Are you happy or mad that Battlefield 3 is going multiplatform?

  • 164 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for mrmcygan
mrmcygan

882

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 mrmcygan
Member since 2010 • 882 Posts

getting it for PS3.

Avatar image for NielsNL
NielsNL

4346

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 NielsNL
Member since 2005 • 4346 Posts

Neutral. I don't care for online shooters (I know, it's shocking).

Avatar image for NoobisMaxcimus
NoobisMaxcimus

2893

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 NoobisMaxcimus
Member since 2007 • 2893 Posts

I thought it was pretty funny. What with the hermits going "oh noes, teh consoliization".

Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

I'm glad it is so I have a chance to play it. I does kind of suck for PC gamers if they get a gimped version of a series that started on PC

Avatar image for Led_poison
Led_poison

10146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Led_poison
Member since 2004 • 10146 Posts
I wonder how they are going to implement all of the controls that go with BF2 on the keyboard.
Avatar image for wolverine4262
wolverine4262

20832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 wolverine4262
Member since 2004 • 20832 Posts
I love BF... as long as it feels more like Battlefield and less like Bad Company, thats fine... BUT, it also means they need 64 players on consoles, otherwise its pointless.
Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

I'm fine with it

Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts
I wonder how they are going to implement all of the controls that go with BF2 on the keyboard. Led_poison
have you played bc2? they did a pretty good job...
Avatar image for SPYDER0416
SPYDER0416

16736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#9 SPYDER0416
Member since 2008 • 16736 Posts

Its pretty selfish to be sad that more people can enjoy a game than just you. GTA DLC going multiplatform made lems go crazy even though they also got to experience it... FIRST. Honestly, PC gamers being sad for a game series they love being able to be played by more people is just stupid.

Avatar image for CRUSHER88
CRUSHER88

2037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 3

#10 CRUSHER88
Member since 2003 • 2037 Posts
Never got the chance to play BF2 on PC but all I ever hear is that it was so much better then BC. With that said, I hope BF3 can still be a great game while going multiplat.
Avatar image for FIipMode
FIipMode

10850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#11 FIipMode
Member since 2009 • 10850 Posts
I was pretty amused by the reactions yes.
Avatar image for linkin_guy109
linkin_guy109

8864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#12 linkin_guy109
Member since 2005 • 8864 Posts

honestly who would expect it to stay exclusive in this day and age? very few games stay exclusive, and the ones that do almost always have contracts keeping them exclusive

Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#13 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts

Its pretty selfish to be sad that more people can enjoy a game than just you. GTA DLC going multiplatform made lems go crazy even though they also got to experience it... FIRST. Honestly, PC gamers being sad for a game series they love being able to be played by more people is just stupid.

SPYDER0416
hermits are more upset about the game now being catered to console owners.
Avatar image for Snagal123
Snagal123

3524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Snagal123
Member since 2006 • 3524 Posts

Really depends if the PC version has to suffer because of it.

If its a 64player Battlefield like we all know and love its fine.

Avatar image for tagyhag
tagyhag

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 tagyhag
Member since 2007 • 15874 Posts
Happy that other people get to play more Battlefield, sad if the game gets downgraded as a result.
Avatar image for bign494
bign494

513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 bign494
Member since 2005 • 513 Posts

Its pretty selfish to be sad that more people can enjoy a game than just you. GTA DLC going multiplatform made lems go crazy even though they also got to experience it... FIRST. Honestly, PC gamers being sad for a game series they love being able to be played by more people is just stupid.

SPYDER0416
its pretty selfish to want fans have to play a dumbed down sequel to their favorite game. besides the fact that it will sell more, there is no benefit to it going muliplatform
Avatar image for Rockman999
Rockman999

7507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Rockman999
Member since 2005 • 7507 Posts
A bit sad cause even though it means I can play the game without shelling out $1000-1500 for a new rig, games end up being better if the dev only focuses on one system instead of dividing resources amongst multiple systems.
Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#18 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts
If PC suffers due to it I will be highly upset, I do not want another BC2. Which I know it will. It will be just anothe BC type BF game.... which is no BF to begin with.
Avatar image for 2Chalupas
2Chalupas

7286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#19 2Chalupas
Member since 2009 • 7286 Posts
Well since I"m not sure when (or if) I'll ever invest into getting a suitable gaming PC again, I'm quite happy to have the option of getting this on my PS3.
Avatar image for godzillavskong
godzillavskong

7904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#20 godzillavskong
Member since 2007 • 7904 Posts

Happy. I've never been a PC gamer,and I couldn't play it on my PC even if I wanted to. Great franchises like this should be multiplayer, especially since they aren't from a first party company, so even if you only own on of the consoles, or a PC, you still get to experience a great title.

Avatar image for InsaneBasura
InsaneBasura

12591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#21 InsaneBasura
Member since 2005 • 12591 Posts

Depends on how the development is structured. But I'm not psyched about the potential implications.

Avatar image for Silenthps
Silenthps

7302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#23 Silenthps
Member since 2006 • 7302 Posts

Its pretty selfish to be sad that more people can enjoy a game than just you. GTA DLC going multiplatform made lems go crazy even though they also got to experience it... FIRST. Honestly, PC gamers being sad for a game series they love being able to be played by more people is just stupid.

SPYDER0416
I don't think people are sad due to the fact that more people can enjoy the game and GTA DLC is a completely different situation. The situation here is that the game will be dumbed down to not take full advantage of the PC.
Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#24 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts
Very happy. But I still want a gaming rig.
Avatar image for Pdiddy105
Pdiddy105

4577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Pdiddy105
Member since 2007 • 4577 Posts

mad, because now its going to have tiny linear maps and a smaller player count.

Avatar image for djsifer01
djsifer01

7238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 djsifer01
Member since 2005 • 7238 Posts
Happy, im getting it for PS3. Why would any developer make a exclusive for PC?Games sell way better on consoles.
Avatar image for tagyhag
tagyhag

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 tagyhag
Member since 2007 • 15874 Posts
Happy, im getting it for PS3. Why would any developer make a exclusive for PC?Games sell way better on consoles.djsifer01
Simple, so they wouldn't be restricted by the limitation of 5 year old hardware.
Avatar image for Diviniuz
Diviniuz

6460

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 0

#28 Diviniuz
Member since 2009 • 6460 Posts
Annoyed because I wanted focus to be on a single platform, but I can understand if they wanted to make more money, so I am just annoyed by it
Avatar image for Karnage108
Karnage108

2595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 Karnage108
Member since 2010 • 2595 Posts
I don't know if I'll even get it, but I can understand why it should be PC only. How will it live up to the last two now?
Avatar image for successful19
successful19

307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 successful19
Member since 2009 • 307 Posts

happy, could care less about pc...

Avatar image for djsifer01
djsifer01

7238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 djsifer01
Member since 2005 • 7238 Posts
[QUOTE="djsifer01"]Happy, im getting it for PS3. Why would any developer make a exclusive for PC?Games sell way better on consoles.tagyhag
Simple, so they wouldn't be restricted by the limitation of 5 year old hardware.

Its a business to make money. I highly doubt developers sit around and say, man i dont want to be restricted by old hardware, who cares if we sell 5 million less copies.
Avatar image for AAllxxjjnn
AAllxxjjnn

19992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 AAllxxjjnn
Member since 2008 • 19992 Posts
It's guaranteed not going to be an evolution of BF2/2142 unless they're making two separate games, one for consoles and one for PC. So, no, not happy.
Avatar image for tagyhag
tagyhag

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 tagyhag
Member since 2007 • 15874 Posts

[QUOTE="tagyhag"][QUOTE="djsifer01"]Happy, im getting it for PS3. Why would any developer make a exclusive for PC?Games sell way better on consoles.djsifer01
Simple, so they wouldn't be restricted by the limitation of 5 year old hardware.

Its a business to make money. I highly doubt developers sit around and say, man i dont want to be restricted by old hardware, who cares if we sell 5 million less copies.

Sure they're a business, but some developers put their hearts out into a game and want it to be nothing but the best. :)

Don't know where you're getting that 5 million copies idea though. :(

Avatar image for Zero5000X
Zero5000X

8314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Zero5000X
Member since 2004 • 8314 Posts
I've never played one of these games so I have no opinion. I don't know whether or not console versions will have a significant affect on the quality.
Avatar image for cloudff7tm
cloudff7tm

3975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 cloudff7tm
Member since 2006 • 3975 Posts

Don't really care, but the reactions were pretty funny.

Avatar image for djsifer01
djsifer01

7238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 djsifer01
Member since 2005 • 7238 Posts

[QUOTE="djsifer01"][QUOTE="tagyhag"] Simple, so they wouldn't be restricted by the limitation of 5 year old hardware.tagyhag

Its a business to make money. I highly doubt developers sit around and say, man i dont want to be restricted by old hardware, who cares if we sell 5 million less copies.

Sure they're a business, but some developers put their hearts out into a game and want it to be nothing but the best. :)

Don't know where you're getting that 5 million copies idea though. :(

Just a random number i used to make my point. I agree with you, i just wish all developers thought that way.
Avatar image for Raymundo_Manuel
Raymundo_Manuel

4641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Raymundo_Manuel
Member since 2010 • 4641 Posts

Depends.


If the experience gets dumbed down then I'll be sad. I'd hate to see essentially Bad Company 3 instead of a true Battlefield 2 successor.


But perhaps DICE will give the console owners that experience, and give PC owners the 64 player battles with aerial combat, and xbox huge maps complete with mod support.


I'm a little disappointed at you console owners amused by the reactions of PC fans. You just remain ignorant to what it means to be a PC gamer as always. I imagine you guys would also be disappointed if a future big budget game lacked Xbox Live integration, or achievements, or leaderboards, or something.

But of course let's just remain in the dark. It's funny if PC gamers get screwed out of features that define the platform... You guys give console gamers a bad name.

Avatar image for coola426
coola426

405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 coola426
Member since 2009 • 405 Posts

HAPPY! you know some people need to know how to SHARE.

Avatar image for GojiMaster
GojiMaster

451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 GojiMaster
Member since 2009 • 451 Posts

What era is BF3 going to be set in? Is it going to stay in WW2 era? If it stays as a modern combat game how will it be any different from Bad Company 2 and Medal of Honor?

I am excited about it coming out for consoles because I don't have a PC that can runs games. Hower, I hope BF3 isn't another clone of Bad Company 2.

Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#41 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

Not very happy but not very sad either. The thing is if they somehow not comprise it would be ok, but if they do then :s. If people realise the game is not better than BF2 they will simply lose tons of sales.

Avatar image for Raymundo_Manuel
Raymundo_Manuel

4641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Raymundo_Manuel
Member since 2010 • 4641 Posts

Not very happy but not very sad either. The thing is if they somehow not comprise it would be ok, but if they do then :s. If people realise the game is not better than BF2 they will simply lose tons of sales.

Espada12

And then blame piracy.

That's how it works, right? A game known for it's multiplayer that gets low sales will have the blame pushed upon piracy. Yah, I'm looking at Epic...

Avatar image for UnknownSniper65
UnknownSniper65

9238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 UnknownSniper65
Member since 2004 • 9238 Posts

After being incredibly disappointed in BF:BC2 I have no interest in buying a battlefield game directed at a console audience.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#44 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

Most are mad, but I don't care if it's good, if it's bad, oh well.

Will get it on PC though.

Avatar image for DarkGamer007
DarkGamer007

6033

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 DarkGamer007
Member since 2008 • 6033 Posts

I will be happy if DICE can manage to get a full Battlefield experience (prone, jets, 32 or even 64 players) and large maps on consoles.

My hope for Battlefield 3 is that is every Battlefield ever and then some. I want to be riding a horse while gunning down people with an M60 on Omaha beach while a helicopter flys over with people using World War I firearms shooting at me. That would be awesome (if it was balanced right).

Avatar image for somuchwonder
somuchwonder

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 somuchwonder
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
happy. i don't game on pc so i'll be getting it for ps3.
Avatar image for walkingdream
walkingdream

4883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 walkingdream
Member since 2009 • 4883 Posts
Mad...
Avatar image for deactivated-66e3137ab3ad5
deactivated-66e3137ab3ad5

16761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#48 deactivated-66e3137ab3ad5
Member since 2006 • 16761 Posts
Happy! :D
Avatar image for NVIDIATI
NVIDIATI

8463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 NVIDIATI
Member since 2010 • 8463 Posts

If the sequel to the Battlefield game I know and love on PC is compromised and dumbed down to work on console tech, then yes I will be upset. Because I have no idea how consoles will support 64 players with massive maps, jets, etc. The best consoles could do was 24 players for BF:BC2 with small maps, and even then that pushed it. Anyways enough with the spin off Bad Company, BF3 is supposed to be able to out-do BF2 and adding destructable environments just doesn't cut it. I'm expecting a fair bit more than something that was released back in 2005.

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
Disappointed more than anything. It's good that they'll sell more and more people will get to play it but... Well I can't help but feel we'll be losing content on the PC that we would have gotten otherwise. It would be a huge shame if BF3 was inferior to BF2 and 2142. BFBC2 is good and all but...there is a lot of things it could have had to make it much better. 32 player is good and all but 64 player is pretty much something you got to have in a BF game to make it have that special epic feeling BF always had in the past, BFBC2 just doesn't have that in most cases. It's also lacking good conquest maps. In BF2 and 2142 there were maps where 1 side started with all but one or two flags and the attackers had to get those, Rush is nice and all but in Rush you can't sneak around the back and pincer attack them like you could back in the old BFs. I just really hope they keep BF3 feeling more like BF2142 than BFBC2. Honestly I would be cool at this point if they pretty much just remade BF2 with frostbite engine and better balance (ie, AA guns work to prevent Jets from being amazing and G36E nerfed)