[QUOTE="SambaLele"] No, i want links for any or all the proofs you can provide. "makes up like 1%" proves nothing, neither that it sells 1%, or that if it does sells that, that it sells only that much because of xenophobism or consumer preference.
dsmccracken
This is a casual fan forum. I'm not doing homework just because you assign it. Here's a good link though:
http://www.indiana.edu/~easc/resources/commerce_culture/trade.htm
I'm not trying to prove my dissertation for my masters, I'm just telling you what I remember.
Now we're talking.
From the text you provided:
" The most popular vehicles in Japan are in the "small" vehicle category with engine capacity between 661-2,000 cc. In addition, all vehicles are right-hand drive. Most American-made cars are above the 2,000 cc category and hence desired by very few who can afford them."
"Since the signing of the Auto Agreement in August 1995, the Big Three's sales in Japan have grown 33 percent. General Motors had a 43.3 percent increase in sales between July of this and last year. BMW, Volkswagen, and Daimler-Benz followed with 30.4, 22.4, and 6.6 percent, respectively. Among the European manufacturers, Volkswagen's total share of the market is the largest, due mainly to its propensity to make smaller vehicles that are priced right for the Japanese."
From the excerptions: the japanese are willing to buy foreign products, it's just that your products doesn't appeal to them that much. Just see how European products sell better. Also, the increase in sales for both American and European cars contradicts your point of xenophobism.
And from the upcoming excerption i'll take, you see that US politics make japan look like xenophobit with a normal act:
"Two most recent trade issues that have caused a row between the US and Japan are insurance and semiconductors. Back on July 31,1986 the two partners signed the Semiconductor Agreement stating that the foreign share of the Japanese microchip market would be 20 percent. Since that time, the foreign share (mostly American) rose well above that mark, reaching 30.2 percent in 1995. The US alone sold $8 billion worth of chips in Japan last year. Nevertheless, the Clinton administration insisted earlier this year that the agreement be renewed with its original terms. Having done away with most numerical targets through the Framework Talks, Japan refused to continue the agreement and won in the end. Many analysts on both sides of the Pacific agreed that continuing the 20 percent requirement was unnecessary as the American share was well established and only poised to grow from there. The US semiconductor industry is one of the most competitive, high-tech, profitable industries in the US and world alike, and protecting it seems like a waste of taxpayers' money. The only obvious reason for this, according to the Investor's Business Daily, is that President Clinton needs California electoral votes and Silicon Valley's campaign cash this year. In other words, it seems that the expiration of the Semiconductor Agreement hurt only the Clinton administration. Another setback has been the agreement to let the private sector, namely the US Semiconductor Industry Association and Electronics Industry Association of Japan, jointly monitor the market developments, including market size, growth, and share. In time, this bilateral body, named the Semiconductor Council, will become a multilateral body for all countries that agree to slash tariffs on semiconductors."
Log in to comment