Alone In The Dark gets a 3.5 on IGN

  • 172 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#1 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts

4.5 Presentation
The story and dialogue are goofy, and both are delivered awkwardly. A DVD-esque menu system is good for skipping around, but otherwise it's pretty useless when there's little worth watching.


6.0 Graphics
Central Park looks adequately spooky at times, and the game runs smoothly. But most character models, enemies and environments lack personality.


6.5 Sound
The soundtrack is catchy, creepy and atmospheric. But the voice acting is cringe-worthy.


3.0 Gameplay
Glitchy, buggy, frustrating, boring and repetitive. The few truly interesting puzzles don't balance out the annoying inventory system, controls and combat.


3.0 Lasting Appeal
You probably won't want to finish this game, let alone play it more than once. Since everything is open from the very beginning, there's nothing to go back and unlock.


3.5
Bad OVERALL

(out of 10 / not an average)

Full review: http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/883/883633p2.html

I cry.:cry:

Avatar image for ONLYDOD
ONLYDOD

6026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#2 ONLYDOD
Member since 2006 • 6026 Posts
Ouch, bring on Silent Hill!
Avatar image for SaintsRowSam
SaintsRowSam

2807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#3 SaintsRowSam
Member since 2006 • 2807 Posts
ouch, i thought it would do pretty good, ecspecially after all those pre orders
Avatar image for TDLlama
TDLlama

2779

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 TDLlama
Member since 2006 • 2779 Posts
Well, it looks like Atari is dead. So long... we hardly knew ye.
Avatar image for web966
web966

11654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#5 web966
Member since 2005 • 11654 Posts
Damn. I thought it looked kind of cool.
Avatar image for Andrew_Xavier
Andrew_Xavier

9625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#6 Andrew_Xavier
Member since 2007 • 9625 Posts
It looked awful in previews and trailers, I was blasted many times for pointing that out, I suppose I was right after all.
Avatar image for chikenfriedrice
chikenfriedrice

13561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 chikenfriedrice
Member since 2006 • 13561 Posts
I thought it got a 7? I just read it an hour ago or so? My bad that was the UK review :P
Avatar image for ReturnOfShinobi
ReturnOfShinobi

880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 ReturnOfShinobi
Member since 2008 • 880 Posts
Ataris Ace in the Hole is a dud:(
Avatar image for -GhostMLD-
-GhostMLD-

3282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 -GhostMLD-
Member since 2008 • 3282 Posts

whoa, im blown away.

the only saving grace this game has is that the 360 sales will dwarf the ps3 version sales cause the PS3 version comes out this fall, when nobody would want to play it anymore.

Avatar image for web966
web966

11654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#10 web966
Member since 2005 • 11654 Posts

I thought it got a 7? I just read it an hour ago or so?chikenfriedrice

IGN UK gave it a 7, IGN US gives it a 3.5

Avatar image for carlisledavid79
carlisledavid79

10522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 carlisledavid79
Member since 2006 • 10522 Posts

whoa, im blown away.

the only saving grace this game has is that the 360 sales will dwarf the ps3 version sales cause the PS3 version comes out this fall, when nobody would want to play it anymore.

-GhostMLD-

You know you say youre not like this in real life. But I bet you are. You always have to take everything so seriously.

Avatar image for lantus
lantus

10591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#12 lantus
Member since 2006 • 10591 Posts
I knew the game wasn't going to be up to snuff. I knew Atari had nothing left in them, looks like you made the wrong decision Phil going to Atari.
Avatar image for chikenfriedrice
chikenfriedrice

13561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 chikenfriedrice
Member since 2006 • 13561 Posts

[QUOTE="chikenfriedrice"]I thought it got a 7? I just read it an hour ago or so?web966

IGN UK gave it a 7, IGN US gives it a 3.5

yeah I edited my post....euro's were much kinder to this game lol

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#14 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
After seeing a couple gameplay videos I knew the game relied far too much on its gimmicks and didn't have anything to make it worthwhile.
Avatar image for club-sandwich
club-sandwich

8399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 club-sandwich
Member since 2007 • 8399 Posts
I'm getting it regardless of the score, I want to try it my self, but this is really a bummer, I had high hopes for this, I was expecting this to be a great survival horror game. :cry:
Avatar image for -GhostMLD-
-GhostMLD-

3282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 -GhostMLD-
Member since 2008 • 3282 Posts
[QUOTE="-GhostMLD-"]

whoa, im blown away.

the only saving grace this game has is that the 360 sales will dwarf the ps3 version sales cause the PS3 version comes out this fall, when nobody would want to play it anymore.

carlisledavid79

You know you say youre not like this in real life. But I bet you are. You always have to take everything so seriously.

no SW is the only place where ull find me acting like this. None of my friends r gamers. My job has nothing to do with games. I have no outlet to speak my mind on games except SW.

Avatar image for Juggernaut140
Juggernaut140

36011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 Juggernaut140
Member since 2007 • 36011 Posts

What?! :cry:

But IGN UK gave it a 7!

Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#18 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts

I'm getting it regardless of the score, I want to try it my self, but this is really a bummer, I had high hopes for this, I was expecting this to be a great survival horror game. :cry:club-sandwich

I've played 2 hours so far. It's a good game at its core, but there are so many damn problems that plague it, like controls and bugs.

Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts
a 3.5...... i think half the developers of the game just died.
Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts
Atari are horrible.
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#21 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts

What?! :cry:

But IGN UK gave it a 7!

Juggernaut140

That's closer to where I'd put it so far. Around a 6.5.

Avatar image for Doctor-Salvador
Doctor-Salvador

681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 Doctor-Salvador
Member since 2008 • 681 Posts
Dayum! This game has the biggest review gaps since Godhand! I gotta frikkin play this.
Avatar image for SpinoRaptor
SpinoRaptor

2419

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 SpinoRaptor
Member since 2006 • 2419 Posts
The game looked bad the moment I saw it.
Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts
Wow, this means it's at least six times better than the movie.
Avatar image for Samurai_Xavier
Samurai_Xavier

4364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Samurai_Xavier
Member since 2003 • 4364 Posts
Wow, that was unexpected.
Avatar image for carlisledavid79
carlisledavid79

10522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 carlisledavid79
Member since 2006 • 10522 Posts
[QUOTE="carlisledavid79"][QUOTE="-GhostMLD-"]

whoa, im blown away.

the only saving grace this game has is that the 360 sales will dwarf the ps3 version sales cause the PS3 version comes out this fall, when nobody would want to play it anymore.

-GhostMLD-

You know you say youre not like this in real life. But I bet you are. You always have to take everything so seriously.

no SW is the only place where ull find me acting like this. None of my friends r gamers. My job has nothing to do with games. I have no outlet to speak my mind on games except SW.

Why the rolepla?. At the end of the day youre choosing to limit yourself. That isnt what a gamers about.

Avatar image for Doctor-Salvador
Doctor-Salvador

681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 Doctor-Salvador
Member since 2008 • 681 Posts

Wow, this means it's at least six times better than the movie.Riverwolf007

:lol:

There are a lot of thing that are better than that pile of crap.

Avatar image for Not-A-Stalker
Not-A-Stalker

5165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Not-A-Stalker
Member since 2006 • 5165 Posts
Wow really? It looked really cool judging from those tech demos Atari showed off a few months ago.
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#29 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts
Getting a 7.0 from IGN UK and getting a 3.5 from IGN US. Something isn't right. Also, EuroGamer gave it a 7.0, which I would put more trust in. I think IGN US obviously failed with this review. Sure, it's not a great game, but their review was far out there.
Avatar image for Zeliard9
Zeliard9

6030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Zeliard9
Member since 2007 • 6030 Posts
Ouch. I doubt it's that bad. I'm more inclined to go with Eurogamer's 7/10 review, which basically says that most of the game is a mess but there are enough cool innovations to make it worth playing.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#31 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Getting a 7.0 from IGN UK and getting a 3.5 from IGN US. Something isn't right. Also, EuroGamer gave it a 7.0, which I would put more trust in. I think IGN US obviously failed with this review. Sure, it's not a great game, but their review was far out there.BioShockOwnz

"Something isn't right?" You mean reviewers aren't allowed to have different opinions?
Avatar image for Wanderer5
Wanderer5

25727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#32 Wanderer5
Member since 2006 • 25727 Posts
Noooooooooo!:cry: I was so excited for this game(well until I learn I couldn't get the PC version a couple of weeks ago). Man that sucks. Feel like the time when Turning Point got crappy reviews.
Avatar image for Andrew_Xavier
Andrew_Xavier

9625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#33 Andrew_Xavier
Member since 2007 • 9625 Posts

Ouch. I doubt it's that bad. I'm more inclined to go with Eurogamer's 7/10 review, which basically says that most of the game is a mess but there are enough cool innovations to make it worth playing.Zeliard9

A 7.0 should be a "good" game, not a mess that is "worth" playing, a 6.0 is a mess worth playing.

Also, I thought 20 minutes ago people were screaming that IGN overrates everything?

Avatar image for Frexie
Frexie

895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Frexie
Member since 2007 • 895 Posts

Weren't the lemmings/sheep claiming ownage about how the PS3 version was delayed? Hopefully the garbage reviews will continue to roll in and they'll just cancel that version altogether.

Avatar image for karram
karram

1682

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 karram
Member since 2006 • 1682 Posts
I didn't expect it to be that bad.Good its not an exclusive for any system.
Avatar image for ocdog45
ocdog45

9072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 143

User Lists: 0

#36 ocdog45
Member since 2005 • 9072 Posts

i guess we are not missing much.

Ouch, bring on Silent Hill!ONLYDOD

Avatar image for Sooshy
Sooshy

1723

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#37 Sooshy
Member since 2007 • 1723 Posts
Dayum.
Avatar image for cronus233
cronus233

493

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 cronus233
Member since 2005 • 493 Posts
If the 360 and PS3 version got this score, what wil the Wii one get?
Avatar image for istreakforfood
istreakforfood

7781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#39 istreakforfood
Member since 2004 • 7781 Posts
I was never hyped for this game like some people were, but I thought the game had really good graphics.
Avatar image for Andrew_Xavier
Andrew_Xavier

9625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#40 Andrew_Xavier
Member since 2007 • 9625 Posts

If the 360 and PS3 version got this score, what wil the Wii one get?cronus233

The wii version is pretty different, maybe it'll score higher, since control problems are a key problem in that review, and the wii's version has completely different controls...or maybe it'll be a disaster, like SvR 2008 Wii.

Avatar image for Zeliard9
Zeliard9

6030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Zeliard9
Member since 2007 • 6030 Posts

[QUOTE="Zeliard9"]Ouch. I doubt it's that bad. I'm more inclined to go with Eurogamer's 7/10 review, which basically says that most of the game is a mess but there are enough cool innovations to make it worth playing.Andrew_Xavier

A 7.0 should be a "good" game, not a mess that is "worth" playing, a 6.0 is a mess worth playing.

Also, I thought 20 minutes ago people were screaming that IGN overrates everything?

Why don't you go and actually read the review?

They gave it a 7 on the strength of its innovations in an era where every game is derivative of the other. The reason it didn't get any higher is because it has a lot of problems.

Avatar image for Juggernaut140
Juggernaut140

36011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 Juggernaut140
Member since 2007 • 36011 Posts
[QUOTE="Juggernaut140"]

What?! :cry:

But IGN UK gave it a 7!

BioShockOwnz

That's closer to where I'd put it so far. Around a 6.5.

Something definitely isn't right. I mean how can you rate Iron Man higher than this?

Avatar image for BZSIN
BZSIN

7889

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 BZSIN
Member since 2005 • 7889 Posts
3.5?? My semi-interest in this game just died a slow, agonising death. Like what's happening to Atari.
Avatar image for Burnsmiesta
Burnsmiesta

1672

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Burnsmiesta
Member since 2004 • 1672 Posts
What the hell are up with reviews these days. One branch of the same site gives it a 7 and the other a 3.5. Colour me confused, usually the scores are pretty similiar.
Avatar image for club-sandwich
club-sandwich

8399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 club-sandwich
Member since 2007 • 8399 Posts

[QUOTE="club-sandwich"]I'm getting it regardless of the score, I want to try it my self, but this is really a bummer, I had high hopes for this, I was expecting this to be a great survival horror game. :cry:BioShockOwnz

I've played 2 hours so far. It's a good game at its core, but there are so many damn problems that plague it, like controls and bugs.

That stinks man. :( I really had high hopes for this game but it sounds so bleh now... ):
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#46 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]Getting a 7.0 from IGN UK and getting a 3.5 from IGN US. Something isn't right. Also, EuroGamer gave it a 7.0, which I would put more trust in. I think IGN US obviously failed with this review. Sure, it's not a great game, but their review was far out there.foxhound_fox

"Something isn't right?" You mean reviewers aren't allowed to have different opinions?

Sure, people can have their goofy opinions.

Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#47 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15874 Posts
lol good thing I was never excited about this game. Even if we exclude this pretty gruesome review, the game still is getting bad reviews everywhere.
Avatar image for JLF1
JLF1

8263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 JLF1
Member since 2005 • 8263 Posts
I think I'll wait to Dead Space is released instead to get my horror thrill.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#50 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Sure, people can have their goofy opinions.BioShockOwnz

I don't see what makes it "goofy." They didn't like the game and criticized it's flaws. Seems like a respectable opinion to me. Just because it doesn't fall within the "common" score level doesn't make it any less "right."