The way I see it they're both FPS war games that just play very differently and cater to different markets; one is a 'tactical' warfare game spanning large maps and one is more of a shoot 'em up arcade warfare game.Having played BF3, the formula is essentially the same as BF:BC2, BF:2142 e.t.c.
I don't think it's really evolved that much more than CoD but don't get me wrong, I can see why neither of them have evolved; they're both very good at what they do and people will still buy them in their millions.
Thoughts SW?
Log in to comment