Are PS4 Pro level graphics good enough for this gen?

Avatar image for bowserjr123
bowserjr123

2478

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#51 bowserjr123
Member since 2006 • 2478 Posts

Meh I'm not much of a graphics whore so they're good enough, but from what I've heard, the Pro vs. regular PS4 difference doesn't seem significant.

Avatar image for speedfog
speedfog

4966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#52 speedfog
Member since 2009 • 4966 Posts

Rise Of The Tomb Raider on the One looks amazing already, hence if you want better graphics on a console then go for the Scorpio soon

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf3bfcedc29b
deactivated-5cf3bfcedc29b

776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#53 deactivated-5cf3bfcedc29b
Member since 2014 • 776 Posts

I think regular PS4 games still look great and I have a Pro.

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#54  Edited By PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

@EG101: 'That's why so many games run less than 30FPS and less than 1080P.'

That's an internet myth. Didn't you notice that half this gen's console library runs at 60fps? Most shooters, racers, sport games, fighting games, multiplayer games, and of course indies do run or aim at 60fps. Last gen it was about CoD, RAGE and just a few other exceptions, and most 30fps games used to dip to mid low 20s. Same dor resolution. Other than a few 900p exceptions, 1080p did become standard.

As for the hardware, i don't think PS4 and X1 are super powerful, but they are easily one generation ahead in terms of results. Games like DOOM, Battlefield 1, SW Battlefront, The Witcher 3, Batman AK, Uncharted 4, FFVX, The Division, Ratchet and Clank, etc make anything on PS3 and 360 looks ridiculously dated!

If you can not see a generation jump from last to current gen, you should google diminishing returns, man!

Avatar image for bobrossperm
BobRossPerm

2886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 BobRossPerm
Member since 2015 • 2886 Posts

PS4 and Xbone graphics are fantastic by todays standards. It's the framerate that's the bigger issue.

Avatar image for quadknight
QuadKnight

12916

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 QuadKnight
Member since 2015 • 12916 Posts

Even OG PS4 and Xbone (when it's not 720p) are good enough for this gen.

Avatar image for 2mrw
2mrw

6206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#57 2mrw
Member since 2008 • 6206 Posts

I dun feel the pro was neccessary at all ... it didn't have any impact wutsoever.

Avatar image for sovkhan
sovkhan

1591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 sovkhan
Member since 2015 • 1591 Posts

Outside of SW, it's more than enough for the average gamer!!!

Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#59  Edited By commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts

@quadknight said:

Even OG PS4 and Xbone (when it's not 720p) are good enough for this gen.

sure , 6 months of patching for the witcher 3 on the ps4 and sub 720p scaling in titanfall 2 on the xboxone.

If there was competition with a better system, it would have been a massacre.

The scorpio can't come too soon and If I was a playstation man, I would have gotten the pro the minute it came out.

Avatar image for quadknight
QuadKnight

12916

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60  Edited By QuadKnight
Member since 2015 • 12916 Posts

@commander: I own a gaming PC and a Pro, the OG PS4 and Xbone are more than good enough for this gen for most gamers. Don't mistake the opinion of people here for the real world. Just because people like me stay at the forefront of tech and worry about things like framerates and resolutions doesn't mean that these things are nearly as important for the rest of the gaming population. Most people are completely happy with the graphics of OG PS4 and Xbone. If I couldn't afford better I'd be perfectly fine with those graphics too especially when you consider how far we've come in technology since the Atari days.

Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#61 commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts

@quadknight said:

@commander: I own a gaming PC and a Pro, the OG PS4 and Xbone are more than good enough for this gen for most gamers. Don't mistake the opinion of people here for the real world. Just because people like me stay at the forefront of tech and worry about things like framerates and resolutions doesn't mean that these things are nearly as important for the rest of the gaming population. Most people are completely happy with the graphics of OG PS4 and Xbone. If I couldn't afford better I'd be perfectly fine with those graphics too especially when you consider how far we've come in technology since the Atari days.

Maybe you should talk to youngsters, they know what the scorpio is. and most of them also don't care about gaming pc's.

What's said here about consoles is very much alive in the real world, power matters and the scorpio will make that crystal clear.

Avatar image for EG101
EG101

2091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62  Edited By EG101
Member since 2007 • 2091 Posts

@commander said:
@quadknight said:

Even OG PS4 and Xbone (when it's not 720p) are good enough for this gen.

sure , 6 months of patching for the witcher 3 on the ps4 and sub 720p scaling in titanfall 2 on the xboxone.

If there was competition with a better system, it would have been a massacre.

The scorpio can't come too soon and If I was a playstation man, I would have gotten the pro the minute it came out.

I agree and obviously Sony and MS also agree that's why we got the Pro and Scorpio's coming.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#63 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

Spoken like a true cow.

Avatar image for quadknight
QuadKnight

12916

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64  Edited By QuadKnight
Member since 2015 • 12916 Posts

@commander: That's all nice in theory except the most powerful console has never won a console generation. The console with the most games that people want to play always wins. It's all about the games and has always been. Power is something that excites people on forums but doesn't mean shit if you don't have games to play.

Scorpio won't do shit to change sales in the real world. OG PS4 and Xbone will continue to outsell the hell out of it. The real world is not Digital Foundry and people don't spend their time counting pixels or noticing screen tearing. Those "youngsters" are too busy playing GTAV, COD, and Minecraft on their current consoles. The reason PS4 is wiping the floor with Xbone isn't because of power it's because it's got better games and because MS screwed up the launch of the Xbone with Kinect and DRM bullshit.

Also lol @ the idea about people not caring about gaming PCs. How ignorant and stupid. There will be more gaming PCs sold at the end of the day than Scorpio because the people that truly care about power know that PCs will better serve their needs with its unrestricted nature and limitless power.

Avatar image for PinchySkree
PinchySkree

1342

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#65 PinchySkree
Member since 2012 • 1342 Posts

@Ghost_Dub said:

It is for me. I don't care how much someone is emotionally attached to pixels and game tech, these games on eighth gen consoles look fantastic.

@Telekill said:

Regular PS4 is good enough for me so...

Low standards and never experienced smooth control over 30 with full visual game assets.

@BassMan said:

The problem with consoles isn't the level of graphics that they can render, but the performance of those graphics. The hardware is too weak to render games at acceptable frame rates while maintaining that graphic fidelity. That is why we end up with games running at a shit 30fps or lower. So, the graphics are good enough, but the performance is not.

Avatar image for deactivated-587acdd100f19
deactivated-587acdd100f19

908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 deactivated-587acdd100f19
Member since 2008 • 908 Posts

The "low standards" argument is weak nerd talk. I'd rather have them with electronics instead of real life failures.

Avatar image for EG101
EG101

2091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 EG101
Member since 2007 • 2091 Posts

@PAL360 said:

@EG101: 'That's why so many games run less than 30FPS and less than 1080P.'

That's an internet myth. Didn't you notice that half this gen's console library runs at 60fps? Most shooters, racers, sport games, fighting games, multiplayer games, and of course indies do run or aim at 60fps. Last gen it was about CoD, RAGE and just a few other exceptions, and most 30fps games used to dip to mid low 20s. Same dor resolution. Other than a few 900p exceptions, 1080p did become standard.

As for the hardware, i don't think PS4 and X1 are super powerful, but they are easily one generation ahead in terms of results. Games like DOOM, Battlefield 1, SW Battlefront, The Witcher 3, Batman AK, Uncharted 4, FFVX, The Division, Ratchet and Clank, etc make anything on PS3 and 360 looks ridiculously dated!

If you can not see a generation jump from last to current gen, you should google diminishing returns, man!

Yea and Assassin's Creed Unity never happened. While we're at it Witcher3, 800P OO1860, 900P Ryse of under 30fps, 720P TitanFall, 720P TitanFall2, 720P Star Wars, 720P Battle Field, 30FPS on rails Drive Club, ton of games with low Anistropic Filtering, etc, etc. <<<This ^^^ never happened it's just internet myth......................

Avatar image for Telekill
Telekill

12061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#68 Telekill
Member since 2003 • 12061 Posts

@PinchySkree: I'm not a graphics whore so...

I'm also looking forward to Double Dragon IV that will basically have NES-Genesis graphics on PS4. And I'll have fun with it.

Fun... you know... the entire reason to game?...

Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#69 commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts

@quadknight said:

@commander: That's all nice in theory except the most powerful console has never won a console generation. The console with the most games that people want to play always wins. It's all about the games and has always been. Power is something that excites people on forums but doesn't mean shit if you don't have games to play.

Scorpio won't do shit to change sales in the real world. OG PS4 and Xbone will continue to outsell the hell out of it. The real world is not Digital Foundry and people don't spend their time counting pixels or noticing screen tearing. Those "youngsters" are too busy playing GTAV, COD, and Minecraft on their current consoles. The reason PS4 is wiping the floor with Xbone isn't because of power it's because it's got better games and because MS screwed up the launch of the Xbone with Kinect and DRM bullshit.

Also lol @ the idea about people not caring about gaming PCs. How ignorant and stupid. There will be more gaming PCs sold at the end of the day than Scorpio because the people that truly care about power know that PCs will better serve their needs with its unrestricted nature and limitless power.

It's not theory, all the people I know outside this gaming forum know very well the power difference between the scorpio and the ps4 pro. Hence most of them got ps4 at this time and most of them are talking about swtiching to ms again.

The most powerfull console did win console generations, the ps1 is a good example of that. Other consoles that weren't the strongest that won either had momentum from a previous console or were released at a more tactical time.

Avatar image for quadknight
QuadKnight

12916

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70  Edited By QuadKnight
Member since 2015 • 12916 Posts

@commander: You're talking out of you ass again. The PS1 wasn't the most powerful console of its gen, that distinction belonged to the N64. Were you even alive then? ? Jesus Christ, kids these days. Nobody is going to switch to the Scorpio it still has no exclusive games and is anchored by the Xbone, LOL if you actually think people are going to switch. I'm gonna quote and laugh at you next year when the Scorpio still doesn't change the trajectory of this gen. Do you really think the over 50 million and probably 70 million PS4 owners by the time the Scorpio launches are really going to throw away their consoles and buy a Scorpio next year? You are a totally delusional lem. You and your minuscule circle of friends do not represent the whole gaming population of millions of gamers. I don't give a crap about what you or them say because it's entirely anecdotal evidence. Reality is that most gamers will continue to game on OG PS4 and Xbone for the majority of the gen whether you admit it or not.

Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#71  Edited By commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts

@quadknight said:

@commander: You're talking out of you ass again. The PS1 wasn't the most powerful console of its gen, that distinction belonged to the N64. Were you even alive then? ? Jesus Christ, kids these days. Nobody is going to switch to the Scorpio it still has no exclusive games and is anchored by the Xbone, LOL if you actually think people are going to switch. I'm gonna quote and laugh at you next year when the Scorpio still doesn't change the trajectory of this gen. Do you really think the over 50 million and probably 70 million PS4 owners by the time the Scorpio launches are really going to throw away their consoles and buy a Scorpio next year? You are a totally delusional lem. You and your minuscule circle of friends do not represent the whole gaming population of millions of gamers. I don't give a crap about what you or them say because it's entirely anecdotal evidence. Reality is that most gamers will continue to game on OG PS4 and Xbone for the majority of the gen whether you admit it or not.

I was very much alive when the n64 released, I even had an atari 2600 in the eigthies and unlike you I know what I'm talking about. The n64 wasn't the strongest system, it was handicapped by its data carrier. Games like final fantasy were not released on the n64 because they could not fit a cartridge.

Power has always been a major factor throughout the console wars and today that hasn't been changed. The sales of the ps4 won't matter for the scorpio, it's from another generation. The x360 sales didn't matter this gen either.

I'm not saying people are going to buy the scorpio at release, but your cow dreams will be shattered quite soon, or it is of course that sony releases a ps5

Avatar image for xdude85
xdude85

6559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72  Edited By xdude85
Member since 2006 • 6559 Posts

PS4 Pro graphics don't mean jack if you don't own a 4K T.V., and even if you do have one, it can't even fully output true 4K resolution.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73  Edited By Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12622 Posts

@PAL360: Huh what? Most shooters target 60fps but fall short of it by a good bit. DOOM, BF1 are the most recent examples. There really aren't that many fighting games out there. So really it's probably closer to a quarter running at 60fps than half. Forza Horizon 3 and Drive Club run at 30fps too.

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51605 Posts

@commander: You're wrong, ps1 was not stronger than 64.

Last time the strongest console won was what, snes? Hell, was that even the strongest then?

Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#75 jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

Don't know. How much better does a game look on a PS4 Pro compared to a regular PS4?

Avatar image for quadknight
QuadKnight

12916

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76  Edited By QuadKnight
Member since 2015 • 12916 Posts

@commander said:
@quadknight said:

@commander: You're talking out of you ass again. The PS1 wasn't the most powerful console of its gen, that distinction belonged to the N64. Were you even alive then? ? Jesus Christ, kids these days. Nobody is going to switch to the Scorpio it still has no exclusive games and is anchored by the Xbone, LOL if you actually think people are going to switch. I'm gonna quote and laugh at you next year when the Scorpio still doesn't change the trajectory of this gen. Do you really think the over 50 million and probably 70 million PS4 owners by the time the Scorpio launches are really going to throw away their consoles and buy a Scorpio next year? You are a totally delusional lem. You and your minuscule circle of friends do not represent the whole gaming population of millions of gamers. I don't give a crap about what you or them say because it's entirely anecdotal evidence. Reality is that most gamers will continue to game on OG PS4 and Xbone for the majority of the gen whether you admit it or not.

I was very much alive when the n64 released, I even had an atari 2600 in the eigthies and unlike you I know what I'm talking about. The n64 wasn't the strongest system, it was handicapped by its data carrier. Games like final fantasy were not released on the n64 because they could not fit a cartridge.

Power has always been a major factor throughout the console wars and today that hasn't been changed. The sales of the ps4 won't matter for the scorpio, it's from another generation. The x360 sales didn't matter this gen either.

I'm not saying people are going to buy the scorpio at release, but your cow dreams will be shattered quite soon, or it is of course that sony releases a ps5

This is pure bollocks. Being handicapped by the fact it used cartridges still doesn't make it weaker than PS1. It was still stronger than the PS1, get your facts straight. The reason the N64 lost was because cartridges were more expensive to produce than CDs, not because of power. Cartridges cost more to produce. It only cost a few cents for game manufacturers to put those games on discs as opposed to putting them on cartridges which was way more expensive. 3rd party companies didn't feel it was worthwhile to pay more money to release their games on N64. In the end, those big third party companies like EA, Square Enix, etc. released their games on PS1 because it was cheaper to do so. Gamers followed the third party companies and bought the console with the big AAA 3rd party games they wanted to play. The N64 was still the most powerful console of the gen it came out.

Power means absolutely nothing when it comes to console sales. In the end, it always boils down to the games that people want to play and the price of the console. Also you're completely delusional if you really think the PS4 and Scorpio are a gen apart, LMAO! What a crock of shit lol. The Scorpio is nothing but a souped up Xbone that will still share the same library as the regular Xbone and won't get its own exclusive games. It is still going to be tied down to this gen and the Xbone platform. The PS4 will continue to destroy the Scorpio in sales even after it releases next year.

Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#77  Edited By commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts

@quadknight said:
@commander said:
@quadknight said:

@commander: You're talking out of you ass again. The PS1 wasn't the most powerful console of its gen, that distinction belonged to the N64. Were you even alive then? ? Jesus Christ, kids these days. Nobody is going to switch to the Scorpio it still has no exclusive games and is anchored by the Xbone, LOL if you actually think people are going to switch. I'm gonna quote and laugh at you next year when the Scorpio still doesn't change the trajectory of this gen. Do you really think the over 50 million and probably 70 million PS4 owners by the time the Scorpio launches are really going to throw away their consoles and buy a Scorpio next year? You are a totally delusional lem. You and your minuscule circle of friends do not represent the whole gaming population of millions of gamers. I don't give a crap about what you or them say because it's entirely anecdotal evidence. Reality is that most gamers will continue to game on OG PS4 and Xbone for the majority of the gen whether you admit it or not.

I was very much alive when the n64 released, I even had an atari 2600 in the eigthies and unlike you I know what I'm talking about. The n64 wasn't the strongest system, it was handicapped by its data carrier. Games like final fantasy were not released on the n64 because they could not fit a cartridge.

Power has always been a major factor throughout the console wars and today that hasn't been changed. The sales of the ps4 won't matter for the scorpio, it's from another generation. The x360 sales didn't matter this gen either.

I'm not saying people are going to buy the scorpio at release, but your cow dreams will be shattered quite soon, or it is of course that sony releases a ps5

This is pure bollocks. Being handicapped by the fact it used cartridges still doesn't make it weaker than PS1. It was still stronger than the PS1, get your facts straight. The reason the N64 lost was because cartridges were more expensive to produce than CDs, not because of power. Cartridges cost more to produce. It only cost a few cents for game manufacturers to put those games on discs as opposed to putting them on cartridges which was way more expensive. 3rd party companies didn't feel it was worthwhile to pay more money to release their games on N64. In the end, those big third party companies like EA, Square Enix, etc. released their games on PS1 because it was cheaper to do so. Gamers followed the third party companies and bought the console with the big AAA 3rd party games they wanted to play. The N64 was still the most powerful console of the gen it came out.

Power means absolutely nothing when it comes to console sales. In the end, it always boils down to the games that people want to play and the price of the console. Also you're completely delusional if you really think the PS4 and Scorpio are a gen apart, LMAO! What a crock of shit lol. The Scorpio is nothing but a souped up Xbone that will still share the same library as the regular Xbone and won't get its own exclusive games. It is still going to be tied down to this gen and the Xbone platform. The PS4 will continue to destroy the Scorpio in sales even after it releases next year.

Yeah sure it's bollocks just because you don't understand how this works. If you don't have enough storage capacity to hold the textures, it doesn't matter how much stronger your gpu and cpu is.

The n64 didn't lose because of the higher cost of cartridges, they lost because their platform couldn't run certain games, because the cartrigdes didn't have enough storage capacity. Of course the higher manufacturing cost of the cartridges didn't help them but it wasn't the main reason.

Square enix didn't release games on the n64 because it needed the capacity of the cd to hold their data,. if those cartridges could hold a lot more data, so major devs could release the same titles on a cartridges they would have done so. What they didn't want , was to nerf the game so it could run on the n64, the changes were too big for that. Final fantasy was three discs, that's 2 gigs of data, a cartridge could only hold 64mb. It was a factor however for smaller third party devs but in the end it was the storage capacity that made nintendo lose that gen.

If power didn't matter, the whole graphics card industry would cease to exist. The scorpio will be more than 4 times the power of the ps4. It's more than a souped up xboxone and it will start a new generation. Dream on if you think people will keep on buying a crappy ps4 when they can have something like the scorpio, that is of course if the scorpio's price isn't too steep.

Avatar image for sayyy-gaa
sayyy-gaa

5850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 sayyy-gaa
Member since 2002 • 5850 Posts

@sovkhan said:

Outside of SW, it's more than enough for the average gamer!!!

Avatar image for quadknight
QuadKnight

12916

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79  Edited By QuadKnight
Member since 2015 • 12916 Posts

@commander said:
@quadknight said:
@commander said:
@quadknight said:

@commander: You're talking out of you ass again. The PS1 wasn't the most powerful console of its gen, that distinction belonged to the N64. Were you even alive then? ? Jesus Christ, kids these days. Nobody is going to switch to the Scorpio it still has no exclusive games and is anchored by the Xbone, LOL if you actually think people are going to switch. I'm gonna quote and laugh at you next year when the Scorpio still doesn't change the trajectory of this gen. Do you really think the over 50 million and probably 70 million PS4 owners by the time the Scorpio launches are really going to throw away their consoles and buy a Scorpio next year? You are a totally delusional lem. You and your minuscule circle of friends do not represent the whole gaming population of millions of gamers. I don't give a crap about what you or them say because it's entirely anecdotal evidence. Reality is that most gamers will continue to game on OG PS4 and Xbone for the majority of the gen whether you admit it or not.

I was very much alive when the n64 released, I even had an atari 2600 in the eigthies and unlike you I know what I'm talking about. The n64 wasn't the strongest system, it was handicapped by its data carrier. Games like final fantasy were not released on the n64 because they could not fit a cartridge.

Power has always been a major factor throughout the console wars and today that hasn't been changed. The sales of the ps4 won't matter for the scorpio, it's from another generation. The x360 sales didn't matter this gen either.

I'm not saying people are going to buy the scorpio at release, but your cow dreams will be shattered quite soon, or it is of course that sony releases a ps5

This is pure bollocks. Being handicapped by the fact it used cartridges still doesn't make it weaker than PS1. It was still stronger than the PS1, get your facts straight. The reason the N64 lost was because cartridges were more expensive to produce than CDs, not because of power. Cartridges cost more to produce. It only cost a few cents for game manufacturers to put those games on discs as opposed to putting them on cartridges which was way more expensive. 3rd party companies didn't feel it was worthwhile to pay more money to release their games on N64. In the end, those big third party companies like EA, Square Enix, etc. released their games on PS1 because it was cheaper to do so. Gamers followed the third party companies and bought the console with the big AAA 3rd party games they wanted to play. The N64 was still the most powerful console of the gen it came out.

Power means absolutely nothing when it comes to console sales. In the end, it always boils down to the games that people want to play and the price of the console. Also you're completely delusional if you really think the PS4 and Scorpio are a gen apart, LMAO! What a crock of shit lol. The Scorpio is nothing but a souped up Xbone that will still share the same library as the regular Xbone and won't get its own exclusive games. It is still going to be tied down to this gen and the Xbone platform. The PS4 will continue to destroy the Scorpio in sales even after it releases next year.

Yeah sure it's bollocks just because you don't understand how this works. If you don't have enough storage capacity to hold the textures, it doesn't matter how much stronger your gpu and cpu is.

The n64 didn't lose because of the higher cost of cartridges, they lost because their platform couldn't run certain games, because the cartrigdes didn't have enough storage capacity. Of course the higher manufacturing cost of the cartridges didn't help them but it wasn't the main reason.

Square enix didn't release games on the n64 because it needed the capacity of the cd to hold their data,. if those cartridges could hold a lot more data, so major devs could release the same titles on a cartridges they would have done so. What they didn't want , was to nerf the game so it could run on the n64, the changes were too big for that. Final fantasy was three discs, that's 2 gigs of data, a cartridge could only hold 64mb. It was a factor however for smaller third party devs but in the end it was the storage capacity that made nintendo lose that gen.

If power didn't matter, the whole graphics card industry would cease to exist. The scorpio will be more than 4 times the power of the ps4. It's more than a souped up xboxone and it will start a new generation. Dream on if you think people will keep on buying a crappy ps4 when they can have something like the scorpio, that is of course if the scorpio's price isn't too steep.

LMAO, what textures? PS1 and N64 era textures took so little space. You really have no idea what you're talking about.

You do realize there was compression right? Games like Perfect Dark, Mario 64, Star fox, etc. looked better than PS1 games and they still fit into cartridges thanks to compression. Square Enix was needed the capacity to store extremely long FMV sequences but they were the exception back in those days. The reality is that most games didn't need long high quality FMV movies like FF games did. The main reason Nintendo lost wasn't power it was simple economics. Compression took extra time and money to do, and in the end devs felt it wasn't worth the effort. N64 was still a more powerful machine than the PS1, destroying your argument that power had anything to do with PS1's success.

Scorpio is still a souped up Xbone regardless of what you say. It's still woefully underpowered next to the latest high end PCs. Until they can provide greater than GTX 1070-1080 level of performance it's not remotely next gen power wise. By the way learn2math...

1.84 X 4 =/= 6TF

The Xbone isn't 4 times more powerful than PS4 it's approximately 3 times as fast as the PS4. Get your facts straight.

Avatar image for howmakewood
Howmakewood

7838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#80 Howmakewood
Member since 2015 • 7838 Posts

Graphics are fine, just wish performance was bigger prio, but sadly that doesn't sell. I take 60fps 1440p over 30fps 4K on most games any day

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#81  Edited By PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

@EG101 said:
@PAL360 said:

@EG101: 'That's why so many games run less than 30FPS and less than 1080P.'

That's an internet myth. Didn't you notice that half this gen's console library runs at 60fps? Most shooters, racers, sport games, fighting games, multiplayer games, and of course indies do run or aim at 60fps. Last gen it was about CoD, RAGE and just a few other exceptions, and most 30fps games used to dip to mid low 20s. Same dor resolution. Other than a few 900p exceptions, 1080p did become standard.

As for the hardware, i don't think PS4 and X1 are super powerful, but they are easily one generation ahead in terms of results. Games like DOOM, Battlefield 1, SW Battlefront, The Witcher 3, Batman AK, Uncharted 4, FFVX, The Division, Ratchet and Clank, etc make anything on PS3 and 360 looks ridiculously dated!

If you can not see a generation jump from last to current gen, you should google diminishing returns, man!

Yea and Assassin's Creed Unity never happened. While we're at it Witcher3, 800P OO1860, 900P Ryse of under 30fps, 720P TitanFall, 720P TitanFall2, 720P Star Wars, 720P Battle Field, 30FPS on rails Drive Club, ton of games with low Anistropic Filtering, etc, etc. <<<This ^^^ never happened it's just internet myth......................

Two points:

1. I can only speak for the PS4 (only console i own this gen), where most games do run at native 1080p and many at 60fps

2. Nice try naming 6 or 7 games from a library of almost 1 thousand.

Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#82  Edited By commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts

@quadknight said:
@commander said:
@quadknight said:

This is pure bollocks. Being handicapped by the fact it used cartridges still doesn't make it weaker than PS1. It was still stronger than the PS1, get your facts straight. The reason the N64 lost was because cartridges were more expensive to produce than CDs, not because of power. Cartridges cost more to produce. It only cost a few cents for game manufacturers to put those games on discs as opposed to putting them on cartridges which was way more expensive. 3rd party companies didn't feel it was worthwhile to pay more money to release their games on N64. In the end, those big third party companies like EA, Square Enix, etc. released their games on PS1 because it was cheaper to do so. Gamers followed the third party companies and bought the console with the big AAA 3rd party games they wanted to play. The N64 was still the most powerful console of the gen it came out.

Power means absolutely nothing when it comes to console sales. In the end, it always boils down to the games that people want to play and the price of the console. Also you're completely delusional if you really think the PS4 and Scorpio are a gen apart, LMAO! What a crock of shit lol. The Scorpio is nothing but a souped up Xbone that will still share the same library as the regular Xbone and won't get its own exclusive games. It is still going to be tied down to this gen and the Xbone platform. The PS4 will continue to destroy the Scorpio in sales even after it releases next year.

Yeah sure it's bollocks just because you don't understand how this works. If you don't have enough storage capacity to hold the textures, it doesn't matter how much stronger your gpu and cpu is.

The n64 didn't lose because of the higher cost of cartridges, they lost because their platform couldn't run certain games, because the cartrigdes didn't have enough storage capacity. Of course the higher manufacturing cost of the cartridges didn't help them but it wasn't the main reason.

Square enix didn't release games on the n64 because it needed the capacity of the cd to hold their data,. if those cartridges could hold a lot more data, so major devs could release the same titles on a cartridges they would have done so. What they didn't want , was to nerf the game so it could run on the n64, the changes were too big for that. Final fantasy was three discs, that's 2 gigs of data, a cartridge could only hold 64mb. It was a factor however for smaller third party devs but in the end it was the storage capacity that made nintendo lose that gen.

If power didn't matter, the whole graphics card industry would cease to exist. The scorpio will be more than 4 times the power of the ps4. It's more than a souped up xboxone and it will start a new generation. Dream on if you think people will keep on buying a crappy ps4 when they can have something like the scorpio, that is of course if the scorpio's price isn't too steep.

LMAO, what textures? PS1 and N64 era textures took so little space. You really have no idea what you're talking about.

You do realize there was compression right? Games like Perfect Dark, Mario 64, Star fox, etc. looked better than PS1 games and they still fit into cartridges thanks to compression. Square Enix was needed the capacity to store extremely long FMV sequences but they were the exception back in those days. The reality is that most games didn't need long high quality FMV movies like FF games did. The main reason Nintendo lost wasn't power it was simple economics. Compression took extra time and money to do, and in the end devs felt it wasn't worth the effort. N64 was still a more powerful machine than the PS1, destroying your argument that power had anything to do with PS1's success.

Scorpio is still a souped up Xbone regardless of what you say. It's still woefully underpowered next to the latest high end PCs. Until they can provide greater than GTX 1070-1080 level of performance it's not remotely next gen power wise. By the way learn2math...

1.84 X 4 =/= 6TF

The Xbone isn't 4 times more powerful than PS4 it's approximately 3 times as fast as the PS4. Get your facts straight.

lol this wasn't the sega cd era. This was the beginning of the 3d era and storage was used for a lot more than fmv's. That 64 mb cartridge on the n64 even with the added time for compression had nerfed backgrounds, lower texture quality, lower quality music. Not to mention if devs spend so much time optimizing the game for the playstation it would have increased quality too.

Overall the playstation was seen as the better system and it's also the reason why it was so successfull.

How can the scorpio be a souped up xboxone if it has 5 times the power, that's not an upgrade, that's another system and it does compete with high end pc's. The gtx 1070 is 6.45 tflops performance. It may not be top end like the gtx 1080 but that's 600$ card, Ms wants to keep the system affordable too.

A console is more than the gpu's tflops as well, with the added performance of the cpu it will certainly be more than 4 times as strong as the ps4, especially because the cpu on the ps4 is a bottleneck.

Avatar image for deactivated-63d2876fd4204
deactivated-63d2876fd4204

9129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 deactivated-63d2876fd4204
Member since 2016 • 9129 Posts

This thread sure is entertaining. It's like reading the comment section of a Yahoo political article. Most of you have no idea what you're talking about. Basic concepts like what defines a generation continues to elude some folks. And this place is pure comedy in regards to tech talk. Just stop...

1 The Xbox Scorpio is an extension of the Xbox One family until Microsoft comes out and says otherwise. That means there is not a new generation starting with its release.

2 The PS4 Pro does offer enhancements to folks using 1080p TVs. Just read the patch notes to any of the supported titles for details.

3 Games running worse on the PS4 Pro is the fault of the developers and not the hardware. Sure there is a CPU and RAM bottleneck, but there is no technical reason for games to not run as well or better at the same resolution with added graphical effects. Or even at a supersampled resolution with comparable settings.

Avatar image for pyro1245
pyro1245

9525

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#84 pyro1245
Member since 2003 • 9525 Posts

Lol console graphics - you'll get what they give you.

Avatar image for ermacness
ermacness

10956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85  Edited By ermacness
Member since 2005 • 10956 Posts

@Commiesdie:

Look? Very few, and that's because of the developer. However there are games that runs a bit rougher on the pro.

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#86  Edited By PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

@Juub1990 said:

@PAL360: Huh what? Most shooters target 60fps but fall short of it by a good bit. DOOM, BF1 are the most recent examples. There really aren't that many fighting games out there. So really it's probably closer to a quarter running at 60fps than half. Forza Horizon 3 and Drive Club run at 30fps too.

Of course there are exceptions (The Division, Destiny, etc), but most current gen shooters do run at pretty stable 60fps. I'm currently playing DOOM and i'm pretty sure it runs always above 55fps, same for SW Battlefront, CoD games, Overwatch, Killing Floor 2, Titanfall 2, etc. Battlefield 1 does have huge dips in 64 player modes, but it's one of the most demanding games games you will find.

As for racers, you named 2 games out of dozens available. How about Forza 5, 6, Project Cars, Dirt Rally, Trackmania, Asseto Corsa, F1 2016, etc?

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12622 Posts

@PAL360: Project Cars runs nowhere near 60fps.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tb4JIBaGBWU

Look up from rate analysis. Most games that target 60fps are not even close to it. Games running at a steady 60fps aren't all that common and that includes shooter.

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#88 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

@Juub1990 said:

@PAL360: Project Cars runs nowhere near 60fps.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tb4JIBaGBWU

Look up from rate analysis. Most games that target 60fps are not even close to it. Games running at a steady 60fps aren't all that common and that includes shooter.

Project Cars is the one with worse performance out from those, yes, but i think you missed the point of our conversation.

People love to say that this generation games perform terribly, but while far from perfect, we have never seen a generation with this much focus on performance.

Many games run at 60fps and many other ones aim at that framerate but stay between 40s and 50s. In previous gens games used to run at mid 20s and no one complained about it. The all mighty Shadow of the Colossus runs at 20fps, Far Cry 3, a game everyone loved last gen, runs at an average of 25fps with tearing everywhere, etc...

I don't think people realise how good is the gaming era we are living in.

Avatar image for Commiesdie
Commiesdie

372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 Commiesdie
Member since 2006 • 372 Posts

@ermacness: u guys where doing the same thing last gen with the ps3 instead blaming limitation on developers instead of shot hardware in general so sorry it is not going.to fly

Avatar image for ermacness
ermacness

10956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 ermacness
Member since 2005 • 10956 Posts

@Commiesdie:

While the hardware was very complicated to work with, for obvious reasons (exclusives) it wasn't all on the hardware. To me, the blame was 50/50.

Avatar image for Commiesdie
Commiesdie

372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91  Edited By Commiesdie
Member since 2006 • 372 Posts

@ermacness:

Ps3 was not complicated just shit if the ps3 was more powerful then 360 at the time how come 90% of multiplats looked better on 360 now this gen I will admit the ps4 is more powerful but not by much

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#92 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts

@PAL360 said:
@Juub1990 said:
In previous gens games used to run at mid 20s and no one complained about it.

Wrong, not sure where you were hiding at, but plenty of people complained when games felt choppy.

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#93  Edited By PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

@04dcarraher: Honestly i don't remember this level of hate and negativism over performance! Which is stupid since, again, we have never had as much 60fps (or close) console games as we have now.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12622 Posts

@PAL360 said:

@04dcarraher: Honestly i don't remember this level of hate and negativism over performance! Which is stupid since, again, we have never had as much 60fps (or close) console games as we have now.

Well the latest talks have been all about resolution and performance. Don't know what happened but this gen has seen a lot of discussions about 1080p vs 900p 30fps vs 60fps. Locked rame rate vs unlocked frame rate etc.

Avatar image for vaidream45
Vaidream45

2116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 Vaidream45
Member since 2016 • 2116 Posts

The level of graphical detail is as good as it gets for now. The ps4 pro games only getting 30fps is the problem for me and why i stick with my pc.

Avatar image for ermacness
ermacness

10956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 ermacness
Member since 2005 • 10956 Posts

@Commiesdie:

Because the 360 was EASIER to code for!!!! Everyone knew this last gen, even the lems. An example of a console being more powerful was shown in the gen 7 era (ps2 vs xbox) and is shown this gen (ps4 vs x1) where the most powerful console had BOTH superior multiplats and exclusives visually and technically. The 360 didn't have that. While it definitely had the multiplat edge, it sure didn't have the exclusive edge to make claim that the 360 was more powerful last gen, and while the 360 did have most of the superior multiplats, there were some (quite a few actually) that shined on the ps3, in fact the ps3 had more superior multiplats against the 360 then ps2 had against the Xbox or the x1 currently have against the ps4.

Avatar image for PinchySkree
PinchySkree

1342

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#97  Edited By PinchySkree
Member since 2012 • 1342 Posts

@Telekill said:

@PinchySkree: I'm not a graphics whore so...

I'm also looking forward to Double Dragon IV that will basically have NES-Genesis graphics on PS4. And I'll have fun with it.

Fun... you know... the entire reason to game?...

Except I specifically mentioned control because wading through 15-30 object pop in cludge is complete misery by comparison.

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#98 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

@vaidream45:

I agree with this. The Pro should be used to guarantee all games at 1080p60, not to push resolutions it barely handles downgrading everything else.

Avatar image for Commiesdie
Commiesdie

372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 Commiesdie
Member since 2006 • 372 Posts
@ermacness said:

@Commiesdie:

Because the 360 was EASIER to code for!!!! Everyone knew this last gen, even the lems. An example of a console being more powerful was shown in the gen 7 era (ps2 vs xbox) and is shown this gen (ps4 vs x1) where the most powerful console had BOTH superior multiplats and exclusives visually and technically. The 360 didn't have that. While it definitely had the multiplat edge, it sure didn't have the exclusive edge to make claim that the 360 was more powerful last gen, and while the 360 did have most of the superior multiplats, there were some (quite a few actually) that shined on the ps3, in fact the ps3 had more superior multiplats against the 360 then ps2 had against e athe Xvbox or the x1 currently have against the ps4.

its not bcuz it is easy to code for it's simply 360 has a better gpu and didn't do some backass bs like excuses and don't use exclusive bs it doesn't matter if ps3 exclusives did look better which they don't it's u know exclusive there is no way of knowing of the 360 could handle it bcuz sony won't let it happen obviously

Avatar image for 2mrw
2mrw

6206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#100 2mrw
Member since 2008 • 6206 Posts

Games still look like PS4/X31 games ... Horizon is probably the only game that uses pro well