I will easily admit that. I love every single aspect of The Witcher 3.
@Random_Matt said:
Good game, but overrated. The open world was quite pointless, served no purpose apart from question marks and other tedious crap. Tons of better rpgs out there.
Such as?
People are praising Skyrim and hailing it as better than The Witcher 3? Where's my gigantic facepalm emote.
Skyrim has a garbage story, filled with boring, derivative characters. The voice acting is on par with a middle school kid's production play, and the hack and slash sponge combat is lul-worthy. Here, let me just hack at this enemy for 5 minutes with right trigger/left click. No need to dodge, or heal, or even try another approach; I can just hack and slash till the sun comes up.
The world is decent, at best, mostly involving dwemer ruins that all look the same, and a bunch of boring stories about characters you'll never get to interact with, or even appeal to. I went into a dungeon in one game, and at the end, there was a woman who said, "You had so much potential, but I guess I'll just have to kill you." What potential? Was I good in bed? Did I have some ugly characteristic that would put me in a great side show? Why can't I join you and help your cause? Why am I always stuck being the good guy and why did I have no choice, whatsoever?
The Witcher 3 had quests out in the middle of nowhere where you met a troll, for instance, who kept getting attacked by men. Now, it was a sort of friendly troll, that wasn't really harming anyone unless they got close, and it even warned them. In Skyrim, you could have killed him, or you could have killed him. But in The Witcher, you could actually help him paint a shield on his tent to hopefully stop people attacking him, or you could kill him. It's all about choices, and the outcomes are different, indeed.
Log in to comment