BF3 PC and PS3/Console screenshot and video comparison

  • 171 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#101 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts

Of course the PC version is better. Is there even any point in bringing this up?

The_Gaming_Baby
I think it was to show that there isn't as huge a gap as a lot of people think, which i'm pleasanlty suprised at. I think the artstyle helps as well not just flat out technical graphics.
Avatar image for Mograine
Mograine

3666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 Mograine
Member since 2006 • 3666 Posts

I think it was to show that there isn't as huge a gap as a lot of people think, which i'm pleasanlty suprised at. I think the artstyle helps as well not just flat out technical graphics.JohnF111

But there is. People saying there isn't using this as evidence need to have their heads screwed right.

Pleasantly surprised at? Why don't you take a read through the thread?

Avatar image for sakura_Ex
sakura_Ex

3066

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 sakura_Ex
Member since 2007 • 3066 Posts
How come people always compare the PS3 and PC but never the PC and the 360 ( mainly graphic wise )? Things that make you go.... hmmmmmm.
Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts

[QUOTE="JohnF111"] I think it was to show that there isn't as huge a gap as a lot of people think, which i'm pleasanlty suprised at. I think the artstyle helps as well not just flat out technical graphics.Mograine

But there is. People saying there isn't using this as evidence need to have their heads screwed right.

Pleasantly surprised at? Why don't you take a read through the thread?

Please name these HUGE differences.
Avatar image for nintendog66
nintendog66

2300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 nintendog66
Member since 2006 • 2300 Posts

How come people always compare the PS3 and PC but never the PC and the 360 ( mainly graphic wise )? Things that make you go.... hmmmmmm.sakura_Ex
There's no footage shown of the 360 version so there's no way to compare.

Here's my comparison(given my topic was locked without reason).

PC

PS3

PC

PS3

PC

PS3

Avatar image for streetridaz
streetridaz

3276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#106 streetridaz
Member since 2003 • 3276 Posts

[QUOTE="Mograine"]

[QUOTE="JohnF111"] I think it was to show that there isn't as huge a gap as a lot of people think, which i'm pleasanlty suprised at. I think the artstyle helps as well not just flat out technical graphics.i5750at4Ghz

But there is. People saying there isn't using this as evidence need to have their heads screwed right.

Pleasantly surprised at? Why don't you take a read through the thread?

Please name these HUGE differences.

Max game resolution, Texture resolution, Shadow Detail, Shadow Resolution, Reflection Detail, Reflection Resolution, 4xAA+ ,8xAF+, Particle effects, Video Scaling, Post processing, FPS, Game Details, Loading Times, Gameplay elements.........all the standard PC to Console differences. LOL :)

Avatar image for sakura_Ex
sakura_Ex

3066

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 sakura_Ex
Member since 2007 • 3066 Posts
[QUOTE="nintendog66"][QUOTE="sakura_Ex"]How come people always compare the PS3 and PC but never the PC and the 360 ( mainly graphic wise )? Things that make you go.... hmmmmmm.

There's no footage shown of the 360 version so there's no way to compare.

I'm not just talking about this game,I'm talking about other games as well.
Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"][QUOTE="Mograine"]

But there is. People saying there isn't using this as evidence need to have their heads screwed right.

Pleasantly surprised at? Why don't you take a read through the thread?

streetridaz

Please name these HUGE differences.

Max game resolution, Texture resolution, Shadow Detail, Shadow Resolution, Reflection Detail, Reflection Resolution, 4xAA+ ,8xAF+, Particle effects, Video Scaling, Post processing, FPS, Game Details, Loading Times, Gameplay elements.........all the standard PC to Console differences. LOL :)

Aside from FPS and the gameplay changes none of those things are huge. They won't change the core gameplay in anyway.

IMO the biggest difference is controller vs mouse. It will have the largest impact on gameplay.

Avatar image for sakura_Ex
sakura_Ex

3066

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 sakura_Ex
Member since 2007 • 3066 Posts
It seems to me PC fanboys don't find the 360 to be a threat ( neither is the PS3 compared to the PC ),but for some reason I always see threads comparing PS3 games with PC games.
Avatar image for streetridaz
streetridaz

3276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#111 streetridaz
Member since 2003 • 3276 Posts
[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"][QUOTE="streetridaz"]

Please name these HUGE differences.i5750at4Ghz
Max game resolution, Texture resolution, Shadow Detail, Shadow Resolution, Reflection Detail, Reflection Resolution, 4xAA+ ,8xAF+, Particle effects, Video Scaling, Post processing, FPS, Game Details, Loading Times, Gameplay elements.........all the standard PC to Console differences. LOL :)

Aside from FPS and the gameplay changes none of those things are huge. They won't change the core gameplay in anyway.

Well no you asked what the huge changes were and those are some of them. They won't change the core gameplay at all but they make a huge difference for the overall experience.
Avatar image for Mograine
Mograine

3666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 Mograine
Member since 2006 • 3666 Posts

Please name these HUGE differences.i5750at4Ghz

Sorry pal, it doesn't work that way. Nothing assures us of the setting the PC screenshots are at, therefore no comparison can be made.

Everything else is just consolite logic.

End of story. I don't have to "name" you anything.

Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"][QUOTE="streetridaz"] Max game resolution, Texture resolution, Shadow Detail, Shadow Resolution, Reflection Detail, Reflection Resolution, 4xAA+ ,8xAF+, Particle effects, Video Scaling, Post processing, FPS, Game Details, Loading Times, Gameplay elements.........all the standard PC to Console differences. LOL :)

streetridaz

Aside from FPS and the gameplay changes none of those things are huge. They won't change the core gameplay in anyway.

Well no you asked what the huge changes were and those are some of them. They won't change the core gameplay at all but they make a huge difference for the overall experience.

Maybe true for you, but not to me. Visually the difference is negligible. I've played alot of BC2 on 360 and PC and the graphical difference is small. I really don't notice it while playing, too much going on. Maybe our definition of huge is just different. Is there a difference, hell yeah, but huge imo would be a stretch.

Avatar image for edidili
edidili

3449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 edidili
Member since 2004 • 3449 Posts

IMO the biggest difference is controller vs mouse. It will have the largest impact on gameplay.

i5750at4Ghz

Nope. Big maps with 3x the console version player counts will offer a totally different experience. The console version will be another Bad company game, the PC version will be the next Battlefield.

Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"] Please name these HUGE differences.Mograine

Sorry pal, it doesn't work that way. Nothing assures us of the setting the PC screenshots are at, therefore no comparison can be made.

Everything else is just consolite logic.

End of story. I don't have to "name" you anything.

So you make a claim, but refuse to defend it. Elitist logic at it's best. FYI I'm no consolite, I have a monster PC and can't wait to play this on it.
Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#116 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60833 Posts
Looking forward to that der PC version.
Avatar image for streetridaz
streetridaz

3276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#117 streetridaz
Member since 2003 • 3276 Posts

[QUOTE="streetridaz"][QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"] Aside from FPS and the gameplay changes none of those things are huge. They won't change the core gameplay in anyway.i5750at4Ghz

Well no you asked what the huge changes were and those are some of them. They won't change the core gameplay at all but they make a huge difference for the overall experience.

Maybe true for you, but not to me. Visually the difference is negligible. I've played alot of BC2 on 360 and PC and the graphical difference is small. I really don't notice it while playing, too much going on. Maybe our definition of huge is just different. Is there a difference, hell yeah, but huge imo would be a stretch.

okay, I can't take you seriously but okay. I play BC2 on 360 and PC as well and the difference to me in incredible!
Avatar image for Mograine
Mograine

3666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 Mograine
Member since 2006 • 3666 Posts

So you make a claim, but refuse to defend it. Elitist logic at it's best. FYI I'm no consolite, I have a monster PC and can't wait to play this on it. i5750at4Ghz

I didn't make any claim, I said the guy saying there was no difference has no clue of what he's talking about, as does everyone who uses the same reasoning ITT.

Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"]

IMO the biggest difference is controller vs mouse. It will have the largest impact on gameplay.

edidili

Nope. Big maps with 3x the console version player counts will offer a totally different experience. The console version will be another Bad company game, the PC version will be the next Battlefield.

Maybe for you. BF games for me are all about clan matches. The only way I play them as pugs are a mess. And clan matches are for the most part 6 v 6 and 12 v 12. won't have an impact on me at all. I never enjoyed 64 players in BF2, too much of a cluster **** for my taste. Honestly playing a BF game outside of a clan match isn't much different than any other modern day shooter. This of course could change depending on the type of fixes Dice makes to the MP.
Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"] So you make a claim, but refuse to defend it. Elitist logic at it's best. FYI I'm no consolite, I have a monster PC and can't wait to play this on it. Mograine

I didn't make any claim, I said the guy saying there was no difference has no clue of what he's talking about, as does everyone who uses the same reasoning ITT.

That in it's self is making a claim....
Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts
[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"]

[QUOTE="streetridaz"] Well no you asked what the huge changes were and those are some of them. They won't change the core gameplay at all but they make a huge difference for the overall experience.streetridaz

Maybe true for you, but not to me. Visually the difference is negligible. I've played alot of BC2 on 360 and PC and the graphical difference is small. I really don't notice it while playing, too much going on. Maybe our definition of huge is just different. Is there a difference, hell yeah, but huge imo would be a stretch.

okay, I can't take you seriously but okay. I play BC2 on 360 and PC as well and the difference to me in incredible!

Which goes back to the point I made in my post: "Maybe our definition of huge is just different".
Avatar image for streetridaz
streetridaz

3276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#122 streetridaz
Member since 2003 • 3276 Posts

[QUOTE="edidili"]

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"]

IMO the biggest difference is controller vs mouse. It will have the largest impact on gameplay.

i5750at4Ghz

Nope. Big maps with 3x the console version player counts will offer a totally different experience. The console version will be another Bad company game, the PC version will be the next Battlefield.

Maybe for you. BF games for me are all about clan matches. The only way I play them as pugs are a mess. And clan matches are for the most part 6 v 6 and 12 v 12. won't have an impact on me at all. I never enjoyed 64 players in BF2, too much of a cluster **** for my taste. Honestly playing a BF game outside of a clan match isn't much different than any other modern day shooter. This of course could change depending on the type of fixes Dice makes to the MP.

Yeah you've definately nevered played 64 players on BF2 because it's not one big cluster there are epic battles going on all over the map. You asked what the huge differences are and we listed some. Then you're only talking about differences to core gameplay which is specific not general. The differences are huge and what you say aren't huge differences to gamaplay in actuality because your adding double if not triple the size of maps and almost 3 times the amount of players in conquest mode. Now if this doesn't affect you per say because all you like to do is clan battle then why are you hear trying to make a general point and then making it all about your style of play. Of course if your style of play is specific then don't ask a general question. Ask a specific one.

Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

Oh man that is hilarious. EVEN from those lousy compressed pics you can see how much more detail there is in the pc version.

Avatar image for The_Pacific
The_Pacific

1804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 The_Pacific
Member since 2011 • 1804 Posts

[QUOTE="The_Pacific"][QUOTE="streetridaz"]

I didn't me your cousins E-Machine! LOL. I can't take you seriously. I run my PC and Xbox 360 on the same screen and when i switch back and forth between inputs my PC makes my xbox look like a joke. Once my eyes get used to the console blur and haze it looks pretty decent but once you go back to PC with True HD and 32xAA the comparison is rediculously obvious.

streetridaz

And how does graphics make a game play better ? PC's look better but I'm not a graphics freak so it doesn't matter to me if 360 looks a but worse.

I never even said it was a factor. I'm defending the PC against people saying that PC graphics aren't all that compared to consoles when the only people who say that are the ones who have never actually see what a gaming pc can do. I play my consoles too. I'm currently playing CODBO on 360 and i'm playing MOH on PS3. I'm a gamer i don't care as long as the game is good but I can't stand it when people downplay the PC because my PC is a powerhouse and that machine is a gaming beast. You just can't see a true gaming pc in action and not want to slap your console like a red headed step child.

No one is bashing PC gamers for having great PC's. All I'm saying is PC gamers make console ports look like they're running on last gen hardware, when in fact you can put out amazing graphics on consoles. They may not be top of the line (like PC games) but their still great. How would seeing a "true gaming Pc" in action change my mind ? I've played PC games and I still prefer consoles :roll:
Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"][QUOTE="edidili"]

Nope. Big maps with 3x the console version player counts will offer a totally different experience. The console version will be another Bad company game, the PC version will be the next Battlefield.

streetridaz

Maybe for you. BF games for me are all about clan matches. The only way I play them as pugs are a mess. And clan matches are for the most part 6 v 6 and 12 v 12. won't have an impact on me at all. I never enjoyed 64 players in BF2, too much of a cluster **** for my taste. Honestly playing a BF game outside of a clan match isn't much different than any other modern day shooter. This of course could change depending on the type of fixes Dice makes to the MP.

Yeah you've definately nevered played 64 players on bf2 because it's not one big cluster there are epic battles going on all over the map.

Bought it at launch. Played the gulf of omen demo until my fingers bled. And no there really weren't. Most of the map would be empty.

I remeber having to upgrade my 9800 pro to a 7800 gt to play it at decent settings.

Avatar image for Mograine
Mograine

3666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 Mograine
Member since 2006 • 3666 Posts

That in it's self is making a claim....i5750at4Ghz

And one that has been proved right all thread long.

Avatar image for gaming25
gaming25

6181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 gaming25
Member since 2010 • 6181 Posts

[QUOTE="Firebird-5"]

theres a lot of jelly console gamers tonight

Chris_Williams

not really, everyone knows the pc version will look better even the developer tweeted that it will be, no surprise. But i do see pc gamers who keep making comparsion topics just to make themselves feel better for whatever reason. What needs to be compared is the 360 version versus the ps3 that would make more sense

PC has nothing else to hype. Their only game worth hyping is something that they share with consoles. They arent Jelly of us PS3 gamers, they're Jam.

Avatar image for streetridaz
streetridaz

3276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#128 streetridaz
Member since 2003 • 3276 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Pacific"][QUOTE="streetridaz"]

And how does graphics make a game play better ? PC's look better but I'm not a graphics freak so it doesn't matter to me if 360 looks a but worse.The_Pacific

I never even said it was a factor. I'm defending the PC against people saying that PC graphics aren't all that compared to consoles when the only people who say that are the ones who have never actually see what a gaming pc can do. I play my consoles too. I'm currently playing CODBO on 360 and i'm playing MOH on PS3. I'm a gamer i don't care as long as the game is good but I can't stand it when people downplay the PC because my PC is a powerhouse and that machine is a gaming beast. You just can't see a true gaming pc in action and not want to slap your console like a red headed step child.

No one is bashing PC gamers for having great PC's. All I'm saying is PC gamers make console ports look like they're running on last gen hardware, when in fact you can put out amazing graphics on consoles. They may not be top of the line (like PC games) but their still great. How would seeing a "true gaming Pc" in action change my mind ? I've played PC games and I still prefer consoles :roll:

No one is bashing you for prefering consoles! stop generalizing me as a typical PC gamer. I'm a gamer I just choose to spend most of my time on my PC because overall it's a much better experience then my 360 or PS3. Have you been reading this thread. Read the thread up until your first post and then lets talk about why I reacted the way i did.
Avatar image for AugustusGraham
AugustusGraham

343

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 AugustusGraham
Member since 2011 • 343 Posts

PC is clearly better.. but not as much as some here make it seem

ttboy

Looks better in motion, and in motion it (PC version) SHATTERS the console versions.

Avatar image for sillaris
sillaris

1083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 sillaris
Member since 2008 • 1083 Posts

i lol'ed trying to say that BF3 on PC is the same, but you post VIDEO screen shots? Desperate are we?

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

49125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 49125 Posts

Can't we wait 'till the game is out to make comparisons ?

A bunch of stills from youtube videos don't really make the game shine now do they...

Avatar image for gaming25
gaming25

6181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134 gaming25
Member since 2010 • 6181 Posts

Can't we wait 'till the game is out to make comparisons ?

A bunch of stills from youtube videos don't really make the game shine now do they...

R4gn4r0k

Exactly. But this is SW.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#135 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

Can't we wait 'till the game is out to make comparisons ?

A bunch of stills from youtube videos don't really make the game shine now do they...

R4gn4r0k

Yes, I remember when Haze was compared to Crysis graphically, and looked how that turned out...

Avatar image for gaming25
gaming25

6181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 gaming25
Member since 2010 • 6181 Posts

[QUOTE="R4gn4r0k"]

Can't we wait 'till the game is out to make comparisons ?

A bunch of stills from youtube videos don't really make the game shine now do they...

mitu123

Yes, I remember when Haze was compared to Crysis graphically, and looked how that turned out...

So he brings up the discussion because of the PC gamers reaction, and you instead turn that into something about the PS3, lol, not surprised at all. Youve been bashing the PS3 left and right.

Avatar image for turtlethetaffer
turtlethetaffer

18973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 144

User Lists: 0

#137 turtlethetaffer
Member since 2009 • 18973 Posts

Can I be brutally honest... and I know that I will make some people mad by saying this but I'm not trolling... they look exactly the same to me.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#138 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="R4gn4r0k"]

Can't we wait 'till the game is out to make comparisons ?

A bunch of stills from youtube videos don't really make the game shine now do they...

gaming25

Yes, I remember when Haze was compared to Crysis graphically, and looked how that turned out...

So he brings up the discussion because of the PC gamers reaction, and you instead turn that into something about the PS3, lol, not surprised at all. Youve been bashing the PS3 left and right.

It's the PS3's fault anyways.;)

Avatar image for tomarlyn
tomarlyn

20148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#139 tomarlyn
Member since 2005 • 20148 Posts
Pretty impressive considering the PS3's age. They're not generations apart like some people hoped for but the Pc version will still be optimal for sure. Its a great engine.
Avatar image for gaming25
gaming25

6181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 gaming25
Member since 2010 • 6181 Posts
[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="gaming25"]

[QUOTE="mitu123"] Yes, I remember when Haze was compared to Crysis graphically, and looked how that turned out...

So he brings up the discussion because of the PC gamers reaction, and you instead turn that into something about the PS3, lol, not surprised at all. Youve been bashing the PS3 left and right.

It's the PS3's fault anyways.;)

No, its your silly PC biast and overly bragging on graphics thats the one to blame. One vid and what do you know, a PC gamer talking about graphics. If we saw jet gameplay on consoles first I wouldnt be surprised if you all said that the sky wasnt blue enough or something like that lol.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#141 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="gaming25"]

So he brings up the discussion because of the PC gamers reaction, and you instead turn that into something about the PS3, lol, not surprised at all. Youve been bashing the PS3 left and right.

gaming25

It's the PS3's fault anyways.;)

No, its your silly PC biast and overly bragging on graphics thats the one to blame. One vid and what do you know, a PC gamer talking about graphics. If we saw jet gameplay on consoles first I wouldnt be surprised if you all said that the sky wasnt blue enough or something like that lol.

I am not bias, I'm making true statements. And I don't hate on the console version for graphics since I'm impressed they can do this game on there, I just find it more impressive on PC.

Avatar image for gaming25
gaming25

6181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 gaming25
Member since 2010 • 6181 Posts
[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="gaming25"][QUOTE="mitu123"] It's the PS3's fault anyways.;)

No, its your silly PC biast and overly bragging on graphics thats the one to blame. One vid and what do you know, a PC gamer talking about graphics. If we saw jet gameplay on consoles first I wouldnt be surprised if you all said that the sky wasnt blue enough or something like that lol.

I am not bias, I'm making true statements. And I don't hate on the console version for graphics since I'm impressed they can do this game on there, I just find it more impressive on PC.

From what you said it doesnt seem like that. Calm down PC gamers, you all are getting a copy of BF3 as well.
Avatar image for Joel_Pichardo
Joel_Pichardo

320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 Joel_Pichardo
Member since 2007 • 320 Posts

Looks better than Bad company 2 and that's good enough for me. We all know the gameplay(online and off) is gonna be good, It is a DICE game afterall :)

Avatar image for turtlethetaffer
turtlethetaffer

18973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 144

User Lists: 0

#144 turtlethetaffer
Member since 2009 • 18973 Posts

Looks better than Bad company 2 and that's good enough for me. We all know the gameplay(online and off) is gonna be good, It is a DICE game afterall :)

Joel_Pichardo

HEY! This is System wars! We don't need that kind of positive thinking!

Avatar image for Tauruslink
Tauruslink

6586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 Tauruslink
Member since 2005 • 6586 Posts

I see a huge difference actually................

gamespot4life
So do I. I was really surprised to be honest.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#146 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="gaming25"] No, its your silly PC biast and overly bragging on graphics thats the one to blame. One vid and what do you know, a PC gamer talking about graphics. If we saw jet gameplay on consoles first I wouldnt be surprised if you all said that the sky wasnt blue enough or something like that lol.gaming25

I am not bias, I'm making true statements. And I don't hate on the console version for graphics since I'm impressed they can do this game on there, I just find it more impressive on PC.

From what you said it doesnt seem like that. Calm down PC gamers, you all are getting a copy of BF3 as well.

Why would I be worried about the console versions? BF is a PC centric franchise anyways, I don't hate it on consoles either, hell, I played some for years on them.:P

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29845

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29845 Posts

Is it really shocking to anyone that the PC version will look better? That being said, I certainly don't think the console iteration looks bad by any stretch of the imagination.

Avatar image for turtlethetaffer
turtlethetaffer

18973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 144

User Lists: 0

#148 turtlethetaffer
Member since 2009 • 18973 Posts

[QUOTE="gamespot4life"]

I see a huge difference actually................

Tauruslink

So do I. I was really surprised to be honest.

I think I am the only one who doesn't see it.

Avatar image for racing1750
racing1750

14567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#149 racing1750
Member since 2010 • 14567 Posts
Of course the PC version will smash the console version, we know this.
Avatar image for _Cadbury_
_Cadbury_

2936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#150 _Cadbury_
Member since 2006 • 2936 Posts
Can't wait to play BF3 on my PS3. Graphical differences are trivial.