Best graphics of E3 2016

FFXV looks pretty good, can't say the same for DR3.

Best graphics; Battlefield 1

Best console graphics; Horizon

lolgpukingthread

Anyway, BF1 looked photorealistic at times, and it's not a finished game.

Battlefield 1, but I don't like its mood and aesthetics.

Don't know why you guys are arguing in vain. Battlefield 1 on PC was the top of the graphics mountain at E3.

Are hermits forced to say BF1 because there's literally no other good looking multiplatform games lol? Anyway BF1 while looks good is not the best.

Lighting and geometry detail are far superior in Horizon.

@gpuking said:

Are hermits forced to say BF1 because there's literally no other good looking multiplatform games lol? Anyway BF1 while looks good is not the best.

Lighting and geometry detail are far superior in Horizon.

That shitposting never ceases.

No I dont think it stagnated but we are definitely seeing laws of diminishing returns.

@panda30 said:

@MonsieurX said:

@panda30 said:

@gpuking said:

For the love of god people please stop replying to panda, that guy obviously has no clue or any technical competency on how to judge a game's graphics properly. Just ignore him so that he can stop polluting my thread with his nonsense.

yea because its made by Sony so I must accept it

your the one who dont know what gfx is or the technical aspect of it I can name you shit ton of graphical aspects in gears 4 demo can you name anithing on horizon

Go ahead,without any grammatical errors now

1) destructive environments

2) particles / dust blowing

3) the wind pushing stuff

it dint just look good but there was lots going on all over

Nothing impressive in there

@gpuking said:

Are hermits forced to say BF1 because there's literally no other good looking multiplatform games lol? Anyway BF1 while looks good is not the best.

Lighting and geometry detail are far superior in Horizon.

You should refrain from posting bullshots and even photo mode. As they are not representative of actual gameplay and make a dishonest comparison.

The image quality won't be nearly as good as in your picture during gameplay. Sure the ps4 neo will likely see improvements in IQ etc but we don't know to what extent yet.

Photo Mode vs gamepaly (your own pictures)

you know whats the difrence however betwing Dice and guerrilla games

they show this at E3

we got this

guerrilla games show this

we got this

I dont think DR3 look that good nider but for a open world game it looks shits and gone over this

Edit:

hec everyone forgoten this game FOR HONOR its hends down the best looking at E3

Battlefield 4 promised us this

But we got this instead.

You see why we should ignore Panda now?

@gpuking said:

Battlefield 4 promised us this

But we got this instead.

You see why we should ignore Panda now?

Looks spot on to me. Killzone on the other hand... Dat nose... them textures.... ick.

@The_Stand_In said:

@gpuking said:

Battlefield 4 promised us this

But we got this instead.

You see why we should ignore Panda now?

Looks spot on to me. Killzone on the other hand... Dat nose... them textures.... ick.

thats what I was thinking LMAOL

@The_Stand_In said:

@gpuking said:

Battlefield 4 promised us this

But we got this instead.

You see why we should ignore Panda now?

Looks spot on to me. Killzone on the other hand... Dat nose... them textures.... ick.

Haha spot on my ass, such denial.

@gpuking said:

@The_Stand_In said:

@gpuking said:

Battlefield 4 promised us this

But we got this instead.

You see why we should ignore Panda now?

Looks spot on to me. Killzone on the other hand... Dat nose... them textures.... ick.

Haha spot on my ass, such denial.

Care to point out what is MASSIVELY different?

For instance in the Killzone pictures the nose is WAY off, the lips are off and disgusting, the skin texture is far less detailed as is the cloth texture. The outfit detail texture is nonexistent in the gameplay pic, the eyes are dull and fuzzy and there are jagged edges everywhere on the cloth which is unnatural looking.

So do tell. The BF4 render may not be the most realistic looking thing ever, but the model looks pretty damn close to what it looks like in game.

@gpuking said:

@The_Stand_In said:

@gpuking said:

Battlefield 4 promised us this

But we got this instead.

You see why we should ignore Panda now?

Looks spot on to me. Killzone on the other hand... Dat nose... them textures.... ick.

Haha spot on my ass, such denial.

what a Loser

Lighting, shader and shadow in gameplay are nowhere near the character render in BF4. Also a better representation of Eco.

You can clearly see fine details in the clothes. Point is neither game has reached their respective render shots, it's not a crime exclusive to KZSF. BF4 is worse if anything. Horizon is a different story tho, nothing stops GG to reach their E3 footage more this time now the engine is more matured and more so with Neo.

Dat massive thread backfire.

And the winner goes to: BF1 PC.

@panda30 said:

@gpuking said:

@The_Stand_In said:

@gpuking said:

Battlefield 4 promised us this

But we got this instead.

You see why we should ignore Panda now?

Looks spot on to me. Killzone on the other hand... Dat nose... them textures.... ick.

Haha spot on my ass, such denial.

what a Loser

LMAO you couldn't have picked a better screen to support your point! The model is almost devoid of fine textures, check the scarf..dear god.

@gpuking said:

Lighting, shader and shadow in gameplay are nowhere near the character render in BF4. Also a better representation of Eco.

You can clearly see fine details in the clothes. Point is neither game has reached their respective render shots, it's not a crime exclusive to KZSF. BF4 is worse if anything. Horizon is a different story tho, nothing stops GG to reach their E3 footage more this time now the engine is more matured and more so with Neo.

big Difrence

E3

and its not the only one

E3

retail

E3

retail???

img-> (Gratenes awaits Here) <- img

@MonsieurX said:

@panda30 said:

@MonsieurX said:

@panda30 said:

@gpuking said:

For the love of god people please stop replying to panda, that guy obviously has no clue or any technical competency on how to judge a game's graphics properly. Just ignore him so that he can stop polluting my thread with his nonsense.

yea because its made by Sony so I must accept it

your the one who dont know what gfx is or the technical aspect of it I can name you shit ton of graphical aspects in gears 4 demo can you name anithing on horizon

Go ahead,without any grammatical errors now

1) destructive environments

2) particles / dust blowing

3) the wind pushing stuff

it dint just look good but there was lots going on all over

Nothing impressive in there

You got to give credit to him for making only one spelling mistake though

FFS panda, please just leave my thread already. you win, you win. Happy?

He posts youtube captures and small shots saying XB>PS; you post bullshots, small gifs, and photomodes saying the even wilder claim of PS>PC. Both of you denied by Digital Foundry. Two birds of the same coin, a match made in heaven.

Probably Detroit.

Sure, it's a slow paced story driven game, but it does look incredible. CGI quality in my opinion!

@zaryia: wats wrong with gifs? They're small enough in size just to show the game in motion. Photomode shots are clearly representative of gameplay just in different angle. You however troll like an opportunist whenever see fit, adding no constructive discussions to the topic, not everyone agrees pc > ps4 graphics. So get use to it.

400x300 gifs and photomodes represent gameplay. Clearly.

You are the same as Panda. No one views you two as different, except in your own distorted minds.

@zaryia said:

@gpuking said:

FFS panda, please just leave my thread already. you win, you win. Happy?

He posts youtube captures and small shots saying XB>PS; you post bullshots, small gifs, and photomodes saying the even wilder claim of PS>PC. Both of you denied by Digital Foundry. Two birds of the same coin, a match made in heaven.

I never say XB >PS

My argument here is that PS fans think PS4 > anithing even if it look uder adv game

this is no gfx king it dont even look as good as farcry4 witch is a similar game

I get people who say GOW even if I don't agree but Horizon no way

I also address the guy who claim GOW> CGI beowulf using Rise and posting actual beowulf

@DragonfireXZ95: Except nobody agrees with you ... other then delusional Hermits on SW.

Well,you're usually the only one agreeing with gpuking

@MonsieurX: I'd recommend taking a closer look at the thread then. Regardless the hermits desperate attempt to somehow talk about BF1s visuals is laughable as it barely got any attention at E3. And it's the usual suspects bashing the PS4.

Looks like BF1 got much more attention thanHorizon

@MonsieurX: I'm not talking about social media where the bro gamers talk about there CoDs and BFs. I'm talking about critics and nobody said BF1 was the best looking game at the show.

When people talked about horizon they talked about how beautiful it was. Nobody is saying its going to outsell an established IP like BF.

Can't believe people still entertain the panda guy alt over that train wreck of a comparison thread he made weeks back with uncharted 4 and ROTR. Same shit, different games. The guy is a clown lol.

Critics, you means those casuals working at polygon, ign and gamespot.

I like this post. Although I wouldn't say everything looks wonderful. There are some ugly ass F2P games that look like PS2 graphics (APB reloaded and DCUO)

But yeah pretty much every AAA game looks awesome.

@AM-Gamer: The fanbase holding gfx king every gen doesn't need conspiracy theories or desperation going on, most people in this thread are saying BF1 clearly looked better because it did. Horizon won't come close to BF1 PC. BF1 had exponentially more buzz and was named best gfx of show at a few sites.

I know its hard to swallow that a machine with much higher hardware potential has the superior graphics (GASP), but you're going to have to come to terms with it. Even some ME4, Dishonered 2, and CoD promo shots looked better than Horizon. Imagine them at 4k.

You're betting off touting the qte simulator GoW4, before it's downgraded that is.

Look at the pictures I posted in post #161, compare the grass, water reflections and overall IQ which are all better in Photo Mode. You must have seen this, since they are your pictures.

it was Ryse thx and I stil stand

@zaryia: Except you don't have the graphics king now .... and GASP you didn't have it at E3. Horizon looked amazing considering it's a full open world GoW was simply the best looking game at the show. Everyone in this thread that disagrees has a history of being a butthurt hermit hence the reason you ran into this thread in the first place. The power of the PC has nothing to do with it since its visual advantage is soon to be rendered strictly to resolution and framerate. And lol at "teh downgrade". GoWs have always looked better at the time of there release and with the arrival of a more powerful PS4 it will look even better.

lol graphics king on the PS4 now

1. The current graphics kings are Witcher 3: Blood and Wine and Star Wars: Battlefront, maxed on PC. Only you and your alt, Gpuking, will disagree. Even Digital Foundry couldn't name UC4 better than PC. Ouch. Don't make me post full UC4 gameplay shots to cause the entire thread to die of laughter.

2. Lmao 20-30 FPS.

3. BF1 is being called the best graphics of E3 2016. Not the to-be-downgraded qte game GoW. And for good reason.

Run off with your perpetual silver medal while you still can.

1. Not a lem.

2. Not actual gameplay. I don't care about in-engine, or in-game videos. Show me someone playing it. I used the wrong term, so whatever. Still not actual gameplay.

@zaryia: Except I don't have an alt and considering I have no idea who you are yet you clearly no me I'm curious who's alt you are.

DF said "UC4 sets a new standard for real time rendering in video games". That's an exact quote so stay butthurt. I haven't heard anyone say BF1 had the best graphics of E3 outside of you raging herms in SW.

And again GOW will only look better not worse. If it's got you mad now imagine what it will do on the Neo LOL!

@MonsieurX: but that new god of war also got more attention than horizon. imo I don't like the direction it went in. It's not for me.

Uncharted 4 delivers a genuine step advance in real-time rendering on console hardware. The Naughty Dog engine is an efficient, capable engine that produces results that tower abovemany other current generation titles. There is a clear dedication to excellence here and it has paid off and Uncharted 4 is the best-looking console game we've ever tested.

-Digital Foundry Final Verdict, UC4.

Don't let the perpetual silver medal hit you on the way out. You better just pray Scorpion doesn't turn that thing into a bronze.