Assassins Creed PC requirements.lol

http://bbs2.ruliweb.daum.net/gaia/do...icleId=1545598

Assassin's creed Unity PC version's System requirements were revealed by intra games, Korean distributor of Ubisoft Korea.

- OS: Windows® 7 SP1, Windows® 8/8.1 (Only 64-bit supports)

- CPU:

Minimum - Intel Core® i5-2500K @ 3.3 GHz or AMD FX-8350 @ 4.0 GHz or above

Recommended - Intel Core® i7-3770 @ 3.4 GHz or AMD FX-8350 @ 4.0 GHz or above

- RAM:

Minimum - 6GB or above

Recommended - 8GB or above

- GPU:

Minimum - NVIDIA GeForce® GTX 680 or AMD Radeon HD 7970 or above

Graphic Memory minimum - 2GB

Recommended - NVIDIA GeForce® GTX 780 or AMD Radeon R9 290X or above

Graphic Memory Recommended - 3 GB

- Sound Card: DX9.0c-compatible

- HDD: above 50 GB

- Multiplayer: 256 kbps Upload bandwidth or Higher

680GTX with FX8350 minimum.................lol

95% of PC can't play this game..lol What say you System War Ubi sucks optimizing on PC or the game really require those resources.

They can? I'm impressed.

"Minimum - NVIDIA GeForce® GTX 680, Minimum - Intel Core® i5-2500K " Whaaaaaat?

It is not any huge difference with gaming perfomance between i5-2500K and i7-3770... Ubi wtf?

Come on is me i write like shit..hahaha

Ubisoft is already proven to be in bed with Nvidia. I wouldn't trust their recommended specs.

Those are ridiculous. Not like I was planning on getting Unity anyways

I'll wait for an actual confirmation, but recent evidence would indicate that ubisoft is not too great at optimization

System requirements for PS4 and xbone to play the Ass Creed....Buy the game, DONE.

900p and 30fps no tnx

Bad opti incoming.

With these requirements many hermits will have same experience or worse lol

yea because know 10 million of them potentially have the capability of running this game at higher than 900p and 30fps judging by the minimum requirements

Not really surprised by the GPU requirements. It looks like the game will not scale below the current gen consoles (unless you play at lower res), since it's a pure new gen title. My guess is that minimum = PS4 level just at 1080p.

The CPU requirements are bonkers though.

Going to have to take this with a boulder of salt, but if these do turn out to be the actual systerm requirements, I'll be waiting for Rogue next year instead. I like Assassin's Creed, but I'm not buying a graphics card (or a console, for that matter) just to play it.

Hahaha!!! Ubisoft is literally a joke now... EA is not the worst anymore.

2500K and 680 as minimum? HAHAHAHAHA!

Buy the PS4 or xbone and then done for the generation. Hermits are having to update and change out parts almost game by game now it seems, gone be a rough gen for hermits pretending like they all have suped up rigs that can play anything in 1080p at 60fps on ultra settings when it's far from the truth.

By the end of the year PS4 will almost have 10 million users alone and this is it's first year on the market, so that number isn't really anything to brag about lol.

Bad optimization or not I will max it out at 1440p. It's good to be able to build a rig with whatever specs I want instead of letting the devs decide what resolution and frame rate I will be playing at.

who exactly are you talking about?

The fx 8350 is pretty damn cheap, but it being min and recommended is confusing.

Anyway, my 970 is ready.

ok whatever considering 10 million own GTX 680 classes GPU that can outperform the ps4 not to mention that's only one class from Nividia.

These reqs for a current gen port aren't much different than a last gen port requiring a 8800 gt and core 2 duo.

How many million of those are 660's? How many bought 2-3 for sli?

Its about the game, not how it looks. Slow paced games are just fine at 30fps, its all about optimization. Well i wont be getting the game anyhow was just curious as to what the specs are.

I mean im playing DriveClub at 30 and Assetto Corsa on PC at 60, both run at the same responsiveness and smoothness. Also Assetto is the same at 60 or 200 fps, so blah.

must be the PC gamers that live off prebuilt rigs

Hahahahaha Ubisoft, very funny, the joke is those specs.

And to think...I got in an argument with someone here who was saying the best versions of multiplats are on PC.

Yet...this type of thing happens non stop.

This is the whole flaw that the herms don't seem to accept. Sure...your games run at better quality....but the majority of PC gamers don't see that quality.....b/c of the non universal system.

So the herms don't get butthurt by my post: I already know the 2 sides: Buy the console version > get lower quality - Buy the PC version > get higher quality...but at the cost of an arm and a leg.

So in this case no one wins.

@timster20:

Why does it matter a ps4 doesn't even outperform a GTX 660

Great this thread has been filled with the usuals PC "experts" who wouldn't game on PC because they somehow know the "truth" about PC gaming.

It's below this games req.

@timster20:

This isn't even a official req from Ubisoft so it really doesn't matter

Looks like the 144fps gamers are gonna have to wait for the GTX 1180's or whatever they'll be called and run them in sli. Hopefully that will be enough power.

@timster20: Source? Because what the OP has posted isn't the official requirements.

Why are you asking me for the source? I didn't start the thread.

Seeing the graphics of this game, this is hard to believe. Oh well it's not like the PC I game on can play many next gen games on minimum anyway.

And lowest graphics settings along with framerate drops to 20 FPS, with low draw distance, no AA/AF, screen tearing, input lag, texture pop in.

The difference isn't just marginal.

BS system requirements. Hey Ubisoft, you don't need to put fake, huge system requirements to appeal to us.

what are with these shitty ports. does it have to do with it being a last gen release?

I think my 5Ghz 3770k and SLI GTX970's will be just fine.

While I wouldn't be surprised to learn UBI is trying to discourage PC gaming, the fact it requires lots of CPU cores isn't in itself surprising.

After the string of games that have been coming out this year with inflated and false requirements, recommending i7's and AMD FX 8's then saying you *need* 3-4gb vram for high/max settings when in fact you don't need it. People shouldn't get their panties in a bunch, as well as console fanboys using these "requirements" as bait which is hilarious.... As for the latest blunder in pc requirements The Evil Within requiring 4gb of vram when in fact only uses 1.6GB of VRAM at 1080p with all its bells and whistles enabled.

This basically. Ubi has always bluffed when it came to PC reqs. No reason to sweat over it.

I'm sure my 670 will still make the cut

Evil Within's vram reqs may have been exaggerated but even a 980 can't maintain 60 fps at 1080p.

680GTX with FX8350 cost cents right now

There is no way these are correct.

If these console developers don't optimise their CPU requirements for the PC this gen, it's going to cause major issues. AMD, Intel and Nvidia are constantly trying to improve efficiency across the board. AMD them selves are trying to do this for example with the A series APUs on the PC, trying to bring as much performance as they can to entry level consumers and you can run PC games on that thing. But if developers continue to be lazy when porting, that just flies in the face of what hardware manufacturers are trying to do.

Even software developers like MS are trying to make their software run on less capable hardware, like their Windows and so on.

I'm not too concerned with this as I have no intention of getting it, but I'm concerned it's turning into a trend. The Evil Within also had these requirements I think. No one should be telling us we need high end CPUs for gaming when obviously MS and Sony think differently.

TC what's your opinion?

According to the Nvidia CEO and steam-survey, more PC's than the number of PS4's sold will.

This game is factually best on PC as it looks and runs better on it.