XXXXXX

128 results
1
2
3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 MortgageMan007

Member since 2010 • 875 Posts

My #1 has to be this game. It was so amazing and set the standards that we see today.

14 years ago

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts

Diablo

14 years ago

943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2010 • 943 Posts

Counter-Strike.

14 years ago

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts

Civ series, not sure which one.

14 years ago

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#5 foxhound_fox

Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

Yeah.

14 years ago

1835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2008 • 1835 Posts

Wawaweewaa, this is hard. I'm going to be reaallly annoying and say world of warcraft, simply because I spent so many hours playing it, and if something is worth putting in so many hours, it must be good! (I don't play it any more though)

14 years ago

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

There's this, and then there's everything else, personally.

14 years ago

875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 MortgageMan007

Member since 2010 • 875 Posts

There's this, and then there's everything else, personally.
DarkLink77

Do you like this better then SC2?

14 years ago

20155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 20155 Posts

Minecraft.jpg

Yeah.
foxhound_fox

Is it really that good? I should try it out sometime..I hear nothing but praise.

14 years ago

9463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 siddarthshetty

Member since 2008 • 9463 Posts

this

14 years ago

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#11 foxhound_fox

Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

Is it really that good? I should try it out sometime..I hear nothing but praise.killerfist

There are two kinds of gamer:

1. Those who love Minecraft
2. Those who haven't played Minecraft

With that said of course, it requires a particular kind of person to enjoy the game. If you enjoy being able to express your creativity, and loved Lego (either as a child, or still do), Minecraft is basically a giant box of Lego bricks that you can play around with. If you don't mind not having "objectives" to complete, and you can come up with "projects" you should be able to pour tens of hours into the game and not even know it. I know, for several weeks, I'd play it 5-6 hours a day (on any day I had the time) and not notice the time go by.

It definitely needs improvements and lots of bug fixes... but as it stands currently, it is possibly the best thing to happen to PC gaming (in the sense of creating a game with so much depth and freedom in Java) in a long time. There have been over 600,000 people who have bought the game already... and it goes up by several thousand every day.

14 years ago

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#12 GeneralShowzer

Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts

Thief 2

Thief 2

14 years ago

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#13 JigglyWiggly_

Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts

o ok

14 years ago

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"]There's this, and then there's everything else, personally.
MortgageMan007

Do you like this better then SC2?

Overall, no, I like StarCraft II better. However, StarCraft had more impact on me at the time.

14 years ago

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts

[QUOTE="killerfist"] Is it really that good? I should try it out sometime..I hear nothing but praise.foxhound_fox

There are two kinds of gamer:

1. Those who love Minecraft
2. Those who haven't played Minecraft

With that said of course, it requires a particular kind of person to enjoy the game. If you enjoy being able to express your creativity, and loved Lego (either as a child, or still do), Minecraft is basically a giant box of Lego bricks that you can play around with. If you don't mind not having "objectives" to complete, and you can come up with "projects" you should be able to pour tens of hours into the game and not even know it. I know, for several weeks, I'd play it 5-6 hours a day (on any day I had the time) and not notice the time go by.

It definitely needs improvements and lots of bug fixes... but as it stands currently, it is possibly the best thing to happen to PC gaming (in the sense of creating a game with so much depth and freedom in Java) in a long time. There have been over 600,000 people who have bought the game already... and it goes up by several thousand every day.

I love the free version, is it worth buying the "full" version now or wait til its complete?

14 years ago

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#16 foxhound_fox

Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

I love the free version, is it worth buying the "full" version now or wait til its complete?
locopatho

You pay 10 Euros now and get the full version when it comes out. Or you wait, and pay 20 Euros later for the full version. I think this is a no-brainer decision. If you love just using bricks to build, going around collecting resources and seeing large-scale projects come to life over time is exceptionally rewarding.

14 years ago

broken_bass_bin

7515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 broken_bass_bin

Member since 2009 • 7515 Posts

That would be Half-Life 2

14 years ago

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts

[QUOTE="locopatho"]I love the free version, is it worth buying the "full" version now or wait til its complete?
foxhound_fox

You pay 10 Euros now and get the full version when it comes out. Or you wait, and pay 20 Euros later for the full version. I think this is a no-brainer decision. If you love just using bricks to build, going around collecting resources and seeing large-scale projects come to life over time is exceptionally rewarding.

:shock: I confused myself, I thought it'd be 10 now and another 20 for full version! Awesome, *goes to download*

14 years ago

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#19 foxhound_fox

Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

:shock: I confused myself, I thought it'd be 10 now and another 20 for full version! Awesome, *goes to download*
locopatho

Yeah, it should be a little clearer... but you are buying an account, not the "game," so you will continually get new content as it is added. That and you can completely change all the textures in the game, so you can alter it to your own specifications. Hell, you could turn it into a literal box of Lego. :lol:

14 years ago

10503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 10503 Posts

Age Of Empires

14 years ago

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#21 GeneralShowzer

Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts

Age Of Empires
_Matt_

GS score : 6.8 :P

14 years ago

10503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 10503 Posts

[QUOTE="_Matt_"]Age Of Empires
GeneralShowzer

GS score : 6.8 :P

Well this is a review i strongly disagree with of theirs.

14 years ago

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#23 GeneralShowzer

Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]
[QUOTE="_Matt_"]Age Of Empires
_Matt_

GS score : 6.8 :P

Well this is a review i strongly disagree with of theirs.

Me too. I played a lot of Age of Empires and Age of Mithology as a kid.

14 years ago

17179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2010 • 17179 Posts

DII

Not even a competition :P

14 years ago

1212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#25 Blacklight2

Member since 2007 • 1212 Posts

I know it only came out 3 years ago but it's still amazing.

14 years ago

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#26 foxhound_fox

Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

GS score : 6.8 :P
GeneralShowzer

A very poor review.

14 years ago

1454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 1454 Posts

never have i played a crazier game

14 years ago

3555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

Member since 2008 • 3555 Posts

Half-Life :)

14 years ago

10503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 10503 Posts

[QUOTE="_Matt_"]
[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"] GS score : 6.8 :P
GeneralShowzer

Well this is a review i strongly disagree with of theirs.

Me too. I played a lot of Age of Empires and Age of Mithology as a kid.

same, Age of Empires and Age of Mythology will always have a special place in my gaming heart!

14 years ago

10503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 10503 Posts

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]GS score : 6.8 :P
foxhound_fox

A very poor review.

very poor as in a very low score, or very poor as in an innaccurate review of the game?

14 years ago

29976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 29976 Posts

I wish I can run Empires.....

14 years ago

8486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 69

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 8486 Posts

Don't know about 'best ever', but my favourite is Shadow of Chernobyl.

14 years ago

1896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 1896 Posts

.

14 years ago

8314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 8314 Posts

There can be only one:

14 years ago

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#35 foxhound_fox

Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

very poor as in a very low score, or very poor as in an innaccurate review of the game?
_Matt_

Mostly unfair. The review seems to be based on the idea that it was a combination of two other games (it mentions Warcraft and Civilization), instead of evaluating the game based on its own merits. Granted, the score merely reflects the reviewer's enjoyment, but I still feel it was unfair to give the predecessor of AOEII such a low score. I enjoyed it quite a bit (not nearly as much as AOEII) but it was still a good game with a unique premise (medieval RTS) for its time.

14 years ago

10503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 10503 Posts

[QUOTE="_Matt_"]very poor as in a very low score, or very poor as in an innaccurate review of the game?
foxhound_fox

Mostly unfair. The review seems to be based on the idea that it was a combination of two other games (it mentions Warcraft and Civilization), instead of evaluating the game based on its own merits. Granted, the score merely reflects the reviewer's enjoyment, but I still feel it was unfair to give the predecessor of AOEII such a low score. I enjoyed it quite a bit (not nearly as much as AOEII) but it was still a good game with a unique premise (medieval RTS) for its time.

agreed.

14 years ago

506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 506 Posts

the BEST most PERFECT game I've ever played.... Zelda 64

Old, but no comparison.

14 years ago

10503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 10503 Posts

the BEST most PERFECT game I've ever played.... Zelda 64
Old, but no comparison.
TruSake

er, we are talking legit pc games here :P

14 years ago

deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#39 deactivated-59d151f079814

Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

Freespace 2

14 years ago

1000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 1000 Posts

[QUOTE="_Matt_"]
[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"] GS score : 6.8 :P
GeneralShowzer

Well this is a review i strongly disagree with of theirs.

Me too. I played a lot of Age of Empires and Age of Mithology as a kid.

Me three, those are Awsome games. Maybe the reviewer just sucked at RTS's.

14 years ago

475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Potato_Monster

Member since 2006 • 475 Posts

So many hours spent on this game at the time

14 years ago

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

[QUOTE="_Matt_"]very poor as in a very low score, or very poor as in an innaccurate review of the game?
foxhound_fox

Mostly unfair. The review seems to be based on the idea that it was a combination of two other games (it mentions Warcraft and Civilization), instead of evaluating the game based on its own merits. Granted, the score merely reflects the reviewer's enjoyment, but I still feel it was unfair to give the predecessor of AOEII such a low score. I enjoyed it quite a bit (not nearly as much as AOEII) but it was still a good game with a unique premise (medieval RTS) for its time.

I never played AoE, but I loved AoEII. Is it worth going back to?

14 years ago

deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#43 deactivated-59d151f079814

Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]
[QUOTE="_Matt_"]very poor as in a very low score, or very poor as in an innaccurate review of the game?
DarkLink77

Mostly unfair. The review seems to be based on the idea that it was a combination of two other games (it mentions Warcraft and Civilization), instead of evaluating the game based on its own merits. Granted, the score merely reflects the reviewer's enjoyment, but I still feel it was unfair to give the predecessor of AOEII such a low score. I enjoyed it quite a bit (not nearly as much as AOEII) but it was still a good game with a unique premise (medieval RTS) for its time.

I never played AoE, but I loved AoEII. Is it worth going back to?

The game had a atmosphere that I did not feel the same way of AoE2.. They are both amazing games though.

14 years ago

20155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 20155 Posts

[QUOTE="killerfist"] Is it really that good? I should try it out sometime..I hear nothing but praise.foxhound_fox

There are two kinds of gamer:

1. Those who love Minecraft
2. Those who haven't played Minecraft

With that said of course, it requires a particular kind of person to enjoy the game. If you enjoy being able to express your creativity, and loved Lego (either as a child, or still do), Minecraft is basically a giant box of Lego bricks that you can play around with. If you don't mind not having "objectives" to complete, and you can come up with "projects" you should be able to pour tens of hours into the game and not even know it. I know, for several weeks, I'd play it 5-6 hours a day (on any day I had the time) and not notice the time go by.

It definitely needs improvements and lots of bug fixes... but as it stands currently, it is possibly the best thing to happen to PC gaming (in the sense of creating a game with so much depth and freedom in Java) in a long time. There have been over 600,000 people who have bought the game already... and it goes up by several thousand every day.

Sounds good to me. I watched some of the videos people uploaded on youtube, and it looks very simple but in a very awesome way. It seems also very addicting. I'll try it out and might pay the 10 euros for it. Seems like a steal.

14 years ago

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#45 foxhound_fox

Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

I never played AoE, but I loved AoEII. Is it worth going back to?DarkLink77

It's... different. It has a lot more rough edges, but one can forgive them if they realize this was the predecessor of the greatness of AOEII, so you can see where all the ideas came from, and how they developed into the second iteration. If you can find it cheap, it would definitely be more than worth playing through most of the campaigns.

14 years ago

5838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Member since 2008 • 5838 Posts

1000+ hours.

Still play here and there.

14 years ago

1000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 1000 Posts

Ice Wind Dale.

14 years ago

6606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 6606 Posts

I would pick Diablo II

14 years ago

3652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

Member since 2010 • 3652 Posts

Honestly Zoo Tycoon

a Civ or TW will be second behind that

14 years ago

34932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 34932 Posts

Counter-Strike.w4rrior17

i would pick this too.

14 years ago

128 results
1
2
3

Jump to Top

Please Log In to post.

Use your keyboard!

ESC

Log in to comment