And the best looking game of 2011 goes to : The Witcher 2. (56k)

  • 166 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for DJ_Headshot
DJ_Headshot

6427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#151 DJ_Headshot
Member since 2010 • 6427 Posts

[QUOTE="Pray_to_me"]

animation 2 clunky.

muscleserge

I'd say animations are more part of presentation then graphics.

This its kinda like saying physics are a apart of graphics its a seperate entity and unless the animations are really bad like one or 2 console ports(bioshock,halo,etc) where animations are locked at 30fps so it looks jerky and slow when the rest of the game is running at 60fps I don't notice at all and doesn't distract from the game in any meaningful way. Although since on the pc I run most games at 60+fps animation naturally look alot smoother then just 30fps so that may have something to do with not noticeing. I can readily notice how sharp and clear the visual quality of a game is along with texture detial and how good other aspects of the graphics are lke lighthing and models so graphics matter alot more then animation to me.

Avatar image for Peredith
Peredith

2289

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#152 Peredith
Member since 2011 • 2289 Posts

[QUOTE="Peredith"]

[QUOTE="Jebus213"]

They're called bugs.

Jebus213

Same bug happened 4 times in a row? I think... on Kaffarov, there's like a row of lights, I shot them (I was bored) and all the lightsources remained. :?

My game can crash 4 times in a row...

:roll: Lemme take a screenshot. Got to do that boring level though. I'll find the lolworthy place which looks like Counter Strike Source, too :D

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#153 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

Actually looks about same as PC version, it runs high/medium mixed setting and nearly all effects are there

In the new video looks stunning for sure

Cant wait to play it on xbox 360 next year

loosingENDS

Actually it doesn't. It looks like medium, sub HD, and sub 30FPS.

Enjoy playing the cruddy looking version.

@Peredith seriously if you wanna even bring up RAGE, at least take pictures of good looking parts like Blue Line Station. You cannot find a CSS-like picture in BF3. Yeah, some of the lightsources are prebaked. Most aren't. RAGE is 100% prebaked.

Avatar image for Peredith
Peredith

2289

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#154 Peredith
Member since 2011 • 2289 Posts

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

Actually looks about same as PC version, it runs high/medium mixed setting and nearly all effects are there

In the new video looks stunning for sure

Cant wait to play it on xbox 360 next year

ChubbyGuy40

Actually it doesn't. It looks like medium, sub HD, and sub 30FPS.

Enjoy playing the cruddy looking version.

@Peredith seriously if you wanna even bring up RAGE, at least take pictures of good looking parts like Blue Line Station. You cannot find a CSS-like picture in BF3. Yeah, some of the lightsources are prebaked. Most aren't. RAGE is 100% prebaked.

Mitu took those pics. :? (Or you mean Blue Line Station in Rage? I haven't got that far :P)

Here, this is what I was talking about with consistance with Battlefield 3 (Ultra settings):

Rage might have tons of low res textures, but it does it with sty1e :cool:

Avatar image for Jshoelace
Jshoelace

846

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#155 Jshoelace
Member since 2008 • 846 Posts

TW2 looks nice in some of those pictures. I havent played it, is it worth buying and do I need to play the first? I dont really care which game has the best graphics, but for me personally, the best looking game I have played this year is BF3. Here is a screenshot I took with everything set on Ultra.

Avatar image for Jshoelace
Jshoelace

846

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#158 Jshoelace
Member since 2008 • 846 Posts

Heres another.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#159 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

Actually looks about same as PC version, it runs high/medium mixed setting and nearly all effects are there

In the new video looks stunning for sure

Cant wait to play it on xbox 360 next year

Peredith

Actually it doesn't. It looks like medium, sub HD, and sub 30FPS.

Enjoy playing the cruddy looking version.

@Peredith seriously if you wanna even bring up RAGE, at least take pictures of good looking parts like Blue Line Station. You cannot find a CSS-like picture in BF3. Yeah, some of the lightsources are prebaked. Most aren't. RAGE is 100% prebaked.

Mitu took those pics. :? (Or you mean Blue Line Station in Rage? I haven't got that far :P)

Here, this is what I was talking about with consistance with Battlefield 3 (Ultra settings):

Rage might have tons of low res textures, but it does it with sty1e :cool:

Like I said, it isn't perfect and has flaws, but I can play your game too:

Don't get me wrong, it's a great looking game, but not always and can look bad at times.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#160 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="daveg1"]its a great looking game but your pics doint help your thread well the last one proves your point a bit... and too the uc3 fanboys saying it looks better than this game.....LOL!!muscleserge
I used Jpegs, they arn't known for high quality, good quality ones would be 2mb+, and suck bandwidth. I also don't cherry pick screens, because with this game I don't need to.

I prefer PNGs.

Avatar image for xsatyr86
xsatyr86

601

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#161 xsatyr86
Member since 2010 • 601 Posts

[QUOTE="Peredith"]

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

Actually it doesn't. It looks like medium, sub HD, and sub 30FPS.

Enjoy playing the cruddy looking version.

@Peredith seriously if you wanna even bring up RAGE, at least take pictures of good looking parts like Blue Line Station. You cannot find a CSS-like picture in BF3. Yeah, some of the lightsources are prebaked. Most aren't. RAGE is 100% prebaked.

mitu123

Mitu took those pics. :? (Or you mean Blue Line Station in Rage? I haven't got that far :P)

Here, this is what I was talking about with consistance with Battlefield 3 (Ultra settings):

Rage might have tons of low res textures, but it does it with sty1e :cool:

Like I said, it isn't perfect and has flaws, but I can play your game too:

Don't get me wrong, it's a great looking game, but not always and can look bad at times.

Dude, you started it by saying Rage has low res textures...

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#162 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="Peredith"]

Mitu took those pics. :? (Or you mean Blue Line Station in Rage? I haven't got that far :P)

Here, this is what I was talking about with consistance with Battlefield 3 (Ultra settings):

Rage might have tons of low res textures, but it does it with sty1e :cool:

xsatyr86

Like I said, it isn't perfect and has flaws, but I can play your game too:

Don't get me wrong, it's a great looking game, but not always and can look bad at times.

Dude, you started it by saying Rage has low res textures...

And it does at times, truth hurts bro. Game doesn't always impress me but it's a great looking game.

Avatar image for xsatyr86
xsatyr86

601

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163 xsatyr86
Member since 2010 • 601 Posts

[QUOTE="xsatyr86"]

[QUOTE="mitu123"] Like I said, it isn't perfect and has flaws, but I can play your game too:

Don't get me wrong, it's a great looking game, but not always and can look bad at times.

mitu123

Dude, you started it by saying Rage has low res textures...

And it does at times, truth hurts bro. Game doesn't always impress me but it's a great looking game.

Truth hurts bro? I have not even played the game nor do I want to. The guy you quoted just replied to your statement with a pic of his own and then you started backtracking by saying it is not perfect and has its flaws.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#164 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="xsatyr86"]

Dude, you started it by saying Rage has low res textures...

xsatyr86

And it does at times, truth hurts bro. Game doesn't always impress me but it's a great looking game.

Truth hurts bro? I have not even played the game nor do I want to. The guy you quoted just replied to your statement with a pic of his own and then you started backtracking by saying it is not perfect and has its flaws.

It's all true, and there's nothing wrong with that.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#165 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

and too the uc3 fanboys saying it looks better than this game.....LOL!!daveg1
They won't agree.D=

Avatar image for dovberg
dovberg

3348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#166 dovberg
Member since 2009 • 3348 Posts

Wow, I'm really surprised someone tried to argue UC3>TW2...I can understand Battle Field 3 or maybe even Crysis 2 but UC3 it honestly laughable.