Now, don't get me wrong, the new Llano chips are going to shake up the market and allow for gaming on lower priced laptops, and that's fantastic. I'm actually surprised how close it is to eing considered a mid-range graphics card.
My point is, the Llano chip is best as a standalone product. If you're going to get a discrete graphics card with it, you might as well get a SB, because the Intel will give you better processing power.
And I don't understand your post including the wattage. Doesn't that just prove my point that when paired with switchable graphics, the intel has lower power consumption?
dk00111
On the discrete graphics card issue, it depends on discrete graphics card. AMD Llano based laptops can CrossFireX with mid-range Radeon HD Mobile parts.
On the watts issue,http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/a8-3500m-llano-apu,2959-22.html
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5243a/5243a5fa8c9271acfad132b244d7678a076b6b38" alt=""
The power use in the above graph is a result of a controlled test on an external monitor, so we repeated this metric again, this time using the laptop's own display. The A8-3500M laptop lasted two hours and 12 minutes. Assuming the Intel laptop used the exact same battery, it would run for one hour and 22 minutes.
This is very impressive. Not only does the A8-3500M get about twice as much time out of its battery, it does so while delivering far better graphics performance. The implications of this are profound: a Llano laptop user might be able to play a mainstream 3D game for an entire two-hour flight with decent frame rates, while the Intel Core i5-based platform would only last for half of the flight with choppy performance. There does, in fact, seem to be validity in AMD's excitement over its improved power story, and of course this is a real advantage when it comes to mobile devices.
PS; I have Intel SB i7-2600 + Radeon HD 6950 big PC box.
Log in to comment