The foliage looks nice, I guess...
This topic is locked from further discussion.
That honestly looks like an iPhone game.Cherokee_JackNot quite iPhone quality...
I don't know why the Characters look so Blocky but I can say for sure that the Street Level looks better than the First.
No....it doesn't. This looks like crap even on the Wii.I guess technically, for the Wii, it looks great. How they use everything I guess is awful, and so it looks like an awful game.
AmayaPapaya
This is the first time something like this has made me laugh. Bravo.I found one more screen:
GreenGoblin2099
Never use bullshots to determine how a game will look. I bet the game will look way better in motion on a tv screen.
super600
Doesn't look that much better in motion. Seriously doesn't look like a improvement over the first one which didn't look great for even a Wii game.
[QUOTE="super600"]
Never use bullshots to determine how a game will look. I bet the game will look way better in motion on a tv screen.
Wanderer5
Doesn't look that much better in motion. Seriously doesn't look like a improvement over the first one which didn't look great for even a Wii game.
Have you seen it on a tv screen yet? You can't judge the graphic quality of a game until you have seen it on your tv screen because bullshots and youtube videos don't do tis game justice.
You can't judge the graphic quality of a game until you have seen it on your tv screen because bullshots and youtube videos don't do tis game justice.super600
You do know bullshots are doctored to make the game look better?
[QUOTE="super600"]You can't judge the graphic quality of a game until you have seen it on your tv screen because bullshots and youtube videos don't do tis game justice.Cherokee_Jack
You do know bullshots are doctored to make the game look better?
Yeah, but some wii games like goldeneye and this game look horrible in screenshots.
[QUOTE="Wanderer5"]
[QUOTE="super600"]
Never use bullshots to determine how a game will look. I bet the game will look way better in motion on a tv screen.
super600
Doesn't look that much better in motion. Seriously doesn't look like a improvement over the first one which didn't look great for even a Wii game.
Have you seen it on a tv screen yet? You can't judge the graphic quality of a game until you have seen it on your tv screen because bullshots and youtube videos don't do tis game justice.
The Conduit didn't look much better on TV... And the game looking bland doesn't help.
That looked better...But it still looks like crap.[QUOTE="super600"]
Here's the game's singleplayer in motion
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDgwvEqTvmM
Lto_thaG
Let's wait untilwe see the game on our tv's because sometimes videos on youtube don't look that great when a person is recording a game.
That looked better...But it still looks like crap.[QUOTE="Lto_thaG"]
[QUOTE="super600"]
Here's the game's singleplayer in motion
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDgwvEqTvmM
super600
Let's wait untilwe see the game on our tv's because sometimes videos on youtube don't look that great when a person is recording a game.
Regardless,the artst-yle will still look horrible.And Goldeneye Wii STILL looks better.Here's the game's singleplayer in motion
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDgwvEqTvmM
super600
That looked better...But it still looks like crap.[QUOTE="Lto_thaG"]
[QUOTE="super600"]
Here's the game's singleplayer in motion
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDgwvEqTvmM
super600
Let's wait untilwe see the game on our tv's because sometimes videos on youtube don't look that great when a person is recording a game.
Come on now you know you're not supposed to prove people wrong in SW. That goes against everything the fanboys stand for!
Regardless, The Conduit 2 looks pretty good for the Wii. It has tough competition with Goldeneye and Black Ops though.
More like 2001. This is like Halo's level of graphics.'-_-
Wanderer5
This is an insult to all games that were made in 2001 :P.
Chubby@
The sad thing is that if C2 does eventually turn out good and proves the haters/ doubters wrong their is zero chance of it outscoring BO which got an AAA ifthe game's online and single player function properly.I think the graphics and Al(if the Al are not actually good in the real game)may push this game's score down a bit, but that depends on how Tom or whoever reviews this game likes the graphicalstyle.
Chubby@
The sad thing is that if C2 does eventually turn out good and proves the haters/ doubters wrong their is zero chance of it outscoring BO which got an AAA ifthe game's online and single player function properly.I think the graphics and Al(if the Al are not actually good in the real game)may push this game's score down a bit, but that depends on how Tom or whoever reviews this game likes the graphicalstyle.
super600
I agree. The Conduit 1 had terrible design and content, but the graphics were good and still has the best controls for FPS (IMO) on the Wii. The gameplay made it fun. It even had some challenging parts to it.
BTW have you seen the Collectors/Limited Edition boxart? Its sick! Oddly enough I remember when people were praising the boxart when it was first shown and now are hating on the art style. Pretty funny but not like it matters since art quality is subjective.
[QUOTE="super600"]
Chubby@
The sad thing is that if C2 does eventually turn out good and proves the haters/ doubters wrong their is zero chance of it outscoring BO which got an AAA ifthe game's online and single player function properly.I think the graphics and Al(if the Al are not actually good in the real game)may push this game's score down a bit, but that depends on how Tom or whoever reviews this game likes the graphicalstyle.
ChubbyGuy40
I agree. The Conduit 1 had terrible design and content, but the graphics were good and still has the best controls for FPS (IMO) on the Wii. The gameplay made it fun. It even had some challenging parts to it.
BTW have you seen the Collectors/Limited Edition boxart? Its sick! Oddly enough I remember when people were praising the boxart when it was first shown and now are hating on the art style. Pretty funny but not like it matters since art quality is subjective.
Anyway HVS have to tie with BO Wiion metacritic which currently has a 78% or has to beat goldeneye's 81% to become the definite wii shooter, but then that 's probably not going to happen anyway.
[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]
[QUOTE="super600"]
Chubby@
The sad thing is that if C2 does eventually turn out good and proves the haters/ doubters wrong their is zero chance of it outscoring BO which got an AAA ifthe game's online and single player function properly.I think the graphics and Al(if the Al are not actually good in the real game)may push this game's score down a bit, but that depends on how Tom or whoever reviews this game likes the graphicalstyle.
super600
I agree. The Conduit 1 had terrible design and content, but the graphics were good and still has the best controls for FPS (IMO) on the Wii. The gameplay made it fun. It even had some challenging parts to it.
BTW have you seen the Collectors/Limited Edition boxart? Its sick! Oddly enough I remember when people were praising the boxart when it was first shown and now are hating on the art style. Pretty funny but not like it matters since art quality is subjective.
Anyway HVS have to tie with BO Wiion metacritic which currently has a 78% or has to beat goldeneye's 81% to become the definite wii shooter, but then that 's probably not going to happen anyway.
I think we can predict GS's score if its a good Wii game.
8.5 :lol:
What in God's name is that crap? The Conduit was an ugly game but it's graphics were at least 5 times as good as these screens, these are just disgusting.
Let's try this again shall we? :P
Although I would argue that some of Doom's textures are of a more higher resolution, I think Conduit 2 wins in this match-up.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment