Let's take a look at each argument and see what's wrong with it shall we?
Cows: PS3 has a better lineup than the 360.
The PS3 lineup is actually vastly inferior to the 360 lineup. This doesn't matter if you include or exclude multiplats, but seriously, a multiplat is a part of the lineup for the 360.
Cows: But I can play all the 360's games on the PC.
Wrong again. The 360 has 4 AAA exclusive games, while the PS3 has none. The 360 also has 11 AA exclusive games. Most of those AAe on the PS3, if not all, are flops. But once again, that doesn't matter. Cows basic argument is: We don't have games to play on our system, so we'll play on the other systems superior lineups. The argument is flawed in and of itself because cows must use 2 systems to beat 1.
Cows: The 360 is not the King of (J)RPGS. The PS2 and DS are.
To start, the PS2 did not have the selection of WRPGs that the 360 does, nor is it current-gen. And DS JRPGs and console JRPGs hardly play anything alike and should not be counted. But I guess that will never stop cows from hiding behind other platforms.
Cows: Microsoft buys all of their exclusives and support.
As if Sony fanboys can even talk about this. How do you think Sony got so much 3rd party support when they were entering the console market? Because they threw their money around. Not to mention the 360 has a simpler architecture to develop for which entices many devs.
Cows: The PS3 has superior graphics.
The 360 was released a year ahead of the PS3. The fact that anything on the PS3 can be done on the 360 is LAUGHABLE. When have you seen a console that was striving for power fail so miserably?
The one and only leg that the PS3 has left to stand on is that it's a bluray player, but now there are many cheaper bluray players.
Log in to comment