anyone thinks rage will take over the graphics king throne from crysis?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for SamGv
SamGv

1102

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 SamGv
Member since 2007 • 1102 Posts

By then Crysis 2 will be out.

Avatar image for GTR2addict
GTR2addict

11863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#52 GTR2addict
Member since 2007 • 11863 Posts

gfsda

hgf

ehhhh... no.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#53 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"]

[QUOTE="urdead18"]

Not.Even.Close.

I don't think anything is going to beat Crysis this gen.

cept for maybe Crysis 2:)

No it won't due to the fact its being made for PS3 and Xbox360 as primary platforms..
Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26715 Posts

[QUOTE="PublicNuisance"]

[QUOTE="skrat_01"]

Crytek wants 8 million in sales. For some reason that is this guys goal: to say he got Halo 3 level sales. I think he has realized that with high system requirements that is much harder. I think Yerli has lost his way. I doubt Crysis 2 will even look as impressive as Crysis turned all the way up with AA and AF maxed out.

skrat_01

Orly? I haven't read that before, and of course its unrealistic. Only an established IP or a breakout title can truly achieve those numbers. As for the game, i'll have to reserve my judgement until more details, and screens emerge.
Either way, unless they drastically improve the art-style and attention to detail in Crysis 2 its going to be a boring repeat of the first one anyway. technically amazing and yet one of the most boring games to look at.Birdy09
Crysis had some strong art direction - the ice world and alien designs are more than enough evidence of it. Besides what is boring is subjective.

It's just one of those guys who hasn't played it yet. I wouldn't mind him.
Avatar image for Silenthps
Silenthps

7302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#56 Silenthps
Member since 2006 • 7302 Posts
nope, even if it takes it from crysis, it still has warhead and crysis2 to deal with.
Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#57 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

Nope. PO or Doom 4 will, which ever comes first. This game is being made for consoles in mind so it's not going to push the graphics bar.

Avatar image for RyuRanVII
RyuRanVII

4257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#58 RyuRanVII
Member since 2006 • 4257 Posts

RAGE used to look much better when it was announced. Now It doesn't look impressive due to the huge visual downgrade. I hope those new screens with cartoony graphics aren't from the PC version.

Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"]

cept for maybe Crysis 2:)

sSubZerOo

No it won't due to the fact its being made for PS3 and Xbox360 as primary platforms..

CryEngine 3 by its very design always uses the PC version as the lead platform, the console versions are generated from the PC version.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#61 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

Nope. PO or Doom 4 will, which ever comes first. This game is being made for consoles in mind so it's not going to push the graphics bar.

Espada12
Yes, finally someone else who knows about Project Offset.
Avatar image for Couth_
Couth_

10369

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Couth_
Member since 2008 • 10369 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"]

cept for maybe Crysis 2:)

AnnoyedDragon

No it won't due to the fact its being made for PS3 and Xbox360 as primary platforms..

CryEngine 3 by its very design always uses the PC version as the lead platform, the console versions are generated from the PC version.

CE3 is made for the consoles. The PC version of Crysis 2 would still use CryEngine 2. It's superior in every way

Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#63 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts
I can't tell - these screenshots are too low in resolution to do any kind of comparison - and I don't see much in the way of vegetation or such. Crysis was impressive because you were running through a woods full of destructible trees, bushes, grasses, etc - and it wasn't just the usual "pixel mess" of most "vegetation" in games.
Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

CE3 is made for the consoles. The PC version of Crysis 2 would still use CryEngine 2. It's superior in every way

Couth_

Where are you people getting this from? Well the smallest glimpse at the engine description will tell you that CryEngine 3 is a cross platform optimized version of CryEngine 2, it is not built specifically for consoles and CryEngine 2 is not superior to it. CryEngine 3 is used by building the PC version as the primary platform while the console versions are generated along side of it, how can it be a separate version when all three versions are built on the same engine using the PC version?

Haven't people been paying attention to any of Crytek's interviews?

Avatar image for KingsMessenger
KingsMessenger

2574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 KingsMessenger
Member since 2009 • 2574 Posts

[QUOTE="AnnoyedDragon"]

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"] No it won't due to the fact its being made for PS3 and Xbox360 as primary platforms..Couth_

CryEngine 3 by its very design always uses the PC version as the lead platform, the console versions are generated from the PC version.

CE3 is made for the consoles. The PC version of Crysis 2 would still use CryEngine 2. It's superior in every way

No. Crysis 2 will use CryENGINE 3.0 The PC version of CryENGINE 3.0 has tons of improvements over CryENGINE 2.0 For Example: Real-time Dynamic Global Illumination Deferred Lighting Uber Shader Technology Real-Time Soft Particle Physics Not to mention many low level optimizations and improvements to make it run faster.... CryENGINE 3.0 was NOT just designed to be the console version of the engine, it just facilitated porting the engine to consoles because of the optimizations and modifications made to the core of the engine. But, the high end still exists and has in fact been greatly improved. Just because the console demo didn't show that doesn't mean that it is not there.
Avatar image for GTR2addict
GTR2addict

11863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#66 GTR2addict
Member since 2007 • 11863 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"]

cept for maybe Crysis 2:)

AnnoyedDragon

No it won't due to the fact its being made for PS3 and Xbox360 as primary platforms..

CryEngine 3 by its very design always uses the PC version as the lead platform, the console versions are generated from the PC version.

i lold at what subzero said, crytek hasn't even shown the pc version of the cryengine 3 :lol:
Avatar image for swazidoughman
swazidoughman

3520

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 91

User Lists: 0

#67 swazidoughman
Member since 2008 • 3520 Posts

No console limited game can surpass Crysis, it's a technical impossibility.

People who think they can live in a fantasy world were 512mb vram+ worth of resources can fit into 256mb and 48 shader units can perform like 240+.

AnnoyedDragon

absolutely false.

The game may be extremely scalable for all you know, afterall, Id is a great dev when it comes to graphics technology.

Avatar image for Saturos3091
Saturos3091

14937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#68 Saturos3091
Member since 2005 • 14937 Posts
[QUOTE="KingsMessenger"] Deferred Lighting .

Deferred Rendering...I wouldn't label that as an improvement unless they've found a way to get around the AA issues. AA is far more important than an unnoticeable improvement in lighting. STALKER:CS had that issue. Otherwise it sounds (and I'm sure will look) fantastic.
Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#69 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

[QUOTE="AnnoyedDragon"]

No console limited game can surpass Crysis, it's a technical impossibility.

People who think they can live in a fantasy world were 512mb vram+ worth of resources can fit into 256mb and 48 shader units can perform like 240+.

swazidoughman

absolutely false.

The game may be extremely scalable for all you know, afterall, Id is a great dev when it comes to graphics technology.

The game is being made for consoles first. The only thing PC will have is AA and higher res, he said it himself, the real graphics contender is doom 4 which he said will showcase the power of his new engine.

Avatar image for VendettaRed07
VendettaRed07

14012

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#70 VendettaRed07
Member since 2007 • 14012 Posts

i know John Carmack is a programming god, but man, all his games recently have looked like crap, litterally. He could do so much better if had better art direction

Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

absolutely false.

The game may be extremely scalable for all you know, afterall, Id is a great dev when it comes to graphics technology.

swazidoughman

It doesn't matter how high it is scaled, at its core it is console limited.

Crysis did what it did because it was designed from the ground up with high end PC hardware in mind. You cannot simply take a console optimized game, pile on higher graphical settings and expect to get a Crysis out of it.

Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#72 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts

[QUOTE="swazidoughman"]

absolutely false.

The game may be extremely scalable for all you know, afterall, Id is a great dev when it comes to graphics technology.

AnnoyedDragon

It doesn't matter how high it is scaled, at its core it is console limited.

Crysis did what it did because it was designed from the ground up with high end PC hardware in mind. You cannot simply take a console optimized game, pile on higher graphical settings and expect to get a Crysis out of it.

What needs to be explained here is that it's about more than just textures / models. When you design a game for consoles - you have significant memory limitations that you don't have on PC. Having to go later and update the game free of those constraints, you will still have design choices you made because of the initial constraints. - However the caveat here is that it depends on how the game is developed internally. if they built with high-end assets and game design in mind, and then figured out how to make those work on each platform, we may not have as limited a game as you would think.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#73 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
I don't understand the hype for this game.. Doom 3 wasn't a very good game.. And really ID hasn't been the same dev sense 2000.. Face it, they are a minor voice compared to the other FPS devs out there like Valve.
Avatar image for KingsMessenger
KingsMessenger

2574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 KingsMessenger
Member since 2009 • 2574 Posts
[QUOTE="Saturos3091"] Deferred Rendering...I wouldn't label that as an improvement unless they've found a way to get around the AA issues. AA is far more important than an unnoticeable improvement in lighting. STALKER:CS had that issue. Otherwise it sounds (and I'm sure will look) fantastic.

They label it deferred lighting. Technically, the two are exactly the same. Anyway, it is an improvement in the sense that it is an additional option. For games where lots of light sources are needed, having it available is great. They still have HDR Rendering available, but now Deferred Rendering is a option.
Avatar image for Saturos3091
Saturos3091

14937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#75 Saturos3091
Member since 2005 • 14937 Posts
[QUOTE="KingsMessenger"][QUOTE="Saturos3091"] Deferred Rendering...I wouldn't label that as an improvement unless they've found a way to get around the AA issues. AA is far more important than an unnoticeable improvement in lighting. STALKER:CS had that issue. Otherwise it sounds (and I'm sure will look) fantastic.

They label it deferred lighting. Technically, the two are exactly the same. Anyway, it is an improvement in the sense that it is an additional option. For games where lots of light sources are needed, having it available is great. They still have HDR Rendering available, but now Deferred Rendering is a option.

Ah, I wasn't aware that it is an option. That is a good thing, then.
Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#76 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

Judgin by recent screens it doesn't look anywhere near Crysis in graphical quality

Avatar image for swazidoughman
swazidoughman

3520

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 91

User Lists: 0

#77 swazidoughman
Member since 2008 • 3520 Posts

Judgin by recent screens it doesn't look anywhere near Crysis in graphical quality

AdrianWerner

What about in scale?

Something that seems to be overlooked often.

Avatar image for KingsMessenger
KingsMessenger

2574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 KingsMessenger
Member since 2009 • 2574 Posts
[QUOTE="Saturos3091"] Ah, I wasn't aware that it is an option. That is a good thing, then.

Yeah. It is basically there to make the engine more versatile. They improved the lighting engine from CryENGINE 2.0, but then also added an entirely separate Deferred Renderer on top of that.
Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#79 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

[QUOTE="AdrianWerner"]

Judgin by recent screens it doesn't look anywhere near Crysis in graphical quality

swazidoughman

What about in scale?

Something that seems to be overlooked often.

in scale too. Especially considering how empty and barren the levels are

Plus it is a little sad...RAGE will be out 6 years after Doom 3 and yet it will have more primitive lighting solution than Doom3 did

Avatar image for GTR2addict
GTR2addict

11863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#80 GTR2addict
Member since 2007 • 11863 Posts

[QUOTE="AdrianWerner"]

Judgin by recent screens it doesn't look anywhere near Crysis in graphical quality

swazidoughman

What about in scale?

Something that seems to be overlooked often.

crysis has custom maps with 30x30 km with no loading times...
Avatar image for videogamesdead8
videogamesdead8

200

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 videogamesdead8
Member since 2009 • 200 Posts

A multiplatform being developed with consoles as the lead platform will never surpass a PC exclusive built from the ground for the pc.

Gamerz1569
lol fear 2 looks better than the original fear
Avatar image for gamecubepad
gamecubepad

7214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -12

User Lists: 0

#82 gamecubepad
Member since 2003 • 7214 Posts

I think it will be about equal. Crysis has a lot of vegetation and Rage is more like Fallout 3 so it's hard to compare the 2. The Game Informer screens looked really good though.

Will Rage look better than Crysis 2 on consoles. That's the real question.

Avatar image for KingsMessenger
KingsMessenger

2574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 KingsMessenger
Member since 2009 • 2574 Posts
[QUOTE="AdrianWerner"]in scale too. Especially considering how empty and barren the levels are Plus it is a little sad... RAGE will be out 6 years after Doom 3 and yet it will have more primitive lighting solution than Doom3 did

How so? I have seen nothing suggesting that id Tech 4 is superior to id Tech 5 in any way(including lighting). Infact, one of the most notable improvements for id Tech 5 is the addition of penumbra shadows, which is a significant improvement to the lighting engine. It still keeps the per-pixel lighting but expands the feature set Where are you getting the idea that it will have more primitive lighting than Doom 3?
Avatar image for Hanass
Hanass

2204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#84 Hanass
Member since 2008 • 2204 Posts

Vegetation is so much harder to reproduce accurately than rocks, sand, water, wood, metal, etc. That Crysis can make trees look as good as now is highly underrated. Rocks can be made beautiful just by painting huge textures onto them; you can't to that for grass and leaves, which is why Rage might look as good as Crysis, but will be inferior from a technical standpoint.

Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

lol fear 2 looks better than the original fearvideogamesdead8

That FEAR 1 came out in 2005 and was designed for GF 7 series generation hardware, the same in consoles minus the fixed hardware advantages, doesn't bother you when using it as a counter argument?

The point was referring to right now, games built for modern PC hardware greatly surpass the capabilities of consoles.

Avatar image for coolguy735
coolguy735

489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#86 coolguy735
Member since 2008 • 489 Posts

I hate to sound like a fanboy but to be honest if you compare screens from Uncharted 2 with screens from Crysis, Uncharted 2 surpasses Crysis graphics-wise.

Of course, the screens from Uncharted 2 might be complete bull BUT from the way they're looking, this will be the best looking game to date. Although I will admit it is hard to compare some games due to clashing styles, Uncharted 2 is looking beautiful and noone can deny this.

Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#87 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts

I hate to sound like a fanboy but to be honest if you compare screens from Uncharted 2 with screens from Crysis, Uncharted 2 surpasses Crysis graphics-wise.

Of course, the screens from Uncharted 2 might be complete bull BUT from the way they're looking, this will be the best looking game to date. Although I will admit it is hard to compare some games due to clashing styles, Uncharted 2 is looking beautiful and noone can deny this.

coolguy735
Uncharted isn't in the same *ballpark* as Crysis :| Comparing low-res screenshots and online videos doesn't do either game justice, but Uncharted 2 is facing unfair competition on the Crysis front.
Avatar image for KingsMessenger
KingsMessenger

2574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 KingsMessenger
Member since 2009 • 2574 Posts

I hate to sound like a fanboy but to be honest if you compare screens from Uncharted 2 with screens from Crysis, Uncharted 2 surpasses Crysis graphics-wise.

Of course, the screens from Uncharted 2 might be complete bull BUT from the way they're looking, this will be the best looking game to date. Although I will admit it is hard to compare some games due to clashing styles, Uncharted 2 is looking beautiful and noone can deny this.

coolguy735
Uncharted 2 looks great, but you are completely delusional if you think that it surpasses Crysis. I could post screenshots, but somehow that seems unnecessary.
Avatar image for coolguy735
coolguy735

489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#89 coolguy735
Member since 2008 • 489 Posts

[QUOTE="coolguy735"]

I hate to sound like a fanboy but to be honest if you compare screens from Uncharted 2 with screens from Crysis, Uncharted 2 surpasses Crysis graphics-wise.

Of course, the screens from Uncharted 2 might be complete bull BUT from the way they're looking, this will be the best looking game to date. Although I will admit it is hard to compare some games due to clashing styles, Uncharted 2 is looking beautiful and noone can deny this.

subrosian

Uncharted isn't in the same *ballpark* as Crysis :| Comparing low-res screenshots and online videos doesn't do either game justice, but Uncharted 2 is facing unfair competition on the Crysis front.

I know what you're getting at with the low-res screens thing but that is all that is available now (to my knowledge at least). But compare these two randomly picked screens and please tell me which looks better:

UNCHARTED 2:

Uncharted 2: Among Thieves Screenshot

CRYSIS:

Crysis Screenshot

Both were taken from IGN.COM so I highly doubt either is going to be graphically downsided for the sake of bias as this isa highly rated website. Uncharted 2 just has the look of a newer game, and it just surpasses Crysis right now in my opinion. As I said before the screens could be total bull but what ever they are they look extremely good.

Avatar image for Snagal123
Snagal123

3524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 Snagal123
Member since 2006 • 3524 Posts

lol fear 2 looks better than the original fearvideogamesdead8

Apart from the fact FEAR 2 didn't have full dynamic lightning and shadows removing alot of the atmosphere, which made it look worse.

Avatar image for Wardemon50
Wardemon50

1637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#91 Wardemon50
Member since 2005 • 1637 Posts

[QUOTE="subrosian"][QUOTE="coolguy735"]

I hate to sound like a fanboy but to be honest if you compare screens from Uncharted 2 with screens from Crysis, Uncharted 2 surpasses Crysis graphics-wise.

Of course, the screens from Uncharted 2 might be complete bull BUT from the way they're looking, this will be the best looking game to date. Although I will admit it is hard to compare some games due to clashing styles, Uncharted 2 is looking beautiful and noone can deny this.

coolguy735

Uncharted isn't in the same *ballpark* as Crysis :| Comparing low-res screenshots and online videos doesn't do either game justice, but Uncharted 2 is facing unfair competition on the Crysis front.

I know what you're getting at with the low-res screens thing but that is all that is available now (to my knowledge at least). But compare these two randomly picked screens and please tell me which looks better:

UNCHARTED 2:

Uncharted 2: Among Thieves Screenshot

CRYSIS:

Crysis Screenshot

Both were taken from IGN.COM so I highly doubt either is going to be graphically downsided for the sake of bias as this isa highly rated website. Uncharted 2 just has the look of a newer game, and it just surpasses Crysis right now in my opinion. As I said before the screens could be total bull but what ever they are they look extremely good.

Way to pick the worst screen for Crysis...

Avatar image for coolguy735
coolguy735

489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#92 coolguy735
Member since 2008 • 489 Posts

[QUOTE="coolguy735"]

[QUOTE="subrosian"] Uncharted isn't in the same *ballpark* as Crysis :| Comparing low-res screenshots and online videos doesn't do either game justice, but Uncharted 2 is facing unfair competition on the Crysis front.Wardemon50

I know what you're getting at with the low-res screens thing but that is all that is available now (to my knowledge at least). But compare these two randomly picked screens and please tell me which looks better:

UNCHARTED 2:

Uncharted 2: Among Thieves Screenshot

CRYSIS:

Crysis Screenshot

Both were taken from IGN.COM so I highly doubt either is going to be graphically downsided for the sake of bias as this isa highly rated website. Uncharted 2 just has the look of a newer game, and it just surpasses Crysis right now in my opinion. As I said before the screens could be total bull but what ever they are they look extremely good.

Way to pick the worst screen for Crysis...

If you think I'm biased, by all means post some screens of your own.

Avatar image for Wardemon50
Wardemon50

1637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#93 Wardemon50
Member since 2005 • 1637 Posts

[QUOTE="Wardemon50"]

[QUOTE="coolguy735"]

I know what you're getting at with the low-res screens thing but that is all that is available now (to my knowledge at least). But compare these two randomly picked screens and please tell me which looks better:

UNCHARTED 2:

Uncharted 2: Among Thieves Screenshot

CRYSIS:

Crysis Screenshot

Both were taken from IGN.COM so I highly doubt either is going to be graphically downsided for the sake of bias as this isa highly rated website. Uncharted 2 just has the look of a newer game, and it just surpasses Crysis right now in my opinion. As I said before the screens could be total bull but what ever they are they look extremely good.

coolguy735

Way to pick the worst screen for Crysis...

If you think I'm biased, by all means post some screens of your own.

Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

snip

coolguy735

Other than just not knowing what is being pushed in Crysis; you would think common sense would prevail and they would look at the hardware capability difference.

Less than half the vram? A fraction of the shader power? Apparently insignificant in console users judging their system of choice capabilities.

Avatar image for gamecubepad
gamecubepad

7214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -12

User Lists: 0

#95 gamecubepad
Member since 2003 • 7214 Posts

Uncharted 2 looks good but it doesn't come close to Crysis.

Uncharted 2

Crysis

Sorry. Uncharted 2 doesn't even look better than KZ2, imo.

Avatar image for coolguy735
coolguy735

489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#96 coolguy735
Member since 2008 • 489 Posts

I may be dellusional in your eyes but to me Uncharted 2 just looks cleaner and more crisp. And don't take me for a ps3 fanboy, I am a fanboy to no console, I just go by what I see.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#97 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

Uncharted 2 looks good but it doesn't come close to Crysis.

Uncharted 2

Crysis

Sorry. Uncharted 2 doesn't even look better than KZ2, imo.

gamecubepad

A multiplayer beta screenshot of Uncharted 2? Really? Though Crysis looks better anyways.

Avatar image for Wardemon50
Wardemon50

1637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#98 Wardemon50
Member since 2005 • 1637 Posts

I may be dellusional in your eyes but to me Uncharted 2 just looks cleaner and more crisp. And don't take me for a ps3 fanboy, I am a fanboy to no console, I just go by what I see.

coolguy735

Avatar image for PSdual_wielder
PSdual_wielder

10646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#99 PSdual_wielder
Member since 2003 • 10646 Posts

A rage vs crysis thread? I thought it would be fun to join in but I guess inevitably it just has to come down to uncharted 2 vs crysis. :roll:

Avatar image for Hanass
Hanass

2204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#100 Hanass
Member since 2008 • 2204 Posts

Did someone say Crysis screens?

Still not convinced? I'll give some professionally made ones if you don't like mine: