[QUOTE="Timstuff"][QUOTE="PBSnipes"][QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"] [QUOTE="Not-A-Stalker"]If Microsoft can pay $50 million for downloadable content, Sony better pay up for the biggest game on their system.PBSnipes
Sony does not negotiate with terrorists.
...in other words, they don't buy exclusives.
PS3 is not losing games, its merely sharing them. Big difference. Why pay for a game your still getting anyway?
Did you actually just say there is no reason to keep a game exclusive? There's no reason to PAY for it unless you've got deep pockets and a lot of desperation. I.E., you're M$.
So you're saying that despite the fact they are in 3rd place in terms of sales, have a weak game lineup and have the lowest number of sales per month, a console that was struggling enough to warrant a $100 price drop only 8 months after release, Sony isn't desparate? And that there's no reason to pay to keepa game (that is usually one of the top 3 most anticipated games for your console) exclusive despite the fact that the publisher has stated if PS3 sales don't improve dramatically they are going to look at taking the game multiplat? Wow. Just wow.Trenton himself said it, they don't pay for exclusives. Its a real waste of money. That money is better spent making sure the first party games are good.
Log in to comment