Battlefield 1943- Amazing game

  • 116 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for lvgaming
lvgaming

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 lvgaming
Member since 2006 • 739 Posts

I played a little bit on PSN and enjoyed it as much as I did with 1942 on PC.

I have a question for Xbox Live players, do you also have indicators on all players? (triangles above heads)

Is this because the planes above are also recon or does it always indicate players?

Avatar image for deactivated-58b6232955e4a
deactivated-58b6232955e4a

15594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 deactivated-58b6232955e4a
Member since 2006 • 15594 Posts
[QUOTE="SAGE_OF_FIRE"]PC Battlefields>1943>BC SquatsAreAwesom
I've never played Bad Company... is it really worse then 1943?

Gold Rush is a bad game mode and the game was designed around it.
Avatar image for deactivated-58b6232955e4a
deactivated-58b6232955e4a

15594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 deactivated-58b6232955e4a
Member since 2006 • 15594 Posts

I played a little bit on PSN and enjoyed it as much as I did with 1942 on PC.

I have a question for Xbox Live players, do you also have indicators on all players? (triangles above heads)

Is this because the planes above are also recon or does it always indicate players?

lvgaming
No if you shoot at someone are aim at them for a long time they will pop up on everyone's hud but they can hide to get away from it.
Avatar image for Abicus7
Abicus7

2009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 Abicus7
Member since 2007 • 2009 Posts

I'm having a ton of fun with this game.

Avatar image for lvgaming
lvgaming

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 lvgaming
Member since 2006 • 739 Posts

[QUOTE="lvgaming"]

I played a little bit on PSN and enjoyed it as much as I did with 1942 on PC.

I have a question for Xbox Live players, do you also have indicators on all players? (triangles above heads)

Is this because the planes above are also recon or does it always indicate players?

SAGE_OF_FIRE

No if you shoot at someone are aim at them for a long time they will pop up on everyone's hud but they can hide to get away from it.

Alright because everyone on the other team had a red indicator above their head, so it was kind of a buzzkill to know where everyone was all the time.

Guess I will have to see it does go away.

Avatar image for SparkyProtocol
SparkyProtocol

7680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 76

User Lists: 0

#106 SparkyProtocol
Member since 2009 • 7680 Posts
[QUOTE="SquatsAreAwesom"][QUOTE="SAGE_OF_FIRE"]PC Battlefields>1943>BC SAGE_OF_FIRE
I've never played Bad Company... is it really worse then 1943?

Gold Rush is a bad game mode and the game was designed around it.

How is it bad? Oh that's right, it's not! It is not like conquest where everybody is skattered allover the map and not together working as an entire team.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#107 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

Great game. i like how its colourfull yet still captures the feeling of war.

Avatar image for deactivated-58b6232955e4a
deactivated-58b6232955e4a

15594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 deactivated-58b6232955e4a
Member since 2006 • 15594 Posts
[QUOTE="SAGE_OF_FIRE"][QUOTE="SquatsAreAwesom"] I've never played Bad Company... is it really worse then 1943?SparkyProtocol
Gold Rush is a bad game mode and the game was designed around it.

How is it bad? Oh that's right, it's not! It is not like conquest where everybody is skattered allover the map and not together working as an entire team.

Ok its not "bad" but not as good as conquest which BC wasn't designed around. Plus with goldrush they had potential to have some truly great scenarios but they didn't.
Avatar image for SparkyProtocol
SparkyProtocol

7680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 76

User Lists: 0

#109 SparkyProtocol
Member since 2009 • 7680 Posts
[QUOTE="SparkyProtocol"][QUOTE="SAGE_OF_FIRE"] Gold Rush is a bad game mode and the game was designed around it. SAGE_OF_FIRE
How is it bad? Oh that's right, it's not! It is not like conquest where everybody is skattered allover the map and not together working as an entire team.

Ok its not "bad" but not as good as conquest which BC wasn't designed around. Plus with goldrush they had potential to have some truly great scenarios but they didn't.

Gold Rush is awesome. I don't see what "potential" it did not meet and I have been a BF gamer since BF:Vietnam
Avatar image for deactivated-58b6232955e4a
deactivated-58b6232955e4a

15594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 deactivated-58b6232955e4a
Member since 2006 • 15594 Posts
[QUOTE="SAGE_OF_FIRE"][QUOTE="SparkyProtocol"] How is it bad? Oh that's right, it's not! It is not like conquest where everybody is skattered allover the map and not together working as an entire team.SparkyProtocol
Ok its not "bad" but not as good as conquest which BC wasn't designed around. Plus with goldrush they had potential to have some truly great scenarios but they didn't.

Gold Rush is awesome. I don't see what "potential" it did not meet and I have been a BF gamer since BF:Vietnam

Instead of just moving up the battlefield they should have done more scenarios, like maybe storming a beach or something.
Avatar image for SparkyProtocol
SparkyProtocol

7680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 76

User Lists: 0

#111 SparkyProtocol
Member since 2009 • 7680 Posts
[QUOTE="SparkyProtocol"][QUOTE="SAGE_OF_FIRE"] Ok its not "bad" but not as good as conquest which BC wasn't designed around. Plus with goldrush they had potential to have some truly great scenarios but they didn't. SAGE_OF_FIRE
Gold Rush is awesome. I don't see what "potential" it did not meet and I have been a BF gamer since BF:Vietnam

Instead of just moving up the battlefield they should have done more scenarios, like maybe storming a beach or something.

I found it fun. They said that in the sequel the maps will have more variety. I am excited to fly a blackhawk in BC2 but I understand how epic storming beaches can be.
Avatar image for CreepyBacon
CreepyBacon

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#112 CreepyBacon
Member since 2005 • 3183 Posts

I like it. But tbh i can't justify paying that price for 3 maps on a game that EA has the rights to shut down whenever they want to.

Avatar image for deactivated-58b6232955e4a
deactivated-58b6232955e4a

15594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 deactivated-58b6232955e4a
Member since 2006 • 15594 Posts

I like it. But tbh i can't justify paying that price for 3 maps on a game that EA has the rights to shut down whenever they want to.

CreepyBacon
They already have plans to add more maps in.
Avatar image for cametall
cametall

7692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#114 cametall
Member since 2003 • 7692 Posts
[QUOTE="ieatnoobs18"]Yeah, i got into two trial version games, and it is great. I might even like it better then BF BC's. I only have one problem with it...why do the japanese and the US both have M1's? and the sniper rifles are really under powered.SAGE_OF_FIRE
They want you to headshot with the snipers but I like how the Japanese snipers use katanas.

It's hilarious watching someone run at you with their katana out (that's what she said) trying to stab you.
Avatar image for REforever101
REforever101

11223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#115 REforever101
Member since 2005 • 11223 Posts

this is quite fun actually. i happened to have 1200 ms points in my account (i think i bought them a year ago...) so i decided to just go for it after trying the trial

it was fun, but my complaint is that 24 players is too few for a map like wake island. hopefully the pc version will have a higher cap

Avatar image for InsaneBasura
InsaneBasura

12591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#116 InsaneBasura
Member since 2005 • 12591 Posts
Apart from not being able to connect to a game the majority of the time, the lag, the visual glitches and the freezing I've been having a grand time with this game. While I totally am being spiteful, the last part of that sentence is not ironic. The game's great fun when it works properly. The elitist snobs are completely missing the point.
[QUOTE="SAGE_OF_FIRE"][QUOTE="SquatsAreAwesom"] I've never played Bad Company... is it really worse then 1943?SparkyProtocol
Gold Rush is a bad game mode and the game was designed around it.

How is it bad? Oh that's right, it's not! It is not like conquest where everybody is skattered allover the map and not together working as an entire team.

Forcing players to work together by restricting their freedom isn't optimal. I much prefer the variety and dynamics offered by Conquest to basically running the gauntlet over and over again. Hope Conquest is a part of BC2 from the start.