[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]
Because basing a generation of anything on anything other than time makes no sense at all? Generations of basketball players aren't defined on skill, generations of pokemon cards aren't based on usefulness of the cards or power, generations of CEO aren't based on success. They are all based on being the successor to the previous lineage and its the same for consoles. Why are you trying so hard?
GD1551
I'm not trying hard at all, because console generations have always been defined by increasing hardware capabilities. As I said earlier this was never an issue before the Wii because most consoles were in the same ballpark of power, but with the Wii and Wii U the issues arises. If a 1960 camry was built exactly like how it was in 1960, today.. would you consider it a modern car?
No, they have been defined by being successor to previous hardware. The fact that they were more powerful is not important. And lol, that analogy is so stupid I'm not going to entertain. Just explain, is what I said about basketball, cards and CEOs inaccurate or does it make sense? Because really, that should be where this argument was decided.
Log in to comment