I am not targeting anyone specifically here with this small little complaint.
Honestly, I am rather tired with all the negativity surrounding DRM in PC games.
From EA's use of SecuROM last year to Ubisoft's new "always-online" protection scheme, thousands of people voice their complaints on message boards, Amazon.com, Youtube, etc. I am tired of it all.
Personally, I don't mind DRM very much at all. For example, for all the hooplah about SecuROM, I haven't seen it do anything serious to my computer. I have installed many games requiring activation via SecuROM. I haven't had any trouble with it at all. My computer hasn't melted down yet, despite what these anti-DRM folks are saying.
However, I do get angry when developers take certain PC-only features out of new games (like the IWNet fiasco and the lack of dedicated servers for MW2). But, that is a completely different story altogether.
I would simply like to point out the hypocrisy that these anti-DRM folks express.
As we all know, software piracy affects the PC gaming industry. These DRM schemes were developed as a result of piracy, not the other way around. Piracy is piracy, and it occurs regardless of whether a game has DRM or not.
Yet all these anti-DRM PC gamers scream like spoiled children, especially those who pirate games themselves on a regular basis! They are causing the very problem they claim to be protesting against!
Anyone agree? Does everyone see the logic in my argument? A majority of these anti-DRM folks are lying hypocrites, sucking the life out of PC gaming as we know it. They expect to play games for free, and raise bloody hell when their actions cause DRM to be instituted into games.
It's disgusting. I know DRM is not the solution, but seeing how an estimated 83% of PC gamers pirate games, a lot of these anti-DRM folks are clearly hypocrites. HYPOCRITES!
...
Log in to comment