no console (this gen or next) can compete with that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhbefMgnHNI&lc=h8ZFX3wJ3mpYMxSZaAxu-r-KHXjluuQuuoWH6_CHUp8
This topic is locked from further discussion.
no console (this gen or next) can compete with that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhbefMgnHNI&lc=h8ZFX3wJ3mpYMxSZaAxu-r-KHXjluuQuuoWH6_CHUp8
I really don't use that many mods, but it's a nice option to have, Heil68i running a few nice mods on skyrim (non enb mods) and the game looks 110% better. it looks so good that i can't even play the xbox360 version anymore (what an ugly game it is without mods ugh!), plus the load times are TERRIBLE on consoles as well.
you get what you pay for.[QUOTE="buccomatic"][QUOTE="GD1551"]
Here's a reason they can....... they don't cost $1000.
GD1551
That's nice but you could also get two consoles for that price.
so your games could suck twice as bad a they already do?? lol[QUOTE="GD1551"][QUOTE="buccomatic"]you get what you pay for.buccomatic
That's nice but you could also get two consoles for that price.
so your games could suck twice as bad a they already do?? lolTombraider seems to be working on all consoles, doesn't seem that way for alot of PCs.
so your games could suck twice as bad a they already do?? lol[QUOTE="buccomatic"][QUOTE="GD1551"]
That's nice but you could also get two consoles for that price.
GD1551
Tombraider seems to be working on all consoles, doesn't seem that way for alot of PCs.
every game needs patched, console or pc. nice try though.and you only need a set up like this to be able to play at a frame rate that isn't a slide show..
System:
Intel i5-2500K@4,3GHz
NVidia GTX 680 OC GPU Boost @ 1200MHzÂ
16GB DDR3
120GB SSD for Win7 64
60GB SSD for Skyrim
1TB HD 7200rpm
(from new egg) only running you...
1. CPU: (for even the 3.3 version) $220
2. GPU: $460
3 RAM: $112
4. SSD: $60
5. HD: $80
Total = $932
Â
enjoy
and you only need a set up like this to be able to play at a frame rate that isn't a slide show..
System:
Intel i5-2500K@4,3GHz
NVidia GTX 680 OC GPU Boost @ 1200MHzÂ
16GB DDR3
120GB SSD for Win7 64
60GB SSD for Skyrim
1TB HD 7200rpm
(from new egg) only running you...
1. CPU: (for even the 3.3 version) $2202. GPU: $460
3 RAM: $112
4. SSD: $60
5. HD: $80
Total = $932
Â
enjoy
casharmy
Drop to a 670, or maybe a 7950, only need one SSD, only 8gb of RAM
Why no case?and you only need a set up like this to be able to play at a frame rate that isn't a slide show..
System:
Intel i5-2500K@4,3GHz
NVidia GTX 680 OC GPU Boost @ 1200MHzÂ
16GB DDR3
120GB SSD for Win7 64
60GB SSD for Skyrim
1TB HD 7200rpm
(from new egg) only running you...
1. CPU: (for even the 3.3 version) $2202. GPU: $460
3 RAM: $112
4. SSD: $60
5. HD: $80
Total = $932
Â
enjoy
casharmy
No mention of software. Pirate confirmed. Just like all PC gamers.and you only need a set up like this to be able to play at a frame rate that isn't a slide show..
System:
Intel i5-2500K@4,3GHz
NVidia GTX 680 OC GPU Boost @ 1200MHzÂ
16GB DDR3
120GB SSD for Win7 64
60GB SSD for Skyrim
1TB HD 7200rpm
(from new egg) only running you...
1. CPU: (for even the 3.3 version) $2202. GPU: $460
3 RAM: $112
4. SSD: $60
5. HD: $80
Total = $932
Â
enjoy
casharmy
no need for even one SSD let alone twoand you only need a set up like this to be able to play at a frame rate that isn't a slide show..
System:
Intel i5-2500K@4,3GHz
NVidia GTX 680 OC GPU Boost @ 1200MHzÂ
16GB DDR3
120GB SSD for Win7 64
60GB SSD for Skyrim
1TB HD 7200rpm
(from new egg) only running you...
1. CPU: (for even the 3.3 version) $2202. GPU: $460
3 RAM: $112
4. SSD: $60
5. HD: $80
Total = $932
Â
enjoy
casharmy
[QUOTE="casharmy"]No mention of software. Pirate confirmed. Just like all PC gamers.and you only need a set up like this to be able to play at a frame rate that isn't a slide show..
System:
Intel i5-2500K@4,3GHz
NVidia GTX 680 OC GPU Boost @ 1200MHzÂ
16GB DDR3
120GB SSD for Win7 64
60GB SSD for Skyrim
1TB HD 7200rpm
(from new egg) only running you...
1. CPU: (for even the 3.3 version) $2202. GPU: $460
3 RAM: $112
4. SSD: $60
5. HD: $80
Total = $932
Â
enjoy
Mr_BillGates
Shush, plus it's obviously not a full build just the important components
[QUOTE="casharmy"]No mention of software. Pirate confirmed. Just like all PC gamers. enjoying your GOW: Judgement?and you only need a set up like this to be able to play at a frame rate that isn't a slide show..
System:
Intel i5-2500K@4,3GHz
NVidia GTX 680 OC GPU Boost @ 1200MHzÂ
16GB DDR3
120GB SSD for Win7 64
60GB SSD for Skyrim
1TB HD 7200rpm
(from new egg) only running you...
1. CPU: (for even the 3.3 version) $2202. GPU: $460
3 RAM: $112
4. SSD: $60
5. HD: $80
Total = $932
Â
enjoy
Mr_BillGates
and you only need a set up like this to be able to play at a frame rate that isn't a slide show..
System:
Intel i5-2500K@4,3GHz
NVidia GTX 680 OC GPU Boost @ 1200MHzÂ
16GB DDR3
120GB SSD for Win7 64
60GB SSD for Skyrim
1TB HD 7200rpm
(from new egg) only running you...
1. CPU: (for even the 3.3 version) $2202. GPU: $460
3 RAM: $112
4. SSD: $60
5. HD: $80
Total = $932
Â
enjoy
casharmy
+motherboard
+cpu cooler(since you have oc)
+psu
+case
+windows
+peripherals like m/k speakers
Â
You can't throw a 2500k and a GTX 680 together and call it a $900 rig.
and you only need a set up like this to be able to play at a frame rate that isn't a slide show..
System:
Intel i5-2500K@4,3GHz
NVidia GTX 680 OC GPU Boost @ 1200MHzÂ
16GB DDR3
120GB SSD for Win7 64
60GB SSD for Skyrim
1TB HD 7200rpm
(from new egg) only running you...
1. CPU: (for even the 3.3 version) $2202. GPU: $460
3 RAM: $112
4. SSD: $60
5. HD: $80
Total = $932
Â
enjoy
casharmy
2 SSDs? :? Don't even need one.
And the GPU is overpriced for what you get. Pop a 7950 in there and it will perform almost the same for almost 2/3 the price. (1/2 in some places)
You also only need half the RAM.Â
God if you're gonna do something like this at least do it right and srop looking like an idiot/ You forgot a PSU, motherboard and OS. Yes PC gaming is expensive but you don't take it up unless you think it's worth it. If you don't then great, stick to a console. That's what they're made for.Â
Trying too hard I seeand you only need a set up like this to be able to play at a frame rate that isn't a slide show..
System:
Intel i5-2500K@4,3GHz
NVidia GTX 680 OC GPU Boost @ 1200MHzÂ
16GB DDR3
120GB SSD for Win7 64
60GB SSD for Skyrim
1TB HD 7200rpm
(from new egg) only running you...
1. CPU: (for even the 3.3 version) $2202. GPU: $460
3 RAM: $112
4. SSD: $60
5. HD: $80
Total = $932
Â
enjoy
casharmy
[QUOTE="casharmy"]
and you only need a set up like this to be able to play at a frame rate that isn't a slide show..
System:
Intel i5-2500K@4,3GHz
NVidia GTX 680 OC GPU Boost @ 1200MHzÂ
16GB DDR3
120GB SSD for Win7 64
60GB SSD for Skyrim
1TB HD 7200rpm
(from new egg) only running you...
1. CPU: (for even the 3.3 version) $2202. GPU: $460
3 RAM: $112
4. SSD: $60
5. HD: $80
Total = $932
Â
enjoy
seanmcloughlin
2 SSDs? :? Don't even need one.
And the GPU is overpriced for what you get. Pop a 7950 in there and it will perform almost the same for almost 2/3 the price. (1/2 in some places)
You also only need half the RAM.Â
God if you're gonna do something like this at least do it right and srop looking like an idiot
Although, is it not okay to just admit that PC gaming is expensive, and we don't care. Â That we are fine paying more for the better experience and multi-purpose use
[QUOTE="casharmy"]
and you only need a set up like this to be able to play at a frame rate that isn't a slide show..
System:
Intel i5-2500K@4,3GHz
NVidia GTX 680 OC GPU Boost @ 1200MHzÂ
16GB DDR3
120GB SSD for Win7 64
60GB SSD for Skyrim
1TB HD 7200rpm
(from new egg) only running you...
1. CPU: (for even the 3.3 version) $2202. GPU: $460
3 RAM: $112
4. SSD: $60
5. HD: $80
Total = $932
Â
enjoy
seanmcloughlin
2 SSDs? :? Don't even need one.
And the GPU is overpriced for what you get. Pop a 7950 in there and it will perform almost the same for almost 2/3 the price. (1/2 in some places)
You also only need half the RAM.Â
God if you're gonna do something like this at least do it right and srop looking like an idiot/ You forgot a PSU, motherboard and OS. Yes PC gaming is expensive but you don't take it up unless you think it's worth it. If you don't then great, stick to a console. That's what they're made for.Â
That's the list of hardware from the link. If you'd like to criticize their choices, take it up with them instead of the guy who's simply quoting it.[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"][QUOTE="casharmy"]
and you only need a set up like this to be able to play at a frame rate that isn't a slide show..
System:
Intel i5-2500K@4,3GHz
NVidia GTX 680 OC GPU Boost @ 1200MHzÂ
16GB DDR3
120GB SSD for Win7 64
60GB SSD for Skyrim
1TB HD 7200rpm
(from new egg) only running you...
1. CPU: (for even the 3.3 version) $2202. GPU: $460
3 RAM: $112
4. SSD: $60
5. HD: $80
Total = $932
Â
enjoy
lowe0
2 SSDs? :? Don't even need one.
And the GPU is overpriced for what you get. Pop a 7950 in there and it will perform almost the same for almost 2/3 the price. (1/2 in some places)
You also only need half the RAM.Â
God if you're gonna do something like this at least do it right and srop looking like an idiot/ You forgot a PSU, motherboard and OS. Yes PC gaming is expensive but you don't take it up unless you think it's worth it. If you don't then great, stick to a console. That's what they're made for.Â
That's the list of hardware from the link. If you'd like to criticize their choices, take it up with them instead of the guy who's simply quoting it.True, except he made the claim that this is the hardware that is "needed," which is not true, and not stated in the video description. So he is still wrong, as are you lowe0
so your games could suck twice as bad a they already do?? lol[QUOTE="buccomatic"][QUOTE="GD1551"]
That's nice but you could also get two consoles for that price.
GD1551
Tombraider seems to be working on all consoles, doesn't seem that way for alot of PCs.
Â
That's not remotely true. The game works perfectly fine if you turn off tesselation. Nvidia didn't receive the game code until a few days before the game launched, so they just need to release new drivers to fix out those very minor kinks--and they are very minor. Tesselation is barely noticeable in the game.Â
so your games could suck twice as bad a they already do?? lol[QUOTE="buccomatic"][QUOTE="GD1551"]
That's nice but you could also get two consoles for that price.
GD1551
Tombraider seems to be working on all consoles, doesn't seem that way for alot of PCs.
Maybe if you tried playing the PC version instead of making conclusions based on hearsay I'd take you seriously. The game runs perfectly fine and looks beautiful on my setup. The crashing with tesselation enabled for Nvidia cards is easily remedied in less than a minute. By comparison, the console versions look like complete ass.Just a few pics with Sharpshooter's ENB combined with a ton of other mods. :P Open image in new tab to see in 1080p.
It's like I'm being trolled or the idiot squad has polluted this thread.and you only need a set up like this to be able to play at a frame rate that isn't a slide show..
System:
Intel i5-2500K@4,3GHz
NVidia GTX 680 OC GPU Boost @ 1200MHzÂ
16GB DDR3
120GB SSD for Win7 64
60GB SSD for Skyrim
1TB HD 7200rpm
(from new egg) only running you...
1. CPU: (for even the 3.3 version) $2202. GPU: $460
3 RAM: $112
4. SSD: $60
5. HD: $80
Total = $932
Â
enjoy
casharmy
[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"]not that impressive, only the lighting was pretty good, everything else is meh....still doesnt look as good as the Deep Down trailer And you're playing the Deep Down tech demo/target render right now, right? Because you better be able to play it if you can claim that.Just a few pics with Sharpshooter's ENB combined with a ton of other mods. :P Open image in new tab to see in 1080p.
Â
Â
Â
Â
xboxiphoneps3
[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"]not that impressive, only the lighting was pretty good, everything else is meh....still doesnt look as good as the Deep Down trailerÂ
xboxiphoneps3
The Deep Down trailer is not representative of any game on the PS4. It's an in-engine tech demo rendered on PC.Â
Guess I'll just throw some of my Skyrim screenshots. Various mods with Jasmin ENB.Â
And you're playing the Deep Down tech demo/target render right now, right? Because you better be able to play it if you can claim that. well the Deep Down trailer was in game real time footage, and it looked fantastically good...these Skyrim mods dont look good lol[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"]
[QUOTE="xboxiphoneps3"] not that impressive, only the lighting was pretty good, everything else is meh....still doesnt look as good as the Deep Down trailerxboxiphoneps3
not to mention the Deep Down trailer was running on unfinished, unfinalized PS4 dev kits, so the graphics will get EVEN better then what they showed
Proof that the Deep Down trailer was in game and real time?
I also love how consolites say PC screenshots that are impossible to ever see on a console don't look good on a constant basis. If you guys don't think these Skyrim shots look good, then playing Skyrim on console must be really aggrevating, especailly with how bad it looks on console.
LOL at all these desperate sony fanboys. I would bet money that all those tech demo's were running off a PC in the background. Hell they never even showed you the new playstation and yet you guys are so desperate you will believe whatever they tell you.
Until I see a console with a disc in the tray running a game as someone plays it real time, then I don't care what anyone says it can do, because you still havn't showed me what it can do.
Â
Â
[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="xboxiphoneps3"]well the Deep Down trailer was in game real time footagexboxiphoneps3
[QUOTE="xboxiphoneps3"]well the Deep Down trailer was in game real time footage, and it looked fantastically good...these Skyrim mods dont look good lol[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"] And you're playing the Deep Down tech demo/target render right now, right? Because you better be able to play it if you can claim that.
DragonfireXZ95
not to mention the Deep Down trailer was running on unfinished, unfinalized PS4 dev kits, so the graphics will get EVEN better then what they showed
Proof that the Deep Down trailer was in game and real time? It's likely that it was indeed running in real time. Considering the engine is in early development as of now, there would be many rendering issues. These types of issues were visible in the demo, leading me to believe it was real time. Regardless, it was a target render. It's more or less likely games will look similar or better then that once games become more specific and optimized for the console.[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="xboxiphoneps3"] well the Deep Down trailer was in game real time footage, and it looked fantastically good...these Skyrim mods dont look good lol
not to mention the Deep Down trailer was running on unfinished, unfinalized PS4 dev kits, so the graphics will get EVEN better then what they showed
xboxiphoneps3
Proof that the Deep Down trailer was in game and real time?
I also love how consolites say PC screenshots that are impossible to ever see on a console don't look good on a constant basis. If you guys don't think these Skyrim shots look good, then playing Skyrim on console must be really aggrevating, especailly with how bad it looks on console.
Skyrim's just not a impressive looking game bro its old....and its been confirmed in a recent PS4 podcast with some Capcom developers.. Okay, let's see the link to that podcast.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment