Blizzard is now selling mounts from their online store...

  • 198 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Greyfeld
Greyfeld

3007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#101 Greyfeld
Member since 2008 • 3007 Posts
[QUOTE="Greyfeld"][QUOTE="SilentlyMad"]You are still saying sword which would be as item that helps in gameplay. 5 non-combat pets and a mount with a new skin does not change gameplay at all. Nerkcon
Exactly.

Ahhhg, I admit defeat. Both of you are really something if you don't care about bragging rights. :(

Bragging rights are fine. But what's going to take away your bragging rights just because somebody bought their mount? It's like you seem to think that because they can shell out $25 for a mount, that takes away your right to say "hey, i got my mount by farming such-and-such instance for 3 months!!"
Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts
[QUOTE="Greyfeld"][QUOTE="Nerkcon"][QUOTE="Greyfeld"] Exactly.

Ahhhg, I admit defeat. Both of you are really something if you don't care about bragging rights. :(

Bragging rights are fine. But what's going to take away your bragging rights just because somebody bought their mount? It's like you seem to think that because they can shell out $25 for a mount, that takes away your right to say "hey, i got my mount by farming such-and-such instance for 3 months!!"

Yes because they have it too now. In fact, it'll give the other guy bragging rights; "I have a cooler version of your mount and I didn't have to lift a finger for it!"
Avatar image for Mograine
Mograine

3666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 Mograine
Member since 2006 • 3666 Posts

1. The answer was true, but they're still making money. After all, they avoid merging low populated servers just to avoid bad news. The monthly fee pays all the servers, employees, and development all by itself. Selling extras is just to give them more pocket change. 2. Most of the content in the the game, including dungeons are bosses, are just reskins. But they're still content. And it is predicted the speed is going to be 370%, %10 faster than any other flying mount in the game.Nerkcon

370% is 10% slower, not faster, than regular mounts.

Avatar image for rcignoni
rcignoni

8863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 rcignoni
Member since 2004 • 8863 Posts
I'm starting to think this game is being made only for the sole purpose of milking, and it's no longer a fan service.
Avatar image for GhoX
GhoX

6267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#105 GhoX
Member since 2006 • 6267 Posts
For now the micro-transactions still aren't directly affecting gameplay. Though Blizzard sure has taken a step down from only character services all the way to race changes, PVP server changes and now ingame mounts. I don't think it would be long before Blizzard starts selling badges for real-world currency or even create some of those extremely infamous "increase experience gain" or "increase drop rate" items. Glad I got out when I had the chance.
Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts

LOL. You guys made fun of us for $2.50 horse armor, but now it's $25. I don't ever want to hear again about how consolites are ruining gaming by buying DLC.

Avatar image for Mograine
Mograine

3666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 Mograine
Member since 2006 • 3666 Posts

LOL. You guys made fun of us for $2.50 horse armor, but now it's $25. I don't ever want to hear again about how consolites are ruining gaming by buying DLC.

lowe0

Inverted logic? It's because this business model has success on consoles that this happens.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#108 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="Vinegar_Strokes"]

how is that milking? if people want to buy mounts then blizzard would be MORONS not to sell them. by the way this does not mean you now have to buy you mount in the game. that would be milking.

Nerkcon

We are paying a MONTHLY FEE for WoW, the monthly fee is suppose to cover all the content in the game. Expansions shouldn't even exist (they did because bandwidth used to be so expensive the monthly fee was just to break even and the expansions made the money). Everything they're selling for extra could and should had been items we can attain in game. Selling extras for real money is how FREE MMORPGs make money.

... No it isn't.. Every major MMO out there has large expansions.. Everquest one had near 20 for crying out loud.. And furthermore who cares? These are not must haves that with out them it makes your gameplay experience poorer..

Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts

[QUOTE="lowe0"]

LOL. You guys made fun of us for $2.50 horse armor, but now it's $25. I don't ever want to hear again about how consolites are ruining gaming by buying DLC.

Mograine

Inverted logic? It's because this business model has success on consoles that this happens.

But hermits go on all the time about how much smarter they are. For proof they remind us that there is no longer a fee for features on Window's Live. Yet they are clearly paying for this or else it wouldn't had happen. In fact, there were a few guys in this thread who defended it.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#110 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

For now the micro-transactions still aren't directly affecting gameplay. Though Blizzard sure has taken a step down from only character services all the way to race changes, PVP server changes and now ingame mounts. I don't think it would be long before Blizzard starts selling badges for real-world currency or even create some of those extremely infamous "increase experience gain" or "increase drop rate" items. Glad I got out when I had the chance.GhoX

They already have those type of items (the increase experience gain one) which you can get from badges..

Avatar image for Lethalhazard
Lethalhazard

5451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#111 Lethalhazard
Member since 2009 • 5451 Posts

[QUOTE="Lethalhazard"][QUOTE="Nerkcon"]Ummmm, no it started before that. Remember how they said they will never do PVE > PVP server transfers? Remember when you could not transfer high level characters to a new server until 6 months later? Or how about taking items that could be made or found in game for fun as bonuses for buying their card battle game? OR maybe with recruit a free making players coming into the game new and alone without people to group with? Or how about this; allowing people to multibox? And this is a good one; instead of merging low populated servers to avoid any bad news possible they they made it super hard to have an actual server community by allowing cross server grouping!Espada12

Right, but this is pretty much the ultimatum. Selling an epic flying mount on a blizzard store for 25$ (that has the same model as the Arthas mount drop). It's just stooping to a whole new level. I wasn't even sure if it was possible to stoop this low after all that.

Your comparison is bad because the mount does not affect your gameplay experience and there is an alternative way to get a similar one without paying. Also micro transactions is nothing new in MMOs so I don't see how this comes as a shock to you. All of this stuff is aesthetic...

It's a carbon copy of what is possibly the hardest mount to get in the game right now. It absolutely affects gameplay -- one of the main reasons to keep playing is to achieve rare items nobody else has. Not to mention, this is Arthas' steed we are talking about! It's a carbon copy of it! It's wrong on so many levels IMO.
Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#112 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts
Ugh, horrible. I can't wait for the first shooter that charges you to unlock a noob-tube.
Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts
[QUOTE="Espada12"]

[QUOTE="Lethalhazard"] Right, but this is pretty much the ultimatum. Selling an epic flying mount on a blizzard store for 25$ (that has the same model as the Arthas mount drop). It's just stooping to a whole new level. I wasn't even sure if it was possible to stoop this low after all that.Lethalhazard

Your comparison is bad because the mount does not affect your gameplay experience and there is an alternative way to get a similar one without paying. Also micro transactions is nothing new in MMOs so I don't see how this comes as a shock to you. All of this stuff is aesthetic...

It's a carbon copy of what is possibly the hardest mount to get in the game right now. It absolutely affects gameplay -- one of the main reasons to keep playing is to achieve rare items nobody else has. Not to mention, this is Arthas' steed we are talking about! It's a carbon copy of it! It's wrong on so many levels IMO.

One of them isn't lore, is it? You care about lore in a Blizzard game? :P I remember reading something Blizzard destroys their lore for all their games with each new installment they make.
Avatar image for Greyfeld
Greyfeld

3007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#114 Greyfeld
Member since 2008 • 3007 Posts
[QUOTE="Mograine"]

[QUOTE="lowe0"]

LOL. You guys made fun of us for $2.50 horse armor, but now it's $25. I don't ever want to hear again about how consolites are ruining gaming by buying DLC.

Nerkcon

Inverted logic? It's because this business model has success on consoles that this happens.

But hermits go on all the time about how much smarter they are. For proof they remind us that there is no longer a fee for features on Window's Live. Yet they are clearly paying for this or else it wouldn't had happen. In fact, there were a few guys in this thread who defended it.

In all fairness, those who typically hold the "hermit" title probably don't play WoW... WoW is a casuals' paradise, runs easily on massively outdated hardware, and is similar to the Wii in its "rope in the non-gamers" approach.
Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts
[QUOTE="Greyfeld"] In all fairness, those who typically hold the "hermit" title probably don't play WoW... WoW is a casuals' paradise, runs easily on massively outdated hardware, and is similar to the Wii in its "rope in the non-gamers" approach.

And real hardcore gamers become fanboys to a certain company or genre, not an entire platform that has multiple shapes and forms.
Avatar image for Lethalhazard
Lethalhazard

5451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#116 Lethalhazard
Member since 2009 • 5451 Posts

[QUOTE="Lethalhazard"][QUOTE="Espada12"]

Your comparison is bad because the mount does not affect your gameplay experience and there is an alternative way to get a similar one without paying. Also micro transactions is nothing new in MMOs so I don't see how this comes as a shock to you. All of this stuff is aesthetic...

Nerkcon

It's a carbon copy of what is possibly the hardest mount to get in the game right now. It absolutely affects gameplay -- one of the main reasons to keep playing is to achieve rare items nobody else has. Not to mention, this is Arthas' steed we are talking about! It's a carbon copy of it! It's wrong on so many levels IMO.

One of them isn't lore, is it? You care about lore in a Blizzard game? :P I remember reading something Blizzard destroys their lore for all their games with each new installment they make.

Well, yeah the lore is actually pretty awful. It's very diluted and flawed. It's just -- this just furthers the amount of inconsistency in the Warcraft universe.

For anyone wondering what the original looks like....it's just a reskinned Invincible model and a 25$ price tag slapped on it.

Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts

[QUOTE="Nerkcon"][QUOTE="Mograine"]

Inverted logic? It's because this business model has success on consoles that this happens.

Greyfeld

But hermits go on all the time about how much smarter they are. For proof they remind us that there is no longer a fee for features on Window's Live. Yet they are clearly paying for this or else it wouldn't had happen. In fact, there were a few guys in this thread who defended it.

In all fairness, those who typically hold the "hermit" title probably don't play WoW... WoW is a casuals' paradise, runs easily on massively outdated hardware, and is similar to the Wii in its "rope in the non-gamers" approach.

That's funny... because every time someone wants to point out how huge PC gaming is, out comes the billion-dollar revenue figure from WoW. So, do they count, or don't they?

Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts

[QUOTE="Greyfeld"][QUOTE="Nerkcon"] But hermits go on all the time about how much smarter they are. For proof they remind us that there is no longer a fee for features on Window's Live. Yet they are clearly paying for this or else it wouldn't had happen. In fact, there were a few guys in this thread who defended it.lowe0

In all fairness, those who typically hold the "hermit" title probably don't play WoW... WoW is a casuals' paradise, runs easily on massively outdated hardware, and is similar to the Wii in its "rope in the non-gamers" approach.

That's funny... because every time someone wants to point out how huge PC gaming is, out comes the billion-dollar revenue figure from WoW. So, do they count, or don't they?

When SW is taking about how big a platform is they include their casual base, when talking about the worth of the platform to core and 'hardcore' gamers they don't.
Avatar image for Greyfeld
Greyfeld

3007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#119 Greyfeld
Member since 2008 • 3007 Posts

[QUOTE="Greyfeld"][QUOTE="Nerkcon"] But hermits go on all the time about how much smarter they are. For proof they remind us that there is no longer a fee for features on Window's Live. Yet they are clearly paying for this or else it wouldn't had happen. In fact, there were a few guys in this thread who defended it.lowe0

In all fairness, those who typically hold the "hermit" title probably don't play WoW... WoW is a casuals' paradise, runs easily on massively outdated hardware, and is similar to the Wii in its "rope in the non-gamers" approach.

That's funny... because every time someone wants to point out how huge PC gaming is, out comes the billion-dollar revenue figure from WoW. So, do they count, or don't they?

*Shrugs* I didn't make the rules. I just live here.
Avatar image for Lethalhazard
Lethalhazard

5451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#120 Lethalhazard
Member since 2009 • 5451 Posts
Apparently it's selling VERY well. All my friends that still play say they've already seen a ton in-game. One of my buddies took a screenshot of about 20 players on the mount just sitting outside of Dalaran. Blizzard wins this one in terms of cash, for sure...
Avatar image for Mograine
Mograine

3666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 Mograine
Member since 2006 • 3666 Posts

That's funny... because every time someone wants to point out how huge PC gaming is, out comes the billion-dollar revenue figure from WoW. So, do they count, or don't they?

lowe0

Playing games on PC now equals being a hermit?

Avatar image for GhoX
GhoX

6267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#122 GhoX
Member since 2006 • 6267 Posts
[QUOTE="lowe0"]

[QUOTE="Greyfeld"] In all fairness, those who typically hold the "hermit" title probably don't play WoW... WoW is a casuals' paradise, runs easily on massively outdated hardware, and is similar to the Wii in its "rope in the non-gamers" approach.Nerkcon

That's funny... because every time someone wants to point out how huge PC gaming is, out comes the billion-dollar revenue figure from WoW. So, do they count, or don't they?

When SW is taking about how big a platform is they include their casual base, when talking about the worth of the platform to core and 'hardcore' gamers they don't.

A lot of people would laugh if WoW is considered as a casual game. WoW can be more hardcore than a lot of other MMO games, and certainly more hardcore than a lot of single player games such as GOW III or Final Fantasy 13 which have always been at the front-line when it comes to discussing the worth of a platform.
Avatar image for Birdy09
Birdy09

4775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 Birdy09
Member since 2009 • 4775 Posts
Apparently it's selling VERY well. All my friends that still play say they've already seen a ton in-game. One of my buddies took a screenshot of about 20 players on the mount just sitting outside of Dalaran. Blizzard wins this one in terms of cash, for sure...Lethalhazard
Sigh.... it will only get worse from here, those out there saying "Why do you care? you dont play anymore" ... simple.... there are already tons of craptastic WoW clones.... that follow WoWs challengless thoughtless combat, repetitive fed-ex spamming quests and cartooney style, when crap like this succeeds... it only gets worse. FFXIV and ToR are the last hope.... of the bigger MMOs that is.
Avatar image for rzepak
rzepak

5758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 rzepak
Member since 2005 • 5758 Posts

Quite frankly I dont care about the store and I dont see why it causes so much controversy. The items in the store are completely optional and useless. The pets cant be used to get ahivements and the mount is basically a nice skin for an epic flying mount. Its not faster then the stuff already in the game it just looks different. Even if Blizzard would put XP potions in the store I still would not care becouse it does not affect me or the way I play. I will have a problem with the store when they start selling swords and armor that is better than the one you can get by raiding for example, and the only way to get it is to pay for it. I dont know maybe Im just too laid back to care, but I dont even care about the expensive services that Blizz provides. I think that server change should be expensive becouse if everyone would switch servers any time they pleased it would be chaos and a strain on the servers. WAR has this service free becouse the population is small and getting smaller.

Avatar image for Birdy09
Birdy09

4775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 Birdy09
Member since 2009 • 4775 Posts

[QUOTE="Nerkcon"][QUOTE="lowe0"]That's funny... because every time someone wants to point out how huge PC gaming is, out comes the billion-dollar revenue figure from WoW. So, do they count, or don't they?

GhoX

When SW is taking about how big a platform is they include their casual base, when talking about the worth of the platform to core and 'hardcore' gamers they don't.

A lot of people would laugh if WoW is considered as a casual game. WoW can be more hardcore than a lot of other MMO games, and certainly more hardcore than a lot of single player games such as GOW III or Final Fantasy 13 which have always been at the front-line when it comes to discussing the worth of a platform.

When you compare whats hardcore you typically go by its genre.... comparing an MMO to FFXIII is ridiculous. Then compare WoW to FFXI .... FF11 is a more more hardcore MMO... but to the extent where it puts alot of people off, its a shame, because its classes and combat is deeper, its end game richer (and consistent)... FFXIV is finding a nice balance. But WoW has lost all of its consistency, its ladder... its anything...

Avatar image for Lethalhazard
Lethalhazard

5451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#126 Lethalhazard
Member since 2009 • 5451 Posts
[QUOTE="Lethalhazard"]Apparently it's selling VERY well. All my friends that still play say they've already seen a ton in-game. One of my buddies took a screenshot of about 20 players on the mount just sitting outside of Dalaran. Blizzard wins this one in terms of cash, for sure...Birdy09
Sigh.... it will only get worse from here, those out there saying "Why do you care? you dont play anymore" ... simple.... there are already tons of craptastic WoW clones.... that follow WoWs challengless thoughtless combat, repetitive fed-ex spamming quests and cartooney style, when crap like this succeeds... it only gets worse. FFXIV and ToR are the last hope.... of the bigger MMOs that is.

Oh my god. They've already made a million dollars off of this mount. There are about 16,000 people in the queue for it right now, which alone is a very high number (whatever that is times 25)......and way more than that have already bought it on day one (today). I fear for the world.
Avatar image for rzepak
rzepak

5758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 rzepak
Member since 2005 • 5758 Posts

[QUOTE="Lethalhazard"]Apparently it's selling VERY well. All my friends that still play say they've already seen a ton in-game. One of my buddies took a screenshot of about 20 players on the mount just sitting outside of Dalaran. Blizzard wins this one in terms of cash, for sure...Birdy09
Sigh.... it will only get worse from here, those out there saying "Why do you care? you dont play anymore" ... simple.... there are already tons of craptastic WoW clones.... that follow WoWs challengless thoughtless combat, repetitive fed-ex spamming quests and cartooney style, when crap like this succeeds... it only gets worse. FFXIV and ToR are the last hope.... of the bigger MMOs that is.

You do know that as time goes on more p2p mmos will have an item store right? It is quite possible that FF14 will have one. The truth is that there is a market for this stuff. Not everyone has as much time as me to put in a couple of hundred hours into the game. People want to have the option to buy vanity items and why should a company refuse? Becouse a small vocal minority on a forum things its an evil trend?

Avatar image for SquatsAreAwesom
SquatsAreAwesom

1678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 SquatsAreAwesom
Member since 2009 • 1678 Posts
FYI... people have been asking for this actually. This is no different then DLC, especially when it has significant in-game value.
Avatar image for Birdy09
Birdy09

4775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 Birdy09
Member since 2009 • 4775 Posts

[QUOTE="Birdy09"][QUOTE="Lethalhazard"]Apparently it's selling VERY well. All my friends that still play say they've already seen a ton in-game. One of my buddies took a screenshot of about 20 players on the mount just sitting outside of Dalaran. Blizzard wins this one in terms of cash, for sure...rzepak

Sigh.... it will only get worse from here, those out there saying "Why do you care? you dont play anymore" ... simple.... there are already tons of craptastic WoW clones.... that follow WoWs challengless thoughtless combat, repetitive fed-ex spamming quests and cartooney style, when crap like this succeeds... it only gets worse. FFXIV and ToR are the last hope.... of the bigger MMOs that is.

You do know that as time goes on more p2p mmos will have an item store right? It is quite possible that FF14 will have one. The truth is that there is a market for this stuff. Not everyone has as much time as me to put in a couple of hundred hours into the game. People want to have the option to buy vanity items and why should a company refuse? Becouse a small vocal minority on a forum things its an evil trend?

If the a decent proportion of the profit when into further development I would defiantly be all for it. But, WoW being the prime example, an incredible old engine. incredible easy to make models, textures..... doesn't get much better, in some cases less treatment than other MMOs. I read an article that the chinese gold farmer market claims that virtual items have as much value has real items.... which is true... if you want it you want it. but why earn the cool stuff when you can just buy it? WoW mayaswell sell gold..... The Item Shop model is more tolerable for free mmos, an MMO like World of warcraft however ... god.... SC2 and D3 have taken so long, they take ages to patch WoW, they dumb it down with each expansion, theres just no need for anything of it bar money.
Avatar image for KristoffBrujah
KristoffBrujah

1860

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 KristoffBrujah
Member since 2005 • 1860 Posts

A fool and his money are soon parted.

Avatar image for Lethalhazard
Lethalhazard

5451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#131 Lethalhazard
Member since 2009 • 5451 Posts
http://kotaku.com/5517956/world-of-warcraft-mounts-now-available-in-the-blizzard-store It's well over a million dollars made now.
Avatar image for hoola
hoola

6422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 hoola
Member since 2004 • 6422 Posts

The only way they could get me to pay extra is for the ability to FULLY customize a land AND air mount. Customize the armor, eyes, face, hair lenght/color/shape. And i MIGHT pay $1 for that ability.

$25 is just insane for a digital picture on a monitor.

Avatar image for rzepak
rzepak

5758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 rzepak
Member since 2005 • 5758 Posts

[QUOTE="rzepak"]

[QUOTE="Birdy09"] Sigh.... it will only get worse from here, those out there saying "Why do you care? you dont play anymore" ... simple.... there are already tons of craptastic WoW clones.... that follow WoWs challengless thoughtless combat, repetitive fed-ex spamming quests and cartooney style, when crap like this succeeds... it only gets worse. FFXIV and ToR are the last hope.... of the bigger MMOs that is.Birdy09

You do know that as time goes on more p2p mmos will have an item store right? It is quite possible that FF14 will have one. The truth is that there is a market for this stuff. Not everyone has as much time as me to put in a couple of hundred hours into the game. People want to have the option to buy vanity items and why should a company refuse? Becouse a small vocal minority on a forum things its an evil trend?

If the a decent proportion of the profit when into further development I would defiantly be all for it. But, WoW being the prime example, an incredible old engine. incredible easy to make models, textures..... doesn't get much better, in some cases less treatment than other MMOs. I read an article that the chinese gold farmer market claims that virtual items have as much value has real items.... which is true... if you want it you want it. but why earn the cool stuff when you can just buy it? WoW mayaswell sell gold..... The Item Shop model is more tolerable for free mmos, an MMO like World of warcraft however ... god.... SC2 and D3 have taken so long, they take ages to patch WoW, they dumb it down with each expansion, theres just no need for anything of it bar money.

Lets see where the money goes. Huge staff that makes WoW and then the maintance. Cataclysm is coming which means a major redisign of a large portion of the world, improving the visuals somewhat while still mainting the Blizz way of making games that will run on a toaster.Teams for Diablo, Starcraft, succesor to WoW, second mmo which is a new IP (this is the thing that requires most money). As to the length of dev time: Diablo was released in 1996, Diablo 2 in 2000. Warcraft 2 - 1996, Warcraft 3 - 2002. Blizzard have always worked slow and this has not changed. WoW also took a long time to make.

Avatar image for Birdy09
Birdy09

4775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134 Birdy09
Member since 2009 • 4775 Posts

LMAO http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCjuFpQ3EeA&fmt=18 Sums it up pretty nicely.

Avatar image for Mystic-G
Mystic-G

6462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 Mystic-G
Member since 2006 • 6462 Posts

It's on the same level as the 15$ DLC that Modern Warfare 2 presented. Sure, it's optionable -- it's still milking. Even though, that at least provided content whereas this 25$ mount provides a reskinned mount that's already in the game available only to hardcore raiders. Not that I play WoW, it's just annoying to see Blizzard do this. I guess they're all for the money now. Lethalhazard

I play WoW and pay my $15/month and I'm no kind of upset about this. If people want to pay $25 for it, then more power to them, but it's not like they get an advantage over me somehow or are able to get in dungeons/raids that I can't get into.

And no, it's not the same as a map pack. You'll play the same exact content if you don't buy the mount. It's actually more like the skins you can buy for BFBC2, won't make a difference, just there. I don't see anyone getting upset over that though.

What's funny is the people who are outraged about this don't even play the game. lol

Avatar image for NAPK1NS
NAPK1NS

14870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#136 NAPK1NS
Member since 2004 • 14870 Posts
THAT'S JUST HORRIBLE! *Finger twitches for the Add to Cart option*
Avatar image for Im_single
Im_single

5134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 Im_single
Member since 2008 • 5134 Posts
[QUOTE="Lethalhazard"]http://kotaku.com/5517956/world-of-warcraft-mounts-now-available-in-the-blizzard-store It's well over a million dollars made now.

As far as I know they had a 100k que for the mount today, do the math...Holy crap.
Avatar image for Im_single
Im_single

5134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#138 Im_single
Member since 2008 • 5134 Posts

LMAO http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCjuFpQ3EeA&fmt=18 Sums it up pretty nicely.

Birdy09
I got a pretty good kick out of that.
Avatar image for rcignoni
rcignoni

8863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 rcignoni
Member since 2004 • 8863 Posts

LMAO http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCjuFpQ3EeA&fmt=18 Sums it up pretty nicely.

Birdy09
Epic. xD
Avatar image for Lethalhazard
Lethalhazard

5451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#141 Lethalhazard
Member since 2009 • 5451 Posts

[QUOTE="Lethalhazard"]It's on the same level as the 15$ DLC that Modern Warfare 2 presented. Sure, it's optionable -- it's still milking. Even though, that at least provided content whereas this 25$ mount provides a reskinned mount that's already in the game available only to hardcore raiders. Not that I play WoW, it's just annoying to see Blizzard do this. I guess they're all for the money now. Mystic-G

I play WoW and pay my $15/month and I'm no kind of upset about this. If people want to pay $25 for it, then more power to them, but it's not like they get an advantage over me somehow or are able to get in dungeons/raids that I can't get into.

And no, it's not the same as a map pack. You'll play the same exact content if you don't buy the mount. It's actually more like the skins you can buy for BFBC2, won't make a difference, just there. I don't see anyone getting upset over that though.

What's funny is the people who are outraged about this don't even play the game. lol

Well, you'd think with 25$ you'd get more than one reskinned model. It's not like a colloboration of them. This is essentially Oblivion horse armor for 25$. I guess it is worth it for some people. Just seems crazy in my head, lol.
Avatar image for SuperBobz
SuperBobz

613

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#142 SuperBobz
Member since 2009 • 613 Posts

$25 for a new skin for a mount you can get for free?:|

That's a total ripoff, $5 would be acceptable, but $25 is pushing it way too far.

Avatar image for Lethalhazard
Lethalhazard

5451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#143 Lethalhazard
Member since 2009 • 5451 Posts

LMAO http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCjuFpQ3EeA&fmt=18 Sums it up pretty nicely.

Birdy09
This....is the best thing I've seen in a long time.
Avatar image for MJPK
MJPK

3360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#144 MJPK
Member since 2006 • 3360 Posts

LMAO http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCjuFpQ3EeA&fmt=18 Sums it up pretty nicely.

Birdy09

That was brilliant :lol:

Avatar image for MJPK
MJPK

3360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#145 MJPK
Member since 2006 • 3360 Posts

$25 for a new skin for a mount you can get for free?:|

That's a total ripoff, $5 would be acceptable, but $25 is pushing it way too far.

SuperBobz

To get the original mount u need to kill the Lich King in ICC 25 man heroic mode with only one guild in all of WoW has done so far.So I wouldn't call the mount free as it will take alot of time to get it.

Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#146 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts
I don't get why people are so up in arms about this. If you don't like it, don't buy it; nobody is forcing you to buy it. You don't have to play WoW to buy it. They're called microtransactions, people, and they're very successful in today's video game market. The kiddies love 'em, and so do the companies, because nowadays the consumers will gladly fork over cash to pay for in-game cosmetics. And really, a mount is just that - a cosmetic. Also, the actual model is this:http://static.mmo-champion.com/mmoc/images/news/2010/april/lilxtcelestial.jpg, and while the mount has the same basic model as Arthas' 25 heroic drop, Invincible, it's still only 280% speed (as opposed to the 310% speed for rare raid boss drops), and the skin makes the entire mount look completely different. So when you see someone riding on Invincible as opposed to Celestial Steed, you'll still be impressed by the guy on Invincible, because there's a noticeable difference visually and in terms of acquisition between the two. Anyway, this is actually kind of cool, because the TCG mounts were already being farmed IRL copiously, i.e. massive amounts of the card packs were being bought in the hopes of getting an ultra-rare loot card. Either that, or people were going on e-Bay and buying/selling them for more than $200. Buying this cool mount for a far lower price in comparison is a sweet deal, and will likely get you laughed at less. All in all, this isn't even required to enjoy WoW, so why do people care? Let the people that want it buy it and be happy with it. It's their money and their choice. Like we already buy so much stuff we don't need, we'll buy this, too.
Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#147 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts
[QUOTE="rzepak"]

[QUOTE="Birdy09"] Sigh.... it will only get worse from here, those out there saying "Why do you care? you dont play anymore" ... simple.... there are already tons of craptastic WoW clones.... that follow WoWs challengless thoughtless combat, repetitive fed-ex spamming quests and cartooney style, when crap like this succeeds... it only gets worse. FFXIV and ToR are the last hope.... of the bigger MMOs that is.Birdy09

You do know that as time goes on more p2p mmos will have an item store right? It is quite possible that FF14 will have one. The truth is that there is a market for this stuff. Not everyone has as much time as me to put in a couple of hundred hours into the game. People want to have the option to buy vanity items and why should a company refuse? Becouse a small vocal minority on a forum things its an evil trend?

If the a decent proportion of the profit when into further development I would defiantly be all for it. But, WoW being the prime example, an incredible old engine. incredible easy to make models, textures..... doesn't get much better, in some cases less treatment than other MMOs. I read an article that the chinese gold farmer market claims that virtual items have as much value has real items.... which is true... if you want it you want it. but why earn the cool stuff when you can just buy it? WoW mayaswell sell gold..... The Item Shop model is more tolerable for free mmos, an MMO like World of warcraft however ... god.... SC2 and D3 have taken so long, they take ages to patch WoW, they dumb it down with each expansion, theres just no need for anything of it bar money.

I don't see why you're crying over this. First of all, your signature makes your posts pretty funny, but whatever. Apparently you don't play anymore. But there is no questioning that WoW has pumped out more content since 2004 than any other MMO, or video game, for that matter, on the market today. And selling gold =/= selling mounts, because there is just about one mount that you can trade in-game right now (which is actually losing popularity), and gold in-game can buy you much more than just cosmetic items. And I lol'd at "taking ages to patch WoW". We got three major content patches last year which added several entirely new raids and 5-man dungeons, not to mention a new battleground and hundreds upon hundreds of in-game changes, services, and additions.
Avatar image for myke2010
myke2010

2747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#148 myke2010
Member since 2002 • 2747 Posts

The problem I have with this is it cheapens the game even further. It used to be once upon a time that the best players had the best stuff. Now it's becoming the richest players have the best stuff. I get enough of that IRL. The fun of a good mmo is putting in the time and effort to get those unique items, thus making your character unique. If anyone can get them buy shelling out more cash then what's the point? Just another reason I haven't missed this game since quitting.

Avatar image for MJPK
MJPK

3360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#149 MJPK
Member since 2006 • 3360 Posts

am I the only one that finds this thread really funny?

It seems to be full of ex players that are angry at blizzard for "stealing" there time and money or for changing the game(for the better imo) and people who have never played a mmo or WoW and thinks that the game is evil just because there is people that get addicted to it when it's there fault for not having any self control.

/rant

Avatar image for Lethalhazard
Lethalhazard

5451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#150 Lethalhazard
Member since 2009 • 5451 Posts

am I the only one that finds this thread really funny?

It seems to be full of ex players that are angry at blizzard for "stealing" there time and money or for changing the game(for the better imo) and people who have never played a mmo or WoW and thinks that the game is evil just because there is people that get addicted to it when it's there fault for not having any self control.

/rant

MJPK
What about players who are biased to the game since they still play and pay for it?