Arguments for the PS3 are few and flawed

[QUOTE="Il_Exile_lI"]TC, you are just as bad as cow grasping at nothing, you are a lemming grasping at nothing. There are clear pros and cons for each console and they each can offer a fun and entertaining experience. I for one hate this whole console wars stuff (yet I can't keep myself away from SW) why can't everyone just play the games they like on the system they like and not worry about what the preferences of others are.TreetarD93

becuase he is most likely 11-12 years old and his mommy won't buy him both consoles.

You're so clever.

[QUOTE="mephisto_11"]

mgs4

/thread

/360

/life

pakman3000

Not much of a game. Great movie though.

Both of you slap yourselfs...

Let's take a look at each argument and see what's wrong with it shall we?

Cows: PS3 has a better lineup than the 360.
No one ever said this, fact is that the general system wars public is under the impression the Ps3 has a brighter future with its lineup for late 2008 and 2009

Cows: But I can play all the 360's games on the PC. Wrong again. The 360 has 4 AAA exclusive games, while the PS3 has none. The 360 also has 11 AA exclusive games. Most of those AAe on the PS3, if not all, are flops. But once again, that doesn't matter. Cows basic argument is: We don't have games to play on our system, so we'll play on the other systems superior lineups. The argument is flawed in and of itself because cows must use 2 systems to beat 1.
/MGS4, thanks for the selfownage OP!
but it doesent stop there, 99% of the gamespot users have a PC so manyof us can play those "exclusives" without laying a finger on a 360

Cows: The 360 is not the King of (J)RPGS. The PS2 and DS are.

To start, the PS2 did not have the selection of WRPGs that the 360 does, nor is it current-gen. And DS JRPGs and console JRPGs hardly play anything alike and should not be counted. But I guess that will never stop cows from hiding behind other platforms.
Its a fact 360 has a superior RPG lineup than the PS3 but comparing it to what the PS2 library has to offer is shooting yourself in the foot. Maybe this comes to a shock to you but if you want to compare the 360 vs PS2 rpg's than the 360 comes off horribly bland to downright bad.

Cows: Microsoft buys all of their exclusives and support.

As if Sony fanboys can even talk about this. How do you think Sony got so much 3rd party support when they were entering the console market? Because they threw their money around. Not to mention the 360 has a simpler architecture to develop for which entices many devs.

Microsoft has already admitted dropping extra dough for extra content for the likes of GTA4 and whatnot PS3 relys mostly on in house devs to clear the road and set a example for the others to follow. Wich is also why sony consoles generally have a slow start than pick up momentum

Cows: The PS3 has superior graphics.

The 360 was released a year ahead of the PS3. The fact that anything on the PS3 can be done on the 360 is LAUGHABLE. When have you seen a console that was striving for power fail so miserably?
You do realise why microsoft is already rushing towards a succesor for the 360 while sony still sees a ton of life in this black box? 4 months ago multiplats would look better on the 360, now the ps3 looks equal/marginally better where do you think the balance will be 4 months from now? keep in mind you already admitted the devs had a 1 year headstart on getting familiar with the PS3

The one and only leg that the PS3 has left to stand on is that it's a bluray player, but now there are many cheaper bluray players.
And you are saying the built in bluray did not help on the PS3's release sales?

SSCyborg

[QUOTE="SSCyborg"]

Let's take a look at each argument and see what's wrong with it shall we?

Cows: PS3 has a better lineup than the 360.
No one ever said this, fact is that the general system wars public is under the impression the Ps3 has a brighter future with its lineup for late 2008 and 2009: a few people have in this topic alone

Cows: But I can play all the 360's games on the PC. Wrong again. The 360 has 4 AAA exclusive games, while the PS3 has none. The 360 also has 11 AA exclusive games. Most of those AAe on the PS3, if not all, are flops. But once again, that doesn't matter. Cows basic argument is: We don't have games to play on our system, so we'll play on the other systems superior lineups. The argument is flawed in and of itself because cows must use 2 systems to beat 1.
/MGS4, thanks for the selfownage OP!
but it doesent stop there, 99% of the gamespot users have a PC so manyof us can play those "exclusives" without laying a finger on a 360:99% of computers can't play those game, and if that was true cows wouldn't get so hyped about Bioshock, OB

Cows: The 360 is not the King of (J)RPGS. The PS2 and DS are.

To start, the PS2 did not have the selection of WRPGs that the 360 does, nor is it current-gen. And DS JRPGs and console JRPGs hardly play anything alike and should not be counted. But I guess that will never stop cows from hiding behind other platforms.
Its a fact 360 has a superior RPG lineup than the PS3 but comparing it to what the PS2 library has to offer is shooting yourself in the foot. Maybe this comes to a shock to you but if you want to compare the 360 vs PS2 rpg's than the 360 comes off horribly bland to downright bad.

Cows: Microsoft buys all of their exclusives and support.

As if Sony fanboys can even talk about this. How do you think Sony got so much 3rd party support when they were entering the console market? Because they threw their money around. Not to mention the 360 has a simpler architecture to develop for which entices many devs.

Microsoft has already admitted dropping extra dough for extra content for the likes of GTA4 and whatnot PS3 relys mostly on in house devs to clear the road and set a example for the others to follow. Wich is also why sony consoles generally have a slow start than pick up momentum

Cows: The PS3 has superior graphics.

The 360 was released a year ahead of the PS3. The fact that anything on the PS3 can be done on the 360 is LAUGHABLE. When have you seen a console that was striving for power fail so miserably?
You do realise why microsoft is already rushing towards a succesor for the 360 while sony still sees a ton of life in this black box? 4 months ago multiplats would look better on the 360, now the ps3 looks equal/marginally better where do you think the balance will be 4 months from now? keep in mind you already admitted the devs had a 1 year headstart on getting familiar with the PS3

The one and only leg that the PS3 has left to stand on is that it's a bluray player, but now there are many cheaper bluray players.
And you are saying the built in bluray did not help on the PS3's release sales?

hot114

dont throw rocks when you live in a glass house

[QUOTE="hot114"][QUOTE="SSCyborg"]

Let's take a look at each argument and see what's wrong with it shall we?

Cows: PS3 has a better lineup than the 360.
No one ever said this, fact is that the general system wars public is under the impression the Ps3 has a brighter future with its lineup for late 2008 and 2009: a few people have in this topic alone

Cows: But I can play all the 360's games on the PC. Wrong again. The 360 has 4 AAA exclusive games, while the PS3 has none. The 360 also has 11 AA exclusive games. Most of those AAe on the PS3, if not all, are flops. But once again, that doesn't matter. Cows basic argument is: We don't have games to play on our system, so we'll play on the other systems superior lineups. The argument is flawed in and of itself because cows must use 2 systems to beat 1.
/MGS4, thanks for the selfownage OP!
but it doesent stop there, 99% of the gamespot users have a PC so manyof us can play those "exclusives" without laying a finger on a 360:99% of computers can't play those game, and if that was true cows wouldn't get so hyped about Bioshock, OB

onewiththegame

[QUOTE="SSCyborg"]

Let's take a look at each argument and see what's wrong with it shall we?

Cows: PS3 has a better lineup than the 360.
No one ever said this, fact is that the general system wars public is under the impression the Ps3 has a brighter future with its lineup for late 2008 and 2009

Cows: But I can play all the 360's games on the PC. Wrong again. The 360 has 4 AAA exclusive games, while the PS3 has none. The 360 also has 11 AA exclusive games. Most of those AAe on the PS3, if not all, are flops. But once again, that doesn't matter. Cows basic argument is: We don't have games to play on our system, so we'll play on the other systems superior lineups. The argument is flawed in and of itself because cows must use 2 systems to beat 1.
/MGS4, thanks for the selfownage OP!
but it doesent stop there, 99% of the gamespot users have a PC so manyof us can play those "exclusives" without laying a finger on a 360

Cows: The 360 is not the King of (J)RPGS. The PS2 and DS are.

To start, the PS2 did not have the selection of WRPGs that the 360 does, nor is it current-gen. And DS JRPGs and console JRPGs hardly play anything alike and should not be counted. But I guess that will never stop cows from hiding behind other platforms.
Its a fact 360 has a superior RPG lineup than the PS3 but comparing it to what the PS2 library has to offer is shooting yourself in the foot. Maybe this comes to a shock to you but if you want to compare the 360 vs PS2 rpg's than the 360 comes off horribly bland to downright bad.

Cows: Microsoft buys all of their exclusives and support.

As if Sony fanboys can even talk about this. How do you think Sony got so much 3rd party support when they were entering the console market? Because they threw their money around. Not to mention the 360 has a simpler architecture to develop for which entices many devs.

Microsoft has already admitted dropping extra dough for extra content for the likes of GTA4 and whatnot PS3 relys mostly on in house devs to clear the road and set a example for the others to follow. Wich is also why sony consoles generally have a slow start than pick up momentum

Cows: The PS3 has superior graphics.

The 360 was released a year ahead of the PS3. The fact that anything on the PS3 can be done on the 360 is LAUGHABLE. When have you seen a console that was striving for power fail so miserably?
You do realise why microsoft is already rushing towards a succesor for the 360 while sony still sees a ton of life in this black box? 4 months ago multiplats would look better on the 360, now the ps3 looks equal/marginally better where do you think the balance will be 4 months from now? keep in mind you already admitted the devs had a 1 year headstart on getting familiar with the PS3

The one and only leg that the PS3 has left to stand on is that it's a bluray player, but now there are many cheaper bluray players.
And you are saying the built in bluray did not help on the PS3's release sales?

hot114

Again your argument is fundamentally flawed but it would waste too much of my time disecting and pointing it out to you.

But I did see you hide behind the PC again. Nice!;)

360>PS3

/thread

AAAAE

(Solid Snake saluting the 360's grave ;_; )

THE KING

HAS CHOSEN HIS THRONE

AAAAE

"It's good...isn't it?"

PLAYSTATION 3 EXCLUSIVE

AAAAE

-Skyfall

FF13 coming to Xbox 360

Xbox 360 win Console War

Let's take a look at each argument and see what's wrong with it shall we?

Cows: PS3 has a better lineup than the 360.

The PS3 lineup is actually vastly inferior to the 360 lineup. This doesn't matter if you include or exclude multiplats, but seriously, a multiplat is a part of the lineup for the 360.

Cows: But I can play all the 360's games on the PC.

Wrong again. The 360 has 4 AAA exclusive games, while the PS3 has none. The 360 also has 11 AA exclusive games. Most of those AAe on the PS3, if not all, are flops. But once again, that doesn't matter. Cows basic argument is: We don't have games to play on our system, so we'll play on the other systems superior lineups. The argument is flawed in and of itself because cows must use 2 systems to beat 1.

Cows: The 360 is not the King of (J)RPGS. The PS2 and DS are.

To start, the PS2 did not have the selection of WRPGs that the 360 does, nor is it current-gen. And DS JRPGs and console JRPGs hardly play anything alike and should not be counted. But I guess that will never stop cows from hiding behind other platforms.

Cows: Microsoft buys all of their exclusives and support.

As if Sony fanboys can even talk about this. How do you think Sony got so much 3rd party support when they were entering the console market? Because they threw their money around. Not to mention the 360 has a simpler architecture to develop for which entices many devs.

Cows: The PS3 has superior graphics.

The 360 was released a year ahead of the PS3. The fact that anything on the PS3 can be done on the 360 is LAUGHABLE. When have you seen a console that was striving for power fail so miserably?

The one and only leg that the PS3 has left to stand on is that it's a bluray player, but now there are many cheaper bluray players.

SSCyborg

You make me laugh so much becuase you only pick things to say good about the 360 and bad about the ps3. What about Blu-ray and having the only so far AAAA game on any console and being 1080p native and not just 720p native which the 360 is and only does a crappy 1080p upscale. what about the fact that the faluire rate is so much lower then the 360 what about that i dont have to pay for online play and also the only huge game still to come out on the 360 is gears of war after that there is nothing ps3 still has loads coming out how about that ps3 is built to last longer then the 360 and also the fact that games look just as good on each console and then they will carry on improving for the ps3 and slow down on the 360 there isnt a jump in diffrence straight from the start DUH

[QUOTE="SSCyborg"]

Let's take a look at each argument and see what's wrong with it shall we?

Cows: PS3 has a better lineup than the 360.

The PS3 lineup is actually vastly inferior to the 360 lineup. This doesn't matter if you include or exclude multiplats, but seriously, a multiplat is a part of the lineup for the 360.

Cows: But I can play all the 360's games on the PC.

Wrong again. The 360 has 4 AAA exclusive games, while the PS3 has none. The 360 also has 11 AA exclusive games. Most of those AAe on the PS3, if not all, are flops. But once again, that doesn't matter. Cows basic argument is: We don't have games to play on our system, so we'll play on the other systems superior lineups. The argument is flawed in and of itself because cows must use 2 systems to beat 1.

Cows: The 360 is not the King of (J)RPGS. The PS2 and DS are.

To start, the PS2 did not have the selection of WRPGs that the 360 does, nor is it current-gen. And DS JRPGs and console JRPGs hardly play anything alike and should not be counted. But I guess that will never stop cows from hiding behind other platforms.

Cows: Microsoft buys all of their exclusives and support.

As if Sony fanboys can even talk about this. How do you think Sony got so much 3rd party support when they were entering the console market? Because they threw their money around. Not to mention the 360 has a simpler architecture to develop for which entices many devs.

Cows: The PS3 has superior graphics.

The 360 was released a year ahead of the PS3. The fact that anything on the PS3 can be done on the 360 is LAUGHABLE. When have you seen a console that was striving for power fail so miserably?

The one and only leg that the PS3 has left to stand on is that it's a bluray player, but now there are many cheaper bluray players.

shoemen22

You make me laugh so much becuase you only pick things to say good about the 360 and bad about the ps3. What about Blu-ray and having the only so far AAAA game on any console and being 1080p native and not just 720p native which the 360 is and only does a crappy 1080p upscale. what about the fact that the faluire rate is so much lower then the 360 what about that i dont have to pay for online play and also the only huge game still to come out on the 360 is gears of war after that there is nothing ps3 still has loads coming out how about that ps3 is built to last longer then the 360 and also the fact that games look just as good on each console and then they will carry on improving for the ps3 and slow down on the 360 there isnt a jump in diffrence straight from the start DUH

Nope, mutiplats on the xbox 360 run and look better than the ps3 counterpart

[QUOTE="hot114"][QUOTE="SSCyborg"]

Let's take a look at each argument and see what's wrong with it shall we?

Cows: PS3 has a better lineup than the 360.
No one ever said this, fact is that the general system wars public is under the impression the Ps3 has a brighter future with its lineup for late 2008 and 2009

Cows: But I can play all the 360's games on the PC. Wrong again. The 360 has 4 AAA exclusive games, while the PS3 has none. The 360 also has 11 AA exclusive games. Most of those AAe on the PS3, if not all, are flops. But once again, that doesn't matter. Cows basic argument is: We don't have games to play on our system, so we'll play on the other systems superior lineups. The argument is flawed in and of itself because cows must use 2 systems to beat 1.
/MGS4, thanks for the selfownage OP!
but it doesent stop there, 99% of the gamespot users have a PC so manyof us can play those "exclusives" without laying a finger on a 360

Cows: The 360 is not the King of (J)RPGS. The PS2 and DS are.

To start, the PS2 did not have the selection of WRPGs that the 360 does, nor is it current-gen. And DS JRPGs and console JRPGs hardly play anything alike and should not be counted. But I guess that will never stop cows from hiding behind other platforms.
Its a fact 360 has a superior RPG lineup than the PS3 but comparing it to what the PS2 library has to offer is shooting yourself in the foot. Maybe this comes to a shock to you but if you want to compare the 360 vs PS2 rpg's than the 360 comes off horribly bland to downright bad.

Cows: Microsoft buys all of their exclusives and support.

As if Sony fanboys can even talk about this. How do you think Sony got so much 3rd party support when they were entering the console market? Because they threw their money around. Not to mention the 360 has a simpler architecture to develop for which entices many devs.

Microsoft has already admitted dropping extra dough for extra content for the likes of GTA4 and whatnot PS3 relys mostly on in house devs to clear the road and set a example for the others to follow. Wich is also why sony consoles generally have a slow start than pick up momentum

Cows: The PS3 has superior graphics.

The 360 was released a year ahead of the PS3. The fact that anything on the PS3 can be done on the 360 is LAUGHABLE. When have you seen a console that was striving for power fail so miserably?
You do realise why microsoft is already rushing towards a succesor for the 360 while sony still sees a ton of life in this black box? 4 months ago multiplats would look better on the 360, now the ps3 looks equal/marginally better where do you think the balance will be 4 months from now? keep in mind you already admitted the devs had a 1 year headstart on getting familiar with the PS3

The one and only leg that the PS3 has left to stand on is that it's a bluray player, but now there are many cheaper bluray players.
And you are saying the built in bluray did not help on the PS3's release sales?

SSCyborg

Again your argument is fundamentally flawed but it would waste too much of my time disecting and pointing it out to you.

But I did see you hide behind the PC again. Nice!;)

It is really sad when people put this much hate into something that should be fun. The more you do this the people are just going to say "gamersare crazy" and other things. Keepmakingit an easy target by hating people that are the same as you, but are just a slight bit different. I don't give a crap if this is system wars. You want to act like a Nazi do it on your own time. Don't drag us all down. BTW I stand by calling you a Nazi since you choose to name your self SScyborg, or an Elite Nazi Robot. Grow up play your 360. Also the only thing keep the 360 down are crazy people like you. Normal people play games for fun. I play games for fun. Seeing as you need to whine about how bad a system is that you don't own. I can only guess you got your 360 just to hate people. Your pathetic. This is the last time I will waist my time on aworthlessslug of a human. Enjoy talking about your 360 while I enjoy playing mine.

[QUOTE="SSCyborg"][QUOTE="hot114"][QUOTE="SSCyborg"]

Let's take a look at each argument and see what's wrong with it shall we?

Cows: PS3 has a better lineup than the 360.
No one ever said this, fact is that the general system wars public is under the impression the Ps3 has a brighter future with its lineup for late 2008 and 2009

Cows: But I can play all the 360's games on the PC. Wrong again. The 360 has 4 AAA exclusive games, while the PS3 has none. The 360 also has 11 AA exclusive games. Most of those AAe on the PS3, if not all, are flops. But once again, that doesn't matter. Cows basic argument is: We don't have games to play on our system, so we'll play on the other systems superior lineups. The argument is flawed in and of itself because cows must use 2 systems to beat 1.
/MGS4, thanks for the selfownage OP!
but it doesent stop there, 99% of the gamespot users have a PC so manyof us can play those "exclusives" without laying a finger on a 360

Cows: The 360 is not the King of (J)RPGS. The PS2 and DS are.

To start, the PS2 did not have the selection of WRPGs that the 360 does, nor is it current-gen. And DS JRPGs and console JRPGs hardly play anything alike and should not be counted. But I guess that will never stop cows from hiding behind other platforms.
Its a fact 360 has a superior RPG lineup than the PS3 but comparing it to what the PS2 library has to offer is shooting yourself in the foot. Maybe this comes to a shock to you but if you want to compare the 360 vs PS2 rpg's than the 360 comes off horribly bland to downright bad.

Cows: Microsoft buys all of their exclusives and support.

As if Sony fanboys can even talk about this. How do you think Sony got so much 3rd party support when they were entering the console market? Because they threw their money around. Not to mention the 360 has a simpler architecture to develop for which entices many devs.

Microsoft has already admitted dropping extra dough for extra content for the likes of GTA4 and whatnot PS3 relys mostly on in house devs to clear the road and set a example for the others to follow. Wich is also why sony consoles generally have a slow start than pick up momentum

Cows: The PS3 has superior graphics.

The 360 was released a year ahead of the PS3. The fact that anything on the PS3 can be done on the 360 is LAUGHABLE. When have you seen a console that was striving for power fail so miserably?
You do realise why microsoft is already rushing towards a succesor for the 360 while sony still sees a ton of life in this black box? 4 months ago multiplats would look better on the 360, now the ps3 looks equal/marginally better where do you think the balance will be 4 months from now? keep in mind you already admitted the devs had a 1 year headstart on getting familiar with the PS3

The one and only leg that the PS3 has left to stand on is that it's a bluray player, but now there are many cheaper bluray players.
And you are saying the built in bluray did not help on the PS3's release sales?

never100

Again your argument is fundamentally flawed but it would waste too much of my time disecting and pointing it out to you.

But I did see you hide behind the PC again. Nice!;)

It is really sad when people put this much hate into something that should be fun. The more you do this the people are just going to say "gamersare crazy" and other things. Keepmakingit an easy target by hating people that are the same as you, but are just a slight bit different. I don't give a crap if this is system wars. You want to act like a Nazi do it on your own time. Don't drag us all down. BTW I stand by calling you a Nazi since you choose to name your self SScyborg, or an Elite Nazi Robot. Grow up play your 360. Also the only thing keep the 360 down are crazy people like you. Normal people play games for fun. I play games for fun. Seeing as you need to whine about how bad a system is that you don't own. I can only guess you got your 360 just to hate people. Your pathetic. This is the last time I will waist my time on aworthlessslug of a human. Enjoy talking about your 360 while I enjoy playing mine.

:lol:
I must be the first Indian Nazi then right? Think before you talk next time.

[QUOTE="SSCyborg"][QUOTE="hot114"][QUOTE="SSCyborg"]

Let's take a look at each argument and see what's wrong with it shall we?

Cows: PS3 has a better lineup than the 360.
No one ever said this, fact is that the general system wars public is under the impression the Ps3 has a brighter future with its lineup for late 2008 and 2009

Cows: But I can play all the 360's games on the PC. Wrong again. The 360 has 4 AAA exclusive games, while the PS3 has none. The 360 also has 11 AA exclusive games. Most of those AAe on the PS3, if not all, are flops. But once again, that doesn't matter. Cows basic argument is: We don't have games to play on our system, so we'll play on the other systems superior lineups. The argument is flawed in and of itself because cows must use 2 systems to beat 1.
/MGS4, thanks for the selfownage OP!
but it doesent stop there, 99% of the gamespot users have a PC so manyof us can play those "exclusives" without laying a finger on a 360

Cows: The 360 is not the King of (J)RPGS. The PS2 and DS are.

To start, the PS2 did not have the selection of WRPGs that the 360 does, nor is it current-gen. And DS JRPGs and console JRPGs hardly play anything alike and should not be counted. But I guess that will never stop cows from hiding behind other platforms.
Its a fact 360 has a superior RPG lineup than the PS3 but comparing it to what the PS2 library has to offer is shooting yourself in the foot. Maybe this comes to a shock to you but if you want to compare the 360 vs PS2 rpg's than the 360 comes off horribly bland to downright bad.

Cows: Microsoft buys all of their exclusives and support.

As if Sony fanboys can even talk about this. How do you think Sony got so much 3rd party support when they were entering the console market? Because they threw their money around. Not to mention the 360 has a simpler architecture to develop for which entices many devs.

Microsoft has already admitted dropping extra dough for extra content for the likes of GTA4 and whatnot PS3 relys mostly on in house devs to clear the road and set a example for the others to follow. Wich is also why sony consoles generally have a slow start than pick up momentum

Cows: The PS3 has superior graphics.

The 360 was released a year ahead of the PS3. The fact that anything on the PS3 can be done on the 360 is LAUGHABLE. When have you seen a console that was striving for power fail so miserably?
You do realise why microsoft is already rushing towards a succesor for the 360 while sony still sees a ton of life in this black box? 4 months ago multiplats would look better on the 360, now the ps3 looks equal/marginally better where do you think the balance will be 4 months from now? keep in mind you already admitted the devs had a 1 year headstart on getting familiar with the PS3

The one and only leg that the PS3 has left to stand on is that it's a bluray player, but now there are many cheaper bluray players.
And you are saying the built in bluray did not help on the PS3's release sales?

never100

Again your argument is fundamentally flawed but it would waste too much of my time disecting and pointing it out to you.

But I did see you hide behind the PC again. Nice!;)

It is really sad when people put this much hate into something that should be fun. The more you do this the people are just going to say "gamersare crazy" and other things. Keepmakingit an easy target by hating people that are the same as you, but are just a slight bit different. I don't give a crap if this is system wars. You want to act like a Nazi do it on your own time. Don't drag us all down. BTW I stand by calling you a Nazi since you choose to name your self SScyborg, or an Elite Nazi Robot. Grow up play your 360. Also the only thing keep the 360 down are crazy people like you. Normal people play games for fun. I play games for fun. Seeing as you need to whine about how bad a system is that you don't own. I can only guess you got your 360 just to hate people. Your pathetic. This is the last time I will waist my time on aworthlessslug of a human. Enjoy talking about your 360 while I enjoy playing mine.

Fanboy much?

So the 360 has 4 AAA exclusives acording to one gamesite? And the PS3 has zero AAA exclusives accroding to one gamesite. Many game sites have 3-6 PS3 games as AAAE. So I fail to see this logic. Other than to hide behind your system of choice and to throw mud at the other system that you didn't choose. All while forgetting that your console of choice has no AAAAE while the other does.

HuhJustaBox

Hypocrisy i think. If you want to tout the "One AAAAE to rule them allzorz" line and then use other game sites as proof that the PS3 has 3-6 AAAE games you might like to know that MGS4 isnt rated AAAAE if you take every other sites review into account, in fact its rated quite a bit lower some well known 360 exclusives ;)

F*ck Final Fantasy XIII going multi didn't kill Sony you stupid f*ck. Final Fantasy Versus XIII, Dark Cloud 3, White Knight Story, Valkyria Chronicles, Team Ico's game, Unannounced BBC Game, Disgea 3, MAG, DC Universe, Infamous, Exclusive Rockstar Game, MotorStorm 2, WipeoutHD, Gran Turismo 5, Resistance 2, Killzone 2, SOCOM, Metal Gear Solid 4, Heavy Rain, and LittleBigPlanet vs. Final Fantasy XIII 360. The inferior port that'll most likely suck. No you stupid sh*t, Sony is alive and kicking.OutlawStarXIII

Less of the mental instability please ...

BTW are you Sihanouk's alt account?

Whoa. That's harsh, bro. But yeah, TC has major insecurity issues that need sorting out.nervmeister

I have insecurity issues? He's the one that went off on a little rant about me personally, when I never attacked a person.

He seems to be the insecure one.

[QUOTE="ArrancarVizard"][QUOTE="-Skyfall"]

AAAAE

(Solid Snake saluting the 360's grave ;_; )

THE KING

HAS CHOSEN HIS THRONE

AAAAE

"It's good...isn't it?"

PLAYSTATION 3 EXCLUSIVE

AAAAE

OutlawStarXIII

FF13 coming to Xbox 360

Xbox 360 win Console War

[QUOTE="ArrancarVizard"][QUOTE="-Skyfall"]

AAAAE

(Solid Snake saluting the 360's grave ;_; )

THE KING

HAS CHOSEN HIS THRONE

AAAAE

"It's good...isn't it?"

PLAYSTATION 3 EXCLUSIVE

AAAAE

OutlawStarXIII

FF13 coming to Xbox 360

Xbox 360 win Console War

LOL, I think I busted your fuse there, still mad about FF13 going to Xbox 360 eh:lol: Also you FAIL for including games that are unnanounced or even don't have a release date.

Y ou call people cows and BTW I called you that cuss you blantly flaunt it in your name you want me to stop take the SS out of your name. And start acting like somone that can live in this world with people that don't just love the 360.never100

Like I said, think before you type. That's not the only thing it could stand for.

This is similar to people getting upset over the Swastika. Just because it means one thing, doesn't mean it can't mean anything else.

[QUOTE="-Skyfall"]

AAAAE

(Solid Snake saluting the 360's grave ;_; )

THE KING

HAS CHOSEN HIS THRONE

AAAAE

"It's good...isn't it?"

PLAYSTATION 3 EXCLUSIVE

AAAAE

-RROD-

Lems are going to get angry. Watch out ;)

yes, its one game and its good.

[QUOTE="nervmeister"]Whoa. That's harsh, bro. But yeah, TC has major insecurity issues that need sorting out.SSCyborg

I have insecurity issues? He's the one that went off on a little rant about me personally, when I never attacked a person.

He seems to be the insecure one.

[QUOTE="OutlawStarXIII"][QUOTE="ArrancarVizard"][QUOTE="-Skyfall"]

AAAAE

(Solid Snake saluting the 360's grave ;_; )

THE KING

HAS CHOSEN HIS THRONE

AAAAE

"It's good...isn't it?"

PLAYSTATION 3 EXCLUSIVE

AAAAE

ArrancarVizard

FF13 coming to Xbox 360

Xbox 360 win Console War

LOL, I think I busted your fuse there, still mad about FF13 going to Xbox 360 eh:lol: Also you FAIL for including games that are unnanounced or even don't have a release date.

[QUOTE="SSCyborg"]

[QUOTE="nervmeister"]Whoa. That's harsh, bro. But yeah, TC has major insecurity issues that need sorting out.nervmeister

I have insecurity issues? He's the one that went off on a little rant about me personally, when I never attacked a person.

He seems to be the insecure one.

And I don't make several threads a day either. :|

[QUOTE="never100"]Y ou call people cows and BTW I called you that cuss you blantly flaunt it in your name you want me to stop take the SS out of your name. And start acting like somone that can live in this world with people that don't just love the 360.SSCyborg

Like I said, think before you type. That's not the only thing it could stand for.

This is similar to people getting upset over the Swastika. Just because it means one thing, doesn't mean it can't mean anything else.

Your right. I'm sorry. Just you just spread so much hate about PS3. It's like my god. i tend to get mad when i think people are hating on each other. Sorry again.

[QUOTE="nervmeister"][QUOTE="SSCyborg"]

[QUOTE="nervmeister"]Whoa. That's harsh, bro. But yeah, TC has major insecurity issues that need sorting out.SSCyborg

I have insecurity issues? He's the one that went off on a little rant about me personally, when I never attacked a person.

He seems to be the insecure one.

And I don't make several threads a day either. :|

TC, I'll consider this as an opinion and I'll tell you mine. I believe the 360 is a great gaming machine with advantages as one year ahead start, better gaming library compared to the PS3 (currently) and arguably better online services. Also I believe the PS3 is a better choice for me since it has many games I love and I won't be able to play on my PC i.e MGS4, FFXIII VS, Socom, GoW3, GT5, Infamous, Uncharted, R&C, Heavy Rain, Motorstorm, KZ2, Resistance, LBP and many others, Plus blu-ray is better than HD-DVD this generation, 360 games that I'm interested in (ME, Bioshock, Geow, Fable...) are all on PC with better quality and (better & free) online services,(knowing that I'm only interested in Ace Combat, not Halo or NG2 or...). Sorry but this is my taste. 360 has been known for having the highest failure rate (rrod, although part of the problem has been dealt with by M$'s 3 years of warranty) but it still freaks me out to see any of my consoles dead. One more thing that prevents me from getting a 360 is the "milkage" done by M$ when it comes to accessories and how they are overpriced. M$ doesn't buy all of its exclusives (lol, it's just stupid) and the PS3 doesn't have superior graphics since both consoles are on par, it is just about the developer and how much hard work is poured into the game. (but 360 is not rpg king right now, the DS, PS2 or PC offer better rpg's as far as I've seen) There is one huge flaw in your argument when you say: cows say, cows do, cows state... I'm a huge cow (yeah baby, I've said it for the first time 8) ) but you fail when you include all cows in the argument (say SOME cows at least), some cows are well mannered and they do their homework before they state worthless things. Ah I have just realized that I typed a wall of text, sorry if that was a little too much and please don't take it offensively...abuabed

I agree, you got a good point. As a cow (I dislike the word by the way) I hate it when people generalize. I acknowlegd the good things the 360 offers but I don't like to be milked.

[QUOTE="OutlawStarXIII"][QUOTE="ArrancarVizard"][QUOTE="-Skyfall"]

AAAAE

(Solid Snake saluting the 360's grave ;_; )

THE KING

HAS CHOSEN HIS THRONE

AAAAE

"It's good...isn't it?"

PLAYSTATION 3 EXCLUSIVE

AAAAE

ArrancarVizard

FF13 coming to Xbox 360

Xbox 360 win Console War

LOL, I think I busted your fuse there, still mad about FF13 going to Xbox 360 eh:lol: Also you FAIL for including games that are unnanounced or even don't have a release date.

[QUOTE="ArrancarVizard"][QUOTE="OutlawStarXIII"][QUOTE="ArrancarVizard"][QUOTE="-Skyfall"]

AAAAE

(Solid Snake saluting the 360's grave ;_; )

THE KING

HAS CHOSEN HIS THRONE

AAAAE

"It's good...isn't it?"

PLAYSTATION 3 EXCLUSIVE

AAAAE

OutlawStarXIII

FF13 coming to Xbox 360

Xbox 360 win Console War

LOL, I think I busted your fuse there, still mad about FF13 going to Xbox 360 eh:lol: Also you FAIL for including games that are unnanounced or even don't have a release date.

Let's take a look at each argument and see what's wrong with it shall we?

Cows: PS3 has a better lineup than the 360.

The PS3 lineup is actually vastly inferior to the 360 lineup. This doesn't matter if you include or exclude multiplats, but seriously, a multiplat is a part of the lineup for the 360.

SSCyborg

This is the only point that you make that is "wrong". You are arguing matters of opinions, not actual facts.

I agree with the rest. Those are dumb fanboy arguments in the first place that don't considered hundreds of factors. They aren't arguments as much as just pure fanboy ignorance.

I agree in that FFXIII going multi didn't kill PS3. But I kind of disagree with you on the 360 version of it being inferior. Chance are, they'll be on par with one another with the PS3 version maybe having a slight graphical advantage. But that's about it.nervmeister

yep, i think they'll probably be about the same.

bravo......

You are truly a proper lemming. Im the irrational religion icon. But YOU use more reason. Thats very good. Keep it up.

Marcus-360

you most feel honored TC, Do you know this guy is? oh boy cows will have a field day with the two of you.

[QUOTE="Marcus-360"]

bravo......

You are truly a proper lemming. Im the irrational religion icon. But YOU use more reason. Thats very good. Keep it up.

ff7isnumbaone

you most feel honored TC, Do you know this guy is? oh boy cows will have a field day with the two of you.

Yeah I do.

Why do you think I'm in the Army?

[QUOTE="-Skyfall"]

AAAAE

(Solid Snake saluting the 360's grave ;_; )

THE KING

HAS CHOSEN HIS THRONE

AAAAE

"It's good...isn't it?"

PLAYSTATION 3 EXCLUSIVE

AAAAE

ArrancarVizard

FF13 coming to Xbox 360

Xbox 360 win Console War

Weakest comeback i've seen thus far. Its laughable that you think FF13 will cause PS3 to collapse. Also, the fact that it will sell alot more in Japan. LOL @ 360 in Japan.

[QUOTE="hot114"][QUOTE="SSCyborg"]-snip-

SSCyborg

Again your argument is fundamentally flawed but it would waste too much of my time disecting and pointing it out to you.

But I did see you hide behind the PC again. Nice!;)

[QUOTE="SSCyborg"]

Let's take a look at each argument and see what's wrong with it shall we?

Cows: PS3 has a better lineup than the 360.

The PS3 lineup is actually vastly inferior to the 360 lineup. This doesn't matter if you include or exclude multiplats, but seriously, a multiplat is a part of the lineup for the 360.

Cows: But I can play all the 360's games on the PC.

Wrong again. The 360 has 4 AAA exclusive games, while the PS3 has none. The 360 also has 11 AA exclusive games. Most of those AAe on the PS3, if not all, are flops. But once again, that doesn't matter. Cows basic argument is: We don't have games to play on our system, so we'll play on the other systems superior lineups. The argument is flawed in and of itself because cows must use 2 systems to beat 1.

Cows: The 360 is not the King of (J)RPGS. The PS2 and DS are.

To start, the PS2 did not have the selection of WRPGs that the 360 does, nor is it current-gen. And DS JRPGs and console JRPGs hardly play anything alike and should not be counted. But I guess that will never stop cows from hiding behind other platforms.

Cows: Microsoft buys all of their exclusives and support.

As if Sony fanboys can even talk about this. How do you think Sony got so much 3rd party support when they were entering the console market? Because they threw their money around. Not to mention the 360 has a simpler architecture to develop for which entices many devs.

Cows: The PS3 has superior graphics.

The 360 was released a year ahead of the PS3. The fact that anything on the PS3 can be done on the 360 is LAUGHABLE. When have you seen a console that was striving for power fail so miserably?

The one and only leg that the PS3 has left to stand on is that it's a bluray player, but now there are many cheaper bluray players.

shoemen22

You make me laugh so much becuase you only pick things to say good about the 360 and bad about the ps3. What about Blu-ray and having the only so far AAAA game on any console and being 1080p native and not just 720p native which the 360 is and only does a crappy 1080p upscale. what about the fact that the faluire rate is so much lower then the 360 what about that i dont have to pay for online play and also the only huge game still to come out on the 360 is gears of war after that there is nothing ps3 still has loads coming out how about that ps3 is built to last longer then the 360 and also the fact that games look just as good on each console and then they will carry on improving for the ps3 and slow down on the 360 there isnt a jump in diffrence straight from the start DUH

For the record, I dont own any of the current gen consoles anymore, but I do like to watch you guys fight amongst yourselves.

Also, the Ps3 isn't native 1080p either, only a handfull of the games are coded in 1080p, the rest are 720p or lower, and your ps3 UPSCALES the image. This doesnt improve the image quality, it just stretches it out like an old poonani.

[QUOTE="shoemen22"][QUOTE="SSCyborg"]

Let's take a look at each argument and see what's wrong with it shall we?

Cows: PS3 has a better lineup than the 360.

The PS3 lineup is actually vastly inferior to the 360 lineup. This doesn't matter if you include or exclude multiplats, but seriously, a multiplat is a part of the lineup for the 360.

Cows: But I can play all the 360's games on the PC.

Wrong again. The 360 has 4 AAA exclusive games, while the PS3 has none. The 360 also has 11 AA exclusive games. Most of those AAe on the PS3, if not all, are flops. But once again, that doesn't matter. Cows basic argument is: We don't have games to play on our system, so we'll play on the other systems superior lineups. The argument is flawed in and of itself because cows must use 2 systems to beat 1.

Cows: The 360 is not the King of (J)RPGS. The PS2 and DS are.

To start, the PS2 did not have the selection of WRPGs that the 360 does, nor is it current-gen. And DS JRPGs and console JRPGs hardly play anything alike and should not be counted. But I guess that will never stop cows from hiding behind other platforms.

Cows: Microsoft buys all of their exclusives and support.

As if Sony fanboys can even talk about this. How do you think Sony got so much 3rd party support when they were entering the console market? Because they threw their money around. Not to mention the 360 has a simpler architecture to develop for which entices many devs.

Cows: The PS3 has superior graphics.

The 360 was released a year ahead of the PS3. The fact that anything on the PS3 can be done on the 360 is LAUGHABLE. When have you seen a console that was striving for power fail so miserably?

The one and only leg that the PS3 has left to stand on is that it's a bluray player, but now there are many cheaper bluray players.

BelAir1

You make me laugh so much becuase you only pick things to say good about the 360 and bad about the ps3. What about Blu-ray and having the only so far AAAA game on any console and being 1080p native and not just 720p native which the 360 is and only does a crappy 1080p upscale. what about the fact that the faluire rate is so much lower then the 360 what about that i dont have to pay for online play and also the only huge game still to come out on the 360 is gears of war after that there is nothing ps3 still has loads coming out how about that ps3 is built to last longer then the 360 and also the fact that games look just as good on each console and then they will carry on improving for the ps3 and slow down on the 360 there isnt a jump in diffrence straight from the start DUH

For the record, I dont own any of the current gen consoles anymore, but I do like to watch you guys fight amongst yourselves.

Also, the Ps3 isn't native 1080p either, only a handfull of the games are coded in 1080p, the rest are 720p or lower, and your ps3 UPSCALES the image. This doesnt improve the image quality, it just stretches it out like an old poonani.

Some games for the PS3 are 1080p native. When they are they look absolutely gorgeous thanks to Blu-ray and HDMI. But yea that whole "all games on PS3 are 1080p" is gettin old.

his opinions arent lies. So he fails at nothing.

Marcus-360

Impressive deception.

In emphasizing the opined nature of the TC's post, you successfully distract from his fallaciously presented analysis by saying, "opinions aren't lies." But at the same time, you ignore the fact that opinions can be ignorantly formed or even non-factual.

[QUOTE="BelAir1"][QUOTE="shoemen22"][QUOTE="SSCyborg"]

Let's take a look at each argument and see what's wrong with it shall we?

Cows: PS3 has a better lineup than the 360.

The PS3 lineup is actually vastly inferior to the 360 lineup. This doesn't matter if you include or exclude multiplats, but seriously, a multiplat is a part of the lineup for the 360.

Cows: But I can play all the 360's games on the PC.

Wrong again. The 360 has 4 AAA exclusive games, while the PS3 has none. The 360 also has 11 AA exclusive games. Most of those AAe on the PS3, if not all, are flops. But once again, that doesn't matter. Cows basic argument is: We don't have games to play on our system, so we'll play on the other systems superior lineups. The argument is flawed in and of itself because cows must use 2 systems to beat 1.

Cows: The 360 is not the King of (J)RPGS. The PS2 and DS are.

To start, the PS2 did not have the selection of WRPGs that the 360 does, nor is it current-gen. And DS JRPGs and console JRPGs hardly play anything alike and should not be counted. But I guess that will never stop cows from hiding behind other platforms.

Cows: Microsoft buys all of their exclusives and support.

As if Sony fanboys can even talk about this. How do you think Sony got so much 3rd party support when they were entering the console market? Because they threw their money around. Not to mention the 360 has a simpler architecture to develop for which entices many devs.

Cows: The PS3 has superior graphics.

The 360 was released a year ahead of the PS3. The fact that anything on the PS3 can be done on the 360 is LAUGHABLE. When have you seen a console that was striving for power fail so miserably?

The one and only leg that the PS3 has left to stand on is that it's a bluray player, but now there are many cheaper bluray players.

Haku_Ryushi

You make me laugh so much becuase you only pick things to say good about the 360 and bad about the ps3. What about Blu-ray and having the only so far AAAA game on any console and being 1080p native and not just 720p native which the 360 is and only does a crappy 1080p upscale. what about the fact that the faluire rate is so much lower then the 360 what about that i dont have to pay for online play and also the only huge game still to come out on the 360 is gears of war after that there is nothing ps3 still has loads coming out how about that ps3 is built to last longer then the 360 and also the fact that games look just as good on each console and then they will carry on improving for the ps3 and slow down on the 360 there isnt a jump in diffrence straight from the start DUH

For the record, I dont own any of the current gen consoles anymore, but I do like to watch you guys fight amongst yourselves.

Also, the Ps3 isn't native 1080p either, only a handfull of the games are coded in 1080p, the rest are 720p or lower, and your ps3 UPSCALES the image. This doesnt improve the image quality, it just stretches it out like an old poonani.

Some games for the PS3 are 1080p native. When they are they look absolutely gorgeous thanks to Blu-ray and HDMI. But yea that whole "all games on PS3 are 1080p" is gettin old.

Yeah I had the list of Native 1080p games somewhere. Not alot, but they are out there. Anyway, back to Bioshock at 2560x1600 (lol sorry :( )

MGS4. #1 rated exclusive this gen.

Lets see, I can play:

MGS4

Uncharted

R&C

Motorstorm

Resistance

Warhawk

MLB 08 the:show

^^^those are just exclusives

Shall I list the multiplats?

kool-aids

Much better then what 360 and PC have to offer.

[QUOTE="kool-aids"]

MGS4. #1 rated exclusive this gen.

Lets see, I can play:

MGS4

Uncharted

R&C

Motorstorm

Resistance

Warhawk

MLB 08 the:show

^^^those are just exclusives

Shall I list the multiplats?

nVidiaGaMer

Much better then what 360 and PC have to offer.

LOL it's YOU.

[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"][QUOTE="kool-aids"]

MGS4. #1 rated exclusive this gen.

Lets see, I can play:

MGS4

Uncharted

R&C

Motorstorm

Resistance

Warhawk

MLB 08 the:show

^^^those are just exclusives

Shall I list the multiplats?

BelAir1

Much better then what 360 and PC have to offer.

LOL it's YOU.

Well noone is right, We have to wait for Banjo, Gears2 and Fable to come out lol

Ya know, threads like these used to really get on my nerves, but as boring as System Wars has been lately, I'm thrilled to see it, lol.

Anyway, whatever, the PS3 is great console. Tastes varies, as well do opinions.

[QUOTE="ArrancarVizard"]

FF13 coming to Xbox 360

Xbox 360 win Console War

Haku_Ryushi

Weakest comeback i've seen thus far. Its laughable that you think FF13 will cause PS3 to collapse. Also, the fact that it will sell alot more in Japan. LOL @ 360 in Japan.

What I find so interesting about the Microsoft consumership's enthusiasm over inheriting FFXIII is the fact that they were laughing at the Sony crowd for expecting so much from it before Square Enix revealed the change.

Duplicitous much?

Eithere way, the game's probably gonna suck. Know why? Because it's a JRPG.

Now wee need Wok7 in here and we'll be complete.BelAir1

Don't forget Dur_Rocky :lol: