Battlefield 3 console multiplayer limited by hardware and networks +Setting

  • 159 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for SPBoss
SPBoss

3746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#151 SPBoss
Member since 2009 • 3746 Posts
Plus you can always select a server with less players
Avatar image for Gauloisez
Gauloisez

68

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#153 Gauloisez
Member since 2011 • 68 Posts
I have never understood why people plays the 64 player matches. From what I've played, in every game that have allowed such a number of gamers, it sucks - it's not funny playing 32 vs 32, it's nothing, but a pure mindless frag-fest. 16 vs 16 is way better. With that said I'm stilling getting this game for PC. :)danish-death
Really? Sometimes I could walk minutes on a large field without being spotted by someone at all. This was on a full 64 player map on a full server. Maybe you should stop playing CoD and try out BF2? 10 bucks on steam
Avatar image for Rainbow6Vet
Rainbow6Vet

133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#154 Rainbow6Vet
Member since 2007 • 133 Posts

http://s1112.photobucket.com/albums/k491/awi5951/random%20stuff/?albumview=slideshow

Thats Bad company 2 on pc. Now how can consoles do that much detail on BF3 when it was way more people and far more detail.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#156 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

http://s1112.photobucket.com/albums/k491/awi5951/random%20stuff/?albumview=slideshow

Thats Bad company 2 on pc. Now how can consoles do that much detail on BF3 when it was way more people and far more detail.

Rainbow6Vet

They believe consoles aren't maxed out yet.XD

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#157 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26712 Posts

[QUOTE="FGMPR"]

[QUOTE="XboximusPrime"]

look, if PC gamers would stop complaining about their game being downsized because of the mean ol consoles, then i wouldnt have reason to bring it up.

FGMPR

If we stopped complaining about PC gaming series being ruined by consoles time and time again, Battlefield 3 would have been 24/32 players for us, too. It's easy to sit there and tell us stop complaining when your a part of the lowest common denominator. You're not the one who had to watch classic PC games like Ghost Recon, Rainbow 6, Deus Ex, Battlefield (between 2-3) etc become simplified, less ambitious and regressive sequels of a game they were supposed to be improving on.

Battlefield 3 PC is good for gaming. PC gamers not willing to see our beloved series go down without a fight is good for gaming. Our attitude towards this has helped the likes of BF3 and Homefront, hell even Black Ops become significantly better games on PC than they would have otherwise.

I know it's a bit unusual, but I'm going to back to the point I made originally about why us PC gamers complain (of which Xboximusprime took issue with). Quoted in the latest Game Informer was this when asked about why 64 player on PC was exclusive:

"'The PC audience has been the one complaining"' Bach says "We haven't actually heard any complaints from the console audience" (in regards to previous 24 player counts with their games).

Now, I don't actually believe this as such, and believe if they could, then they would be making BF3 64 players on all platforms, but one thing is for certain. Us PC gamers complained and campaigned long and hard to make sure that BF3 was going to be a PC game first and foremost, and we have been rewarded for our efforts.

What I would like is for console gamers to start doing the same, so that come next generation, basic MP features that were standard for years before xbox Live came along will become standard again. Dedicated servers and server browsers as a bare minimum standard for everyone benifitseveryone.

I doubt that'll happen. Especially with the huge surge of casual gamers we got this gen thanks to Call of Duty, Halo, and Gears, etc. They seem to bend over and take it up the tail pipe when it comes to pricing, content, and online features. We can blame commercials for it too, the huge ad budget campaigns are the problems that led all of these casual gamers to flock to FPS games in the first place.
Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#158 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26712 Posts

[QUOTE="menes777"]

[QUOTE="XboximusPrime"]

sir! :evil:That is absolutely 100 percent correct :P, but It did end up being that now didnt it? This ended being about PC Gamer elitism adn that they are being treated less because the console version is trying to be just as good as their version, like it usualy is with these threads.

Jebus213

What you don't seem to understand is the level of frustration PC gamers have because of the current trend in the consolization of many long favored franchises. Imagine you have a favorite TV show or Movie series that's watered down to appeal to all ages. Imagine if Transformers 3 was a G rated movie? Can you imagine how many pissed off fanboys there would be? PC gamers tend to have a higher standards because it's what we are use to. Yes you can call it whining but it's really a demand for a better product. Another way to look at it would be to imagine the Wii as the lowest common demoninator and every game for PS3 and Xbox360 being made with motion controls in mind. Then imagine your favorite titles requiring some form of dance gameplay to be included with it? Then all of sudden it's not "whining" anymore.

Very well said^ and its fact.

But in the end, all they can do is just criticize PC gamers and call us "elitists" because we show facts.

I lol'd at his comment on Transformers 3 as a G-rated movie, and then talked about higher standards because it's what we are used to. Like the Transformers movies had high standards to begin with. :lol: Anyway, he is right about the PC gamer and higher standards thing, even if his analogy was bad.
Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#159 lamprey263  Online
Member since 2006 • 45433 Posts
Homefront is going to have 32 player MP using dedicated servers, surely EA could do this too with BF3, if not better, I mean how is a big company like EA going to let THQ show them up on this?