Batman Arkham City sequel or prequel?

For those of you that beat the game, do you think Rocksteady plans on making a sequel? I think they definatley should because of all the the unexplained things and what not but, they said they were going to make a silver age prequel. What do you think?

I want a Catwoman spin-off. She was so fun to play with and would love her abilities and weapons flashed out with a game unique to her.

The next game should be called "Gotham City" and let you drive the Batmobile around all of Gotham.Timstuff

The next game should be called "Gotham City" and let you drive the Batmobile around all of Gotham.Timstuff

I'd like this approach, it feels weird to just cut the arkham story right now with some villains still at large (ie the scarecrow) and I would like them to finish it off and then do whatever they like

I wish they whould make a game for a marvel character. For eaxmaple if they put in the polish that they did into the batman games a Ironman game by the same studio could be epic. Or a spiderman game done right by them salo would be epic.

[QUOTE="Timstuff"]The next game should be called "Gotham City" and let you drive the Batmobile around all of Gotham.parkurtommo

i liked much better the first game than the city one, can anyone tell me why ? the-obiwan

Arkham City is objectively better than Arkham Assylum.

They heavily hinted at a sequel with the Watcher in the Wings sidequest and whatnot. Not only that but I have a feeling this will be a cheap trick to use the Joker again.

They heavily hinted at a sequel with the Watcher in the Wings sidequest and whatnot. Not only that but I have a feeling this will be a cheap trick to use the Joker again.turtlethetaffer

[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"]They heavily hinted at a sequel with the Watcher in the Wings sidequest and whatnot. Not only that but I have a feeling this will be a cheap trick to use the Joker again.Zeviander

Ok nevermind. Still. Prequels don't work too well in video games because with games you need to improve on previous ones and it begs the question "if this came before the other where was this awesome tool in the other?"

[QUOTE="Zeviander"][QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"]They heavily hinted at a sequel with the Watcher in the Wings sidequest and whatnot. Not only that but I have a feeling this will be a cheap trick to use the Joker again.turtlethetaffer

Ok nevermind. Still. Prequels don't work too well in video games because with games you need to improve on previous ones and it begs the question "if this came before the other where was this awesome tool in the other?"

That's why they're choosing to do a different Batman and not just something that happened like a year before AA

It should definetly we a sequel. Based on the stuff side mission. The following are spoilers

[spoiler] Based on what the Watcher Azrael said about a new threat coming . All roads lead to the Black Glove. This was a group that tried numerous ways to kill Batman. Also Hush and Potential Scarecrow Involment leads to that also. As in the comics Hush and Scarecrow once worked together as Master and Mentor figure to hunt the Batman. Also Other Bat Family Characters were involved in the story arc and helped Batman in different ways. I would be surprised if Rocksteady didnt follow that arc. For more reference read the Batman RIP storyline as it goes more in depth [/spoiler]

The above spoilers would introduce a new villain and can move on without the Joker.

I want a new story. Getting a little tired of the Joker tbh. I don't mind if some loose ends are left, because there should always be some unexplained mystery in Batman that can be explained later.

Hope Rocksteady never stop, what an incredible world they realise in game.

I rather have a new story in gotham

They heavily hinted at a sequel with the Watcher in the Wings sidequest and whatnot. Not only that but I have a feeling this will be a cheap trick to use the Joker again.

turtlethetaffer

we don't want joker overload. even somebody as awesome as him can be used too much.

They heavily hinted at a sequel with the Watcher in the Wings sidequest and whatnot. Not only that but I have a feeling this will be a cheap trick to use the Joker again.

turtlethetaffer

we don't want joker overload. even somebody as awesome as him can be used too much.

The next game should be called "Gotham City" and let you drive the Batmobile around all of Gotham.Timstuff

I want a Catwoman spin-off. She was so fun to play with and would love her abilities and weapons flashed out with a game unique to her.

Swift_Boss_A

[QUOTE="Timstuff"]The next game should be called "Gotham City" and let you drive the Batmobile around all of Gotham.marklarmer

[QUOTE="marklarmer"]

[QUOTE="Timstuff"]The next game should be called "Gotham City" and let you drive the Batmobile around all of Gotham.parkurtommo

The next game should be called "Gotham City" and let you drive the Batmobile around all of Gotham.Timstuff

This. I'm really not very stoked on the setting of a "silver age" prequel. But I'm excited for it as a game, because Rocksteady has more than proven themselves to be totally boss at making super hero games.

I want a Catwoman spin-off. She was so fun to play with and would love her abilities and weapons flashed out with a game unique to her.

Swift_Boss_A

Hell *bleeping* YES to this!! :D

I think it would be cool if they made Batman Beyond.

Sequel. But that is not possible because they already used everyone you can fight, and it can't be Joker anymore for obvious reasons.

I think they should do a new Hero game. Maybe an X-Men one where you get to make your own character and choose his/her mutant power. It would be open world and you face oppression from the people, you get to choose how to interact with them.

You can choose to try and prove your worth through society and that you deserve equality through the way of the X-Men by trying to help society. Or you can try and seek revenge on the masses for treating you wrongly for being different by working with Magneto. You can either be hero or villian.

I think Rocksteady could do very well with something like that.

Sequel for me.

I think it would be cool if they made Batman Beyond.

crimsonman1245

Sequel. But that is not possible because they already used everyone you can fight, and it can't be Joker anymore for obvious reasons.ShadowMoses900

i liked much better the first game than the city one, can anyone tell me why ? the-obiwan

I think it would be cool if they made Batman Beyond.

crimsonman1245

Which era is exactly silver age? I'm really new to the comic book scene of Batmna, I only started getting into it this past month, and I've been more focused on trying to get a hold of some new 52's. althoguh, Hush was a great read!!

[QUOTE="crimsonman1245"]

I think it would be cool if they made Batman Beyond.

Blabadon

Sequel of course, both Arkham City and Arkham Asylum hinted heavily at other enemies and characters yet to appear, while Arkham City took it a step further by introducing hidden hints for a sequel premise involving Scarecrow and a certain person from Bruce Wayne's past.

Neither. Rocksteady's an amazingly talented developer and I want to see them tackle a new IP. They've said that super-hero games are really neglected and they'd like to focus on that, so hopefully that's what they'll continue to do as it has tremendous potential. And as much as I love Batman, we have two great games already and anything more would be pushing redundancy. I suppose I would be fine with one more, and if I had to choose it'd be a prequel.

I'd kill to see a darker-themed TMNT game that's closer to the comics than the cartoon using the AA and AC engine in an open-world setting. There was a rumor they were working on something but I believe they denied it unfortunately.