All these people hailing 2009 the year of the ps3

I think

Halo ODST suck

Forza suck

opininon =/= fact

[QUOTE="Walker34"]

[QUOTE="Ibacai"] Agreed, 2010 is going to be by far the 360's best year yet. Not just with the fantastic software, but also Natal and whatever new console updates there will be.hanslacher54

[QUOTE="Walker34"]

Wait....you ask "when does 2 games make a system?" and then list two games for 360. Then you list multiplats, that are also on the PS3. Not to mention discounting games on the PS3. Do you see the problem here? Sure, you could easily not care for a system and like none of it's games. But to call fans "desperate" seems kind of silly. Sounds more like damage control pointed towards cows.Ibacai

I did that on purpose because cows can't see their whole hypocrisy. So how is this a win for the ps3? Please explain. I'm listening. I'd like to hear how the ps3 is clearly "winning".

You wanted it

Uncharted 2

Wipeout HD Fury

Demon's Souls

Killzone 2

MLB 09 The Show

Flower

Infamous

Comet Crash

Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2

Trine

Singstar Motown

Bomberman Ultra

Fat Princess

Zen Pinball

All of these have a 80% or higher on gamerankings, came out in 2009, and can only be played on PS3. (except some on there are also on PS2)

[QUOTE="Walker34"]

[QUOTE="Ibacai"] Wait....you ask "when does 2 games make a system?" and then list two games for 360. Then you list multiplats, that are also on the PS3. Not to mention discounting games on the PS3. Do you see the problem here? Sure, you could easily not care for a system and like none of it's games. But to call fans "desperate" seems kind of silly. Sounds more like damage control pointed towards cows.hanslacher54

I did that on purpose because cows can't see their whole hypocrisy. So how is this a win for the ps3? Please explain. I'm listening. I'd like to hear how the ps3 is clearly "winning".

You wanted it

Uncharted 2

Wipeout HD Fury

Demon's Souls

Killzone 2

MLB 09 The Show

Flower

Infamous

Comet Crash

Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2

Trine

Singstar Motown

Bomberman Ultra

Fat Princess

Zen Pinball

All of these have a 80% or higher on gamerankings, came out in 2009, and can only be played on PS3. (except some on there are also on PS2)

What is so great about it? I still don't want a ps3. Demons souls almost had me as i'm a huge diablo fan and was looking for a fix. Uncharted is also a great series and i was looking to play it. But since when does 2 games make a system? Infamous i passed on and don't regret it. Same with killzone. I played both. Meh more of the same. neither game is that good.

This year has been the year of the 360 imo. I've been playing halo odst, forza is right around the corner. Nevermind being overloaded with multiplats like dirt 2, batman arkayn asylum, nba 2k10. Fun arcade games like shadow complex. Nevermind still playing and finishing games in my 360 library like fallout 3 and oblivion. WAiting on more multiplats that are more than i can handle like dragon age, borderlands, the sabateur, etc... Waiting on mass effect, alan wake etc....... Nevermind the "mods" that are available for the 360 that you can't do on your silly ps3's. That's a killer. What really am i missing?

If this is a win for the ps3 you guys are really desparate.

Walker34

It's ironic that in order to destroy the credibility of the PS3 this year, you typically run through the list and knock down games for vague and generic reasons.

You named two exclusives that you have on the 360, and since you knock down the PS3 with generic comments, it's just as fair to expect cows to state ODST is an overpriced expansion and Forza 3 a boring sim. But of course, we know that's not the case.

The PS3 has been consistent. The 360 has not. Using multiplatform only makes you look like the desperate one, and let's not forget which version of Batman got the extra content.

Essentially, your argument is "Halo ODST and Forza are right around the corner" That's great. But to use that against the PS3 is too funny.

The only one desperate here is you.

[QUOTE="hanslacher54"]

[QUOTE="Walker34"]

I did that on purpose because cows can't see their whole hypocrisy. So how is this a win for the ps3? Please explain. I'm listening. I'd like to hear how the ps3 is clearly "winning".

-RocBoys9489-

You wanted it

Uncharted 2

Wipeout HD Fury

Demon's Souls

Killzone 2

MLB 09 The Show

Flower

Infamous

Comet Crash

Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2

Trine

Singstar Motown

Bomberman Ultra

Fat Princess

Zen Pinball

All of these have a 80% or higher on gamerankings, came out in 2009, and can only be played on PS3. (except some on there are also on PS2)

Too bad Ninja Gaiden 2 wasn't on that list.

[QUOTE="Walker34"]

What is so great about it? I still don't want a ps3. Demons souls almost had me as i'm a huge diablo fan and was looking for a fix. Uncharted is also a great series and i was looking to play it. But since when does 2 games make a system? Infamous i passed on and don't regret it. Same with killzone. I played both. Meh more of the same. neither game is that good.

This year has been the year of the 360 imo. I've been playing halo odst, forza is right around the corner. Nevermind being overloaded with multiplats like dirt 2, batman arkayn asylum, nba 2k10. Fun arcade games like shadow complex. Nevermind still playing and finishing games in my 360 library like fallout 3 and oblivion. WAiting on more multiplats that are more than i can handle like dragon age, borderlands, the sabateur, etc... Waiting on mass effect, alan wake etc....... Nevermind the "mods" that are available for the 360 that you can't do on your silly ps3's. That's a killer. What really am i missing?

If this is a win for the ps3 you guys are really desparate.

Alpha-Male22

It's ironic that in order to destroy the credibility of the PS3 this year, you typically run through the list and knock down games for vague and generic reasons.

You named two exclusives that you have on the 360, and since you knock down the PS3 with generic comments, it's just as fair to expect cows to state ODST is an overpriced expansion and Forza 3 a boring sim. But of course, we know that's not the case.

The PS3 has been consistent. The 360 has not. Using multiplatform only makes you look like the desperate one, and let's not forget which version of Batman got the extra content.

Essentially, your argument is "Halo ODST and Forza are right around the corner" That's great. But to use that against the PS3 is too funny.

The only one desperate here is you.

The TREY is hardly consistent.

This year has been brilliant yes, but that's about it.

Thankfully SONY got there **** together and have really shoock things up.

Overall the Xbox has been more consistent with it;s quality games.

MS HOWEVER don't have the dev team to keep up with SONY, so SONY's current landslide of games could continue for a long time.

[QUOTE="Alpha-Male22"]

[QUOTE="Walker34"]

What is so great about it? I still don't want a ps3. Demons souls almost had me as i'm a huge diablo fan and was looking for a fix. Uncharted is also a great series and i was looking to play it. But since when does 2 games make a system? Infamous i passed on and don't regret it. Same with killzone. I played both. Meh more of the same. neither game is that good.

This year has been the year of the 360 imo. I've been playing halo odst, forza is right around the corner. Nevermind being overloaded with multiplats like dirt 2, batman arkayn asylum, nba 2k10. Fun arcade games like shadow complex. Nevermind still playing and finishing games in my 360 library like fallout 3 and oblivion. WAiting on more multiplats that are more than i can handle like dragon age, borderlands, the sabateur, etc... Waiting on mass effect, alan wake etc....... Nevermind the "mods" that are available for the 360 that you can't do on your silly ps3's. That's a killer. What really am i missing?

If this is a win for the ps3 you guys are really desparate.

Stats_

It's ironic that in order to destroy the credibility of the PS3 this year, you typically run through the list and knock down games for vague and generic reasons.

You named two exclusives that you have on the 360, and since you knock down the PS3 with generic comments, it's just as fair to expect cows to state ODST is an overpriced expansion and Forza 3 a boring sim. But of course, we know that's not the case.

The PS3 has been consistent. The 360 has not. Using multiplatform only makes you look like the desperate one, and let's not forget which version of Batman got the extra content.

Essentially, your argument is "Halo ODST and Forza are right around the corner" That's great. But to use that against the PS3 is too funny.

The only one desperate here is you.

The TREY is hardly consistent.

This year has been brilliant yes, but that's about it.

Thankfully SONY got there **** together and have really shoock things up.

Overall the Xbox has been more consistent with it;s quality games.

MS HOWEVER don't have the dev team to keep up with SONY, so SONY's current landslide of games could continue for a long time.

I'm pretty sure we are talking about 2009.

Overall the 360 has the more acclaimed library, especially when it comes to AA titles.

However the PS3 has been consistent, and for the first time, the 360 has been relatively slow.

This gen is pretty funny. The PS3 starts off with a "meh" library, but now it's picked up steam while the 360 and Wii are the ones with the average libraries of games.

2010 seems to be better for the 360 and the PS3 seems to continue its roll, and I have no idea where the Wii is going.

[QUOTE="-RocBoys9489-"][QUOTE="hanslacher54"]

You wanted it

Uncharted 2

Wipeout HD Fury

Demon's Souls

Killzone 2

MLB 09 The Show

Flower

Infamous

Comet Crash

Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2

Trine

Singstar Motown

Bomberman Ultra

Fat Princess

Zen Pinball

All of these have a 80% or higher on gamerankings, came out in 2009, and can only be played on PS3. (except some on there are also on PS2)

Alpha-Male22

Too bad Ninja Gaiden 2 wasn't on that list.

*Reads list*

Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2

What grade are you in, 3rd?

Uncharted 2 + Demon's Souls + Infamous + Killzone 2 > ODST + Forza 3
Sure, in your opinion you might not like some of PS3's games but 4 AAAA > 2 AAA

Uncharted 2 + Demon's Souls + Infamous + Killzone 2 > ODST + Forza 3
Sure, in your opinion you might not like some of PS3's games but 4 AAAA > 2 AAA

dylanmcc

[QUOTE="Walker34"]

I did that on purpose because cows can't see their whole hypocrisy. So how is this a win for the ps3? Please explain. I'm listening. I'd like to hear how the ps3 is clearly "winning".

You wanted it

Uncharted 2

Wipeout HD Fury

Demon's Souls

Killzone 2

MLB 09 The Show

Flower

Infamous

Comet Crash

Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2

Trine

Singstar Motown

Bomberman Ultra

Fat Princess

Zen Pinball

All of these have a 80% or higher on gamerankings, came out in 2009, and can only be played on PS3. (except some on there are also on PS2)

However the PS3 has been consistent, and for the first time, the 360 has been relatively slow.

This gen is pretty funny. The PS3 starts off with a "meh" library, but now it's picked up steam while the 360 and Wii are the ones with the average libraries of games.

2010 seems to be better for the 360 and the PS3 seems to continue its roll, and I have no idea where the Wii is going.

Alpha-Male22

The PS3 hjas not been consistent this year. Its had 4 AAAE titles and 1 AE titles in the span of 9 months. That is not consistency at all. Especially when you realize that until lastmonth that number was just 2 AAA games. Not to knock the PS3 but consistency isn't simply a number, consistency is very dependant on a span of time and the PS3 has not been consistent at all in that span of time. The only systems to be consistent this year have been the PC (as always), the Wii (surprisingly), and the DS (which is always solid).

[QUOTE="Stats_"]

[QUOTE="Alpha-Male22"]

It's ironic that in order to destroy the credibility of the PS3 this year, you typically run through the list and knock down games for vague and generic reasons.

You named two exclusives that you have on the 360, and since you knock down the PS3 with generic comments, it's just as fair to expect cows to state ODST is an overpriced expansion and Forza 3 a boring sim. But of course, we know that's not the case.

The PS3 has been consistent. The 360 has not. Using multiplatform only makes you look like the desperate one, and let's not forget which version of Batman got the extra content.

Essentially, your argument is "Halo ODST and Forza are right around the corner" That's great. But to use that against the PS3 is too funny.

The only one desperate here is you.

Alpha-Male22

The TREY is hardly consistent.

This year has been brilliant yes, but that's about it.

Thankfully SONY got there **** together and have really shoock things up.

Overall the Xbox has been more consistent with it;s quality games.

MS HOWEVER don't have the dev team to keep up with SONY, so SONY's current landslide of games could continue for a long time.

I'm pretty sure we are talking about 2009.

Overall the 360 has the more acclaimed library, especially when it comes to AA titles.

However the PS3 has been consistent, and for the first time, the 360 has been relatively slow.

This gen is pretty funny. The PS3 starts off with a "meh" library, but now it's picked up steam while the 360 and Wii are the ones with the average libraries of games.

2010 seems to be better for the 360 and the PS3 seems to continue its roll, and I have no idea where the Wii is going.

Consistent over a course of one year? ONE WHOLE YEAR???

That almost a slap in the face to the word consistent. When loking at consistency of a consolem you should take into account it's entire lifespan.

The PS3 has had a great year, far better then the XBOX360's imo, but i wouldnt call it consistent. It's in fact the opposite, as previous years were average (apart from MGS)

[QUOTE="Alpha-Male22"]

[QUOTE="Stats_"]

The TREY is hardly consistent.

This year has been brilliant yes, but that's about it.

Thankfully SONY got there **** together and have really shoock things up.

Overall the Xbox has been more consistent with it;s quality games.

MS HOWEVER don't have the dev team to keep up with SONY, so SONY's current landslide of games could continue for a long time.

Stats_

I'm pretty sure we are talking about 2009.

Overall the 360 has the more acclaimed library, especially when it comes to AA titles.

However the PS3 has been consistent, and for the first time, the 360 has been relatively slow.

This gen is pretty funny. The PS3 starts off with a "meh" library, but now it's picked up steam while the 360 and Wii are the ones with the average libraries of games.

2010 seems to be better for the 360 and the PS3 seems to continue its roll, and I have no idea where the Wii is going.

Consistent over a course of one year? ONE WHOLE YEAR???

That almost a slap in the face to the word consistent. When loking at consistency of a consolem you should take into account it's entire lifespan.

The PS3 has had a great year, far better then the XBOX360's imo, but i wouldnt call it consistent. It's in fact the opposite, as previous years were average (apart from MGS)

The thread is clearly talking about 2009, no one is arguing about the whole generation. I have no idea where you get this rule of taking into consideration the whole generation when its 2009 we are specifically discussing

I even agreed with you overall, but 2009 has been better for the PS3, and you even admit it in the next line.

As for consistency, Its much more consistent than the 360, but its understandable if people like ActicEdge are going to call into question the consistency rate. So in that case, I take back calling it a consistent year and state that its been the most consistent console this year-- I do feel that the software lineup for exclusives have been consistent-- as for time span, thats arguable and will not debate that because its clear that ActicEdge makes a point.

[QUOTE="Stats_"]

[QUOTE="Alpha-Male22"]

I'm pretty sure we are talking about 2009.

Overall the 360 has the more acclaimed library, especially when it comes to AA titles.

However the PS3 has been consistent, and for the first time, the 360 has been relatively slow.

This gen is pretty funny. The PS3 starts off with a "meh" library, but now it's picked up steam while the 360 and Wii are the ones with the average libraries of games.

2010 seems to be better for the 360 and the PS3 seems to continue its roll, and I have no idea where the Wii is going.

Alpha-Male22

Consistent over a course of one year? ONE WHOLE YEAR???

That almost a slap in the face to the word consistent. When loking at consistency of a consolem you should take into account it's entire lifespan.

The PS3 has had a great year, far better then the XBOX360's imo, but i wouldnt call it consistent. It's in fact the opposite, as previous years were average (apart from MGS)

The thread is clearly talking about 2009, no one is arguing about the whole generation. I have no idea where you get this rule of taking into consideration the whole generation when its 2009 we are specifically discussing

I even agreed with you overall, but 2009 has been better for the PS3, and you even admit it in the next line.

As for consistency, Its much more consistent than the 360, but its understandable if people like ActicEdge are going to call into question the consistency rate. So in that case, I take back calling it a consistent year and state that its been the most consistent console this year-- I do feel that the software lineup for exclusives have been consistent-- as for time span, thats arguable and will not debate that because its clear that ActicEdge makes a point.

You "SHOULD" take the console life into consideration when talking of consistency as a year of good titles is hardly consistent if it's had 2 of subpar titles.

Obviously you are speaking of this year and as you have now called it the most consistent console THIS year,I can fully agree with you. (Although the Wii has done well)

Also,I like your pretty colours.

[QUOTE="Stats_"]

[QUOTE="Alpha-Male22"]

I'm pretty sure we are talking about 2009.

Overall the 360 has the more acclaimed library, especially when it comes to AA titles.

However the PS3 has been consistent, and for the first time, the 360 has been relatively slow.

This gen is pretty funny. The PS3 starts off with a "meh" library, but now it's picked up steam while the 360 and Wii are the ones with the average libraries of games.

2010 seems to be better for the 360 and the PS3 seems to continue its roll, and I have no idea where the Wii is going.

Alpha-Male22

Consistent over a course of one year? ONE WHOLE YEAR???

That almost a slap in the face to the word consistent. When loking at consistency of a consolem you should take into account it's entire lifespan.

The PS3 has had a great year, far better then the XBOX360's imo, but i wouldnt call it consistent. It's in fact the opposite, as previous years were average (apart from MGS)

The thread is clearly talking about 2009, no one is arguing about the whole generation. I have no idea where you get this rule of taking into consideration the whole generation when its 2009 we are specifically discussing

I even agreed with you overall, but 2009 has been better for the PS3, and you even admit it in the next line.

As for consistency, Its much more consistent than the 360, but its understandable if people like ActicEdge are going to call into question the consistency rate. So in that case, I take back calling it a consistent year and state that its been the most consistent console this year-- I do feel that the software lineup for exclusives have been consistent-- as for time span, thats arguable and will not debate that because its clear that ActicEdge makes a point.

I'd like to make the point as well that while I don't think the PS3 has been consistent I still feel as though up to now its had a better year than the 360 or Wii. Consistency is very dependant on time as I said and a repeating variable. (because you can be consistently bad lol)Quality and best year however do not necessarily have to be consistent imo. Ijust wanted to make the point that consistency in the span of a year does require more than 4AAAE and 1 AE games both set in pairs close to each other. I don't know whystats is talking about the entire life cycle though. You can only grip on to the past for so long. If you do this, you are essentially not giving a system a chance to improve.

[QUOTE="Alpha-Male22"]

[QUOTE="Stats_"]

Consistent over a course of one year? ONE WHOLE YEAR???

That almost a slap in the face to the word consistent. When loking at consistency of a consolem you should take into account it's entire lifespan.

The PS3 has had a great year, far better then the XBOX360's imo, but i wouldnt call it consistent. It's in fact the opposite, as previous years were average (apart from MGS)

Stats_

The thread is clearly talking about 2009, no one is arguing about the whole generation. I have no idea where you get this rule of taking into consideration the whole generation when its 2009 we are specifically discussing

I even agreed with you overall, but 2009 has been better for the PS3, and you even admit it in the next line.

As for consistency, Its much more consistent than the 360, but its understandable if people like ActicEdge are going to call into question the consistency rate. So in that case, I take back calling it a consistent year and state that its been the most consistent console this year-- I do feel that the software lineup for exclusives have been consistent-- as for time span, thats arguable and will not debate that because its clear that ActicEdge makes a point.

You "SHOULD" take the console life into consideration when talking of consistency as a year of good titles is hardly consistent if it's had 2 of subpar titles.

Obviously you are speaking of this year and as you have now called it the most consistent console THIS year,I can fully agree with you. (Although the Wii has done well)

Also,I like your pretty colours.

I was always talking about this year, sorry if I made that vague-- and like I said, overall, the 360 has the larger and higher rated software.

Im glad you like the pretty colors, seeing the gray text is very boring

[QUOTE="hanslacher54"]

[QUOTE="Walker34"]

I did that on purpose because cows can't see their whole hypocrisy. So how is this a win for the ps3? Please explain. I'm listening. I'd like to hear how the ps3 is clearly "winning".

-RocBoys9489-

You wanted it

Uncharted 2

Wipeout HD Fury

Demon's Souls

Killzone 2

MLB 09 The Show

Flower

Infamous

Comet Crash

Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2

Trine

Singstar Motown

Bomberman Ultra

Fat Princess

Zen Pinball

All of these have a 80% or higher on gamerankings, came out in 2009, and can only be played on PS3. (except some on there are also on PS2)

I don't remember the 360 ever having having Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2. :?

[QUOTE="Alpha-Male22"]

[QUOTE="-RocBoys9489-"] I played Ninja Gaiden 2 last summer on my 360. Fail.-RocBoys9489-

Too bad Ninja Gaiden 2 wasn't on that list.

*Reads list*

Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2

What grade are you in, 3rd?

Ninja Gaiden 2 was not on that list.

If your going to insult me, make sure your insult is not applicable to you.

[QUOTE="BilkeLegenda"]This "war" was over as soon as it started peeps.Now days gamers want to experience the new level of gaming and obviously the 360 does not have the ability to give the new level,the ps3 does,there is plenty of evidence to support that im sure every 360 owner is aware of it,u just dont wonna accept it.dreman999