Assassins creed Origins runs in full 4K on X1X after all

Yeah yeah, here take this so you can amuse yourself kiddo and stop spreading lameness.

Im only buying this because it takes place in Egypt, and am hyped this game and the X1X are releasing at the same time. Cant wait : )

@pinkanimal said:

@SecretPolice said:

@pinkanimal said:

@SecretPolice said:

@davillain- said:

Indeed. Xbox gamers really hype there own console so high, it's starting to show it's true colors as everyday we see news on 4K not being truly 4K but then again, some of us who actually pays attention to the console would know this.

What they need to do is just wait until the damn console release this November and see how this all plays out.

Indeed. Xbox anti-fan gamers rarely hype there own system so high, it's starting to show it's true colors as everyday we see news on 4K being truly 4K on Mighty X1X but then again, some of us who actually pays attention to the console would know this.

What MS/Xbox anti-fans need to do is just wait until the damn console release this November and see how this all plays out.

Did you catch the kvally/ronvalencia lemming virus of lemming fanboyism? No creativity, just copy-pasting stuff that makes no sense and goes against reality. Lemmings are the lamest fanboy group ever.

Did you catch the pinkanimal/Moogenja ( eh, one in the same :P ) crazy cow virus of bovine fanboyism? No creativity, just copy-pasting stuff that makes no sense and goes against reality. radicalized mad cows are the lamest fanboy group ever.

Yeah yeah, here take this so you can amuse yourself kiddo and stop spreading lameness.

Lololol :P

@tormentos:

Oh look, a cow hiding behind PC. Never seen that before. >_>

Read the thread context. He basically said, "if you want a 4K experience get a 1080ti like me, consolites." His rig, with only 8GB RAM and 500GB hdd, came out to $1700 on Newegg when you add to the requisite components.

I posted a comparison pic to prove that Assassin's Creed/Ubi is not the hill you want to die on being a hermit. Here it is again...the difference in image quality $1000 more gets you...(right-click, view image for full size)

@ronvalencia said:

@quadknight said:

@Juub1990 said:

Which means the game is unable to maintain 4K on the Xbox One X.

Shut up.

@quadknight said:

The clown apparently does not lol.

Microsoft fans were making fun of the PS4 Pro and FauxK. Now suddenly dynamic resolution is alright lol?

Which is why I continue to maintain that lems are the most pathetic fanboys on SW. Constantly flip-flopping without shame just like MS. A couple of months ago they were making fun of Dynamic 4K on the Pro, now that the DynamicBone X is doing the same thing they are suddenly praising it. Shameless embarrassing behavior from them. Look at Ron in here defending Dynamic 4K, the same clown that said X1X would use Ryzen and would be equivalent to a PC using a GTX 1070/1080. "True uncompromised 4K" was all the rage for him now he's embracing Dynamic 4K and checkerboarding like they are long lost loves lmao!

YOU ARE WRONG.

what the hell is full 4k with dynamic.......the game as a whole is dynamic ron. when scenes get busy it changes the resolution.....stop twisting it...

chart me if im wrong

@stereointegrity:

The whole premise of this thread is bullshit since GamingBolt acknowledged they made an error in their article. TC hasn't updated the title or the opening post.

DF's E3 analysis still stands which means largely 2160pCBR presentation with dynamic res during heavy scenes. In other words, lem ownage denied...thread backfire.

who is it backfiring on? the OP?

@stereointegrity:

Me, in particular, because I used it to attempt ownage on cow_epyon and instead it backfired. lol.

Ron was simply unaware of the correction by the article's author because TC abandoned ship and didn't update.

You can... on PC. :) Except without the checkerboard. Lol

"A lot of times" could literally mean anything to some people. That could mean that it will hit 4k for a total of 5 seconds in a total time span of a minute.

I wouldn't go by goofy hearsay like this if I were you.

@DragonfireXZ95: Its Ubi game so checkerboard might be available on pc too

@gamecubepad said:

@tormentos:

Oh look, a cow hiding behind PC. Never seen that before. >_>

Read the thread context. He basically said, "if you want a 4K experience get a 1080ti like me, consolites." His rig, with only 8GB RAM and 500GB hdd, came out to $1700 on Newegg when you add to the requisite components.

I posted a comparison pic to prove that Assassin's Creed/Ubi is not the hill you want to die on being a hermit. Here it is again...the difference in image quality $1000 more gets you...(right-click, view image for full size)

Interesting. My PC isn't $1700 and this is what I got.

Oh, Ubisoft supports checkerboard in their PC games? I guess I haven't looked at that setting since I only run 2560 x 1080. But either way, on PC you can just go full 4k at 60 fps with a powerful enough rig.

? @ Ron the rabid lem desperately trying to change the definition of dynamic 4K.

Good luck trying to explain anything to him, this guy barely understands english.

Looks like Dynamic 4k gets the stamp of approval from lemmings. Dis gun b gud!

@DragonfireXZ95:

That's the point, though. lol. Hence, "consolization is a bitch, eh".

My comparison demonstrates the difference in image quality between the X1X and a high-end PC on a Ubi title is nearly imperceptible. You didn't see it, neither did Grey Elf who's a photographer and probably has highly attenuated perception towards these things.

@howmakewood:

They included it in R6 Siege and Watch Dogs 2, so the chances of it being in AC, or at least having the ability to invoke it, are pretty good.

R6: S and WD2 support it by the name "Temporal Filtering", Sony by "Checkerboard Rendering", and Insomiac by "Temporal Injection".

You should make that pic bigger. It's tiny as hell.

It's a horrible comparison, to be honest. When you can't even see the image because it's in 720p. It looks even smaller than 720p.

That's not on me, it's GS and their support of 4K images. Go to post #128 in this thread and try "right-click, view image" on that one.

I had a disclaimer on it saying, "Example(usually right-click, view image shows 4K original, but GS can be shit so you might have to click then go into gallery and use right-click view image)..."

Ok, so, first off. Your PC image isn't using the high res texture pack that Ubisoft released for this game.

Glad it worked. :)

Once again, you prove my point. Neither is the comparison image.

Um, that's what I was talking about--the comparison image.

Aren't you comparing PC and console and saying that the PC version suffers because of consolization? Shouldn't you be using the high res texture pack to prove that it looks better than the console version?

The broken image is not the comparison. You are looking at it. Pixel peep it and you'll see what I mean.

My point was to compare Ubi's advanced implementation of Checkerboard rendering with Native res. X1X has 6-7GB VRAM tied to 384-bit bus and over 300GB/s mem bandwidth, it's getting PC's Ultra textures in all likelihood.

http://twvideo01.ubm-us.net/o1/vault/gdc2016/Presentations/El_Mansouri_Jalal_Rendering_Rainbow_Six.pdf

Gives an excellent presentation of how checkerboarding(or what ever you want to call it works)

No, it's not getting PC's ultra textures. I'd be incredibly surprised if it did.

They are a separate download that was created after the fact, specifically for PC.

Example: Your picture texture vs the ultra picture texture.

Dude, you're missing the point altogether, and to be fair I'm being illusive about it. lol.

The point is that you can't even discern that you're looking at a image that's half native 2160p and half 2160pCBR, but not divided down the middle.

---

DF on ACO E3 alpha build:

"I think the results here are rather quite excellent edges appears sharp and distinct just like they would at native 4k across most of the scene and even up-close image quality can pass for a native presentation"

"overall I get the impression that the presentation here is more like that of a high-end PC experience than console level visuals"

"intricate detail and long draw distances"

"worth bearing in mind this is an Alpha build"..."John had a first hand look and said the game is running a stable 30fps"

"it's not surprising as Ubisoft pioneered the checkerboard technique with R6 Siege and clearly the technology has matured"

---

PC's max will look only minimally better than X1X, with GimpWorks tech required to saturate a high-end GPU.

Hence my, "consolization is a bitch, eh" and DF's "the presentation here is more like that of a high-end PC experience than console level visuals".

@howmakewood:

Thanks! Checking it out now.

Okay, so they are the same resolution or close or whatever, yet higher res textures don't count? I mean, I get your point, but to ignore literally everything else just to try to prove it is cherry picking to the max.

It was my fault for being illusive. They are not the same res, one is operating at half-resolution. The texture pack is irrelevant because X1X is stacked to the max with ~7GB VRAM at 300GB/s mem bandwidth.

Proof:

This is with the Ultra Texture pack and full-on Ultra settings. X1X will use mostly High with Ultra textures, so it will come in under the 7GB mark. Especially with pixel count closer to 1440p than 4k.

Hahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa...

Hahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa....

I did say this, but I did change my mind on this fact. At first I was really wanting them to put a better CPU in this machine then the jaguar core. But after seeing what they did with the machine and understanding they really couldn't put anything but Jaguar to keep the cost down I am okay with it. So I am not sure what the big deal is?

I am sooooo sure you have NEVER changed your stance on anything right?

Lollllllllllllllllllllll:

@tormentos said:

After knowing that the PS4 Neo is real,and a confirmation of spec...A Polaris 36CU 911 mhz GPU will deliver considerable performance and true 4k gaming

P.S.- Sorry for calling you "too dumb" the other day.

That is funny coming from you who hid on your PC to attack the Pro..hahahahaha

Stop your bullshit he changed GPU and it wasn't even close to $1,500.

Double the price to play something similar that sounds familiar.

Is funny to see you downplay the gap between a 1080Ti and the XBO X while at the same time hype the gap between the XBOX and Pro.. hahahahaa

OH did you add the $300 you will spent on xbox live over 5 years on your price comparison?

Oh SNAP!

@tormentos:

Dude, F*CK DriveClub. It's pathetic you can't even use your flagship racer, GT Sport, to back your fanboysim...cause it runs 1600x1800 and looks average. Hahahaha.

And F*CK your spin-job too. I would have crushed the Pro with the power of the Mighty Scorpio if we knew more at the time.

---

P.S.- Have you bought a PS4 or a PC yet? That way hiding behind PC like the coward you are makes more sense. Now hiding behind a 30fps racer...hahahahaha.

I know right. You can find hundreds of posts of his like this. I have them bookmarked, but I don't want/need to say anything more.

Who is Kvally? Fakenews. You are wrong.

Mods can verify my IP is different from Kvally.

Try again mad cow.

Who is Kvally? Really? lol

@gamecubepad said:

@Xabiss said:

Oh SNAP!

I know right. You can find hundreds of posts of his like this. I have them bookmarked, but I don't want/need to say anything more.

The question is can he be a man and own up that he made a mistake. We all make them, hell no one is perfect. I wanted a better CPU in the Xbox One X, but I came around and understood the reasons why they did what they did. After seeing the performance they are getting out of the X and how much better it is over the Pro. I am going to be pretty happy with the purchase.

@Xabiss:

Nah, Tormentos is a caricature of himself. Part of the act is never to admit you're wrong.

@ronvalencia:

Question:

According to DF, how dynamic was the resolution of the "stable 30fps" Alpha build they previewed?

Answer:

Digital Foundry said:

Crucially, it looks great on a 4K screen, and if there is dynamic resolution in play in order to stabilise performance, we didn't pick up on anything that overtly compromises the image. Indeed, we extracted a few shots for pixel-counting analysis and found a 2160p result in all cases.

Lulz.

#RonLovesFakeNews

That's better with "we extracted a few shots for pixel-counting analysis and found a 2160p result in all cases". LOL.

@ronvalencia:

@gamecubepad said:

@DragonfireXZ95 said:

Okay, so they are the same resolution or close or whatever, yet higher res textures don't count? I mean, I get your point, but to ignore literally everything else just to try to prove it is cherry picking to the max.

It was my fault for being illusive. They are not the same res, one is operating at half-resolution. The texture pack is irrelevant because X1X is stacked to the max with ~7GB VRAM at 300GB/s mem bandwidth.

Proof:

This is with the Ultra Texture pack and full-on Ultra settings. X1X will use mostly High with Ultra textures, so it will come in under the 7GB mark. Especially with pixel count closer to 1440p than 4k.

That's system shared RAM. Just because it has that much RAM, doesn't mean it's going to all go to textures and video. Unless they changed this?

HOLY BLIP! Xbox WON IT'S OVER FOR SONY! You can keep your movie games while I play th ebest version of every multiplat

@DragonfireXZ95 said:

@gamecubepad said:

@DragonfireXZ95 said:

Okay, so they are the same resolution or close or whatever, yet higher res textures don't count? I mean, I get your point, but to ignore literally everything else just to try to prove it is cherry picking to the max.

It was my fault for being illusive. They are not the same res, one is operating at half-resolution. The texture pack is irrelevant because X1X is stacked to the max with ~7GB VRAM at 300GB/s mem bandwidth.

Proof:

This is with the Ultra Texture pack and full-on Ultra settings. X1X will use mostly High with Ultra textures, so it will come in under the 7GB mark. Especially with pixel count closer to 1440p than 4k.

That's system shared RAM. Just because it has that much RAM, doesn't mean it's going to all go to textures and video. Unless they changed this?

VRAM is short for video ram LOL.

X1X has more than one 4K game as claimed by Pinkanimal

@ronvalencia said:

@gamecubepad said:

@ronvalencia:

X1X has more than one 4K game as claimed by Pinkanimal

@pinkanimal

At least sack up when you're calling him out