According to Sony they are number one

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for thecreechxxx
thecreechxxx

745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 thecreechxxx
Member since 2003 • 745 Posts

Basically money talks.... Even though I don't love the Wii, it is dominating and xbox is after them. Sony can rest on it's laurels and claim they are an industry leader, but they're a business. They cannot dominate now or in the future without sales. They're a business and have to be profitable. They can spin it how they want, but longevity will mean nothing if Nintendo and Xbox come out with their new system years before the new playstation. They can make a machine that will last 20 years, but that won't satisfy gamers forever, they will move on and Playstation will have to as well.

Avatar image for sparkypants
sparkypants

2609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#102 sparkypants
Member since 2007 • 2609 Posts
It's official, Sony is run by delusional idiots. No wonder the PS3 is failing so bad.Dahaka-UK
I agree, they need to get their whole management team in shape and they also need a new PR team and Im not talking just about the PS3...Sony has relied on their name for to long and its starting to come back and bite them in the a$$. Dont get me wrong their stuff is great but the way they convey themselves they just look like desperate fools.
Avatar image for Pariah_001
Pariah_001

4850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 Pariah_001
Member since 2003 • 4850 Posts
their demographics are different, but they are all in the same industry... the videogame industry.ogvampire

Last I checked, Wii's marketing was tremendously different from Sony's. They're both trying to reach out to different groups. i.e. They're not in direct competition on that front. Wii is trying to be a multipurpose exercise machine that capitalizes on novelty appeal for basically any demographic. Sony is going straight for the gamers.

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#104 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42196 Posts
I like Sony Consoles and all, but what Kaz Hirai is saying is just plain pretentious.
Avatar image for fbigent34
fbigent34

2389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 fbigent34
Member since 2007 • 2389 Posts

Let me be sony for a sec. "We dont consider nintendo in the same market as us"

btw someone should make a comic with this guy,.

Avatar image for fbigent34
fbigent34

2389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 fbigent34
Member since 2007 • 2389 Posts
[QUOTE="ogvampire"]their demographics are different, but they are all in the same industry... the videogame industry.Pariah_001

Last I checked, Wii's marketing was tremendously different from Sony's. They're both trying to reach out to different groups. i.e. They're not in direct competition on that front. Wii is trying to be a multipurpose exercise machine that capitalizes on novelty appeal for basically any demographic. Sony is going straight for the gamers.

really? rockband, gh? gta all say hello to you. all compaines are competeting with gamers. hence they in the video game market.
Avatar image for TAKE_IT_BACK
TAKE_IT_BACK

3850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 TAKE_IT_BACK
Member since 2008 • 3850 Posts

In other words: "We are the number one because we don't count our competitors (who are actually beating us)"

IronBass

^This sums it up perfectly.

Avatar image for ogvampire
ogvampire

9210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 ogvampire  Online
Member since 2008 • 9210 Posts
[QUOTE="ogvampire"]their demographics are different, but they are all in the same industry... the videogame industry.Pariah_001

Last I checked, Wii's marketing was tremendously different from Sony's. They're both trying to reach out to different groups. i.e. They're not in direct competition on that front. Wii is trying to be a multipurpose exercise machine that capitalizes on novelty appeal for basically any demographic. Sony is going straight for the gamers.

sony is not going straight for gamers, they are going straight for technophiles... why would they include an unnecessary blu-ray drive in a videogames console, and include a remote and blu-ray movie in their bundles?:|

Avatar image for TAKE_IT_BACK
TAKE_IT_BACK

3850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 TAKE_IT_BACK
Member since 2008 • 3850 Posts

Sony is going straight for the gamers.Pariah_001

Right, thats exactly why we get PS3 commercials like this.:roll:

Avatar image for Pariah_001
Pariah_001

4850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 Pariah_001
Member since 2003 • 4850 Posts
really? rockband, gh? gta all say hello to you. all compaines are competeting with gamers. hence they in the video game market.fbigent34
And I say hello back and follow up by pointing out that Sony isn't trying to rely on novelty controls to sell their system. Where were these games when Cooking Mama and Spongebob were first being sold? It's called "shovelware" for a reason: it's for marketing first and gaming second. Wii is still marketed based on its interface, not its. Not its "games."
Avatar image for KingTuttle
KingTuttle

2471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 KingTuttle
Member since 2006 • 2471 Posts
[QUOTE="Pariah_001"][QUOTE="ogvampire"]their demographics are different, but they are all in the same industry... the videogame industry.ogvampire

Last I checked, Wii's marketing was tremendously different from Sony's. They're both trying to reach out to different groups. i.e. They're not in direct competition on that front. Wii is trying to be a multipurpose exercise machine that capitalizes on novelty appeal for basically any demographic. Sony is going straight for the gamers.

sony is not going straight for gamers, they are going straight for technophiles... why would they include an unnecessary blu-ray drive in a videogames console, and include a remote and blu-ray movie in their bundles?:|

Because they gambled that the Format War and the Next Gen Gaming Console War could both be won with the PS3 and the Playstation brand....whoooops!
Avatar image for Pariah_001
Pariah_001

4850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 Pariah_001
Member since 2003 • 4850 Posts
sony is not going straight for gamers, they are going straight for technophiles... why would they include an unnecessary blu-ray drive in a videogames console, and include a remote and blu-ray movie in their bundles?:|ogvampire
If the Blu-Ray player actually serves a purpose for making games work optimally, then it's not unnecessary. By your logic, I could claim that the 360's DVD drive is unnecessary since games could be played on more inferior technology.
Avatar image for stiltzsy
stiltzsy

1486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 stiltzsy
Member since 2008 • 1486 Posts
This is so stupid, I pray something was lost in translation....otherwise another person has opened their mouth and confirmed that they are an idiot.
Avatar image for Pariah_001
Pariah_001

4850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 Pariah_001
Member since 2003 • 4850 Posts
Right, thats exactly why we get PS3 commercials like this.:roll:TAKE_IT_BACK
At the beginning of the commercial, the guy states that he wants to play games. Nice try though.
Avatar image for fbigent34
fbigent34

2389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 fbigent34
Member since 2007 • 2389 Posts
[QUOTE="fbigent34"]really? rockband, gh? gta all say hello to you. all compaines are competeting with gamers. hence they in the video game market.Pariah_001
And I say hello back and follow up by pointing out that Sony isn't trying to rely on novelty controls to sell their system. Where were these games when Cooking Mama and Spongebob were first being sold? It's called "shovelware" for a reason: it's for marketing first and gaming second. Wii is still marketed based on its interface, not its. Not its "games."

really what you call the sixass and than adding rumble afterwords? oh really you do know there shovelwhare on all consoles? even the ps3.
Avatar image for ogvampire
ogvampire

9210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 ogvampire  Online
Member since 2008 • 9210 Posts
[QUOTE="ogvampire"][QUOTE="Pariah_001"]

Last I checked, Wii's marketing was tremendously different from Sony's. They're both trying to reach out to different groups. i.e. They're not in direct competition on that front. Wii is trying to be a multipurpose exercise machine that capitalizes on novelty appeal for basically any demographic. Sony is going straight for the gamers.

KingTuttle

sony is not going straight for gamers, they are going straight for technophiles... why would they include an unnecessary blu-ray drive in a videogames console, and include a remote and blu-ray movie in their bundles?:|

Because they gambled that the Format War and the Next Gen Gaming Console War could both be won with the PS3 and the Playstation brand....whoooops!

ok, so what does that have to do with my point that sony wasnt going straight for the gamers with the ps3?

Avatar image for kingtito
kingtito

11775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 kingtito
Member since 2003 • 11775 Posts
[QUOTE="fbigent34"]really? rockband, gh? gta all say hello to you. all compaines are competeting with gamers. hence they in the video game market.Pariah_001
And I say hello back and follow up by pointing out that Sony isn't trying to rely on novelty controls to sell their system. Where were these games when Cooking Mama and Spongebob were first being sold? It's called "shovelware" for a reason: it's for marketing first and gaming second. Wii is still marketed based on its interface, not its. Not its "games."

Only a Sony fanboy would say the Wii and PS3 are in different markets. Last time I checked the home console market is where they're trying to sell those products.
Avatar image for TAKE_IT_BACK
TAKE_IT_BACK

3850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 TAKE_IT_BACK
Member since 2008 • 3850 Posts

[QUOTE="TAKE_IT_BACK"]Right, thats exactly why we get PS3 commercials like this.:roll:Pariah_001
At the beginning of the commercial, the guy states that he wants to play games. Nice try though.

But you saw how Sony was specifically showing off the PS3's Blu-Ray and movie downloading service. They're trying to appeal to a market of people who want to upgrade to Blu-Ray as well casual and hardcore gamers. They're keeping there options open because its obvious that not enough gamers support the PS3's software to a point where it could offset the money lost on each console made.

Avatar image for stiltzsy
stiltzsy

1486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 stiltzsy
Member since 2008 • 1486 Posts

[QUOTE="Pariah_001"][QUOTE="TAKE_IT_BACK"]Right, thats exactly why we get PS3 commercials like this.:roll:TAKE_IT_BACK

At the beginning of the commercial, the guy states that he wants to play games. Nice try though.

But you saw how Sony was specifically showing off the PS3's Blu-Ray and movie downloading service. They're trying to appeal to a market of people who want to upgrade to Blu-Ray as well casual and hardcore gamers. They're keeping there options open because its obvious that not enough gamers support the PS3's software to a point where it could offset the money lost on each console made.

The reasons gamers don't support the PS3 is because sony was pushing a bluray player that can also play games. They wanted to win the format battle with toshiba. They won the format battle, but lost the gaming war because of it.
Avatar image for Steppy_76
Steppy_76

2858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#120 Steppy_76
Member since 2005 • 2858 Posts
[QUOTE="ogvampire"]sony is not going straight for gamers, they are going straight for technophiles... why would they include an unnecessary blu-ray drive in a videogames console, and include a remote and blu-ray movie in their bundles?:|Pariah_001
If the Blu-Ray player actually serves a purpose for making games work optimally, then it's not unnecessary. By your logic, I could claim that the 360's DVD drive is unnecessary since games could be played on more inferior technology.

Except that going farther back WOULD give a definite difference. As it stands nearly every game comes on a single disc and looks and plays the same. Of course I expect nothing less of you than defending anything sony says or does to your dying breath.
Avatar image for ogvampire
ogvampire

9210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 ogvampire  Online
Member since 2008 • 9210 Posts

[QUOTE="ogvampire"]sony is not going straight for gamers, they are going straight for technophiles... why would they include an unnecessary blu-ray drive in a videogames console, and include a remote and blu-ray movie in their bundles?:|Pariah_001
If the Blu-Ray player actually serves a purpose for making games work optimally, then it's not unnecessary. By your logic, I could claim that the 360's DVD drive is unnecessary since games could be played on more inferior technology.

alot of ps3 games have to install gigs of info to be 'optimised' to work properly.... explain to me again why blu-ray is necessary for gaming when the PC and 360 have no issues and have pretty much the same games?

Avatar image for Pariah_001
Pariah_001

4850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 Pariah_001
Member since 2003 • 4850 Posts
[QUOTE="kingtito"] Only a Sony fanboy would say the Wii and PS3 are in different markets. Last time I checked the home console market is where they're trying to sell those products.

You could market a toaster as a console, but that doesn't make it a console.
Avatar image for Pariah_001
Pariah_001

4850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 Pariah_001
Member since 2003 • 4850 Posts
But you saw how Sony was specifically showing off the PS3's Blu-Ray and movie downloading service. They're trying to appeal to a market of people who want to upgrade to Blu-Ray as well casual and hardcore gamers. They're keeping there options open because its obvious that not enough gamers support the PS3's software to a point where it could offset the money lost on each console made.TAKE_IT_BACK

All this point tries to tell me is that they'd be using a Blu-Ray as a stepping stone to selling more games.

The commercial is not enough to assume that Sony is trying to overshadow gaming since it clearly implied that it was a peripheral function. The character in the commercial got it to play games. That's the emphasis.

Avatar image for Pariah_001
Pariah_001

4850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 Pariah_001
Member since 2003 • 4850 Posts
Except that going farther back WOULD give a definite difference. As it stands nearly every game comes on a single disc and looks and plays the same. Of course I expect nothing less of you than defending anything sony says or does to your dying breath.Steppy_76
Rage and Metal Gear Solid say hello. Trying to narrow the field by discounting games with multiple disks and discounting the fact that devs could accomplish more on the Blu-Ray (as evidenced the aforementioned games) makes your argument rather disingenuous.
Avatar image for kingtito
kingtito

11775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 kingtito
Member since 2003 • 11775 Posts
[QUOTE="kingtito"] Only a Sony fanboy would say the Wii and PS3 are in different markets. Last time I checked the home console market is where they're trying to sell those products. Pariah_001
You could market a toaster as a console, but that doesn't make it a console.

So you're saying the Wii, PS3 and 360 aren't consoles? You have to be the biggest fanboy on these forums.....and that's saying something.
Avatar image for Dr_Corndog
Dr_Corndog

3245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#126 Dr_Corndog
Member since 2004 • 3245 Posts

"It's difficult to talk about Nintendo, because we don't look at their console as being a competitor"

HarlockJC

Maybe they should start, because I bought a Wii instead of a 360 or PS3.

Avatar image for kingtito
kingtito

11775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 kingtito
Member since 2003 • 11775 Posts
[QUOTE="Steppy_76"]Except that going farther back WOULD give a definite difference. As it stands nearly every game comes on a single disc and looks and plays the same. Of course I expect nothing less of you than defending anything sony says or does to your dying breath.Pariah_001
Rage and Metal Gear Solid say hello. Trying to narrow the field by discounting games with multiple disks and discounting the fact that devs could accomplish more on the Blu-Ray (as evidenced the aforementioned games) makes your argument rather disingenuous.

You either work for Sony or you own lots of stock. Your opinion from here on out is pretty much moot.
Avatar image for Pariah_001
Pariah_001

4850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 Pariah_001
Member since 2003 • 4850 Posts
alot of ps3 games have to install gigs of info to be 'optimised' to work properly.... explain to me again why blu-ray is necessary for gaming when the PC and 360 have no issues and have pretty much the same games?ogvampire
Because the games have already been made on the blu-ray. If Blu-ray was used to make it, the Blu-ray is needed to play it and in the form it's in. Trying to use multiplats designed by devs with little incentive to bring out the full performance of Blu-ray is rather deceptive in the fact of the PS3's exclusive games. Is sounds like this argument of yours is trying to say Sony should've made their system about total installs and multiple disks like with 360 and PC. Is that what you're trying to say?
Avatar image for DragonxanderPR
DragonxanderPR

292

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#129 DragonxanderPR
Member since 2008 • 292 Posts

largest lifespan? not if more people don't start buying it...and games for it too. KingTuttle

That large life span won't show off during this gen, it will show up on the next one. I would even say the PS3 is a 7.5 gen console, meaning that it's much too advanced for the 7th gen, yet Sony doesn't shows off the full potential of the PS3 as long as there is no need (that's why many PS3 games are similar in overall quality to many 360 games). They're saving the best for last. In other words, when both Microsoft and Nintendo show up their next gen consoles, the PS3 would have some significant price drop, becoming attractive to both minor developers and most of the current public. That way, Sony will have a mega sales boost, like the one the PS2 experienced by the late 6th gen. All of that, and the console would still have enough juice to deliver...

I wouldn't say the PSP's faring well enough (limited library, cheap excuse for an analog stick, short battery life, overlycostly UMDs, lots of media functionality not needed by most gamers...).

Avatar image for Pariah_001
Pariah_001

4850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 Pariah_001
Member since 2003 • 4850 Posts
So you're saying the Wii, PS3 and 360 aren't consoles? You have to be the biggest fanboy on these forums.....and that's saying something.kingtito
I'm saying the Wii doesn't market itself as a console even though it's listed as one.
Avatar image for ogvampire
ogvampire

9210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 ogvampire  Online
Member since 2008 • 9210 Posts
[QUOTE="TAKE_IT_BACK"]But you saw how Sony was specifically showing off the PS3's Blu-Ray and movie downloading service. They're trying to appeal to a market of people who want to upgrade to Blu-Ray as well casual and hardcore gamers. They're keeping there options open because its obvious that not enough gamers support the PS3's software to a point where it could offset the money lost on each console made.Pariah_001

All this point tries to tell me is that they'd be using a Blu-Ray as a stepping stone to selling more games.

The commercial is not enough to assume that Sony is trying to overshadow gaming since it clearly implied that it was a peripheral function. The character in the commercial got it to play games. That's the emphasis.

let me try to use your logic against you:

at this point the wii is using casual games as a stepping stone to get non-gamers interested in gaming and to have them buy more games...

i would say since the Wii doesnt play DVD's or any kind of movie and is not trying to get people to watch or buy movies, it is Nintendo that is going straight for the gamer, not sony...

Avatar image for loftus42
loftus42

1086

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 loftus42
Member since 2008 • 1086 Posts
well sony at the moment has the system that has the largest life span, wii is a gamecube with motion sensors and the 360 is reaching the end of the road. the ps3 is not only a game system it is also a blue ray movie player and since blue ray won the movie wars this makes ps3 a two in one deal so sony does not have to make a new system since there's will survive for a while yet.hellsing6666666
Lol, Largest lifespan? they have yet to show anything that the 360 can't counter. When the next xbox comes out, I doubt very seriuosly Sony is gonna ignore it and stay with the PS3. The lifespan of the PS3 will be determined by the lifespan of the 360. Once the 360 is replaced, the PS3 will follow suit soon, or will quickly fall to the wayside. The PS3 will not be able to keep up with the Nextbox.
Avatar image for kingtito
kingtito

11775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 kingtito
Member since 2003 • 11775 Posts
[QUOTE="kingtito"]So you're saying the Wii, PS3 and 360 aren't consoles? You have to be the biggest fanboy on these forums.....and that's saying something.Pariah_001
I'm saying the Wii doesn't market itself as a console even though it's listed as one.

What?????? Since when has the Wii been marketed as something else? I've NEVER seen it marketed as something else other than a console, can't say the same for the PS3 though.
Avatar image for TAKE_IT_BACK
TAKE_IT_BACK

3850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134 TAKE_IT_BACK
Member since 2008 • 3850 Posts
[QUOTE="TAKE_IT_BACK"]But you saw how Sony was specifically showing off the PS3's Blu-Ray and movie downloading service. They're trying to appeal to a market of people who want to upgrade to Blu-Ray as well casual and hardcore gamers. They're keeping there options open because its obvious that not enough gamers support the PS3's software to a point where it could offset the money lost on each console made.Pariah_001

All this point tries to tell me is that they'd be using a Blu-Ray as a stepping stone to selling more games.

The commercial is not enough to assume that Sony is trying to overshadow gaming since it clearly implied that it was a peripheral function. The character in the commercial got it to play games. That's the emphasis.

You misunderstand me: I agree that Blu-Ray is a way to get non-gamers who are just buying the PS3 for it. But that obviously shows they are not aiming "straight for gamers" They are aiming to attract non gamers and casuals as well, and that is smart, especially when no one is buying their games.

Avatar image for Pariah_001
Pariah_001

4850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 Pariah_001
Member since 2003 • 4850 Posts
let me try to use your logic against you: at this point the wii is using casual games as a stepping stone to get non-gamers interested in gaming and to have them buy more games... ogvampire
But that's not what they're doing. They're marketing control schemes. Not games. In the case of Blu-ray, it serves a physical purpose for the games being marketed for PS3. Blu-ray/PS3s ulterior characteristics are marketed peripherally. I wasn't saying that I felt Sony was using Blu-ray as a stepping stone. I observed that-that was your own contention.
i would say since the Wii doesnt play DVD's or any kind of movie and is not trying to get people to watch or buy movies, it is Nintendo that is going straight for the gamer, not sony...ogvampire
This still ignores the fact that Wii's controller is being marketed before the shovelware. They're banking on the novelty before showcasing their "games."
Avatar image for ogvampire
ogvampire

9210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 ogvampire  Online
Member since 2008 • 9210 Posts

[QUOTE="ogvampire"]alot of ps3 games have to install gigs of info to be 'optimised' to work properly.... explain to me again why blu-ray is necessary for gaming when the PC and 360 have no issues and have pretty much the same games?Pariah_001
Because the games have already been made on the blu-ray. If Blu-ray was used to make it, the Blu-ray is needed to play it and in the form it's in. Trying to use multiplats designed by devs with little incentive to bring out the full performance of Blu-ray is rather deceptive in the fact of the PS3's exclusive games. Is sounds like this argument of yours is trying to say Sony should've made their system about total installs and multiple disks like with 360 and PC. Is that what you're trying to say?

'blu-ray was used to make it'?

blu-ray was not used to make anything... its just a storage medium:|

multiple disks? 360 has had only a couple of games that needed that... wow :roll:

also, if the 360 had the option to install info on the HDD when those games were being developed, the devs wouldnt have needed to make that game into multiple disks...

its obvious you dont know what youre talking about, so i wont bother with this discussion

have a nice day

Avatar image for Pariah_001
Pariah_001

4850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 Pariah_001
Member since 2003 • 4850 Posts
What?????? Since when has the Wii been marketed as something else? I've NEVER seen it marketed as something else other than a console, can't say the same for the PS3 though. kingtito
My quote wasn't an analysis of the Wii's marketing but rather the validity of your logic.
Avatar image for ogvampire
ogvampire

9210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#138 ogvampire  Online
Member since 2008 • 9210 Posts

[QUOTE="ogvampire"]let me try to use your logic against you: at this point the wii is using casual games as a stepping stone to get non-gamers interested in gaming and to have them buy more games... Pariah_001
But that's not what they're doing. They're marketing control schemes. Not games. In the case of Blu-ray, it serves a physical purpose for the games being marketed for PS3. Blu-ray/PS3s ulterior characteristics are marketed peripherally. I wasn't saying that I felt Sony was using Blu-ray as a stepping stone. I observed that-that was your own contention.
i would say since the Wii doesnt play DVD's or any kind of movie and is not trying to get people to watch or buy movies, it is Nintendo that is going straight for the gamer, not sony...ogvampire
This still ignores the fact that Wii's controller is being marketed before the shovelware. They're banking on the novelty before showcasing their "games."

now im convinced... you work for Sony:lol:

Avatar image for Steppy_76
Steppy_76

2858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#140 Steppy_76
Member since 2005 • 2858 Posts
[QUOTE="Steppy_76"]Except that going farther back WOULD give a definite difference. As it stands nearly every game comes on a single disc and looks and plays the same. Of course I expect nothing less of you than defending anything sony says or does to your dying breath.Pariah_001
Rage and Metal Gear Solid say hello. Trying to narrow the field by discounting games with multiple disks and discounting the fact that devs could accomplish more on the Blu-Ray (as evidenced the aforementioned games) makes your argument rather disingenuous.

No, I'm going to look at the overwhelming number of single disc games vs. the two you mentioned. Or is your stance really that helping out less than half a percent of games equals "needed".
Avatar image for Pariah_001
Pariah_001

4850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 Pariah_001
Member since 2003 • 4850 Posts
You misunderstand me: I agree that Blu-Ray is a way to get non-gamers who are just buying the PS3 for it. But that obviously shows they are not aiming "straight for gamers" They are aiming to attract non gamers and casuals as well, and that is smart, especially when no one is buying their games.TAKE_IT_BACK
You misunderstand me. I wasn't saying that Sony was using Blu-ray to attract non-gamers (although it was a clever way of killing off the HD-DVD brand). I was saying that it's ulterior uses are advertised peripherally. They are going straight for gamers before trying to peddle a format and movie player.
Avatar image for kingtito
kingtito

11775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 kingtito
Member since 2003 • 11775 Posts
[QUOTE="kingtito"]What?????? Since when has the Wii been marketed as something else? I've NEVER seen it marketed as something else other than a console, can't say the same for the PS3 though. Pariah_001
My quote wasn't an analysis of the Wii's marketing but rather the validity of your logic.

I'm not the one claiming the PS3 is in a different market, YOU are. I see no point in further discussions with you. It's obvious you're blinded by your love for Sony.
Avatar image for DAZZER7
DAZZER7

2422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#143 DAZZER7
Member since 2004 • 2422 Posts

[QUOTE="DAZZER7"]

Where did SOny or anyone else say that they were the "current market leaders". Please point out where you got that information from, because otherwise you look like you shot your mouth off without knowing what you are talking about.

ZIMdoom

[QUOTE="DAZZER7"]Well put lol. Sony are not the 'current' market leaders no matter how the cows or their execs try and spin it! ZIMdoom

Where did SOny or anyone else say that they were the "current market leaders". Please point out where you got that information from, because otherwise you look like you shot your mouth off without knowing what you are talking about.

Where did I say Sony said they were the market leaders :lol: I didn't!
Avatar image for Pariah_001
Pariah_001

4850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 Pariah_001
Member since 2003 • 4850 Posts

'blu-ray was used to make it'?blu-ray was not used to make anything... its just a storage medium

That's required for maintaining quality in the games specifically designed to work towards its strengths. Very good.

multiple disks? 360 has had only a couple of games that needed that... wow :roll:ogvampire

That doesn't answer my question. Blu-ray seeks to amplify quality by downplaying compression and eliminate the need for disk swapping. 360 games are reliant upon those things.

also, if the 360 had the option to install info on the HDD when those games were being developed, the devs wouldnt have needed to make that game into multiple disks... ogvampire

Which is my point. Are you trying to say that directly reading DVDs is unnecessary in the same vein as Blu-ray since gamers could just download installs?

its obvious you dont know what youre talking about, so i wont bother with this discussion have a nice dayogvampire

And he makes a new reply seconds later.

Avatar image for Pariah_001
Pariah_001

4850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 Pariah_001
Member since 2003 • 4850 Posts
No, I'm going to look at the overwhelming number of single disc games vs. the two you mentioned. Or is your stance really that helping out less than half a percent of games equals "needed".Steppy_76
This isn't about quantity of examples. It's about saying that Blu-ray is totally unnecessary when certain games have already proven that Blu-ray can output more quality than 360. The only reason you're confused on this is because your point relies entirely on multiplats that don't even try to push the system and its format, but rather gimp the game so as to not piss off any particular demographic.
Avatar image for TAKE_IT_BACK
TAKE_IT_BACK

3850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 TAKE_IT_BACK
Member since 2008 • 3850 Posts

You misunderstand me. I wasn't saying that Sony was using Blu-ray to attract non-gamers Pariah_001

But they are:?

They are going straight for gamers before trying to peddle a format and movie player.Pariah_001

If thats really the way you want to consider it... But that is not going "straight for gamers". Maybe they do(or did) put gamers before non gamers, but its obvious that they aren't just appealing to gamers, therefore they are not going "straight for gamers".

I'm quite confused on why you act like its such a bad thing to appeal to non gamers and casuals. If Sony wasn't doing that, they would probably be in a worse spot then they are now. Putting faith in so called "hardcore" gamers was their mistake: where are these so called gamers when LBP and R2 flopped in sales?

Avatar image for Pariah_001
Pariah_001

4850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 Pariah_001
Member since 2003 • 4850 Posts
[QUOTE="kingtito"] I'm not the one claiming the PS3 is in a different market, YOU are.

I wasn't saying you were. I was questioning the logic by which you were claiming that the Wii could, without debate, be called a console in the same vein as PS3 or 360.
Avatar image for DAZZER7
DAZZER7

2422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#148 DAZZER7
Member since 2004 • 2422 Posts
[QUOTE="kingtito"]So you're saying the Wii, PS3 and 360 aren't consoles? You have to be the biggest fanboy on these forums.....and that's saying something.Pariah_001
I'm saying the Wii doesn't market itself as a console even though it's listed as one.

What does it market itself as? It plays games, they come on disks, you plug it into a tv, its a games console. Whilst they do have a different angle on hooking consumers, they essentially have broad markets that significantly over-lap! I understand your argument I really do but consider it this way. You have the technophiles at one end of the spectrum and the complete casuals at the other! There is a huge market in between, both are competing for!
Avatar image for Pariah_001
Pariah_001

4850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 Pariah_001
Member since 2003 • 4850 Posts

But they are:?TAKE_IT_BACK

Allow me to amend: The Blu-Rays purpose is not to attract non-gamers and their more direct marketing doesn't try to. Peripherally is another story.

If thats really the way you want to consider it... But that is not going "straight for gamers". Maybe they do(or did) put gamers before non gamers, but its obvious that they aren't just appealing to gamers, therefore they are not going "straight for gamers".

I'm quite confused on why you act like its such a bad thing to appeal to non gamers and casuals. If Sony wasn't doing that, they would probably be in a worse spot then they are now. Putting faith in so called "hardcore" gamers was their mistake: where are these so called gamers when LBP and R2 flopped in sales?

TAKE_IT_BACK

First: It's possible to go "straight" for a certain demographic before letting people know about the console's peripheral features.

Second: I'm not saying it would be a bad thing. I'm just saying it's not the reality of the matter.

Avatar image for Dibdibdobdobo
Dibdibdobdobo

6683

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#150 Dibdibdobdobo
Member since 2008 • 6683 Posts

We should rename Sony Fanboys ostriches.

With the new slogan "IF WE DONT SEE IT, IT ISNT HAPPENING"