts
What were the specs of the computer.