Can PS3 handle Alan Wake?

Easily, at 720p.Parasomniac

The PS3 would run it at 720p with better graphics

GTSaiyanjin2

Like RDR ? :P

[QUOTE="hiryu3"]any system can run any game given enough time, money and smart programmersTerrencec06

enough said..... dont entertain this kid.

RDR is technically as impressive as any PS3 exclusive IF not more.If somebody wants to prove me wrong go ahead... :D

PS3 has GOW3, UC2, GOW3. 360 so far hasn't matched any of these games. So...yes. easily :D

RDR is technically as impressive as any PS3 exclusive IF not more.If somebody wants to prove me wrong go ahead... :D

Bus-A-Bus

No need to prove you, it simply isn't. :P

RDR is technically as impressive as any PS3 exclusive IF not more.If somebody wants to prove me wrong go ahead... :D

Bus-A-Bus

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

RDR is technically as impressive as any PS3 exclusive IF not more.If somebody wants to prove me wrong go ahead... :D

spudofwar13

No need to prove you, it simply isn't. :P

RDR is more impressive then AW for that matter,as is GTA IV.Just the things that those games do in fully dynamic open world is simply out of the reach of linear corridor games...

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

RDR is technically as impressive as any PS3 exclusive IF not more.If somebody wants to prove me wrong go ahead... :D

spudofwar13

No need to prove you, it simply isn't. :P

pretty much :P

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

RDR is technically as impressive as any PS3 exclusive IF not more.If somebody wants to prove me wrong go ahead... :D

Zero_epyon

Im not saying ps3 cant handle any of those games,im just saying that sheer scope and things that this gen R* games like GTAIV and especially RDR do is more impressive then best looking games.Its not opinion,its fact.

[QUOTE="Zero_epyon"][QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

RDR is technically as impressive as any PS3 exclusive IF not more.If somebody wants to prove me wrong go ahead... :D

Bus-A-Bus

Im not saying ps3 cant handle any of those games,im just saying that sheer scope and things that this gen R* games like GTAIV and especially RDR do is more impressive then best looking games.Its not opinion,its fact.

[QUOTE="spudofwar13"]

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

RDR is technically as impressive as any PS3 exclusive IF not more.If somebody wants to prove me wrong go ahead... :D

Bus-A-Bus

No need to prove you, it simply isn't. :P

RDR is more impressive then AW for that matter,as is GTA IV.Just the things that those games do in fully dynamic open world is simply out of the reach of linear corridor games...

[QUOTE="spudofwar13"]

So, what do you think?

Can the PS3 handle Alan Wake? :roll:

theseekar

Of course not, PS3 has no game with huge open spaces, open thick forests with stunning foliage with weather effects too or volumetric dynamic lighting

So, from its exclusives that have all those tiny and linear worlds and still not even close to the foliage and ligting of AW i can safly say that its cant handle it it he slightest

RDR also proves that 360 is far better in open world games and next gen effects than PS3

You serious? All RDR proves is that Rockstar put more effort in the 360 version, not much more either. The 360 ver looks better but not by much.

Alan Wake doesn't even look good. It's blurry, the textures are average, the facial animations are laughably bad, and there's a thick fog at night to obscure your view. The lighting effects are impressive, but when so much needs to be sacrificed to achieve them, it's hardly something to brag about.

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="spudofwar13"]

No need to prove you, it simply isn't. :P

Ninja-Hippo

RDR is more impressive then AW for that matter,as is GTA IV.Just the things that those games do in fully dynamic open world is simply out of the reach of linear corridor games...

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="Zero_epyon"] Well....But....What about...Damn Opinions!Zero_epyon

Im not saying ps3 cant handle any of those games,im just saying that sheer scope and things that this gen R* games like GTAIV and especially RDR do is more impressive then best looking games.Its not opinion,its fact.

Oh...yea...and i mean...that sig is :lol: :lol: I was showing it to my brother who does not even know what its all about neither he cares about games and he was laughing like crazy :D

[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"][QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

RDR is more impressive then AW for that matter,as is GTA IV.Just the things that those games do in fully dynamic open world is simply out of the reach of linear corridor games...

Zero_epyon

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="spudofwar13"]

No need to prove you, it simply isn't. :P

Ninja-Hippo

RDR is more impressive then AW for that matter,as is GTA IV.Just the things that those games do in fully dynamic open world is simply out of the reach of linear corridor games...

Alan Wake is in the same boat as Halo 3(2 passes for HDR :roll: ).Devs just f*** it up...they RENDERED whole world,meaning all the vistas and environments were actually hi poly cus in their previous gameplay type you could go there so it HAD to be rendered.In linear game that is ABSOLUTELY un necessary so thats mostly their fault...

Anyway,RDR probably most impressive game scope wise on consoles...draw distance is almost unlimited and you can go wherever you lay your eyes on.PLUS,that foliage and the amount of it is just incredible,NEVER seen on consoles before.

[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"][QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

RDR is more impressive then AW for that matter,as is GTA IV.Just the things that those games do in fully dynamic open world is simply out of the reach of linear corridor games...

Zero_epyon

EXACTLY.I just wrote that at the same time you have :D Bad devs decision...

[QUOTE="Zero_epyon"][QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"] Alan Wake uses a large open world. It's only closed off for story/gameplay purposes, not technical limitations. Respawn-d

Because they already had made the world,then saw it aint gonna work.I mean they sent their team to totally copy Washington area,then spend ALOT of time putting it in game to just trow it away it would been waist.The worst thing is that game was actually 720p 2xaa at E3 but duo to alot of transparencies they went 4xaa...

[QUOTE="Zero_epyon"][QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"] Alan Wake uses a large open world. It's only closed off for story/gameplay purposes, not technical limitations. Respawn-d

No. You are totally wrong. They created the world and then built levels around them so the world is consistent and you can accuratly map out where Alan has been aroud Bright Falls

[QUOTE="Respawn-d"]

[QUOTE="Zero_epyon"] Waste of resources.OB-47

No. You are totally wrong. They created the world and then built levels around them so the world is consistent and you can accuratly map out where Alan has been aroud Bright Falls

Of course it can...

[QUOTE="spudofwar13"]

So, what do you think?

Can the PS3 handle Alan Wake? :roll:

Easyle

The PS3 can handle Uncharted 1 and 2, along with Killzone 2, but not Alan Wake. Don't f**k with him. :P

Exactly, finally someone who understands. :D

Oh, and Alan Wake is more impressive than Uncharted 1 and it still has better and bigger environments than Uncharted 2 and all the foliage too.

Alan Wake has the whole world rendered with forests and minuate details, which are unfortunately blocked for story purposes and judging by the ps3's inability to handle open-world very well (GTA IV/RDR), I doubt it. Plus it's coded for 360 so you know...;)93soccer

Ps3 can handle open world games just fine. See (infamous). The only reason RDR is slightly inferior is becauseofdevs

I don't see why everyone has an obsession with open world games being more technically impressive. From what I've seen, all they do is use repeated textures, buildings, cars, people everywhere, and really there's not that much going on at a time. Linear games just allow the devs to fit more stuff into one place, and to put focus into other places, like the amazing background environments.

I think (and shoot me down if you want) that consoles could even handle Crysis at it's fullest, if it was made on a custom engine for a specific console. We're not really talking about hardware here, it's all about the devs.

[QUOTE="Parasomniac"]Easily, at 720p.Snugenz

The PS3 would run it at 720p with better graphics

GTSaiyanjin2

Like RDR ? :P

If 360 can run it, PS3 can too.

If 360 can run it, PS3 can too.

dream431ca

Then why no PS3 games looks like it ?

I doubt it could run so huge scale, so next gen lighting and such huge detail in foliage all at the same time, RDR shows PS3 is old gen

It would not run as good but it could do AW. That is because the graphics engine in AW is a mulitiplat engine. On multiplat engines the PS3 has not to this day made a game with the scale of AW nor graphics like AW. The only time the PS3 can shine is when you have to use a PS3 only engine.

The PS3 is probably completely incapable of AW's lighting, but I think it could probably run everything else better.

[QUOTE="dream431ca"]

If 360 can run it, PS3 can too.

Then why no PS3 games looks like it ?

I doubt it could run so huge scale, so next gen lighting and such huge detail in foliage all at the same time, RDR shows PS3 is old gen

Yes It can handle Uncharted 2

[QUOTE="theseekar"]

[QUOTE="dream431ca"]

If 360 can run it, PS3 can too.

2mrw

Then why no PS3 games looks like it ?

I doubt it could run so huge scale, so next gen lighting and such huge detail in foliage all at the same time, RDR shows PS3 is old gen

That's it. After reading theseekar's other thread and reading through his responses in this one and his interaction with the TC, I'm convinced:

spudofwar13 and theseekar are the SAME person. spudofwar13 is a new account, he went out of his way to make it seem like a Sony fan playing up AW, and they even write the same way. I guess theseekar got tired of no one agreeing with him so he had to agree with himself. 8):P

In all honesty the cell could do the large scale, but the gpu would struggle with lighting so that would have to be toned down, but the BD space could give us higher rez textures, but I doubt it could run in 720 maybe 640

[QUOTE="2mrw"][QUOTE="theseekar"]

Then why no PS3 games looks like it ?

I doubt it could run so huge scale, so next gen lighting and such huge detail in foliage all at the same time, RDR shows PS3 is old gen

That's it. After reading theseekar's other thread and reading through his responses in this one and his interaction with the TC, I'm convinced:

spudofwar13 and theseekar are the SAME person. spudofwar13 is a new account, he went out of his way to make it seem like a Sony fan playing up AW, and they even write the same way. I guess theseekar got tired of no one agreeing with him so he had to agree with himself. 8):P

Why wouldn't it be able to handle the game? :?

Does it use some sort of extraordinary game engine that can only work on the Xbox360? :? :?

We should be having Alan wake vs Infamous Graphics threads

[QUOTE="SpiritOfFire117"]

[QUOTE="2mrw"] talking about scale, GOW3 is massive and the PS3 can easily run it ...... even at 720 ...... actually after finishing it ( i bought it 2 days ago) , i believe AW looks last generation. The game is sub HD, the PS3 can handle it easily .... and on 5 years in dev, i think the game could have looked next next generation. RDR is another case of multiplatform title that was made to take advantage of the x360 hardware more than the PS3 ....... can't really prove anything with it..... and yet the differences aren't huge, hence the same scores everywhere.2mrw

Neither of those 2 things are last gen (PS3 or AW) so you're both very wrong.

[QUOTE="theseekar"]

[QUOTE="dream431ca"]

If 360 can run it, PS3 can too.

2mrw

Then why no PS3 games looks like it ?

I doubt it could run so huge scale, so next gen lighting and such huge detail in foliage all at the same time, RDR shows PS3 is old gen

Can you prove this?Or is it anytime something is wrong with ps3 version 360 is the one that got all attention.Did it ever occur to you that they had 40 megs less to work with on ps3 version?Or that RSX maybe could not draw everything,maybe it was bottlenecked?I do remember this is R*s 4th game on ps3 and they started it on ps3 as exclusives,whats wrong now?

[QUOTE="SpiritOfFire117"]

[QUOTE="2mrw"] talking about scale, GOW3 is massive and the PS3 can easily run it ...... even at 720 ...... actually after finishing it ( i bought it 2 days ago) , i believe AW looks last generation. The game is sub HD, the PS3 can handle it easily .... and on 5 years in dev, i think the game could have looked next next generation. RDR is another case of multiplatform title that was made to take advantage of the x360 hardware more than the PS3 ....... can't really prove anything with it..... and yet the differences aren't huge, hence the same scores everywhere.2mrw

. The only time the PS3 can shine is when you have to use a PS3 only engine.

vaderhater

Why is every topic about Alan Wake filled with stupid?