Battlefield 3 currently runs better on the PS3 ( Console Version)

  • 172 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for soapandbubbles
soapandbubbles

3412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#151 soapandbubbles
Member since 2010 • 3412 Posts
keyword 'CURRENTLY'
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#152 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts
keyword 'CURRENTLY'soapandbubbles
Damn, you win this one.=p
Avatar image for treedoor
treedoor

7648

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#153 treedoor
Member since 2004 • 7648 Posts

[QUOTE="psn8214"]

[QUOTE="soapandbubbles"]So consolites are NOT missing much. bigboss5ak

64 vs 24 players online. . :P

Ahh everytime i see this it makes me feel good about getting me a rig, oh and the better graphics helps as well.

Well, it'll be better graphics, more players, jets, server browser, and DICE's fanbase which means a better community in general.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#154 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="bigboss5ak"][QUOTE="psn8214"]

64 vs 24 players online. . :P

treedoor

Ahh everytime i see this it makes me feel good about getting me a rig, oh and the better graphics helps as well.

Well, it'll be better graphics, more players, jets, server browser, and DICE's fanbase which means a better community in general.

This one is huge for me as it gives you options as well, the matchmaking needs work on consoles.

Avatar image for shadi2020
shadi2020

435

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#155 shadi2020
Member since 2011 • 435 Posts
well i'm not a lem (only the lems who care about the unoticeble differences in multiplat games ) so i does not matter which console looks a little bit better in light or shadows the game will look good on both consoles and at the end will look the same for me i will get this game on pc and play it with max setting
Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#156 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts
[QUOTE="shadi2020"]well i'm not a lem (only the lems who care about the unoticeble differences in multiplat games ) so i does not matter which console looks a little bit better in light or shadows the game will look good on both consoles and at the end will look the same for me i will get this game on pc and play it with max setting

lets not kid ourselves here..both cows and lemmings fight over which muitplatform looks better and both sides bring up ridiculous flaws to make the other platform look weak.
Avatar image for shadi2020
shadi2020

435

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#157 shadi2020
Member since 2011 • 435 Posts
[QUOTE="lawlessx"][QUOTE="shadi2020"]well i'm not a lem (only the lems who care about the unoticeble differences in multiplat games ) so i does not matter which console looks a little bit better in light or shadows the game will look good on both consoles and at the end will look the same for me i will get this game on pc and play it with max setting

lets not kid ourselves here..both cows and lemmings fight over which muitplatform looks better and both sides bring up ridiculous flaws to make the other platform look weak.

i know but lems just take it a little to far since the game looks the same and plays the same i don't give a damn about which version have a little bit better light or shadows thats just sad the only thing thats matters is the exclusives bec it shows what the console is capable of
Avatar image for Tessellation
Tessellation

9297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#158 Tessellation
Member since 2009 • 9297 Posts

"a bit early to make fair comparisons between the two" Ah ok then. tagyhag

indeed, OP destroyed his/her own thread by him/herself,i love when people try to claim ownage with things they don't even bother reading.

Avatar image for neogeo419
neogeo419

1474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#159 neogeo419
Member since 2006 • 1474 Posts

For me it will be PC...But for one of my bf it will be 360 which is fine...He does not have a high end PC and prefers his xbox live.

Avatar image for charlesdarwin55
charlesdarwin55

2651

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#161 charlesdarwin55
Member since 2010 • 2651 Posts

After reading this thread as a proud PS3 fanboy Im doing this right now

Avatar image for johny300
johny300

12496

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#162 johny300
Member since 2010 • 12496 Posts
Crytek also said this with crysis 2 and look at how that turned out.
Avatar image for Lto_thaG
Lto_thaG

22611

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163 Lto_thaG
Member since 2006 • 22611 Posts

It consistently blows my mind when people say they'd rather play the console version. Why? Even if you don't have the means, are you telling me that you'd choose the 24 player, limited by console game over the glory that will be the 64 player PC version? I'm not buying it. I guarantee every single last one of you would jump at a chance to play the PC version.

psn8214

If I could play the PC version,I would.Who wouldn't?
I'll get the console version because it won't even run on my computer.
I will check it out on my brother's computer though.Crazy hermit that buys every new piece of hardware released for the computer.

Avatar image for chrion133
chrion133

847

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#164 chrion133
Member since 2007 • 847 Posts

[QUOTE="Da_lil_PimP"][QUOTE="VensInferno"] How so?

VensInferno

Obviously you never played BF2. But if you did, the console versions just won't be the same compared to the PC.

I havent. But is it right to call out all console gamers for "doing it wrong"? Of course PC will be the best version. But is it logical to center out people who got console version?

The point is both versions cost the same and even if you have a mid-range rig running it on low/medium it will still put the console versions to absolute shame. Why waste 60 bucks when you can win with the same 60.

Avatar image for deactivated-5c79c3cfce222
deactivated-5c79c3cfce222

4715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#165 deactivated-5c79c3cfce222
Member since 2009 • 4715 Posts

[QUOTE="McStrongfast"]

[QUOTE="finalfantasy94"]

Sure I would if the PC let me play with my DS3(without an attachment)and my psn friends and had trophies. Again im not trying to say PC sucks just trying to point out its not insane someone would want to play on another system. Im not going to lie I would like to try it on PC full blast but I wouldint make it my perminant place to play battlefield 3.

finalfantasy94

Get real son, this is the only proper reason for choosing a console version.
Wireless DS3 and trophies are the kinds of nitpicky reasons I'd come up with when deciding to get a game for PS3 or 360. They should cease being relevant when one version is inarguably going to be a lot better. Like when Dead Space 2 came with Extraction. Or when BF3 is primarily made for PC.

Whats the proper reasonvarys person to person. There is no define fact for it. What you think is nitpicky I may look at it as my main reason which version I would get. Im hoping your not one of those PC ego maniacs who think if your playing it on anything els but a PC your doing it wrong. Which translats to your an idiot if you play it on a console.

You can sit there and tell me that you prioritize playing BF3 with specifically a wireless DS3 (a wired one or wireless 360 controller won't do) and e-peen points, over the vastly improved graphics and more expansive multiplayer in the version which the developer has stressed is getting special attention and exclusive features. But you will be crazy.

Avatar image for streetridaz
streetridaz

3276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#166 streetridaz
Member since 2003 • 3276 Posts
[QUOTE="Zero_epyon"][QUOTE="psn8214"]

[QUOTE="lawlessx"]

they're just console fanboys(not owners) trying to defend console gaming.

Yup. My post is a telling off of such inane fanboyism.

I'd get the console version because my friends will. But I keep telling them I'm still on the fence and I may not even get it for the PS3.

Yeah a few of my buddies are getting it for 360 and a few are getting it for ps3. I have both consoles and i played BFBC2 on 360 and PC but I told them there is no way that I'm even considering getting BF3 on consoles. It was made for DX11 on PC and that is no doubt where the best experience is going to be. They were all pissy about it but hey....sorry thats what I build my Eyefinity PC for was games like BF3 so i'm putting that bad boy to use.
Avatar image for deactivated-5c79c3cfce222
deactivated-5c79c3cfce222

4715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#167 deactivated-5c79c3cfce222
Member since 2009 • 4715 Posts

Server browser is huge for me as it gives you options as well, the matchmaking needs work on consoles.

mitu123

Man, I'm so sick of this "Quick Play" nonsense. It probably does get you into a game more quickly, but what should matter the most is that you get into the right game. And you never know until you've waited for the map to load up. I don't know the latency, I don't know the amount of players, or if the teams are evenly matched since there's no auto team balance.

Also it feels like the game prioritizes keeping the player count on all servers above 16 or so over filling servers up, I don't want to join those servers, but am frequently connected to them. And lag has become more of an issue recently in my experience. Don't know which countries I'm being connected to.

Because of all that crap I often find myself joining a game, holding back to check the teams. then quit because the player list looks like s***. And then I have to pick a specific map or wait some so I'm not connected to that same server again, which does happen, so I have to wait for it to load and then quit again.. Etc. It's...it is not a good time. In practice this alleged "quick play" is a much slower and more frustrating experience than I remember a server browser setup ever being. And Battlefield has had some crappy ass server browsers.

Avatar image for right4dead
right4dead

1062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#168 right4dead
Member since 2010 • 1062 Posts

Who cares? If you're playing it on a console, you're doing it wrong.

cain006

neh, i dont want to play against people who use a mouse to shoot, thats just cheap.

Avatar image for mrmusicman247
mrmusicman247

17601

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#169 mrmusicman247
Member since 2008 • 17601 Posts

[QUOTE="cain006"]

Who cares? If you're playing it on a console, you're doing it wrong.

right4dead

neh, i dont want to play against people who use a mouse to shoot, thats just cheap.

Cheap? How so?
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#170 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="right4dead"]

[QUOTE="cain006"]

Who cares? If you're playing it on a console, you're doing it wrong.

mrmusicman247

neh, i dont want to play against people who use a mouse to shoot, thats just cheap.

Cheap? How so?

It's not, though preferring a controller to a kb/m for PC FPS is questionable.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#171 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

Server browser is huge for me as it gives you options as well, the matchmaking needs work on consoles.

McStrongfast

Man, I'm so sick of this "Quick Play" nonsense. It probably does get you into a game more quickly, but what should matter the most is that you get into the right game. And you never know until you've waited for the map to load up. I don't know the latency, I don't know the amount of players, or if the teams are evenly matched since there's no auto team balance.

Also it feels like the game prioritizes keeping the player count on all servers above 16 or so over filling servers up, I don't want to join those servers, but am frequently connected to them. And lag has become more of an issue recently in my experience. Don't know which countries I'm being connected to.

Because of all that crap I often find myself joining a game, holding back to check the teams. then quit because the player list looks like s***. And then I have to pick a specific map or wait some so I'm not connected to that same server again, which does happen, so I have to wait for it to load and then quit again.. Etc. It's...it is not a good time. In practice this alleged "quick play" is a much slower and more frustrating experience than I remember a server browser setup ever being. And Battlefield has had some crappy ass server browsers.

That's why I picked it up on PC as well, to avoid doing that because I've been there on my 360. At least it's a improvement over matchmaking no matter how crappy the server browser is.

Avatar image for mrmusicman247
mrmusicman247

17601

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#172 mrmusicman247
Member since 2008 • 17601 Posts

[QUOTE="mrmusicman247"][QUOTE="right4dead"]

neh, i dont want to play against people who use a mouse to shoot, thats just cheap.

mitu123

Cheap? How so?

It's not, though preferring a controller to a kb/m for PC FPS is questionable.

Yeah, I definitely prefer playing FPS's on PC.