you know whats funny about these threads, PC elitists like to shove this crap in peoples faces and yet the specs and performance of each the 360 and PS3 is comparible to a gaming PC in 2005. So what does this guy have to say to people with pc's from those years?? i mean really my PC in 2005 couldn't run mass effect or even COD 4 even. Its true you get what you pay for but its not rational to argue or boast your epeen when most people are fine with 30-60 frames and a modest resolution. But yeah fail thread is fail.
AiurProtoss
Whats funny is that some were playing those games on 2005/2006 based Pc better then the console versions.
For example Myself, I had a Sempron 3300, 1.5gb of DDR(both from 2005), and a 7600GS in 2006 and was able to play CoD 4 all on high settings at 1280x1024, which totally made the console versions look like crap, the console versions dont even run the game all on high settings and runs it at 1024x600....
And ME 1 the min requirements are Operating System: Windows XP or Vista
Processor:
2.4+GHZ Intel or 2.0+GHZ AMD
Memory: 1 Gigabyte Ram (XP) 2 Gigabyte Ram (Vista)
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 6 series(6800GT or better)
ATI 1300XT or better (X1550, X1600 Pro and HD2400 are below minimum system requirements
then Recomended to play the game on high better then the console versions
Operating System: Windows XP or Vista
Processor: 2.6+GHZ Intel or 2.4+GHZ AMD
Memory: 2 Gigabyte Ram Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GTX or higher.
ATI X1800 XL series or higher
Hard Drive Space: 12 Gigabytes (better quality out of the box then 360 version which used compression)
Log in to comment