Assassin's Creed. PS3 vs Xbox 360. Producer explains the differences!!!

I would always go for 360 version, in the end will be the very best one, that is a given fact proved by a host of titles by nowgreg_splicer

I would always go for 360 version, in the end will be the very best one, that is a given fact proved by a host of titles by nowgreg_splicer

It is Ubisoft after all... Cow's call them "lazy dev's" and "bases to Microsoft".

Quote:

There shouldn't be any differences at all. We're sharing the exact same assets. The engines have the same capabilities. Both systems have different things going for them. With PLAYSTATION 3, currently, you can see maybe a slight difference in some of the textures. With Xbox 360 right now you may see a little bit smoother framerate, maybe a couple more frames per second right now. It's so negligible right now that unless you're sitting there looking at them both side by side, you're not going to see any difference. And that's our goal - to deliver the exact same experience on both of them.

http://www.gameinformer.com/News/Story/200705/N07.0523.1653.37195.htm?Page=1 

LuvGaming

Where does it say the textures will be better?

[QUOTE="Deevoshun"]

[QUOTE="LuvGaming"][QUOTE="NobuoMusicMaker"]That's why multiplatform releases are bad for the game.  The lesser console, Xbox360 in this case, downgrades the more powerful console, PS3.LuvGaming

 "With Playstation 3, currently, you can see maybe a slight difference in some of the textures."

Where in that sentence does Ubi say PS3 has better textures?  Cows please point it out for me, I thinking my eye sight might be failing me.:roll:

Ok lets try it this way, Xbox gets better framerate and there is a slight difference in textures ok... 

Try this cows, lets say the PS3 does have better textures, why not just drop the BETTER framerate a little bit to match those better textures???  (you do this all the time on PC's to get a better framerate).  Its because they dont need to because 360 version is probably the one with the better textures, that would make more sense.  I mean if you already got the better framerate which is something I alway go for on my PC, why not bump up the graphics settings a bit to get a to the sweat spot.

[QUOTE="The_One_White"]

[QUOTE="NobuoMusicMaker"]That's why multiplatform releases are bad for the game. The lesser console, Xbox360 in this case, downgrades the more powerful console, PS3.LuvGaming

It says that the 360 has the better framerate and i would prefer smoother playing to some terxtures looking different...

i believe the comment about not being able to notice unless you juxtapose them applied to the textures as well. 

Deevoshun, seems like you're pointing out wishful thinking and not facts. Both versions will be the same so again, who cares?LuvGaming

And you were doing pretty much the same thing by saying the PS3 would have better textures yet nowhere in the article does it say that.

[QUOTE="xX0LDSCH00LXx"]

The term "General Purpose" CPU Power is one that is very useful for gaming.

One of the reasons why Xbox 360 versions of multi-platform games always end up so much better than Playstation 3 games is because the games use traditional programming code, which really gives the Xbox 360 a big performance advantage over the Playstation 3.

Just look at the way games like Call of Duty 3 and F.E.A.R. have perfectly smooth framerates on the Xbox 360, but the Playstation 3 versions of the game have very choppy framerates.

The reason for performance problems like that with the Playstation 3 is often because of the lack of General Purpose CPU power.

The other reason for those framerate performance problems in Playstation 3 games is because the PS3 is always limited to 256MB of CPU RAM, much of which is dedicated to the 96MB PS3 Operating System that takes up too much memory.

Xbox 360 has a much more efficient Operating System that takes up only 32MB of RAM, and the Xbox 360 can use up to 512MB of RAM for the General Purpose CPU functions. Xbox 360 even has an addition 10MB of eDRAM to help with General Purpose CPU power.

No doubt about, the General Purpose CPU power is something the developers of games appreciate very much! I should know, because I'm a game developer! General Purpose power gives you the ability to use processing power and RAM wherever you need it at any time; it is very flexible.

But the Playstation 3 has so many hardware bottleneck restrictions and limitations that it makes programming very difficult. What would you rather have, one 3.2 Ghz CPU with two threads, like the PS3 has, or would you rather thave three 3.2Ghz Power PC chips, each with two threads, for a total of six threads, like the Xbox 360 has. I think it's pretty obvious that the Xbox 360 is better.

I was reading an article from Ubisoft that talked about how the Xbox 360 version of Assassins Creed will have noticeably better Artificial Intelligence than the Playstation 3 version. The reason for this is because the developers said they could devote an entire CPU to focus entirely on Artificial Intelligence with the Xbox 360.

The Playstation 3 can't compete with that kind of performance, because it's outdated parallel processing architecture won't allow it. PS3 only has one CPU with only two threads. There are seven SPE subprocessors that receive instructions from the CPU with their thread. The problem is the fact that the CPU has only two threads to send signals with. Sony originally wanted to include two Cell CPU processors with the PS3, but they couldn't because of the pricing. This means the PS3 can only send instructions to two SPE subprocessors at a time. This is not an efficient way to program games; it is literally like trying to juggle seven balls with only two hands...it's pretty much impossible, and it offers very poor performance.

More and more publishers and developers have become aware of this as time has passed. The performance game continues to increase in favor of the Xbox 360 as time goes on.

Just look how Call of Duty 3 was better on the Xbox 360 when it was released on both systems. The Xbox 360 version had a perfectly smooth framerate, allowed 24 people to talk online with each other, and the controller rumbled. But with the Playstation 3, the controller doesn't rumble, the framerate isn't smooth, and you can't talk to anyone while you are playing online.

Look at how newly released games like Virtua Tennis 3 still don't have online play for the Playstation 3. The Xbox 360 version has online play and online voice chat. Those are awesome features that add a lot of fun to the Xbox 360 version. General Purpose CPU power is one of the reasons why the Xbox 360 is so much better in terms of all the features included in the games.

The gap in performance really is getting bigger, though. Look at the way games are released so much earlier for Xbox 360, and yet the Xbox 360 versions of the games end up so much better. Rainbow Six: Vegas has been available on the Xbox 360 for over six months, and it is awesome! Ghost Recon: Advanced Warfighter 2 is another Xbox 360 game that has been available for a long time now. The Playstation 3 versions of those games are nowhere to be seen, because there isn't enough "General Purpose" power on the Playstation 3, and it is causing the developers to have to spend a lot more time and money developing the games for the PS3.

The problem is, the Playstation 3 versions of the games aren't worth the wait. Just look at the way F.E.A.R. won all sorts of awards for being a great game with cool gameplay and great graphics when it was released for the PC and Xbox 360 over six months ago.

But when the Playstation 3 version of F.E.A.R. was released, we saw there is a BIG difference in performance between the Xbox 360 and the Playstation 3. The framerate in F.E.A.R. on the Xbox 360 is smooth at all times, and the online play is great on the Xbox 360. But with the Playstation 3, the framerate often dips below 20 frames per second at times, which makes the game virtually unplayable at times. When you play online, you can't talk to anyone on the PS3. The reason traditional features like that aren't included in the PS3 versions of the games is because the PS3 doesn't have enough traditional "General Purpose" CPU power.

If you want to read the review of F.E.A.R. for yourself, go here: http://www.1up.com/do/revie...

But, the lack of General Purpose CPU power is the reason why the PS3 has developed a reputation for having poor framerates, and offering fewer features in games. This lack of General Purpose CPU power is also why PS3 versions of games are released later in many situations where developers aren't familiar with that type of non-traditional programming environment. Overall, my friends and I are very disappointed with the Playstation 3, it's lack of games, it's difficult programming environment, and it's overall lack of performance.

xX0LDSCH00LXx

[QUOTE="LuvGaming"]Deevoshun, seems like you're pointing out wishful thinking and not facts. Both versions will be the same so again, who cares?Evo310whp

And you were doing pretty much the same thing by saying the PS3 would have better textures yet nowhere in the article does it say that.

I agree, TC has been owned

That's why multiplatform releases are bad for the game.  The lesser console, Xbox360 in this case, downgrades the more powerful console, PS3.NobuoMusicMaker

Quote:

There shouldn't be any differences at all. We're sharing the exact same assets. The engines have the same capabilities. Both systems have different things going for them. With PLAYSTATION 3, currently, you can see maybe a slight difference in some of the textures. With Xbox 360 right now you may see a little bit smoother framerate, maybe a couple more frames per second right now. It's so negligible right now that unless you're sitting there looking at them both side by side, you're not going to see any difference. And that's our goal - to deliver the exact same experience on both of them.

http://www.gameinformer.com/News/Story/200705/N07.0523.1653.37195.htm?Page=1

LuvGaming

 Well thats the reason why mulitplatform sucks..if they work on the ps3 exclusive they can use the cell and rsx..and the 360 version not so sure..

[QUOTE="Evo310whp"]

[QUOTE="LuvGaming"]Deevoshun, seems like you're pointing out wishful thinking and not facts. Both versions will be the same so again, who cares?El_Fanboy

And you were doing pretty much the same thing by saying the PS3 would have better textures yet nowhere in the article does it say that.

I agree, TC has been owned

 This was brought up about page 1 or 2 of the thread. ?TC kindly ignored it all and just continued to drag this topic.

[QUOTE="Evo310whp"]

[QUOTE="LuvGaming"]Deevoshun, seems like you're pointing out wishful thinking and not facts. Both versions will be the same so again, who cares?El_Fanboy

And you were doing pretty much the same thing by saying the PS3 would have better textures yet nowhere in the article does it say that.

I agree, TC has been owned

[QUOTE="LuvGaming"]

Quote:

There shouldn't be any differences at all. We're sharing the exact same assets. The engines have the same capabilities. Both systems have different things going for them. With PLAYSTATION 3, currently, you can see maybe a slight difference in some of the textures. With Xbox 360 right now you may see a little bit smoother framerate, maybe a couple more frames per second right now. It's so negligible right now that unless you're sitting there looking at them both side by side, you're not going to see any difference. And that's our goal - to deliver the exact same experience on both of them.

http://www.gameinformer.com/News/Story/200705/N07.0523.1653.37195.htm?Page=1

elementz28

 Well thats the reason why mulitplatform sucks..if they work on the ps3 exclusive they can use the cell and rsx..and the 360 version not so sure..

 Gee, it took you how many years of gaming to figure out something most people figured out right away. If the company is going to make it an exclusive, they have more time and resources to work on the game and can produce things on one system that they couldn't do on another. Too bad cows can't seem to grasp that concept and believe that only PS3 can do things other systems can't...

[QUOTE="El_Fanboy"][QUOTE="Evo310whp"]

[QUOTE="LuvGaming"]Deevoshun, seems like you're pointing out wishful thinking and not facts. Both versions will be the same so again, who cares?DXGreat1_HGL

And you were doing pretty much the same thing by saying the PS3 would have better textures yet nowhere in the article does it say that.

I agree, TC has been owned

 This was brought up about page 1 or 2 of the thread. ?TC kindly ignored it all and just continued to drag this topic.

[QUOTE="DXGreat1_HGL"][QUOTE="El_Fanboy"][QUOTE="Evo310whp"]

[QUOTE="LuvGaming"]Deevoshun, seems like you're pointing out wishful thinking and not facts. Both versions will be the same so again, who cares?LuvGaming

And you were doing pretty much the same thing by saying the PS3 would have better textures yet nowhere in the article does it say that.

I agree, TC has been owned

 This was brought up about page 1 or 2 of the thread. ?TC kindly ignored it all and just continued to drag this topic.

Dude you only started saying that when people kept asking "where does it say the PS3 will have better textures"

[QUOTE="elementz28"][QUOTE="LuvGaming"]

Quote:

There shouldn't be any differences at all. We're sharing the exact same assets. The engines have the same capabilities. Both systems have different things going for them. With PLAYSTATION 3, currently, you can see maybe a slight difference in some of the textures. With Xbox 360 right now you may see a little bit smoother framerate, maybe a couple more frames per second right now. It's so negligible right now that unless you're sitting there looking at them both side by side, you're not going to see any difference. And that's our goal - to deliver the exact same experience on both of them.

http://www.gameinformer.com/News/Story/200705/N07.0523.1653.37195.htm?Page=1

DXGreat1_HGL

Well thats the reason why mulitplatform sucks..if they work on the ps3 exclusive they can use the cell and rsx..and the 360 version not so sure..

Gee, it took you how many years of gaming to figure out something most people figured out right away. If the company is going to make it an exclusive, they have more time and resources to work on the game and can produce things on one system that they couldn't do on another. Too bad cows can't seem to grasp that concept and believe that only PS3 can do things other systems can't...

many devlopers already come out and said the ps3 is much more of a powerful system..i believe them more then the lemmings here..lol.. do the 360 have the cell or rsx? no..so it sucks..

[QUOTE="LuvGaming"][QUOTE="DXGreat1_HGL"][QUOTE="El_Fanboy"][QUOTE="Evo310whp"]

[QUOTE="LuvGaming"]Deevoshun, seems like you're pointing out wishful thinking and not facts. Both versions will be the same so again, who cares?Evo310whp

And you were doing pretty much the same thing by saying the PS3 would have better textures yet nowhere in the article does it say that.

I agree, TC has been owned

 This was brought up about page 1 or 2 of the thread. ?TC kindly ignored it all and just continued to drag this topic.

Dude you only started saying that when people kept asking "where does it say the PS3 will have better textures"

Looks like another Multiplat game that is better on the 360

Who cares which one looks better? with the PS3 there will be almost no loading times because of the installation. By the way Assassin's Creed is kinda lame right now. The battle system looks so clunky and  the enemies wait till they attack. This game is so similar with Splinter Cell Conviction. They should fix atelier's movements, no assassin moves so  slow and ungracefully. Improve the graphics cause it looks like "meh" right now compared to all of the other next gen titles.

[QUOTE="DXGreat1_HGL"][QUOTE="elementz28"][QUOTE="LuvGaming"]

Quote:

There shouldn't be any differences at all. We're sharing the exact same assets. The engines have the same capabilities. Both systems have different things going for them. With PLAYSTATION 3, currently, you can see maybe a slight difference in some of the textures. With Xbox 360 right now you may see a little bit smoother framerate, maybe a couple more frames per second right now. It's so negligible right now that unless you're sitting there looking at them both side by side, you're not going to see any difference. And that's our goal - to deliver the exact same experience on both of them.

http://www.gameinformer.com/News/Story/200705/N07.0523.1653.37195.htm?Page=1

elementz28

Well thats the reason why mulitplatform sucks..if they work on the ps3 exclusive they can use the cell and rsx..and the 360 version not so sure..

Gee, it took you how many years of gaming to figure out something most people figured out right away. If the company is going to make it an exclusive, they have more time and resources to work on the game and can produce things on one system that they couldn't do on another. Too bad cows can't seem to grasp that concept and believe that only PS3 can do things other systems can't...

many devlopers already come out and said the ps3 is much more of a powerful system..i believe them more then the lemmings here..lol.. do the 360 have the cell or rsx? no..so it sucks..

Its all word of mouth. People/devs can say one thing but its time they start showing the so called uber power of the PS3 instead of just talking about it in these crappy interviews that cows try to use as bragging rights and ownage.  So far I have seen nothing to back these statements up.

any multiplat can be better on PS3 in every way possible... ex oblivion

/thread 

That's why multiplatform releases are bad for the game.  The lesser console, Xbox360 in this case, downgrades the more powerful console, PS3.NobuoMusicMaker

Hhhhmm.. no. 360 GPU is better then the PS3's, so who is downgrading who? The game is going to be identical on both systems. Unlike Ubisoft games on the PS3 and the awesom F.E.A.R. , Assassin's Creed should look and play the same on the PS3 and 360.

any multiplat can be better on PS3 in every way possible... ex oblivion

/thread 

l1mIt

hmm if its better then why did it score less than the "crappy" 360 version...that is weird

[QUOTE="l1mIt"]

any multiplat can be better on PS3 in every way possible... ex oblivion

/thread

Evo310whp

hmm if its better then why did it score less than the "crappy" 360 version...that is weird

[QUOTE="tree-branch"]For paying 200 more dollars to get a ps3 the multplats should be better on ps3.LosDaddie

QFT!!

It's a sad day when the more expensive console doesn't get a superior product.

[QUOTE="elementz28"][QUOTE="DXGreat1_HGL"][QUOTE="elementz28"][QUOTE="LuvGaming"]

Quote:

There shouldn't be any differences at all. We're sharing the exact same assets. The engines have the same capabilities. Both systems have different things going for them. With PLAYSTATION 3, currently, you can see maybe a slight difference in some of the textures. With Xbox 360 right now you may see a little bit smoother framerate, maybe a couple more frames per second right now. It's so negligible right now that unless you're sitting there looking at them both side by side, you're not going to see any difference. And that's our goal - to deliver the exact same experience on both of them.

http://www.gameinformer.com/News/Story/200705/N07.0523.1653.37195.htm?Page=1

Evo310whp

Well thats the reason why mulitplatform sucks..if they work on the ps3 exclusive they can use the cell and rsx..and the 360 version not so sure..

Gee, it took you how many years of gaming to figure out something most people figured out right away. If the company is going to make it an exclusive, they have more time and resources to work on the game and can produce things on one system that they couldn't do on another. Too bad cows can't seem to grasp that concept and believe that only PS3 can do things other systems can't...

many devlopers already come out and said the ps3 is much more of a powerful system..i believe them more then the lemmings here..lol.. do the 360 have the cell or rsx? no..so it sucks..

Its all word of mouth. People/devs can say one thing but its time they start showing the so called uber power of the PS3 instead of just talking about it in these crappy interviews that cows try to use as bragging rights and ownage. So far I have seen nothing to back these statements up.

what you goin to do? bring up gears of war..thats the only game that you guys like talkin about..you guys waited a year to get it....lol.its only been what 5 months since the ps3 been launched...oh i know another great lookin game for the 360 halo 2 opps i mean 3..

[QUOTE="LuvGaming"]

Quote:

There shouldn't be any differences at all. We're sharing the exact same assets. The engines have the same capabilities. Both systems have different things going for them. With PLAYSTATION 3, currently, you can see maybe a slight difference in some of the textures. With Xbox 360 right now you may see a little bit smoother framerate, maybe a couple more frames per second right now. It's so negligible right now that unless you're sitting there looking at them both side by side, you're not going to see any difference. And that's our goal - to deliver the exact same experience on both of them.

http://www.gameinformer.com/News/Story/200705/N07.0523.1653.37195.htm?Page=1

elementz28

 Well thats the reason why mulitplatform sucks..if they work on the ps3 exclusive they can use the cell and rsx..and the 360 version not so sure..

If they made it exclusive for the PS3 the game wouldn't be out until 2009. :lol: If they made if the 360 it would have been out by now. Because they are releasing the game for both platforms we have to wait for the PS3 to be finished. I'm sure the 360 & PC versions are already done by now.

[QUOTE="Evo310whp"][QUOTE="elementz28"][QUOTE="DXGreat1_HGL"][QUOTE="elementz28"][QUOTE="LuvGaming"]

Quote:

There shouldn't be any differences at all. We're sharing the exact same assets. The engines have the same capabilities. Both systems have different things going for them. With PLAYSTATION 3, currently, you can see maybe a slight difference in some of the textures. With Xbox 360 right now you may see a little bit smoother framerate, maybe a couple more frames per second right now. It's so negligible right now that unless you're sitting there looking at them both side by side, you're not going to see any difference. And that's our goal - to deliver the exact same experience on both of them.

http://www.gameinformer.com/News/Story/200705/N07.0523.1653.37195.htm?Page=1

elementz28

Well thats the reason why mulitplatform sucks..if they work on the ps3 exclusive they can use the cell and rsx..and the 360 version not so sure..

Gee, it took you how many years of gaming to figure out something most people figured out right away. If the company is going to make it an exclusive, they have more time and resources to work on the game and can produce things on one system that they couldn't do on another. Too bad cows can't seem to grasp that concept and believe that only PS3 can do things other systems can't...

many devlopers already come out and said the ps3 is much more of a powerful system..i believe them more then the lemmings here..lol.. do the 360 have the cell or rsx? no..so it sucks..

Its all word of mouth. People/devs can say one thing but its time they start showing the so called uber power of the PS3 instead of just talking about it in these crappy interviews that cows try to use as bragging rights and ownage. So far I have seen nothing to back these statements up.

what you goin to do? bring up gears of war..thats the only game that you guys like talkin about..you guys waited a year to get it....lol.its only been what 5 months since the ps3 been launched...oh i know another great lookin game for the 360 halo 2 opps i mean 3..

You cow pies. Anyway why do I need to bring up geow for my point I dont have to bring anything up I am not trying to prove the 360 is more powerful here you (cows) are the ones claiming the PS3 is more powerful just because of what a few devs have said.

The devs, Sony, you fanboy cows can say whatever you want to if it makes you feel better but at the end of the day if you cant actually show and I mean noticebly show that the PS3 is "more powerful than the 360" then its all talk and thats is all it is at this point in time.

Cows take one comment out of an interview and if it goes with your thinking you try to use it as ownage and bragging rights. Like I said I dont have to prove anything your the ones bragging how the PS3 has this divine power I am still waiting to see it.

[QUOTE="l1mIt"]

any multiplat can be better on PS3 in every way possible... ex oblivion

/thread

Evo310whp

hmm if its better then why did it score less than the "crappy" 360 version...that is weird

lower standards lemming?  a 9.5 now is better than a 9.6 from a YEAR ago... and it was a fact PS3s oblivion had better textures and a farther draw distance...

oblivion is a game thats an example that any port can be better on PS3 

For paying 200 more dollars to get a ps3 the multplats should be better on ps3.tree-branch

[QUOTE="Evo310whp"][QUOTE="l1mIt"]

any multiplat can be better on PS3 in every way possible... ex oblivion

/thread

l1mIt

hmm if its better then why did it score less than the "crappy" 360 version...that is weird

lower standards lemming?  a 9.5 now is better than a 9.6 from a YEAR ago... and it was a fact PS3s oblivion had better textures and a farther draw distance...

oblivion is a game thats an example that any port can be better on PS3 

How is a 9.5 now better than a 9.6 a year ago I dont get that one sorry. I keep forgetting how passionate you cows are over that one game.

I heard Assasin's Creed is aboot the Third Crusade.JLuke360

its about the hashshashins (the original assasins, where the word "assasin" came from)

any multiplat can be better on PS3 in every way possible... ex oblivion

/thread

l1mIt

obivion was released a full year after the 360 and pc versions and the developers stated that everything they did on in the ps3 could have been done on the other versions if they had extended time...your point fails. 

[QUOTE="Evo310whp"][QUOTE="l1mIt"]

any multiplat can be better on PS3 in every way possible... ex oblivion

/thread

l1mIt

hmm if its better then why did it score less than the "crappy" 360 version...that is weird

lower standards lemming? a 9.5 now is better than a 9.6 from a YEAR ago... and it was a fact PS3s oblivion had better textures and a farther draw distance...

oblivion is a game thats an example that any port can be better on PS3

and any ps3 non-exclusive game can look better on 360 if you give them a year to port it.

[QUOTE="l1mIt"][QUOTE="Evo310whp"][QUOTE="l1mIt"]

any multiplat can be better on PS3 in every way possible... ex oblivion

/thread

Evo310whp

hmm if its better then why did it score less than the "crappy" 360 version...that is weird

lower standards lemming? a 9.5 now is better than a 9.6 from a YEAR ago... and it was a fact PS3s oblivion had better textures and a farther draw distance...

oblivion is a game thats an example that any port can be better on PS3

How is a 9.5 now better than a 9.6 a year ago I dont get that one sorry. I keep forgetting how passionate you cows are over that one game.

can you say lower standards?

low...er....stand...ards... try it lemming its not to hard 

[QUOTE="Evo310whp"][QUOTE="l1mIt"][QUOTE="Evo310whp"][QUOTE="l1mIt"]

any multiplat can be better on PS3 in every way possible... ex oblivion

/thread

l1mIt

hmm if its better then why did it score less than the "crappy" 360 version...that is weird

lower standards lemming? a 9.5 now is better than a 9.6 from a YEAR ago... and it was a fact PS3s oblivion had better textures and a farther draw distance...

oblivion is a game thats an example that any port can be better on PS3

How is a 9.5 now better than a 9.6 a year ago I dont get that one sorry. I keep forgetting how passionate you cows are over that one game.

can you say lower standards?

low...er....stand...ards... try it lemming its not to hard

can you say that the ps3 version came out a year later? If the game didn't look better, then Bethesda wouldn't be very good devs would they? O, and by the way, with the sales of Oblivion on PS3 as crappy as they are, dont look forward to Elder Scrolls V on your ps3 anywhere near the 360/PC launch. 

[QUOTE="l1mIt"][QUOTE="Evo310whp"][QUOTE="l1mIt"]

any multiplat can be better on PS3 in every way possible... ex oblivion

/thread

Evo310whp

hmm if its better then why did it score less than the "crappy" 360 version...that is weird

lower standards lemming?  a 9.5 now is better than a 9.6 from a YEAR ago... and it was a fact PS3s oblivion had better textures and a farther draw distance...

oblivion is a game thats an example that any port can be better on PS3 

How is a 9.5 now better than a 9.6 a year ago I dont get that one sorry. I keep forgetting how passionate you cows are over that one game.

It's not. What's so funny is the developers could go back and work on the 360 version for another 6 months and make it even better then the PS3 version :lol: :P The PS3 version could be improved just like the 360 version was. Cows are so funny.

[QUOTE="l1mIt"][QUOTE="Evo310whp"][QUOTE="l1mIt"][QUOTE="Evo310whp"][QUOTE="l1mIt"]

any multiplat can be better on PS3 in every way possible... ex oblivion

/thread

El_Fanboy

hmm if its better then why did it score less than the "crappy" 360 version...that is weird

lower standards lemming? a 9.5 now is better than a 9.6 from a YEAR ago... and it was a fact PS3s oblivion had better textures and a farther draw distance...

oblivion is a game thats an example that any port can be better on PS3

How is a 9.5 now better than a 9.6 a year ago I dont get that one sorry. I keep forgetting how passionate you cows are over that one game.

can you say lower standards?

low...er....stand...ards... try it lemming its not to hard

can you say that the ps3 version came out a year later? If the game didn't look better, then Bethesda wouldn't be very good devs would they? O, and by the way, with the sales of Oblivion on PS3 as crappy as they are, dont look forward to Elder Scrolls V on your ps3 anywhere near the 360/PC launch.

ya thats a smart one...bring up sales, where xflop was released a year ahead of PS3...isnt obvious what oblivion would sell more on? :| 

[QUOTE="Evo310whp"][QUOTE="l1mIt"][QUOTE="Evo310whp"][QUOTE="l1mIt"]

any multiplat can be better on PS3 in every way possible... ex oblivion

/thread

l1mIt

hmm if its better then why did it score less than the "crappy" 360 version...that is weird

lower standards lemming? a 9.5 now is better than a 9.6 from a YEAR ago... and it was a fact PS3s oblivion had better textures and a farther draw distance...

oblivion is a game thats an example that any port can be better on PS3

How is a 9.5 now better than a 9.6 a year ago I dont get that one sorry. I keep forgetting how passionate you cows are over that one game.

can you say lower standards?

low...er....stand...ards... try it lemming its not to hard 

 My standards when it comes to videogames are fine.

For paying 200 more dollars to get a ps3 the multplats should be better on ps3.tree-branch

[QUOTE="El_Fanboy"][QUOTE="l1mIt"][QUOTE="Evo310whp"][QUOTE="l1mIt"][QUOTE="Evo310whp"][QUOTE="l1mIt"]

any multiplat can be better on PS3 in every way possible... ex oblivion

/thread

l1mIt

hmm if its better then why did it score less than the "crappy" 360 version...that is weird

lower standards lemming? a 9.5 now is better than a 9.6 from a YEAR ago... and it was a fact PS3s oblivion had better textures and a farther draw distance...

oblivion is a game thats an example that any port can be better on PS3

How is a 9.5 now better than a 9.6 a year ago I dont get that one sorry. I keep forgetting how passionate you cows are over that one game.

can you say lower standards?

low...er....stand...ards... try it lemming its not to hard

can you say that the ps3 version came out a year later? If the game didn't look better, then Bethesda wouldn't be very good devs would they? O, and by the way, with the sales of Oblivion on PS3 as crappy as they are, dont look forward to Elder Scrolls V on your ps3 anywhere near the 360/PC launch.

ya thats a smart one...bring up sales, where xflop was released a year ahead of PS3...isnt obvious what oblivion would sell more on? :| 

So PS3 will have better textures and 360 will have a smoother frame rate ?

That's why multiplatform releases are bad for the game.  The lesser console, Xbox360 in this case, downgrades the more powerful console, PS3.NobuoMusicMaker

Man are your reading skills poor.

The higher frame-rate for the 360, which seems to happen in just about EVERY multiplatform game, would give the 360 the edge in power, despite what Sony has been feeding you fanboys.  The PS3 IS NOT keeping up with the processing.

It is obvious that the PS3 and 360 are close in power, but the PS3 has a bottleneck somewhere that is keeping it from reaching the frames-per-second that the 360 is acheiving.