Conduit 2 New Multiplayer Screenshots(56k)

These are multiplayer pics, they had to cut down on the visuals for multiplayer so it can run better. The game looks way better in motion. The animations for the reloading weapons look really good.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTwSMaP5WBU&feature=channel

p3anut

Don't bother, most of the people on SW are too busy posting pics of Doom and Quake to listen to reason.

These crappy screenshots do nothing to showcase how the game would look in motion with component cables.

Everyone bashed Goldeneye for its graphics before it came out, and it turned out to be one of the Wii's better looking games.

[QUOTE="p3anut"]

These are multiplayer pics, they had to cut down on the visuals for multiplayer so it can run better. The game looks way better in motion. The animations for the reloading weapons look really good.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTwSMaP5WBU&feature=channel

caryslan2

Don't bother, most of the people on SW are too busy posting pics of Doom and Quake to listen to reason.

These crappy screenshots do nothing to showcase how the game would look in motion with component cables.

Everyone bashed Goldeneye for its graphics before it came out, and it turned out to be one of the Wii's better looking games.

So to be accepted amongst the most hardcore of sheep and see "reason". I'd have to be obedient and tear out my eyes?

No thanks (by the way, the fact that Quake 3 and Doom even comes close to a 2011 game is just freaking sad.)

[QUOTE="p3anut"]

These are multiplayer pics, they had to cut down on the visuals for multiplayer so it can run better. The game looks way better in motion. The animations for the reloading weapons look really good.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTwSMaP5WBU&feature=channel

caryslan2

Don't bother, most of the people on SW are too busy posting pics of Doom and Quake to listen to reason.

These crappy screenshots do nothing to showcase how the game would look in motion with component cables.

Everyone bashed Goldeneye for its graphics before it came out, and it turned out to be one of the Wii's better looking games.

Lettuce be cereal...

You cannot polish a turd.

[QUOTE="caryslan2"]

[QUOTE="p3anut"]

These are multiplayer pics, they had to cut down on the visuals for multiplayer so it can run better. The game looks way better in motion. The animations for the reloading weapons look really good.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTwSMaP5WBU&feature=channel

Vesica_Prime

Don't bother, most of the people on SW are too busy posting pics of Doom and Quake to listen to reason.

These crappy screenshots do nothing to showcase how the game would look in motion with component cables.

Everyone bashed Goldeneye for its graphics before it came out, and it turned out to be one of the Wii's better looking games.

So to be accepted amongst the most hardcore of sheep and see "reason". I'd have to be obedient and tear out my eyes?

No thanks (by the way, the fact that Quake 3 and Doom even comes close to a 2011 game is just freaking sad.)

First off I'm not a sheep. I own Sony, Sega and other systems. Second, I never said anyone had to be obedient or tear out their eyes. The screenshots look crappy, but so did the screen shots and the first trailer that was shown for Goldeneye before it came out.

In the end, Goldeneye turned out to be one of the best looking Wii games. Someone could find an excellent picture of Super Mario 64 and a crappy picture of Super Mario Galaxy 2 and start declaring that SM64 is the better looking game.

A bunch of crappy screenshots of a game that is still in development does not prove the game will be bad looking once it comes out. Think of how many times people have used this argument with Goldeneye and other Wii games and once the games come out, they are proven wrong.

I'm not going to sit here and say Conduit 2 will be the greatest looking Wii game when it comes out. Hell, it may very well be a pathetic looking game that would look bad even by PS2 standards.

But keep in mind that first Conduit was considered one of the better looking games on the Wii, so why would the second one fall short of reaching at least the level of the first one?

If the game looks bad when it comes out, then I'll have no issue if people want to rip it apart. Hell, I may even join in at that point.

But to bash a game when its still in development is pathetic. Of course Doom and Quake 3 may look better when you pick out the best screenshots you can find and put them up against some crappy pictures of a game that's still in development.

Hell, at that point you might as well just throw Wolfenstein 3D into the mix to complete the "ownage":roll:

But the fact is, you're still not proving anything by doing that. Come back in April and try this again when the game has come out and we have something final we can judge the game by.

Don't bother, most of the people on SW are too busy posting pics of Doom and Quake to listen to reason.

These crappy screenshots do nothing to showcase how the game would look in motion with component cables.

Everyone bashed Goldeneye for its graphics before it came out, and it turned out to be one of the Wii's better looking games.

caryslan2

I saw the game in motion and it still looks bad.

Here is Quake 3 in motion.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-T6IAHWMd2I&hd=1

Now compare that to the links you guys posted of Conduit 2.

[QUOTE="caryslan2"]

Don't bother, most of the people on SW are too busy posting pics of Doom and Quake to listen to reason.

These crappy screenshots do nothing to showcase how the game would look in motion with component cables.

Everyone bashed Goldeneye for its graphics before it came out, and it turned out to be one of the Wii's better looking games.

Hakkai007

I saw the game in motion and it still looks bad.

And like I keep saying, wait until the game comes out before you judge it. Everyone sad Goldeneye was a horrible looking game and it turned out to be a better looking game then the pre-release screenshots and videos showed.

But to bash a game when its still in development is pathetic. Of course Doom and Quake 3 may look better when you pick out the best screenshots you can find and put them up against some crappy pictures of a game that's still in development.

caryslan2

Still in development? These screens are recently posted, and guess what the game is shipping on the 19th April. I seriously doubt they can boost the graphics drastically in three months. And picking out best screenshots I can find of Doom? If you even played the game you'd know that I did not pick out the best architecture, because that is a screenshot of the starting level.

[QUOTE="caryslan2"]

Don't bother, most of the people on SW are too busy posting pics of Doom and Quake to listen to reason.

These crappy screenshots do nothing to showcase how the game would look in motion with component cables.

Everyone bashed Goldeneye for its graphics before it came out, and it turned out to be one of the Wii's better looking games.

Hakkai007

I saw the game in motion and it still looks bad.

Here is Quake 3 in motion.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-T6IAHWMd2I&hd=1

Now compare that to the links you guys posted of Conduit 2.

First off, that's not Quake 3. Its a mod of the game. And honestly, what does this prove anyway? I'll admit, it looks good and in certain aspects it does beat how the Conduit 2 looks.

But its a player running around barren environment with nothing to shot. I'm sorry, but I would give the edge to Conduit 2 for the sole reason that there is more going on in the environment.

This look nice, but how does it own the Conduit 2 when its nothing more then a bunch of barren environments?

By the way, here is a much better video.

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/exclusive-china-conduit-2/709807

First off, that's not Quake 3. Its a mod of the game. And honestly, what does this prove anyway? I'll admit, it looks good and in certain aspects it does beat how the Conduit 2 looks.

But its a player running around barren environment with nothing to shot. I'm sorry, but I would give the edge to Conduit 2 for the sole reason that there is more going on in the environment.

This look nice, but how does it own the Conduit 2 when its nothing more then a bunch of barren environments?

caryslan2

It's quake 3 defrag which is mainly for jumping challenges but still uses the quake 3 engine and defrag came out in 2000.

So I am comparing a 1999 engine on a modification that came out in 2000.

By the way, here is a much better video.

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/exclusive-china-conduit-2/709807

caryslan2

It still looks just as bad the only thing that makes it look better than the other videos is that it's in a darker area.

When you enter the lighter areas when you can actually see then the game gets worse.

What I hate most about it is the lame blur used when reloading.

Well, atleast someone doesn't give out bullshots.

Maybe it'll be fun in the MP mode.

Shooter of the year!

Get hyped, boi.!

People shouldn'tpredict the score of this game yet people because their is loads of evidence that suggest that this game could score as high as Goldeneye if it's created properly

Here's a funny pattern I noticed with all the games that scored high in the past year or so that people thought would be bad

Red Steel 2:If I recall people said that there was no way this game was going to get as high as it did and it was going to fail again

Sonic Colorseople said it was going to fail like all the other sonic games,but it didn't

Goldeneye:If I recall people said that their was no chance for this game to be as good as the original and that it was going to fail.Some people also said that the graphics were horrible for a wii game, but it eventually turned out good.

Conduit 2 The same graphic complaints are being aimed at it like Goldeneye and a bunch of other complaints that we may not have evidence for just yet. Will this game score bad or will it score as good as the other games?

Just be warned people to not rate this game to low or you may be shocked if it scores as high as the other games.

[QUOTE="caryslan2"]

[QUOTE="p3anut"]

These are multiplayer pics, they had to cut down on the visuals for multiplayer so it can run better. The game looks way better in motion. The animations for the reloading weapons look really good.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTwSMaP5WBU&feature=channel

Remmib

Don't bother, most of the people on SW are too busy posting pics of Doom and Quake to listen to reason.

These crappy screenshots do nothing to showcase how the game would look in motion with component cables.

Everyone bashed Goldeneye for its graphics before it came out, and it turned out to be one of the Wii's better looking games.

Lettuce be cereal...

You cannot polish a turd.

And ironically, this polished ball of feces looks better than Conduit 2 :P

[QUOTE="Remmib"]

[QUOTE="caryslan2"]

Don't bother, most of the people on SW are too busy posting pics of Doom and Quake to listen to reason.

These crappy screenshots do nothing to showcase how the game would look in motion with component cables.

Everyone bashed Goldeneye for its graphics before it came out, and it turned out to be one of the Wii's better looking games.

windsquid9000

Lettuce be cereal...

You cannot polish a turd.

And ironically, this polished ball of feces looks better than Conduit 2 :P

Better specular maps, higher resolution textures, better anti-aliasing, better bump-mapping. Hmmm I think we have a winner here!

[QUOTE="windsquid9000"]

[QUOTE="Remmib"]

Lettuce be cereal...

You cannot polish a turd.

Vesica_Prime

And ironically, this polished ball of feces looks better than Conduit 2 :P

Better specular maps, higher resolution textures, better anti-aliasing, better bump-mapping. Hmmm I think we have a winner here!

It probably looks better in motion, as many Wii games do. Still, these screenshots are very......ehhhhh.

Everybody needs to cool down about how this looks. Just remember that this will look better in motion on your t.v screen I mean look at the developers track record, look at the original Conduit graphics, also remember the wiis online capabilities. Theres no way this game can go wrong.

BTW Who has even PLAYED The Conduit?

Finally.. a 7 page thread on a wii game!

BTW Who has even PLAYED The Conduit?

LegatoSkyheart

Everybody needs to cool down about how this looks. Just remember that this will look better in motion on your t.v screen I mean look at the developers track record, look at the original Conduit graphics, also remember the wiis online capabilities. Theres no way this game can go wrong.

Jolt_counter119

BTW Who has even PLAYED The Conduit?

LegatoSkyheart