Anonymous Lists 3 Demands From Sony

  • 157 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for TheMoreYouOwn
TheMoreYouOwn

3927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 TheMoreYouOwn
Member since 2010 • 3927 Posts

oh lordy lord.

Avatar image for tagyhag
tagyhag

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 tagyhag
Member since 2007 • 15874 Posts

Man I can't wait for Sony to catch Anonymous, and trust me, they WILL catch him, it's only a matter of time. Better yet why doesn't just Sony hire Geohotz to catch Anonymous and Sony will give him a little break.

Blazerdt47
I don't know if you're joking or not. :lol:
Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#103 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts

Man I can't wait for Sony to catch Anonymous, and trust me, they WILL catch him, it's only a matter of time. Better yet why doesn't just Sony hire Geohotz to catch Anonymous and Sony will give him a little break.

Blazerdt47

I get the feeling you don´t really know what anonymous is...

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#104 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts

Man I can't wait for Sony to catch Anonymous, and trust me, they WILL catch him, it's only a matter of time. Better yet why doesn't just Sony hire Geohotz to catch Anonymous and Sony will give him a little break.

Blazerdt47

This might help you a bit :Phttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_(group)

Avatar image for jhu686
jhu686

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 jhu686
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
yes
Avatar image for rpgs_shall_rule
rpgs_shall_rule

1943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#106 rpgs_shall_rule
Member since 2006 • 1943 Posts

[QUOTE="rpgs_shall_rule"]

[QUOTE="TheGuardian03"]Not gonna happen, who are Sony to tell the consumer what to do ? just STFU and get a life.theuncharted34

Fixed that for you :)

the consumer has the right to do whatever they want with what they paid for, sure. as long as it doesn't hurt others in the process, which geohot releasing the keys caused. And that's all there is to it.

Gunpowder has probably taken countless lives by now. I'm pretty sure the inventor(s) are hailed as geniuses now. That's kind of analogous to what Geohot did. Also, if you haven't realized, I'm not being entirely serious, although this is where I stand on the issue. You people just take it way to seriously :D

Avatar image for monson21502
monson21502

8230

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 monson21502
Member since 2009 • 8230 Posts

ied be happy if they made them do a 3 year free extened warrenty on those faulty phat ps3s. they got till july to make that happen for me:) then my 3 years would be over:cry:

Avatar image for deactivated-58b6232955e4a
deactivated-58b6232955e4a

15594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 deactivated-58b6232955e4a
Member since 2006 • 15594 Posts
[QUOTE="Timstuff"][QUOTE="DerekLoffin"]I have a counter proposal: -End all illegal activity. -Identify themselves to the proper authorities, and admit to all previous illegal activities -Kindly stop acting in 'consumers' name when we never approved your actions in the first place.

Sounds reasonable to me. Maybe we should DDOS /b/ to give them incentive.

I hope not. /v/ is my favorite place to discuss all things (not) video games.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6
deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6

6176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6
Member since 2009 • 6176 Posts

Sony: Lol no.

Avatar image for Phaze-Two
Phaze-Two

3444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 Phaze-Two
Member since 2009 • 3444 Posts

[QUOTE="dercoo"]

[QUOTE="theuncharted34"]

sony doing that would be as likely a chicken walking into kfc.

MarcRecon

:lol:

love that analogy.

Me too:lol:

i don't. chickens are dumb, they wouldn't be able to reason that KFC serves chicken as food and that it better run. KFC resaurants don't kill the chickens themselves either, soooo.....

Avatar image for Timstuff
Timstuff

26840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#111 Timstuff
Member since 2002 • 26840 Posts
[QUOTE="Blazerdt47"]

Man I can't wait for Sony to catch Anonymous, and trust me, they WILL catch him, it's only a matter of time. Better yet why doesn't just Sony hire Geohotz to catch Anonymous and Sony will give him a little break.

tagyhag
I don't know if you're joking or not. :lol:

If he loses he'll take any break he can get. Sony will probably give him a choice of either paying them back his debts for the rest of his life, or doing digital wetwork for them to earn his financial freedom back.
Avatar image for Pug-Nasty
Pug-Nasty

8508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#112 Pug-Nasty
Member since 2009 • 8508 Posts

They never tried to stop the modification of the ps3 until a hacker released a cracked version of their own firmware, thus making the modifications a security risk.

They haven't brought legal action against any people who possess the collected IPs. Apparently, the reason they asked to collect them in the first place was to show that the case should be heard in California.

Again, they are not bringing legal action to Hotz for altering a product he owns, they are bringing legal action against him for altering software they own and distributing it.

Avatar image for loveless9
loveless9

167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#113 loveless9
Member since 2011 • 167 Posts

I agree with their point about allowing Linux and whatnot. Just because one bad apple screwed things up doesn't mean they should punish a whole userbase for it... what is this, third grade?

Avatar image for PSdual_wielder
PSdual_wielder

10646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#114 PSdual_wielder
Member since 2003 • 10646 Posts

Of course they want 3 to happen. If sony starts suing the hell out of everyone in that IP address list, their Anonymous secret society will probably cease to exist overnight. :P

Avatar image for stereointegrity
stereointegrity

12151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 stereointegrity
Member since 2007 • 12151 Posts
somone else trying to black mail a company that brings in billions.....there lawyers are going to have a field day
Avatar image for BodyElite
BodyElite

2678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 BodyElite
Member since 2009 • 2678 Posts
Do these people do anything else besides worry about their ps3's?? Seriously... Illegally fighting with a fortune 500 corporation just so you can continue to hack your ps3's seem very geeky to me :lol: :P
Avatar image for Infinite_Access
Infinite_Access

2483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#117 Infinite_Access
Member since 2007 • 2483 Posts

Hackers can do whatever they **** want to their consoles... but as soon as they do.. I don't want them allowed on PSN AT ALL! and no warranty. I will not risk my games being ruined so a bunch of nerds can modify **** on a gaming system.

Avatar image for TheAcountantMan
TheAcountantMan

1281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 TheAcountantMan
Member since 2011 • 1281 Posts
i support geohotz with this, so yes i support anon aswell.
Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#119 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts
somone else trying to black mail a company that brings in billions.....there lawyers are going to have a field daystereointegrity
Well their lawyers will have fun waiting behind the Australian government, Church of Scientology, China, Bank of America, and a bunch or other places that have a personal bone to pick with Anonymous. While Anonymous undoubtedly won't get their demands and probably lose interest in a while, they aren't even in the faintest danger from Sony.
Avatar image for BodyElite
BodyElite

2678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 BodyElite
Member since 2009 • 2678 Posts

Hackers can do whatever they **** want to their consoles... but as soon as they do.. I don't want them allowed on PSN AT ALL! and no warranty. I will not risk my games being ruined so a bunch of nerds can modify **** on a gaming system.

Infinite_Access
Bingo! JTag'ers on the 360 can play online with free month accounts for an hour before the account gets banned, and in that one hour all hell breaks loose on Live. Nerds and their abilities to p*ss off regular folk from the confinements of their couches/computer chairs :P
Avatar image for razgriz_101
razgriz_101

16875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#121 razgriz_101
Member since 2007 • 16875 Posts

i support geohotz with this, so yes i support anon aswell.TheAcountantMan

how anyone can support a hypocritical bunch of basement dwellers is beyond me.

its in the name of consumerz!!!!!! *attacks* PSN >> Consumer "WTF anon"

Avatar image for hakanakumono
hakanakumono

27455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 hakanakumono
Member since 2008 • 27455 Posts

#3 is reasonable. But Sony shouldn't "give in" to anything. Give them something and they will only want more. The best thing for Sony to do is to operate as usual, free of what basement dwellers feel about their policies.

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts
How about they make the PS3 really cool to have and not a BURDEN all of the time?
Avatar image for hakanakumono
hakanakumono

27455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 hakanakumono
Member since 2008 • 27455 Posts

[QUOTE="TheAcountantMan"]i support geohotz with this, so yes i support anon aswell.razgriz_101

how anyone can support a hypocritical bunch of basement dwellers is beyond me.

its in the name of consumerz!!!!!! *attacks* PSN >> Consumer "WTF anon"

Not playstation consumers silly. Who cares about playstation, playstation games, PSN, etc? All that matters is that the small group of people that want to use their PS3s for Linux, as a media hub, etc.

Avatar image for BodyElite
BodyElite

2678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 BodyElite
Member since 2009 • 2678 Posts

#3 is reasonable. But Sony shouldn't "give in" to anything. Give them something and they will only want more. The best thing for Sony to do is to operate as usual, free of what basement dwellers feel about their policies.

hakanakumono
Exactly. And I'm hating how these basement dwellers think that they are fighting for the rights of all consumers. Honestly, how here cares about hacking ps3's? All I care about is banning those losers from PSN so I can play my legit games in peace!
Avatar image for soulitane
soulitane

15091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#126 soulitane
Member since 2010 • 15091 Posts

[QUOTE="TheAcountantMan"]i support geohotz with this, so yes i support anon aswell.razgriz_101

how anyone can support a hypocritical bunch of basement dwellers is beyond me.

its in the name of consumerz!!!!!! *attacks* PSN >> Consumer "WTF anon"

That's the part I've never understood, how it's for the consumer. By hacking it he's allowed the hackers to ruin certain games for other people, yet he's supposedly done all of this for us.
Avatar image for Jynxzor
Jynxzor

9313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#127 Jynxzor
Member since 2003 • 9313 Posts
Third one was never happening in the first place good ol Anon...Using there head-brains!
Avatar image for DreamCryotank
DreamCryotank

1829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 DreamCryotank
Member since 2011 • 1829 Posts

sony doing that would be as likely a chicken walking into kfc.

theuncharted34

Best analogy ever :lol:

And this Sony Geohot Annonymous case is getting ridiculous...ly awesome. :D Can't wait to see what happens.

Avatar image for TheAcountantMan
TheAcountantMan

1281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 TheAcountantMan
Member since 2011 • 1281 Posts
Anon is reasonable, and i hope their demands get met.
Avatar image for deactivated-635601fd996cc
deactivated-635601fd996cc

4381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#130 deactivated-635601fd996cc
Member since 2009 • 4381 Posts

i agree with _SWAG_, sony is the best imho

Cheesehead9099
LOL fanboy alert
Avatar image for tommyas
tommyas

2594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 tommyas
Member since 2007 • 2594 Posts
Alpha-Male22
Who the hell they think they are to command Sony what to do?! Do they have any legal background to it? No. Its all their opinion on the matter and that doesnt make it right.
Avatar image for tommyas
tommyas

2594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 tommyas
Member since 2007 • 2594 Posts

[QUOTE="razgriz_101"]

[QUOTE="TheAcountantMan"]i support geohotz with this, so yes i support anon aswell.hakanakumono

how anyone can support a hypocritical bunch of basement dwellers is beyond me.

its in the name of consumerz!!!!!! *attacks* PSN >> Consumer "WTF anon"

Not playstation consumers silly. Who cares about playstation, playstation games, PSN, etc? All that matters is that the small group of people that want to use their PS3s for Linux, as a media hub, etc.

Theres only one person to be blamed for removal of Other OS. And thats their precious Geohot. He is responsible for the removal of Other OS.

Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#134 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

Link

  • Sony must end any attempts to bring legal action to alter a product they own.

Alpha-Male22

This one stands out to me. Really? Sony shouldn't be able to pursue legal action when people modify a product they own? Really? There other two are actually alot more reasonable.

Avatar image for supdotcom
supdotcom

1121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 supdotcom
Member since 2010 • 1121 Posts

lolwut? these hackers are getting annoying. so they want to help the community by causing more problems for legit gamers?

Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#136 blue_hazy_basic  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts

[QUOTE="TheAcountantMan"]i support geohotz with this, so yes i support anon aswell.razgriz_101

how anyone can support a hypocritical bunch of basement dwellers is beyond me.

its in the name of consumerz!!!!!! *attacks* PSN >> Consumer "WTF anon"

From GS: The good news for PS3 owners is that it appears as if Anonymous will be backing off its hostilities. An update to the loose-knit organization's website claims it would no longer be directing its efforts at bringing down services such as the PlayStation Network. "Anonymous is not attacking the PSN at this time," the update reads. "Sony's official position is that the PSN is undergoing maintenance. We realize that targeting the PSN is not a good idea. We have therefore temporarily suspended our action, until a method is found that will not severely impact Sony customers." "Anonymous is on your side, standing up for your rights," the message continues. "We are not aiming to attack customers of Sony. This attack is aimed solely at Sony, and we will try our best to not affect the gamers, as this would defeat the purpose of our actions. If we did inconvenience users, please know that this was not our goal." The group went on to note that its campaign against Sony will continue "until we are satisfied with the outcome."

I do think Anon's demands are too much though.

Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#137 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts

They used to be cute awhile back, now they're just annoying. I hope Sony just ignores the kids.

Twin-Blade

I bet half of them find it "Awesome" when they go to a store and buy booze without being ID'd.

  • Sony must allow for end-user modification of the PS3, as was available prior to the 3.21 firmware update.

This was allowed by Sony before 3.21 so it's not like they are asking for the PS3 SDK to be made open source or anything.

  • Sony must end any attempts to bring legal action to alter a product they own.

They do own the system afterall, the problem is when you buy the PS3 you are agreeing to certain terms and one of those is that you won't circumvent the security which Geohotz has done although i think the court ruled that out so Sony is now trying to get Geo on the PSN accounts thing.

  • Sony must not pursue legal action against any collected IP address.

we all know Sony getting the IP addresses of people who visited numerous sites was extreme so again Anonymous asking for that to stop and the information to remain private is not too extreme

I guess their demands aren't too extreme and they're not exactly asking Sony to drop all court cases against those pesky hackers. So i am still supporting Sony for the fact Geo knew hackers would pour into the PSN and ruin my gaming experience after what he did yet he played ignorance and went public with nothing more than fame on his mind.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#138 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="Alpha-Male22"]tommyas
Who the hell they think they are to command Sony what to do?! Do they have any legal background to it? No. Its all their opinion on the matter and that doesnt make it right.

Actually they do have legal background for their demands but the "effective" way to do it is using the justice system which is pretty much what Geohot is doing.
Avatar image for deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a

26108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#139 deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
Member since 2008 • 26108 Posts
Should totally give in.
Avatar image for _VenomX
_VenomX

1614

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 _VenomX
Member since 2009 • 1614 Posts

sony made geohotz hide in fear in southamerica and sony will do the same with these nonsense group. sony will deal with this so fast like nothing happened, in my eyes

_SWAG_

Said very well done, Exactly my thoughts :P

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#141 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60835 Posts
Sony won't be doing any of those.
Avatar image for ZippySlappy
ZippySlappy

2664

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 ZippySlappy
Member since 2009 • 2664 Posts

sony doing that would be as likely a chicken walking into kfc.

theuncharted34
Rofl'd. Hope sony finds (them) and sue them for life.
Avatar image for romans828_2002
romans828_2002

1108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 romans828_2002
Member since 2003 • 1108 Posts

I hate overused analogies, but here you go:

Yes, we own the PS3. However Sony owns the network and you obtain a license to use it by agreeing to certain terms. I own my car, but the state owns the road, and I am licensed to drive on them agreeing to certain conditions. Heck, I can even mod my car, but some mods are not allowable by law for safety concerns. Sony's ToU not only protects them, but as we've seen from experience, also protect the average consumer's gaming experience. No reasonable consumer wants a hacker to have free reign on Sony's network.

So, as I see it, it's not Anon that's standing up for my rights, but rather Sony, who is trying to assure that all games function fairly and in the manner the developer intended. If I can't play securely on their network knowing that the rules are fair, then I'm not going to own the console. So, no, Anon is not doing this for me, but rather, they are doing it because they are self-righteous thugs who want to make a name for themselves.

Oh, and whatever happened to the idea that if you don't like what one company is doing, you can always go to their competition? Heck, if modding is your thing, why bother with consoles to begin with? Just play on the PC and leave the rest of us alone.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="romans828_2002"]I hate overused analogies, but here you go: Yes, we own the PS3. However Sony owns the network and you obtain a license to use it by agreeing to certain terms. I own my car, but the state owns the road, and I am licensed to drive on them agreeing to certain conditions. Heck, I can even mod my car, but some mods are not allowable by law for safety concerns. Sony's ToU not only protects them, but as we've seen from experience, also protect the average consumer's gaming experience. No reasonable consumer wants a hacker to have free reign on Sony's network. So, as I see it, it's not Anon that's standing up for my rights, but rather Sony, who is trying to assure that all games function fairly and in the manner the developer intended. If I can't play securely on their network knowing that the rules are fair, then I'm not going to own the console. So, no, Anon is not doing this for me, but rather, they are doing it because they are self-righteous thugs who want to make a name for themselves. Oh, and whatever happened to the idea that if you don't like what one company is doing, you can always go to their competition? Heck, if modding is your thing, why bother with consoles to begin with? Just play on the PC and leave the rest of us alone.

The thing is the car company can't prevent you from modding your car and shouldn't. There are a lot of people who mod the car for purposes other than breaking the law. Sony wanting to prevent everyone to do it because a few might misuse is what's wrong. They should deal with those who ruin PSN by other means but leave law abiding people do whatever they want with their console.
Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="romans828_2002"]I hate overused analogies, but here you go: Yes, we own the PS3. However Sony owns the network and you obtain a license to use it by agreeing to certain terms. I own my car, but the state owns the road, and I am licensed to drive on them agreeing to certain conditions. Heck, I can even mod my car, but some mods are not allowable by law for safety concerns. Sony's ToU not only protects them, but as we've seen from experience, also protect the average consumer's gaming experience. No reasonable consumer wants a hacker to have free reign on Sony's network. So, as I see it, it's not Anon that's standing up for my rights, but rather Sony, who is trying to assure that all games function fairly and in the manner the developer intended. If I can't play securely on their network knowing that the rules are fair, then I'm not going to own the console. So, no, Anon is not doing this for me, but rather, they are doing it because they are self-righteous thugs who want to make a name for themselves. Oh, and whatever happened to the idea that if you don't like what one company is doing, you can always go to their competition? Heck, if modding is your thing, why bother with consoles to begin with? Just play on the PC and leave the rest of us alone.

The thing is the car company can't prevent you from modding your car and shouldn't. There are a lot of people who mod the car for purposes other than breaking the law. Sony wanting to prevent everyone to do it because a few might misuse is what's wrong. They should deal with those who ruin PSN by other means but leave law abiding people do whatever they want with their console.

you can modify hardware, it just voids the warranty, havn't you seen the xbox mods with all the cool cases and bedazzlers or w/e, its more about modifying the software which I don't agree with. Unfortunately you have to modify the software to run your own code but the majority of code is probably hacks or ways to play pirated games.
Avatar image for Mafty
Mafty

74

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#146 Mafty
Member since 2003 • 74 Posts
sony>group of internet punks Sorry, but tot hink some group of internet e-thugs can take down a giant corporation is silly. They will laugh at those demands and squash them
Avatar image for Ratchet_Fan8
Ratchet_Fan8

5574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#147 Ratchet_Fan8
Member since 2008 • 5574 Posts
Sony will shoot Anon. I can hope can i ? :P
Avatar image for antifanboyftw
antifanboyftw

2214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#148 antifanboyftw
Member since 2007 • 2214 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="romans828_2002"]I hate overused analogies, but here you go: Yes, we own the PS3. However Sony owns the network and you obtain a license to use it by agreeing to certain terms. I own my car, but the state owns the road, and I am licensed to drive on them agreeing to certain conditions. Heck, I can even mod my car, but some mods are not allowable by law for safety concerns. Sony's ToU not only protects them, but as we've seen from experience, also protect the average consumer's gaming experience. No reasonable consumer wants a hacker to have free reign on Sony's network. So, as I see it, it's not Anon that's standing up for my rights, but rather Sony, who is trying to assure that all games function fairly and in the manner the developer intended. If I can't play securely on their network knowing that the rules are fair, then I'm not going to own the console. So, no, Anon is not doing this for me, but rather, they are doing it because they are self-righteous thugs who want to make a name for themselves. Oh, and whatever happened to the idea that if you don't like what one company is doing, you can always go to their competition? Heck, if modding is your thing, why bother with consoles to begin with? Just play on the PC and leave the rest of us alone.

The thing is the car company can't prevent you from modding your car and shouldn't. There are a lot of people who mod the car for purposes other than breaking the law. Sony wanting to prevent everyone to do it because a few might misuse is what's wrong. They should deal with those who ruin PSN by other means but leave law abiding people do whatever they want with their console.

Depends on what modifications you make to your car. Also, you got it backwards. The few are the ones.who aren't pirates or hackers and care about the other os.
Avatar image for Planeforger
Planeforger

20162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#149 Planeforger
Member since 2004 • 20162 Posts

Ah, good to see that Anon's plans are still consistently amusing. They might truly be powerful if they actually stop to think things through.

Let's see:

Sony must allow for end-user modification of the PS3, as was available prior to the 3.21 firmware update.

Translation: Anon wants you to remove more of your security features.

What it would achieve:

  • More hacking (due to the security vulnerabilities brought by OtherOS), which would lead to...
  • More cheaters online
  • More pirated games.
  • General badness for the vast majority of Playstation users (although the vocal minority would be thrilled).

Sony must end any attempts to bring legal action to alter a product they own.

Translation: Anon wants you to give up any control you have over your own products.

What it would achieve:

  • Sony would be unable to respond to new security threats, and thus there'd be more cheaters online and more pirated games.
  • Encouragement of hacking or other unauthorised/illegal uses of the PS3, given that the modders won't be able to be sued by it. Thus there'd be more cheaters online and more pirated games.
  • General badness for the vast majority of Playstation users (although the vocal minority would be thrilled).

Sony must not pursue legal action against any collected IP address.

Translation: Please don't come after us.

What it would achieve:

  • Nothing in the way of preserving people's rights, since random IP addresses aren't going to be sued if they've done nothing wrong.
  • Encouragement of hacking or other unauthorised/illegal uses of the PS3, given that their anonymity would be reinforced. Thus there'd be more cheaters online and more pirated games.
  • General badness for the vast majority of Playstation users (although the vocal minority would be thrilled).

Maybe I've missed things or over-generalised, but...it's sort of sad and hilarious that they actually expect Sony to respond to their blackmail.

If this was a legal agreement, it'd automatically be invalid for any number of reasons (duress, lack of consideration, etc). The fact that it's definitely not a legal document, and is in fact just the demands of a bunch of self-righteous...people (who, ironically, refuse to stand up for themselves as individuals), ensures that no matter the result, it will achieve absolutely nothing.

Avatar image for Lionheart08
Lionheart08

15814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#150 Lionheart08
Member since 2005 • 15814 Posts

[QUOTE="razgriz_101"]

[QUOTE="TheAcountantMan"]i support geohotz with this, so yes i support anon aswell.blue_hazy_basic

how anyone can support a hypocritical bunch of basement dwellers is beyond me.

its in the name of consumerz!!!!!! *attacks* PSN >> Consumer "WTF anon"

From GS: The good news for PS3 owners is that it appears as if Anonymous will be backing off its hostilities. An update to the loose-knit organization's website claims it would no longer be directing its efforts at bringing down services such as the PlayStation Network. "Anonymous is not attacking the PSN at this time," the update reads. "Sony's official position is that the PSN is undergoing maintenance. We realize that targeting the PSN is not a good idea. We have therefore temporarily suspended our action, until a method is found that will not severely impact Sony customers." "Anonymous is on your side, standing up for your rights," the message continues. "We are not aiming to attack customers of Sony. This attack is aimed solely at Sony, and we will try our best to not affect the gamers, as this would defeat the purpose of our actions. If we did inconvenience users, please know that this was not our goal." The group went on to note that its campaign against Sony will continue "until we are satisfied with the outcome."

I do think Anon's demands are too much though.

I guess this means they're going to spam Sony Exec's emails with porn until they get their way.