horseshit ai = best developer? Â lol no
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="ReadingRainbow4"]Rockstar, Rocksteady, Ubisoft Montreal, Bungie, Bethesda, etc... I mean, there are plenty of devs that you could make the argument for being the best dev this gen.from this gen, I can't think of anyone better in the AAA space.
mems_1224
gta 4 was incredibly boring, rocksteady? eh I liked arkham asylum way more than city. Assassins creed is fair I guess but I wouldn't put it in a top 5 of anything list.
Bungie? not a fan of halo. Bethesda? Oblvion and skyrim are both such incredibly boring, stale games. They have landmass and little else.
[QUOTE="Sonysexual1"][QUOTE="GrannyGoat"]To be honest, I was quite impressed with the gameplay in TLOU. Unlike Gears of War, you can't shotgun your way to victory. Variety in weapon usage and movement/action is necessary. This makes the gameplay quite dynamic and has immense replay value. How you got through 1 section on the first playthrough is usually drastically different then how you'll do it in your 2nd playthrough. It's too bad Halo and Gears are mediocre trash. I really feel sorry for lembots that they don't have a 1st part studio that's even 1/2 as great as Naughty Dog. It must be frustrating. You're obviously a BIAS TROLL because this thread isn't even about Microsoft or their games, yet you continually bash everything Microsoft or XBox. You're obviously completely wrong about Halo & Gears. They are "AAAE" games that have outsold every Naughty Dog game on the PS3. This isn't a diss to Naughty Dog, because I agree, their games are GREAT. It's a diss to your bias idiotic comments that has no justification. Your opinion doesn't matter when millions of gamers and critics completely disagree with you. http://www.metacritic.com/search/all/Halo/results http://www.metacritic.com/search/all/Gears+of+War/results Maybe if you'd take you head out of Sony A$$ you would be able to see better.lol no.
Â
their gameplay/AI SUCKS, plus they're always in the news for ripping people off and/or stealing.
blackace
Because sales = quality, am I right?
[QUOTE="cain006"]Hopefully they're cooking up a new IP for next gen systems, I'd hate to seem them get stuck on Batman forever.Agreed I feel like they could do anything in the action adventure genre very well.I dunno about best but Rocksteady was easily the most surprising amazing developer this gen.
heeweesRus
You're obviously a BIAS TROLL because this thread isn't even about Microsoft or their games, yet you continually bash everything Microsoft or XBox. You're obviously completely wrong about Halo & Gears. They are "AAAE" games that have outsold every Naughty Dog game on the PS3. This isn't a diss to Naughty Dog, because I agree, their games are GREAT. It's a diss to your bias idiotic comments that has no justification. Your opinion doesn't matter when millions of gamers and critics completely disagree with you. http://www.metacritic.com/search/all/Halo/results http://www.metacritic.com/search/all/Gears+of+War/results Maybe if you'd take you head out of Sony A$$ you would be able to see better.[QUOTE="blackace"][QUOTE="Sonysexual1"] To be honest, I was quite impressed with the gameplay in TLOU. Unlike Gears of War, you can't shotgun your way to victory. Variety in weapon usage and movement/action is necessary. This makes the gameplay quite dynamic and has immense replay value. How you got through 1 section on the first playthrough is usually drastically different then how you'll do it in your 2nd playthrough. It's too bad Halo and Gears are mediocre trash. I really feel sorry for lembots that they don't have a 1st part studio that's even 1/2 as great as Naughty Dog. It must be frustrating.Sonysexual1
Because sales = quality, am I right?
user reviews mean nothing, when are you going to get it through your thick skull?[QUOTE="GrannyGoat"]cracks me up that cows scream this game is the best game of the generation..but when it comes to the AI all they have to say it they've seen worse..ROFL!!!!!!!!!! an action/stealth game kind of needs good AI, let alone be the best game this gen. cows just need to admit they like the pretty cutscenes and be done it. The Last of Us: 9.1 User Score Halo 4: 6.9 User Score I hope you realize that a 9.0+ user score is extremely rare for high-budget titles. User scores never count for anything because bias fanboys will vote 1 on AAAE games. lol!! User scores are pretty much meaningless on every site.[QUOTE="Wiimotefan"]
Meh.. I've seen much worse from highly praised games. Â People still treat MGS4 as godly even though the AI is considerably worse than any TLOU examples I've seen.
Sonysexual1
Rockstar, Rocksteady, Ubisoft Montreal, Bungie, Bethesda, etc... I mean, there are plenty of devs that you could make the argument for being the best dev this gen.[QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="ReadingRainbow4"]
from this gen, I can't think of anyone better in the AAA space.
ReadingRainbow4
gta 4 was incredibly boring, rocksteady? eh I liked arkham asylum way more than city. Assassins creed is fair I guess but I wouldn't put it in a top 5 of anything list.
Bungie? not a fan of halo. Bethesda? Oblvion and skyrim are both such incredibly boring, stale games. They have landmass and little else.
I wouldn't say it was incredibly boring. GTA4 was overrated but was still a pretty damn good game. I liked Asylum more too but that doesn't mean Arkham City wasn't great. Assassins Creed 2 and Brotherhood, Far Cry 3, RB6 Vegas 1 and 2, Splinter Cell Conviction, all great games. And they got Watch Dogs coming out next which looks like it could contend for GOTY this year. I mean, its ok if you don't like these developers but they've all made just as much of an impact this gen if not more than Naughty Dog.You're obviously a BIAS TROLL because this thread isn't even about Microsoft or their games, yet you continually bash everything Microsoft or XBox. You're obviously completely wrong about Halo & Gears. They are "AAAE" games that have outsold every Naughty Dog game on the PS3. This isn't a diss to Naughty Dog, because I agree, their games are GREAT. It's a diss to your bias idiotic comments that has no justification. Your opinion doesn't matter when millions of gamers and critics completely disagree with you. http://www.metacritic.com/search/all/Halo/results http://www.metacritic.com/search/all/Gears+of+War/results Maybe if you'd take you head out of Sony A$$ you would be able to see better.[QUOTE="blackace"][QUOTE="Sonysexual1"] To be honest, I was quite impressed with the gameplay in TLOU. Unlike Gears of War, you can't shotgun your way to victory. Variety in weapon usage and movement/action is necessary. This makes the gameplay quite dynamic and has immense replay value. How you got through 1 section on the first playthrough is usually drastically different then how you'll do it in your 2nd playthrough. It's too bad Halo and Gears are mediocre trash. I really feel sorry for lembots that they don't have a 1st part studio that's even 1/2 as great as Naughty Dog. It must be frustrating.Sonysexual1
Because sales = quality, am I right?
i used Metacritic scores TROLL. You blind. LOL!! What a dummy. Most of those games are AAAE. I don't use stupid User Scores.
Yes sales mean something. It means more people LOVED one game over another. Cows praise all these exclusives, but they never buy them. lol!! Besides MGS IV, Uncharted and GT5, most PS3 exclusives have not be big sellers (selling 8 million or more). If a game is truly great it should sell millions and millions. Just ask Nintendo and their Mario Kart games. The PS3 had like 9 out of 11 flops for their exclusives last year.
PS3 2012 Exlcusives Flops
Ratchet & Clank: Full Frontal Assault 7.0
PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale 6.5
LittleBigPlanet Karting 7.0
Mugen Souls 4.0
Atelier Meruru: The Apprentice of Arland 5.0
Sorcery 4.5
Starhawk 7.5
Tales of Graces f 7.0
Yakuza: Dead Souls 5.5
[QUOTE="ReadingRainbow4"][QUOTE="mems_1224"] Rockstar, Rocksteady, Ubisoft Montreal, Bungie, Bethesda, etc... I mean, there are plenty of devs that you could make the argument for being the best dev this gen. mems_1224
gta 4 was incredibly boring, rocksteady? eh I liked arkham asylum way more than city. Assassins creed is fair I guess but I wouldn't put it in a top 5 of anything list.
Bungie? not a fan of halo. Bethesda? Oblvion and skyrim are both such incredibly boring, stale games. They have landmass and little else.
I wouldn't say it was incredibly boring. GTA4 was overrated but was still a pretty damn good game. I liked Asylum more too but that doesn't mean Arkham City wasn't great. Assassins Creed 2 and Brotherhood, Far Cry 3, RB6 Vegas 1 and 2, Splinter Cell Conviction, all great games. And they got Watch Dogs coming out next which looks like it could contend for GOTY this year. I mean, its ok if you don't like these developers but they've all made just as much of an impact this gen if not more than Naughty Dog.yeah I'm not denying that, I guess ubisoft for the most part deserves to be there.
[QUOTE="Sonysexual1"][QUOTE="GrannyGoat"]cracks me up that cows scream this game is the best game of the generation..but when it comes to the AI all they have to say it they've seen worse..ROFL!!!!!!!!!! an action/stealth game kind of needs good AI, let alone be the best game this gen. cows just need to admit they like the pretty cutscenes and be done it.ÂThe Last of Us: 9.1 User Score Halo 4: 6.9 User Score I hope you realize that a 9.0+ user score is extremely rare for high-budget titles. User scores never count for anything because bias fanboys will vote 1 on AAAE games. lol!! User scores are pretty much meaningless on every site.blackace
You sound like you're crying. Regret paying for your mediocre exclusives?
[QUOTE="Sonysexual1"]
[QUOTE="blackace"] You're obviously a BIAS TROLL because this thread isn't even about Microsoft or their games, yet you continually bash everything Microsoft or XBox. You're obviously completely wrong about Halo & Gears. They are "AAAE" games that have outsold every Naughty Dog game on the PS3. This isn't a diss to Naughty Dog, because I agree, their games are GREAT. It's a diss to your bias idiotic comments that has no justification. Your opinion doesn't matter when millions of gamers and critics completely disagree with you. http://www.metacritic.com/search/all/Halo/results http://www.metacritic.com/search/all/Gears+of+War/results Maybe if you'd take you head out of Sony A$$ you would be able to see better. blackace
Because sales = quality, am I right?
i used Metacritic scores TROLL. You blind. LOL!! What a dummy. Most of those games are AAAE. I don't use stupid User Scores.
Yes sales mean something. It means more people LOVED one game over another. Cows praise all these exclusives, but they never buy them. lol!! Besides MGS IV, Uncharted and GT5, most PS3 exclusives have not be big sellers (selling 8 million or more). If a game is truly great it should sell millions and millions. Just ask Nintendo and their Mario Kart games. The PS3 had like 9 out of 11 flops for their exclusives last year.
PS3 2012 Exlcusives Flops
Ratchet & Clank: Full Frontal Assault 7.0
PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale 6.5
LittleBigPlanet Karting 7.0
Mugen Souls 4.0
Atelier Meruru: The Apprentice of Arland 5.0
Sorcery 4.5
Starhawk 7.5
Tales of Graces f 7.0
Yakuza: Dead Souls 5.5
Isn't it funny that no Halo game for the 360 beat LittleBigPlanet?
[QUOTE="cain006"]Hopefully they're cooking up a new IP for next gen systems, I'd hate to seem them get stuck on Batman forever.I dunno about best but Rocksteady was easily the most surprising amazing developer this gen.
heeweesRus
:P
In all seriousness though, Rocksteady blew me away more than any other dev last gen. Arkham City is an absolutely god tier game in incredible design. I cannot praise that game enough. It does everything as perfectly as possible... My eyes are on them to see what they cook up next.
User scores never count for anything because bias fanboys will vote 1 on AAAE games. lol!! User scores are pretty much meaningless on every site.[QUOTE="blackace"][QUOTE="Sonysexual1"] The Last of Us: 9.1 User Score Halo 4: 6.9 User Score I hope you realize that a 9.0+ user score is extremely rare for high-budget titles. Sonysexual1
You sound like you're crying. Regret paying for your mediocre exclusives?
Mediocre exclusives? Which one would those be. I own ALL the systems dummy. I have a PS3, XBox 360 and a Wii. I own The Last of Us and Ni No Kuni. I'm not a BIAS TROLLING FANBOY like you. I have Lost Odyssey, Forza 3 & 4, all Halo's, Gears 1, 2, 3, Kameo, Crackdown, Naruto, Tales of Vesperia, Infinite Undiscovery, , Super Mario Galaxy, SSBB, Zelda, XenoBlade, etc..etc... I have most of the AAAE for all 3 systems. There's nothing for me to cry about. I have no regrets because I'm a True Gamer. You are a clueless moron.You're obviously a BIAS TROLL because this thread isn't even about Microsoft or their games, yet you continually bash everything Microsoft or XBox. You're obviously completely wrong about Halo & Gears. They are "AAAE" games that have outsold every Naughty Dog game on the PS3. This isn't a diss to Naughty Dog, because I agree, their games are GREAT. It's a diss to your bias idiotic comments that has no justification. Your opinion doesn't matter when millions of gamers and critics completely disagree with you. http://www.metacritic.com/search/all/Halo/results http://www.metacritic.com/search/all/Gears+of+War/results Maybe if you'd take you head out of Sony A$$ you would be able to see better.[QUOTE="blackace"][QUOTE="Sonysexual1"] To be honest, I was quite impressed with the gameplay in TLOU. Unlike Gears of War, you can't shotgun your way to victory. Variety in weapon usage and movement/action is necessary. This makes the gameplay quite dynamic and has immense replay value. How you got through 1 section on the first playthrough is usually drastically different then how you'll do it in your 2nd playthrough. It's too bad Halo and Gears are mediocre trash. I really feel sorry for lembots that they don't have a 1st part studio that's even 1/2 as great as Naughty Dog. It must be frustrating.Sonysexual1
Because sales = quality, am I right?
99% of the time yes they actually do, contrary to idiotic belief people usually buy quality.[QUOTE="Sonysexual1"]
[QUOTE="blackace"] You're obviously a BIAS TROLL because this thread isn't even about Microsoft or their games, yet you continually bash everything Microsoft or XBox. You're obviously completely wrong about Halo & Gears. They are "AAAE" games that have outsold every Naughty Dog game on the PS3. This isn't a diss to Naughty Dog, because I agree, their games are GREAT. It's a diss to your bias idiotic comments that has no justification. Your opinion doesn't matter when millions of gamers and critics completely disagree with you. http://www.metacritic.com/search/all/Halo/results http://www.metacritic.com/search/all/Gears+of+War/results Maybe if you'd take you head out of Sony A$$ you would be able to see better. WilliamRLBaker
Because sales = quality, am I right?
99% of the time yes they actually do, contrary to idiotic belief people usually buy quality.So why are Halo sales so high? The game is a mediocre POS.
1.Naughty Dog-Two new IPs, Uncharted 2 and TLOU are at 95 metacritic scores.
2.Rockstar-Despite the mediocre GTA4, they came back strong with the great Red Dead Redemption and Max Payne 3.
3.Rocksteady-Made the best game this gen (Arkham City), Arkham Asylum was also amazing.
Honorable mentions for Platinum Games and Bioware.
Â
1.Naughty Dog-Two new IPs, Uncharted 2 and TLOU are at 95 metacritic scores.
2.Rockstar-Despite the mediocre GTA4, they came back strong with the great Red Dead Redemption and Max Payne 3.
3.Rocksteady-Made the best game this gen (Arkham City), Arkham Asylum was also amazing.
Honorable mentions for Platinum Games and Bioware.
Â
crimsonman1245
And still no Microsoft studio. :cry:
How does any gamer live with no quality exclusives?
99% of the time yes they actually do, contrary to idiotic belief people usually buy quality.[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]
[QUOTE="Sonysexual1"]
Because sales = quality, am I right?
Sonysexual1
So why are Halo sales so high? The game is a mediocre POS.
You could have actually made a good argument, a lot of the highest grossing games/movies/music range from average at best to pure shit.
Yet for some reason you chose something that actually strengthens his argument. Â Overall, the Halo games have been pretty damn great.
[QUOTE="blackace"]
[QUOTE="Sonysexual1"]
Because sales = quality, am I right?
Sonysexual1
i used Metacritic scores TROLL. You blind. LOL!! What a dummy. Most of those games are AAAE. I don't use stupid User Scores.
Yes sales mean something. It means more people LOVED one game over another. Cows praise all these exclusives, but they never buy them. lol!! Besides MGS IV, Uncharted and GT5, most PS3 exclusives have not be big sellers (selling 8 million or more). If a game is truly great it should sell millions and millions. Just ask Nintendo and their Mario Kart games. The PS3 had like 9 out of 11 flops for their exclusives last year.
PS3 2012 Exlcusives Flops
Ratchet & Clank: Full Frontal Assault 7.0
PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale 6.5
LittleBigPlanet Karting 7.0
Mugen Souls 4.0
Atelier Meruru: The Apprentice of Arland 5.0
Sorcery 4.5
Starhawk 7.5
Tales of Graces f 7.0
Yakuza: Dead Souls 5.5
Isn't it funny that no Halo game for the 360 beat LittleBigPlanet?
LOL!! Who give a shit. I own LittleBigPlanet. My point is you are bashing games you don't even own. lol!! Calling games trash that you've never played. You're an embarrassment to all Cows on this forum. You're a childish kid who wouldn't know a good game Kaz himself showed it to you. At least Heil68 recognizes decent games on other platforms, even though he loves the Playstation platform.After Uncharter 2? Yes. After Uncharted 3 and TLOU I'd say they are a bit overrated just like TLOU. I just finished TLOU today and I'm not quite sure how or why it got all those perfect scores. While I hated Tom McShea's poorly written review--I actually agree with his score. This game was and is truly an 8.0 experience. There was nothing there that hasn't been seen or done. I want ND to step up their game next time for all the s**t talking they were doing about other devs games because currenly after TLOU and UC3 they've shown that they are all talk and no show.
[QUOTE="Sonysexual1"]
[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"] 99% of the time yes they actually do, contrary to idiotic belief people usually buy quality.
Wiimotefan
So why are Halo sales so high? The game is a mediocre POS.
You could have actually made a good argument, a lot of the highest grossing games/movies/music range from average at best to pure shit.
Yet for some reason you chose something that actually strengthens his argument. Â Overall, the Halo games have been pretty damn great.
Halo 4 - 87 Metacritic, 6.9 User score
[QUOTE="Sonysexual1"][QUOTE="blackace"]
i used Metacritic scores TROLL. You blind. LOL!! What a dummy. Most of those games are AAAE. I don't use stupid User Scores.
Yes sales mean something. It means more people LOVED one game over another. Cows praise all these exclusives, but they never buy them. lol!! Besides MGS IV, Uncharted and GT5, most PS3 exclusives have not be big sellers (selling 8 million or more). If a game is truly great it should sell millions and millions. Just ask Nintendo and their Mario Kart games. The PS3 had like 9 out of 11 flops for their exclusives last year.
PS3 2012 Exlcusives Flops
Ratchet & Clank: Full Frontal Assault 7.0
PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale 6.5
LittleBigPlanet Karting 7.0
Mugen Souls 4.0
Atelier Meruru: The Apprentice of Arland 5.0
Sorcery 4.5
Starhawk 7.5
Tales of Graces f 7.0
Yakuza: Dead Souls 5.5blackace
Isn't it funny that no Halo game for the 360 beat LittleBigPlanet?
LOL!! Who give a shit. I own LittleBigPlanet. My point is you are bashing games you don't even own. lol!! Calling games trash that you've never played. You're an embarrassment to all Cows on this forum. You're a childish kid who wouldn't know a good game Kaz himself showed it to you. At least Heil68 recognizes decent games on other platforms, even though he loves the Playstation platform.Halo and Gears ARE mediocre trash. The user reviews prove it.
[QUOTE="Wiimotefan"]
[QUOTE="Sonysexual1"]
So why are Halo sales so high? The game is a mediocre POS.
Sonysexual1
You could have actually made a good argument, a lot of the highest grossing games/movies/music range from average at best to pure shit.
Yet for some reason you chose something that actually strengthens his argument. Â Overall, the Halo games have been pretty damn great.
Halo 4 - 87 Metacritic, 6.9 User score
Looks like some good scores to me, I dont see your point? Â
Anyways, I figured you meant Halo in general, not just the latest entry.
[QUOTE="Sonysexual1"]
[QUOTE="Wiimotefan"]
You could have actually made a good argument, a lot of the highest grossing games/movies/music range from average at best to pure shit.
Yet for some reason you chose something that actually strengthens his argument. Â Overall, the Halo games have been pretty damn great.
Wiimotefan
Halo 4 - 87 Metacritic, 6.9 User score
Looks like some good scores to me, I dont see your point? Â
Anyways, I figured you meant Halo in general, not just the latest entry.
I don't buy any game under 90 on meta. Sub-90 games are mediocre at best because of score inflation in the gaming press.
99% of the time yes they actually do, contrary to idiotic belief people usually buy quality.[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]
[QUOTE="Sonysexual1"]
Because sales = quality, am I right?
Sonysexual1
So why are Halo sales so high? The game is a mediocre POS.
I don't get what your sig is trying to prove. That the same sad bastards rating every Sony exclusive 10/10 are rating every MS exclusive 0/10 because "M$ are teh evil!"?[QUOTE="Sonysexual1"][QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"] 99% of the time yes they actually do, contrary to idiotic belief people usually buy quality.
locopatho
So why are Halo sales so high? The game is a mediocre POS.
I don't get what your sig is trying to prove. That the same sad bastards rating every Sony exclusive 10/10 are rating every MS exclusive 0/10 because "M$ are teh evil!"And the 360 fanboys aren't doing the same to PS3 exclusives?
99% of the time yes they actually do, contrary to idiotic belief people usually buy quality.[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]
[QUOTE="Sonysexual1"]
Because sales = quality, am I right?
Sonysexual1
So why are Halo sales so high? The game is a mediocre POS.
The sales are high because the game is GREAT. Your one of the few 100 people that can't see that. That's alright because blind bias fanboys tend to not see greatness on other platforms that aren't their favorite. lol!! I guess Super Mario Galaxy 2 (which has the highest Metacritic score and a 9.1 user score) is trash as well. lol!![QUOTE="Wiimotefan"]
[QUOTE="Sonysexual1"]
Halo 4 - 87 Metacritic, 6.9 User score
Sonysexual1
Looks like some good scores to me, I dont see your point? Â
Anyways, I figured you meant Halo in general, not just the latest entry.
I don't buy any game under 90 on meta. Sub-90 games are mediocre at best because of score inflation in the gaming press.
Haha, sucks for you then. Â There are plenty of excellent sub 90 games on MC. Â One of the best PS3 exclusives this year is sitting at 85.
[QUOTE="Sonysexual1"][QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"] 99% of the time yes they actually do, contrary to idiotic belief people usually buy quality.
blackace
So why are Halo sales so high? The game is a mediocre POS.
The sales are high because the game is GREAT. Your one of the few 100 people that can't see that. That's alright because blind bias fanboys tend to not see greatness on other platforms that aren't their favorite. lol!! I guess Super Mario Galaxy 2 (which has the highest Metacritic score and a 9.1 user score) is trash as well. lol!!Is your brain malfunctioning? What does SMG2 have anything to do with Halo 4? Halo 4 is a mediocre CoD-wannabe game with high sales.
[QUOTE="Wiimotefan"]
[QUOTE="Sonysexual1"]
Halo 4 - 87 Metacritic, 6.9 User score
Sonysexual1
Looks like some good scores to me, I dont see your point? Â
Anyways, I figured you meant Halo in general, not just the latest entry.
I don't buy any game under 90 on meta. Sub-90 games are mediocre at best because of score inflation in the gaming press.
boring fakeboy *yawn*[QUOTE="Wiimotefan"]
[QUOTE="Sonysexual1"]
Halo 4 - 87 Metacritic, 6.9 User score
Sonysexual1
Looks like some good scores to me, I dont see your point? Â
Anyways, I figured you meant Halo in general, not just the latest entry.
I don't buy any game under 90 on meta. Sub-90 games are mediocre at best because of score inflation in the gaming press.
What an idiotic opinion. I don't buy games based on metascore. I have never bought games based on metascore.I never let the metascore to make a decision on the last two games I bough which were halo 4 and dishonored. I bought halo 4 because I heard good things about it and because I was interested in trying a halo game. I bought dishonored because I felt like it would be an interesting game to play. I didn't even looked at the metascore when I bought that game and I enjoyed it even though I suck at it.The same thing applies for two other 360 games I bought which were witcher 2 and sonic generations.
[QUOTE="Sonysexual1"]
[QUOTE="Wiimotefan"]
Looks like some good scores to me, I dont see your point? Â
Anyways, I figured you meant Halo in general, not just the latest entry.
super600
I don't buy any game under 90 on meta. Sub-90 games are mediocre at best because of score inflation in the gaming press.
What an idiotic opinion. I don't buy games based on metascore. I have never bought games based on metascore.I never let the metascore to make a decision on the last two games I bough which were halo 4 and dishonored. I bought halo 4 because I heard good things about it and because I was interested in trying a halo game. I bought dishonored because I felt like it would be an interesting game to play.Â
Where? All I'm hearing is shittalk on Halo 4, hence its 6.9 user score.
[QUOTE="crimsonman1245"]
1.Naughty Dog-Two new IPs, Uncharted 2 and TLOU are at 95 metacritic scores.
2.Rockstar-Despite the mediocre GTA4, they came back strong with the great Red Dead Redemption and Max Payne 3.
3.Rocksteady-Made the best game this gen (Arkham City), Arkham Asylum was also amazing.
Honorable mentions for Platinum Games and Bioware.
Â
Sonysexual1
And still no Microsoft studio. :cry:
How does any gamer live with no quality exclusives?
Microsoft is more of a publisher. They still have great games this generation. Halo 3, Halo Reach, Forza 3 & 4, Fable 2 & 3, PGR 3 & 4, Kameo, Perfect Dark Zero, Lost Odyssey, etc.. were all great games. M$ first 3 years is when they churned out the hits. Their last 2 years have been mediocre.The sales are high because the game is GREAT. Your one of the few 100 people that can't see that. That's alright because blind bias fanboys tend to not see greatness on other platforms that aren't their favorite. lol!! I guess Super Mario Galaxy 2 (which has the highest Metacritic score and a 9.1 user score) is trash as well. lol!![QUOTE="blackace"][QUOTE="Sonysexual1"]
So why are Halo sales so high? The game is a mediocre POS.
Sonysexual1
Is your brain malfunctioning? What does SMG2 have anything to do with Halo 4? Halo 4 is a mediocre CoD-wannabe game with high sales.
:lol:
There are gametypes in halo 4 that don't even rip off of cod in the mp and they are really fun.
I don't get what your sig is trying to prove. That the same sad bastards rating every Sony exclusive 10/10 are rating every MS exclusive 0/10 because "M$ are teh evil!"[QUOTE="locopatho"][QUOTE="Sonysexual1"]
So why are Halo sales so high? The game is a mediocre POS.
Sonysexual1
And the 360 fanboys aren't doing the same to PS3 exclusives?
No, 360 fans aren't that sad. 360 launched in 2005 for a reasonable price and had amazing games from the get go. PS3 launched in 2006 in USA/Japan, 2007 everywhere else, cost 600 euro so a lot of people had to wait til it was a reasonable price, and had flop exclusives and shitty multiplats for years. All that "Just Waiting" gave fanboys time to become feral and rage on the internet. Even though PS3 is much better these days, they still have their cancerous "hate MS by defaullt" attitude.[QUOTE="super600"]
[QUOTE="Sonysexual1"]
I don't buy any game under 90 on meta. Sub-90 games are mediocre at best because of score inflation in the gaming press.
Sonysexual1
What an idiotic opinion. I don't buy games based on metascore. I have never bought games based on metascore.I never let the metascore to make a decision on the last two games I bough which were halo 4 and dishonored. I bought halo 4 because I heard good things about it and because I was interested in trying a halo game. I bought dishonored because I felt like it would be an interesting game to play.Â
Where? All I'm hearing is shittalk on Halo 4, hence its 6.9 user score.
There are issues with halo 4, but they are not big enough issues  to make the game a mediocre or crap game in my opinion.
[QUOTE="Wiimotefan"]
[QUOTE="Sonysexual1"]
Halo 4 - 87 Metacritic, 6.9 User score
Sonysexual1
Looks like some good scores to me, I dont see your point? Â
Anyways, I figured you meant Halo in general, not just the latest entry.
I don't buy any game under 90 on meta. Sub-90 games are mediocre at best because of score inflation in the gaming press.
The first 3 Halo games are 9.1 and higher on Metacritic. WTF are you talking about. Stop using dumb User Scores. They are meaningless. The only scores that matter are the ones coming from professional gaming critics. Not juvenile kids like yourself.[QUOTE="Sonysexual1"][QUOTE="Wiimotefan"]
Looks like some good scores to me, I dont see your point? Â
Anyways, I figured you meant Halo in general, not just the latest entry.
blackace
I don't buy any game under 90 on meta. Sub-90 games are mediocre at best because of score inflation in the gaming press.
The first 3 Halo games are 9.1 and higher on Metacritic. WTF are you talking about. Stop using dumb User Scores. They are meaningless. The only scores that matter are the ones coming from professional gaming critics. Not juvenile kids like yourself.So do you admit LittleBigPlanet trumps every single Halo and Gears game for this generation? How sad...
I don't get what your sig is trying to prove. That the same sad bastards rating every Sony exclusive 10/10 are rating every MS exclusive 0/10 because "M$ are teh evil!"[QUOTE="locopatho"][QUOTE="Sonysexual1"]
So why are Halo sales so high? The game is a mediocre POS.
Sonysexual1
And the 360 fanboys aren't doing the same to PS3 exclusives?
No, because they aren't bias bratty juvenile children like more of the cows on here.[QUOTE="Sonysexual1"][QUOTE="locopatho"] I don't get what your sig is trying to prove. That the same sad bastards rating every Sony exclusive 10/10 are rating every MS exclusive 0/10 because "M$ are teh evil!"blackace
And the 360 fanboys aren't doing the same to PS3 exclusives?
No, because they aren't bias bratty juvenile children like more of the cows on here.:cry:
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment